| 參考文獻 |
References
Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 439.
Alexander, P. A., & The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259-280.
Argelagos, E., & Pifarré, M. (2012). Improving information problem solving skills in secondary education through embedded instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 515-526.
Barzilai, S., & Ka’adan, I. (2017). Learning to integrate divergent information sources: The interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 193-232.
Barzilai, S., Zohar, A. R., & Mor-Hagani, S. (2018). Promoting integration of multiple texts: A review of instructional approaches and practices. Educational psychology review, 30(3), 973-999.
Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written communication, 2(1), 3-23.
Bigot, L. L., & Rouet, J. F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students′ comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 445-470.
Blaum, D., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Britt, M. A. (2017). Thinking about global warming: Effect of policy-related documents and prompts on learning about causes of climate change. Discourse Processes, 54(4), 303-316.
Boscolo, P., Arfé, B., & Quarisa, M. (2007). Improving the quality of students′ academic writing: an intervention study. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 419-438.
Brand-Gruwel, S., & Wopereis, I. (2006). Integration of the information problem-solving skill in an educational programme: The effects of learning with authentic tasks. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 4, 243–263.
Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1207-1217.
Bråten, I. (2008). Personal epistemology, understanding of multiple texts, and learning within Internet technologies. In Knowing, knowledge and beliefs (pp. 351-376). Springer, Dordrecht.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2009). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 47(1), 1-31.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010). When law students read multiple documents about global warming: Examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. Instructional Science, 38(6), 635-657.
Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48-70.
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 814-840.
Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1981). Note-taking and passage style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 242.
Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students′ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and instruction, 20(4), 485-522.
Britt, M. A., & Sommer, J. (2004). Facilitating textual integration with macro-structure focusing tasks. Reading Psychology, 25(4), 313-339.
Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J. F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso, 209-233.
Britt, M. A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J. F. (2014). Scientific literacy: The role of goal-directed reading and evaluation in understanding scientific information. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 104-122.
Bryson, M. K. (2002). Cognitive supports for composition fostering reflectivity in the processes and the products of reading disabled and normally achieving adolescent student-writers.
Cameron, C., Van Meter, P., & Long, V. A. (2017). The effects of instruction on students′ generation of self-questions when reading multiple documents. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(2), 334-351.
Caverly, D. C., Orlando, V. P., & Mullen, J.-A. L. (2000). Textbook study reading. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 105–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coiro, J. (2003). Exploring literacy on the internet: Reading comprehension on the internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The reading teacher, 56(5), 458-464.
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
Crowhurst, M. (1987). Cohesion in argument and narration at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 185-201.
Daher, T. A., & Kiewra, K. A. (2016). An investigation of SOAR study strategies for learning from multiple online resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 10-21.
Daher, T. A., & Kiewra, K. A. (2016). An investigation of SOAR study strategies for learning from multiple online resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 10–21.
Darowski, E. S., Patson, N. D., & Helder, E. (2016). Implementing a synthesis tutorial to improve student literature reviews. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 35(3), 94-108.
De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of educational psychology, 97(2), 139.
Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of educational psychology, 63(1), 8.
Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational psychology, 77(5), 522.
Gagnière, L., Betrancourt, M., & Détienne, F. (2012). When metacognitive prompts help information search in collaborative setting. European review of applied psychology, 62(2), 73-81.
Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010a). Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents: Which is better for whom? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 157-173.
Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010b). Understanding and integrating multiple science texts: Summary tasks are sometimes better than argument tasks. Reading Psychology, 31(1), 30-68.
Gleason, M. M. (1999). The role of evidence in argumentative writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15(1), 81-106.
Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw Jr, J. A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text.
Goldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Managing, understanding, applying, and creating knowledge in the information age: Next-generation challenges and opportunities. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 255-269.
Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., ... & Project READI. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219-246.
González-Lamas, J., Cuevas, I., & Mateos, M. (2016). Arguing from sources: design and evaluation of a programme to improve written argumentation and its impact according to students’ writing beliefs/Argumentar a partir de fuentes: diseño y evaluación de un programa para mejorar la argumentación escrita y su impacto en función de las creencias acerca de la escritura académica que mantienen los estudiantes. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39(1), 49-83.
Greene, J. A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 142-160.
Hagerman, M. S. (2017). Disrupting students’ online reading and research habits: the LINKS intervention and its impact on multiple Internet text integration skills. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 18(1), 105-156.
Hammann, L. A., & Stevens, R. J. (2003). Instructional approaches to improving students′ writing of compare-contrast essays: An experimental study. Journal of literacy research, 35(2), 731-756.
Hilbert, T. S., & Renkl, A. (2008). Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy to learning from texts: what characterizes good and poor mappers? Instructional Science, 36(1), 53–73.
Hofer, B. K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2012). Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 227–256). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-009
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of educational research, 67(1), 88-140.
Hofer, B.K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43–55.
Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., & Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: Sorting things out. Discourse Processes, 45(4-5), 323-345.
Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational psychologist, 20(1), 23-32.
Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147-172.
King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational psychologist, 39(1), 5-18.
Kingsley, T. L., Cassady, J. C., & Tancock, S. M. (2015). Successfully promoting 21st century online research skills: interventions in 5th-grade classrooms. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 54(2), 5.
Kirkpatrick, L. C., & Klein, P. D. (2009). Planning text structure as a way to improve students’ writing from sources in the compare–contrast genre. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), 309–321.
