研發、出口與企業成長-以臺灣上市櫃製造業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：156

、訪客IP：13.58.151.231

姓名

顏竹涵(Chu-Han Yen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

研發、出口與企業成長-以臺灣上市櫃製造業為例

相關論文

★ 資訊科技的使用對製造業廠商生產力之影響	★ 寶島債介紹及發展前景
★ 電腦軟體與資料庫的採用與對廠商績效的影響- 台灣製造業的研究	★ 中國新高技術園區技術效率及其影響因素的研究
★ 政府管控房地產政策對不動產市場及銀行不動產授信業務之影響	★ 鶯歌捷運線對房價的影響
★ 貿易、技術與薪資溢酬	★ 聚集與生產力:台灣紡織產業的實證研究
★ 勞工派遣與正職受僱型態之實證研究－金融海嘯前後之分析比較	★ 影響政府採購效率之實證研究—以某縣市政府為例
★ 台灣民眾轉換從業身分的決策以及「不景氣-推擠」假說之檢定	★ 汽車燃油效率、反彈效果與特徵價格之研究
★ Three Essays on the Industrial Economics	★ 研究發展與技術購買-台灣製造業之實證研究
★ 合併廠商的績效表現與決策因素分析	★ 合併型態對廠商績效與股票報酬的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2027-7-20以後開放)

摘要(中)

隨著世界經貿自由發展，臺灣在全球產業鏈中擔任不可或缺的角色。研發與出口對於國內經濟成長有著舉足輕重的地位。本研究使用2000年至2020年臺灣製造業上市櫃公司資料，除了探討出口和研發和企業成長的關聯性，還考量了這兩項因素與廠商規模及廠商年齡之間的交互作用。由普通最小平方法的估計結果發現，廠商規模與廠齡和公司成長之間存在U型關係；研發支出較多、勞動生產力較高的公司，其員工成長率顯著較高，出口則不是影響公司成長的主要因素。在控制廠商固定效果後，研發支出對公司員工成長則有負向顯著的影響，這意味著企業擁有更多創新活動時，會減緩其對人力的需求；而出口在廠商內部也出現了顯著正向作用，顯示龐大的全球市場將成為企業成長的動力。在中介效果方面，研發對於企業成長的正向影響大部分是來自於出口及廠齡的強化效果；相反地，廠商規模則不是影響研發帶動成長的主要中介因素。最後，不論是依據廠商規模或廠齡區分的子樣本皆顯示，研發和出口的交互作用對促進成長有顯著的影響；而廠齡所扮演的中介角色仍然比廠商規模來的重要。

摘要(英)

Along with global economy and trade liberalization, Taiwan plays an indispensable role in the global industrial chain. Domestic economic growth is highly dependent on R&D expenditures and exports. Based on panel dataset from Taiwan manufacturing listed company for the 2000–2020 period, this study examines not only the direct influences of R&D expenditures and exports on firm growth but also the interactions between these two factors and firm size and firm age. We found both firm age and firm size have a U-shaped relationship with firm growth. Small and young firms are found grow faster. OLS estimation indicated that R&D expenditures and labor productivity have significant positive effect on firm growth, while export is may not a potential driver stimulating employment growth. By contrast, the estimate on R&D expenditures is significant negative after controlling for firm fixed effects, suggesting that technological progress will make companies reduce the demand for employees, exports shows 10% significant positive. Regarding the mediation, most of the positive impact of R&D expenditures on firm growth comes from the complementary effects of exports and firm age, however, firm size is not the main mediator. Finally, we observe that interaction of R&D expenditures and exports is enhancing growth for firms of all size and age groups.

關鍵字(中)

★ 研發
★ 出口
★ 廠齡
★ 公司規模

關鍵字(英)

★ R&D
★ Export
★ frim age
★ firm size

論文目次

目錄
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章研究動機與目的 1
1-1 研究動機與目的 1
第二章文獻回顧 5
2-1 研發對企業成長之影響 5
2-2 出口對企業成長之影響 6
2-3 出口及研發對企業成長之影響 8
第三章資料來源與實證模型 10
3-1 資料來源 10
3-2 變數定義 12
3-2-1 應變數 12
3-2-2 解釋變數 12
3-3 模型設定 15
3-3-1 合併OLS模型(Pooled OLS model) 15
3-3-2 廠商固定效果模型(Firm Fixed-effects model) 16
3-3-3 中介效果 (Mediation Effect) 17
第四章實證結果 19
4-1 合併OLS模型(Pooled OLS model)之實證分析 19
4-2 廠商固定效果模型(Firm fixed-effects model)之實證分析 22
4-3 中介效果(Mediation Effect)之實證分析 24
4-4 依廠齡與廠商規模分組觀察之實證結果 27
4-4-1 廠齡分組之實證分析 27
4-4-2 廠商規模分組之實證分析 30
4-4-3 高成長公司之實證結果 33
第五章結論與研究限制 36
5-1 結論 36
5-2 研究限制 37
參考文獻 38

參考文獻

林珈伶(2017)，「台灣廠商之創新、對外投資和勞動雇用策略及對生產力影響」，國立清華大學，博士論文。
林曉嬋(2019)，「新興科技對未來勞動市場的挑戰與因應」，《人力規劃及發展研究報告》，19，頁1-40。
劉安淇(2019) ，「經濟全球化對公司成長之影響-以台灣製造業為例」，國立中央大學，碩士論文。
劉碧珍與吳俊信 (2021)，「研發與成長: 廠齡是否扮演重要角色?—以臺灣製造業為例」，《臺灣經濟預測與政策》，52(1)，頁39–81。
經濟部統計處(2021)，「我國製造業研發與技術量能分析」，《經濟部統計處》。
Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V. (2005), “Financial and legal constraints to growth: does firm size matter?” Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137–177.
Bernard, A., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B. and Kortum, S. (2003), “Plants and productivity in international trade,” American Economic Review, 93, 1268–1290.
Bernard, A.B., and Wagner, J. (1997), “Exports and success in German manufacturing,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 133(1), 134–157.
Bernard, A.B., Jensen, J.B., Redding, S.J., and Schott, P.K. (2007), “Firms in international trade,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 105–130.
Brouwer, E., Kleinknecht, A. and Reijnen O. N. (1993), “Employment growth and innovation at the firm level,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3, 153-159.
Cintio, M. D., Ghosh, S. and Grassi, E. (2017), “Firm growth, R&D expenditures and exports: An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs,” Research Policy, 46, 836–852.
Coad, A. and Rao, R. (2008), “Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors:A quantile regression approach,” Research Policy, 37(4), 633–648.
Daunfeldt, S. O. and Elert, N. (2013), “When is Gibrat’s law a law?” Small Business Economics, 41(1), 133–147.
Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J. C. and Schuh, S. (1996), “Job creation and destruction,” MIT Press Books, 1.
Falk, M. and Hagsten, E. (2015), “Export status and firm growth of European SMEs,” Economics Bulletin, 35(2), 1130–1138.
Golovko, E., and Valentini, G. (2011), “Exploring the complementarity between innovation and export for SMEs’ growth,” Journal of International Business Studies, 42(3), 362–380.
Grazzi, M. and Moschella, D. (2018), “Small, young, and exporters: New evidence on the determinants of firm growth,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 125–152.
Hall, B.H., Lotti, F. and Mairesse, J., (2009), “Innovation and productivity in SMEs:empirical evidence for Italy,” Small Business Economics, 33(1), 13–33.
Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S. and Miranda, J. (2013), “Who creates job? Small versus large versus young,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 347–361.
Jovanovic, B. (1982), “Selection and evolution of industry,” Econometrica, 50, 649–670.
Love, J. and Roper, S. (2015), “SME innovation, exporting and growth: a review of existing evidence,” International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(1), 28–48.
Lucas, R. E. (1967), “Adjustment costs and the theory of supply,” Journal of Political Economy, 75, 321–344.
Luís, M. B. Cabral and José, Mata. (2003), “On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory,” American Economic Review, 93(4), 1075-1090.
Mairesse, J. and Wu, Y. (2019), “Impacts of innovation, export, and other factors on firm employment growth in Chinese manufacturing industries,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(1), 123-138.
Melitz, M. J. (2003), “The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocation and aggregate industry productivity,” Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.
Naidoo, K. (2019), “Firm-level employment growth in South Africa：The role of innovation and exports,” WIDER Working Paper, 83.
Navaretti, G. B., Castellani, D., and Pieri, F. (2014), “Age and firm growth: evidence from three European countries,” Small Business Economics, 43(4), 823–837.
Park, Y., Shin, J., and Kim, T. (2010), “Firm size, age, industrial networking, and growth: a case of the Korean manufacturing industry,” Small Business Economics, 35(2), 153–168.
Simon, H. A. and Bonini, C. P. (1958), “The size distribution of business firms,” American Economic Review, 48, 607–617.
Sousa, N., Rueda-Cantouche, J., Arto, I. and Andreoni, V. (2012), “Extra-EU exports and employment,” European Commission, DG Trade Chief Economist Note.
Spescha, A. (2019), “R&D expenditures and firm growth – is small beautiful?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(2), 156–179.
Wagner, J. (1995), “Exports, firm size, and firm dynamics,” Small Business Economics, 7(1), 29–39.
Wagner, J. (2002), “The causal effects of exports on firm size and labor productivity: First evidence from a matching approach,” Economics Letters, 77(2), 287–292.
Yang, C. H. and Huang, C. H. (2005), “R&D, size and firm growth in Taiwan’s electronics industry,” Small Business Economics, 25, 477–487.
Yang, C. H. and Tsou, M. W. (2020), “Globalization and firm growth: does ownership matter?” Small Business Economics, 55, 1019–1037.

指導教授

鄒孟文(Meng-Wen Tsou)

審核日期

2022-7-19

推文