摘要(英) |
Due to the inseparable relationship between global climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, the global attention to the issue of greenhouse gas emissions has deepened the management and control of corporate carbon footprints by government organizations, which has also become an issue that enterprises need to face in the next generation. In the future, products with the concept of energy saving, carbon reduction and environmental protection should of course be favored by consumers and receive government incentives and subsidies. In the medical autoinjector industry, few people have conducted carbon foot surveys and researches in this industry.
This study uses the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method to conduct inventory analysis in each stage of the life cycle of medical auto-injectors, supplemented by empirical analysis of medical autoinjector energy consumption cases and case studies. The carbon footprint generated in the cycle is mainly in the stages of plastic raw materials, manufacturing, transportation and logistics. This study explores the distribution of carbon footprints in each stage of its life cycle. The results of the research analysis show that in each stage of the medical auto-injector life cycle in this study, if the number of medical autoinjectors produced in one year′s shipment is evaluated, the highest carbon footprint is the energy used in the production of the auto-injector. Consumption and raw materials, packaging consumables account for 98% of the overall carbon footprint, and only 2% for transport logistics. The least carbon footprint is water and electricity consumption, accounting for about 15% of the overall manufacturing process, mainly due to the recycling of water resources. In the case study, it was also found that the production consumables such as PS、PET Tray and cartons used to hold sub-assembly products, despite being very light in weight, account for a relatively high carbon footprint, accounting for about 29% of the total production process. Therefore, if an alternative packaging material with a lower carbon footprint is used, this will effectively reduce the carbon footprint of the production of medical auto-injectors, in order to achieve the goal of energy saving and carbon reduction. |
參考文獻 |
中文文獻
1. 醫療器材產業鏈簡介 (2022年)。產業價值鏈資訊平台。取自https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=C200(上網時間:2021年11月5日)。
2. 鄧哲明 (2013年) 。「新藥的研發流程概論」。科學月刊第519期,第188頁。
3. 國家氣候變遷調適政策綱領 (2012年)。行政院經濟建設委員會,台灣氣候變遷調適平台。取自https://adapt.epa.gov.tw/TCCIP-1-D/TCCIP-1-D-3.html (上網日期:2022年2月25日)。
4. 黃冠愷 (2011年)。「台灣公司的碳揭露案例-溫室氣體盤查與碳足跡」。國立嘉義大學碩士論文。
5. 國家溫室氣體減量法規資訊網 (2022年)。行政院環境保護署。取自https://ghgrule.epa.gov.tw/(上網日期:2022年3月2日)。
6. ISO 14064-1溫室氣體盤查標準 (2018年)。ISO Leader。取自https://www.isoleader.com.tw/home/iso-coaching-detail/ISO14064-1(上網日期:2022年4月19日)。
7. 李秀英、劉俊儒、楊筱翎 (2011年)。「企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性研究」。東海管理評論,第13卷,第1期,第77~112頁。
8. 行政院環保署 (2022年)。取自https://www.epa.gov.tw/。(上網日期:2022年4月19日)。
9. 劉漢卿 (1994年)。「建築生命週期能源消費分析與溫室氣體排放量估算」。國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文。
10. 盧怡靜、呂穎彬 (2014年)。「ISO 14040 生命週期評估的下一步」。永續產業發展季刊第66期,第29-35頁。
11. Eric Lowitt (2014年)。「挺過暖化企業進化」。哈佛商業評論中文版,第92期,第102~108頁。
12. 吳以健、盧虎生 (2010年)。「稻米生產之生命週期與碳足跡環境影響評估」。農業與農政第212期。
13. 經濟部工業局 (2001年)。「ISO 14000系列--生命週期評估技術與應用手冊」。經濟部工業局。
14. 顏銘呈 (2014年)。「牡蠣養殖之碳足跡估算-以七股牡蠣養殖為例」。國立成功大學海洋科技與事務研究所碩士論文。
15. 林郁孜 (2011年)。「實現低碳社會-碳足跡計算器架構之研究」。國立臺北科技大學碩士論文。
16. 財團法人工業技術研究院碳足跡資訊網 (2022年)。取自https://cfp-calculate.tw/cfpc/WebPage/LoginPage.aspx。(上網日期:2022年4月19日)。
17. 經濟部能源局網站 (2022年)。取自http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw。(上網日期:2022年4月19日)。
18. 李育明 (2003年)。「國內推動生命週期評估應用之回顧與展望」。經濟部工業局工安環保報導專欄,第15卷(期),第11-13頁。
19. 維基百科波音747機型規格(2022年)。取自https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E6%B3%A2%E9%9F%B3747。(上網日期:2022年4月19日)。
20. 陳汝潔(2016年)。台灣公路貨運服務碳足跡及環境衝擊評估研究-以某貨運業者爲例。國立臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
21. 胡憲倫(2018年)。生命週期評估(LCA)介紹。國立台北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所企業暨環境系統化管理研究室。
英文文獻
22. Barrow-Williams, T., & Burnell, R. (2007). “Auto-Injectors: Technology Advances and Market Trend”. Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology, Vol.23, pp 57–62.
23. Bretz, R., & Frankhauser, P. (1996). “Screening LCA Large Numbers of Products-Estimation Tool to Fill Data”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessmenthttps://link.springer.com/journal/11367, Vol. 1, pp 139-146.
24. Claudia, A., & Arroja, L. (2011). “Comparison of Methodologies for Estimating The Carbon Footprint – Case Study of Office Paper”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.24, pp 30-35.
25. Copenhagen Accord (2009). “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change” (UNFCCC).
26. Emissions Gap Report (2019). “United Nations Environment Programme” (UNEP).
27. Finkbeiner, M., Inaba, A., Tan, R., Christiansen, K., & Klüppel, H. J. (2006). “The New International Standards for Life Cycle Assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 11, pp80-85.
28. Gerngross, T., & Slater, S. (2000). How Green are Green Plastics. Scientific American, pp 37-41.
29. ISO 14040 (2006). “Environmental Management, Life Cycle Assessment, Principles & Framework”. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14040:ed-2:v1:en (Accessed on 20220316).
30. ISO 14044 (2006). “Environmental Management, Life Cycle Assessment, Requirement & Guideline”. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14044:ed-1:v1:en (Accessed on 20220316).
31. Jacquemin, L., Pontalier, P. Y., & Sablayrolles, C. (2012). “Life cycle assessment Applied to the Process Industry”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 17, pp1028-1041.
32. Living Planet Report (2012). “World Wide Fund for Nature”. https://www.wwf.org.uk (Accessed on 20220713).
33. PAS 2050 (2011). “Specification for The Assessment of The Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services”. British Standards Institution.
34. The Paris Agreement (2015). “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change” (UNFCCC).
35. The Montreal Protocol (2000). “The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer”, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
36. The IPCC and the Sixth Assessment Cycle (2017). “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change” (IPCC).
37. United Nations (1998). “Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change” (UNFCCC).
38. Wackernagel, M. (1996). “Our Ecological Footprint”. New Society Publishers.
39. Wang, L., & Wang, Y., & Du, H. (2009). “A Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Hydro-Unclear and Wind Power”. A China Study, Applied Energy, Vol.249, pp 37-45.
40. Weinhofer, G., & Busch, T. (2012). “Corporate Strategies for Managing Climate Risks”. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 22, pp 121-144.
41. Weitz, K., Todd, J., Curran, M., & Malkin, M. (1996). “Considerations and a Report on the State of Practice”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 1, pp 79-85.
42. World Energy Outlook 2017 Executive Summary (2017). “International Energy Agency” (IEA).
https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO_2017_Executive_Summary_English_version.pdf (Accessed on 20220713).
43. Wright, L., & Kemp, S., & Williams, I. (2011). “Carbon Footprinting, Towards a Universally Accepted Definition”. Carbon Management, pp 61-72.
44. Williams, A. (2009). “Life Cycle Analysis: A Step by Step Approach”. Illinois Sustainable Technology Center. |