Knefelkamp, L. L., & Slepitza, R. (1976). A cognitive-developmental model of career development-An adaptation of the Perry scheme. The counseling psychologist, 6(3), 53-58.
Knudson, R. E. (1994). An analysis of persuasive discourse: Learning how to take a stand. Discourse Processes, 18(2), 211-230.
Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 242-262.
Kobayashi, K. (2007). The influence of critical reading orientation on external strategy use during expository text reading. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 363-375.
Kobayashi, K. (2009). Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: Effects of external strategy use. Instructional Science, 37(4), 311-324.
Ku, Y.-M. (2020). Incorporating Scenario-Based Design into Reading Literacy Assessment and Instruction (MOST108-2410-H008-039-SS2). Taoyuan: National Central University.
Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., ... & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096.
Le Bigot, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students’ comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 445–470.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2018). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In Theoretical models and processes of literacy (pp. 319-346). Routledge.
Linderholm, T., Therriault, D. J., & Kwon, H. (2014). Multiple science text processing: Building comprehension skills for college student readers. Reading Psychology, 35(4), 332-356.
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2015). Examining response confidence in multiple text tasks. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 407-436.
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Analyzing and integrating models of multiple text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 143-147.
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2019). Toward an integrated framework of multiple text use. Educational Psychologist, 54(1), 20-39.
List, A., & Du, H. (2021). Reasoning beyond history: examining students’ strategy use when completing a multiple text task addressing a controversial topic in education. Reading and Writing, 34(4), 1003-1048. References
Lundeberg, M. A. (1987). Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: studying understanding in legal case analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 407-432.
Lundstrom, K., Diekema, A. R., Leary, H., Haderlie, S., & Holliday, W. (2015). Teaching and learning information synthesis: An intervention and rubric based assessment. Communications in Information Literacy, 9(1), 4.
Magolda, M. B. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students′ intellectual development. Jossey-Bass.
McCann, T. M. (1989). Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 62-76.
McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational psychology review, 19(2), 113-139.
Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and instruction, 14(2), 139-178.
Merkt, M., Werner, M., & Wagner, W. (2017). Historical thinking skills and mastery of multiple document tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 135-148.
Monte-Sano, C. (2011). Beyond reading comprehension and summary: Learning to read and write in history by focusing on evidence, perspective, and interpretation. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(2), 212-249.
Moorf, D. W., & Readence, J. F. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. The Journal of Educational Research, 78(1), 11-17.
Moschner, B., Gruber, H., & Studienstiftungsarbeitsgruppe EPI. (2005). Epistemologische Überzeugungen. Forschungsbericht Nr. 18. Regensburg: Universität Regensburg, Lehrstuhl für Lehr-Lern-Forschung.
Naumann, A. B., Wechsung, I., & Krems, J. F. (2009). How to support learning from multiple hypertext sources. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 639-646.
Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. The construction of mental representations during reading, 88108.
Peters, M. A., Rider, S., Hyvonen, M., & Besley, T. (2017). Post-truth and fake news. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 567-567.
Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 17-37.
Primor, L., & Katzir, T. (2018). Measuring multiple text integration: A review. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2294.
Readence, J. E., & Moore, D. W. (1984). An investigation of current attention to the early literature on content area reading instruction. Literacy Research and Instruction, 23(4), 299-307.
Reisman, A. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and instruction, 30(1), 86-112.
Rouet, J. F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Psychology Press.
Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. Text relevance and learning from text, 19-52.
Rouet, J. F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. (2017). RESOLV: Readers′ representation of reading contexts and tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 200-215.
Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and instruction, 15(1), 85-106.
Rukavina, I., & Daneman, M. (1996). Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories for text. Journal of Educational psychology, 88(2), 272.
Ryan, M. P. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards. Journal of educational psychology, 76(2), 248.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488.
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391.
Sanders, T. J., & Noordman, L. G. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse processes, 29(1), 37-60.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of educational psychology, 82(3), 498.
Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI).
Segev-Miller, R. (2004). Writing from sources: The effect of explicit instruction on college students′ processes and products. L1-Educational studies in language and literature, 4(1), 5-33.
Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2007). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 191-210.
Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Brummernhenrich, B., & Bromme, R. (2013). Dealing with uncertainty: Readers′ memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 130-150.
Ståhl, T. (2019). Epistemic Beliefs and Googling. Frontline Learning Research, 7(3), 27-63.
Stein, N. L., & Bernas, R. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. Foundations of argumentative text processing, 5, 97-116.
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2009). Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and multiple‐text comprehension among upper secondary students. Educational Psychology, 29(4), 425-445.
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2010). The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 91-111.
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 513-527.
Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning (No. Sirsi) i9780024211606).
Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students′ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 323.
VanSledright, B. (2002). Confronting history’s interpretive paradox while teaching fifth graders to investigate the past. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 1089-1115.
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of educational psychology, 91(2), 301.
Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1060-1106.
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of educational Psychology, 83(1), 73.
Wopereis, I., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Vermetten, Y. (2008). The effect of embedded instruction on solving information problems. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 738-752.
Wyatt, D., Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Stein, S., Evans, P., & Brown, R. (1993). Comprehension strategies, worth and credibility monitoring, and evaluations: cold and hot cognition when experts read professional articles that are important to them. Learning and Individual Differences, 5, 49-72.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students′ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-7-1以後開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit