參考文獻 |
黃堅厚. (1999). 人格心理學. 台北: 心理出版社.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), 1-211.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74(1), 33-52.
Anderson, G., Keith, M. J., Francisco, J., & Fox, S. (2018, January). The Effect of Software Team Personality Composition on Learning and Performance: Making the" Dream" Team. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 451-460). https://doi. org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.059
Akarsu, Z., Orgun, P., Dinc, H., Gunyel, B., & Yilmaz, M. (2019). Assessing personality traits in a large scale software development company: Exploratory industrial case study. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1060, 192-206.
Akbar, R. (2019). Tailoring agile-based software development processes. IEEE Access, 7, 139852-139869.
Acton, B. P., Braun, M. T., & Foti, R. J. (2020). Built for unity: assessing the impact of team composition on team cohesion trajectories. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(6), 751-766.
Avila, D. T., Van Petegem, W., & Libotton, A. (2021). ASEST framework: a proposal for improving teamwork by making cohesive software engineering student teams. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(5), 750-764.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391.
Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2001). Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 195-228.
Bowers, J., May, J., Melander, E., Baarman, M., & Ayoob, A. (2002, August). Tailoring XP for large system mission critical software development. In Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods (pp. 100-111). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Bagby, R. M., Marshall, M. B., & Georgiades, S. (2005). Dimensional personality traits and the prediction of DSM-IV personality disorder symptom counts in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(1), 53-67.
Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., Jacobsohn, G. C., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2008). The personality composition of teams and creativity: The moderating role of team creative confidence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(4), 255-282.
Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C., Postlethwaite, B. E., & Brown, K. G. (2013). Ready to rumble: How team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 385-392.
Bell, S. T., Brown, S. G., Colaneri, A., & Outland, N. (2018). Team composition and the ABCs of teamwork. American Psychologist, 73(4), 349-362.
Basirati, M. R., Otasevic, M., Rajavi, K., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Understanding the relationship of conflict and success in software development projects. Information and Software Technology, 126, 106331.
Bergner, R. M. (2020). What is personality? Two myths and a definition. New Ideas in Psychology, 57, 100759.
Cattell, R. B. (1948). Concepts and methods in the measurement of group syntality. Psychological Review, 55(1), 48-63.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual Psychological Assessment Resources. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234-246.
Chen, G., & Tjosvold, D. (2002). Cooperative goals and constructive controversy for promoting innovation in student groups in China. Journal of Education for Business, 78(1), 46-50.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. N.Y.: Routledge.
Cruz, S., da Silva, F. Q., & Capretz, L. F. (2015). Forty years of research on personality in software engineering: A mapping study. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 94-113.
Campanelli, A. S., & Parreiras, F. S. (2015). Agile methods tailoring–A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 110, 85-100.
Campanelli, A. S., Camilo, R. D., & Parreiras, F. S. (2018). The impact of tailoring criteria on agile practices adoption: A survey with novice agile practitioners in Brazil. Journal of Systems and Software, 137, 366-379.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417-440.
DeMarco, T., & Lister, T. (1999). Productive projects and teams. Dorset House,.
De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.
Domino, M. A., Collins, R. W., Hevner, A. R., & Cohen, C. F. (2003, April). Conflict in collaborative software development. In Proceedings of the 2003 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Freedom in Philadelphia--leveraging differences and diversity in the IT workforce (pp. 44-51). N.Y.: Association for Computing Machinery.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 820-828.
den Hartog, S. C., Runge, J. M., Reindl, G., & Lang, J. W. (2020). Linking personality trait variance in self-managed teams to team innovation. Small Group Research, 51(2), 265-295.
Edwards, J. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4(2), 144-192.
Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 435-441.
Eldor, L., & Harpaz, I. (2016). A process model of employee engagement: The learning climate and its relationship with extra‐role performance behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 213-235.
El Baz, J., & Ruel, S. (2021). Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107972.
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329-344.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, Ohio: University of Akron Press.
Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N. L., & O′Kane, T. (2003). Software development method tailoring at Motorola. Communications of the ACM, 46(4), 64-70.
F. Tripp, J., & Armstrong, D. J. (2018). Agile methodologies: organizational adoption motives, tailoring, and performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 58(2), 170-179.
Gerlitz, J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. DIW Research Notes, 4, 1-16.
Goodhue, D. L., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2012). Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data?. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 981-1001.
Guang-dong, W. (2013). The Relationship Between Project Team Dynamic Feature, Conflict Dimension and Project Success--An Empirical Research from Shanghai, China. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 29(6), 935-952.
Haythorn, W. (1953). The influence of individual members on the characteristics of small groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(2), 276-284.
Humphrey, W. S., Snyder, T. R., & Willis, R. R. (1991). Software process improvement at Hughes Aircraft. IEEE Software, 8(4), 11-23.
Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869-879.
Halfhill, T., Sundstrom, E., Lahner, J., Calderone, W., & Nielsen, T. M. (2005). Group personality composition and group effectiveness: An integrative review of empirical research. Small Group Research, 36(1), 83-105.
Hanssen, G. K., Westerheim, H., & Bjørnson, F. O. (2005, June). Tailoring RUP to a defined project type: A case study. In International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (pp. 314-327). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Hsu, S. Y. C., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2007). Team transformational leadership, trust, satisfaction, and commitment: The testing of a structural equation model in software development teams. Review of Business Information Systems, 11(3), 17-28.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. (2015). Is being a jerk necessary for originality? Examining the role of disagreeableness in the sharing and utilization of original ideas. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(4), 621-639.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
Hauff, S., & Richter, N. (2015). Power distance and its moderating role in the relationship between situational job characteristics and job satisfaction: An empirical analysis using different cultural measures. Cross Cultural Management, 22, 68-89.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I–method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63-76.
Hsu, J. S. C., Shih, S. P., & Li, Y. (2017). The mediating effects of in-role and extra-role behaviors on the relationship between control and software-project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1524-1536.
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117, 442-458.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31, 2-24.
Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., & Croyle, R. T. (2019). Strategies for team science success: Handbook of evidence-based principles for cross-disciplinary science and practical lessons learned from health researchers. N.Y.: Springer.
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 517-543.
Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today, 5, 43-46.
Janis, I. L. (2008). Groupthink. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36(1), 36.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Tjosvold, D. (2006). Constructive controversy. The handbook of conflict resolution. Theory and Practice, 2, 69-91.
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O.P. John, R.W. Robins, & L.A. Per-vin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). N.Y.: Guilford Press.
Jiang, J. J., Chang, J. Y., Chen, H. G., Wang, E. T., & Klein, G. (2014). Achieving IT program goals with integrative conflict management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(1), 79-106.
Johnson, D. W. (2015). Constructive controversy: Theory, research, practice. U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning, Active learning—Beyond the future (pp. 59-70). U.K.: IntechOpen.
Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman & D. R. Ilgen (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). N.Y.: Wiley.
Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744-764.
Kalus, G., & Kuhrmann, M. (2013). Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process (pp. 171-180). N.Y: Association for Computing Machinery.
Kong, D. T., Konczak, L. J., & Bottom, W. P. (2015). Team performance as a joint function of team member satisfaction and agreeableness. Small Group Research, 46(2), 160-178.
Kartiwi, M., & Sukmana, H. T. (2015). Influences of the input factors towards the success of an information system project. Telkomnika, 13(2), 686-693.
Körner, M., Wirtz, M. A., Bengel, J., & Göritz, A. S. (2015). Relationship of organizational culture, teamwork and job satisfaction in interprofessional teams. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-12.
Kock, N. (2017). Common method bias: a full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. In Partial least squares path modeling (pp. 245-257). Cham: Springer.
Kesmodel, U. S. (2018). Cross‐sectional studies–what are they good for? Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97(4), 388-393.
Levina, N. (2005). Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 109-130.
Liang, T. P., Liu, C. C., Lin, T. M., & Lin, B. (2007). Effect of team diversity on software project performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107, 636-653.
Liang, T. P., Jiang, J., Klein, G. S., & Liu, J. Y. C. (2009). Software quality as influenced by informational diversity, task conflict, and learning in project teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(3), 477-487.
Loi, R., Lai, J. Y., & Lam, L. W. (2012). Working under a committed boss: A test of the relationship between supervisors′ and subordinates′ affective commitment. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 466-475.
Liu, C., Yang, L. Q., & Nauta, M. M. (2013). Examining the mediating effect of supervisor conflict on procedural injustice–job strain relations: The function of power distance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(1), 64-74.
Li, Y., Shepherd, M., Liu, J. Y. C., & Klein, G. (2017). Enhancing development team flexibility in IS projects. Information Technology and Management, 18(1), 83-96.
Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2020). Exploring the team dynamic learning process in software process tailoring performance: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(3), 502-518.
Lee, J. C., Wang, Y. T., & Chen, C. Y. (2020). The effect of transactive memory systems on process tailoring in software projects: The moderating role of task conflict and shared temporal cognitions. Journal of Systems and Software, 164, 110545.
Lee, J. C., Chou, I. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2021). The effect of process tailoring on software project performance: The role of team absorptive capacity and its knowledge‐based enablers. Information Systems Journal, 31(1), 120-147.
Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2021). Exploring the effects of team coordination and power distance on effective software process tailoring: a theoretical perspective. Information Technology & People, 35(3), 1009-1028.
Mann, L., & Janis, I. (1983). Decisional conflict in organizations. Productive Conflict Management: Perspectives for Organizations (pp. 19-40). N.Y.: Irvington Publishers.
McRae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. N.Y.: Guilford.
Moad, J. (1994). Psych tests for MIS staff: is this nuts? Datamation, 40(13), 27-29.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American psychologist, 52(5), 509-516.
Moon, H. (2001). The two faces of conscientiousness: duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 533-540.
Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface‐and deep‐level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(8), 1015-1039.
Morgeson, F. P., Reider, M. H., & Campion, M. A. (2005). Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 583-611.
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476.
Monteiro, P., Machado, R. J., & Kazman, R. (2009, September). Inception of software validation and verification practices within CMMI Level 2. In 2009 Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (pp. 536-541). Berlin: IEEE.
Madrid, H. P., Patterson, M. G., Birdi, K. S., Leiva, P. I., & Kausel, E. E. (2014). The role of weekly high‐activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 234-256.
Model, B. F. Johnson, JA (2017). Big-Five model. In V. Zeigler-Hill, TK Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1-16). N.Y.: Springer.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574.
Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organization Management, 24(1), 28-45.
Nanda, V. (2001, October). On tailoring an organizational standard software development process for specific projects. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Quality (pp. 1-13). Madird, Spain: IEEE Computer Society.
Nesterkin, D., & Porterfield, T. (2016). Conflict management and performance of information technology development teams. Team Performance Management, 22(5/6), 242-256.
O′Neill, T. A., & Allen, N. J. (2011). Personality and the prediction of team performance. European Journal of Personality, 25(1), 31-42.
O′Neill, T. A., & Allen, N. J. (2014). Team task conflict resolution: An examination of its linkages to team personality composition and team effectiveness outcomes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(2), 159.
O’Neill, T. A., Hoffart, G. C., McLarnon, M. M., Woodley, H. J., Eggermont, M., Rosehart, W., & Brennan, R. (2017). Constructive controversy and reflexivity training promotes effective conflict profiles and team functioning in student learning teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 257-276.
Ou, Z., Chen, T., Li, F., & Tang, P. (2018). Constructive controversy and creative process engagement: The roles of positive conflict value, cognitive flexibility, and psychological safety. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(2), 101-113.
Oreg, S., & Berson, Y. (2019). Leaders’ impact on organizational change: Bridging theoretical and methodological chasms. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 272-307.
O’Meara, M. S., & South, S. C. (2019). Big Five personality domains and relationship satisfaction: Direct effects and correlated change over time. Journal of Personality, 87(6), 1206-1220.
Ostermeier, K., Davis, M., & Pavur, R. (2020). Personality configurations in teams: a comparison of compilation and composition models. Team Performance Management, 26(3/4), 227-246.
Ogunfowora, B., Stackhouse, M., Maerz, A., Varty, C., Hwang, C., & Choi, J. (2021). The impact of team moral disengagement composition on team performance: the roles of team cooperation, team interpersonal deviance, and collective extraversion. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(3), 479-494.
Pervin, L. A. (1996). The science of personality. N.Y.: Wiley.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Paul, S., Seetharaman, P., Samarah, I., & Mykytyn, P. P. (2004). Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams. Information & Management, 41(3), 303-321.
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652.
Pedreira, O., Piattini, M., Luaces, M. R., & Brisaboa, N. R. (2007). A systematic review of software process tailoring. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 32(3), 1-6.
Prewett, M. S., Walvoord, A. A., Stilson, F. R., Rossi, M. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2009). The team personality–team performance relationship revisited: The impact of criterion choice, pattern of workflow, and method of aggregation. Human Performance, 22(4), 273-296.
Parolia, N., Chen, J. V., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2015). Conflict resolution effectiveness on the implementation efficiency and achievement of business objectives in IT programs: A study of IT vendors. Information and Software Technology, 66, 30-39.
Pillat, R. M., Oliveira, T. C., Alencar, P. S., & Cowan, D. D. (2015). BPMNt: A BPMN extension for specifying software process tailoring. Information and Software Technology, 57, 95-115.
Prewett, M. S., Brown, M. I., Goswami, A., & Christiansen, N. D. (2018). Effects of team personality composition on member performance: A multilevel perspective. Group & Organization Management, 43(2), 316-348.
Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(3), 238-264.
Qamar, N., & Malik, A. A. (2020). Determining the Relative Importance of Personality Traits in Influencing Software Quality and Team Productivity. Computing & Informatics, 39(5), 994-1021.
Reilly, R. R., Lynn, G. S., & Aronson, Z. H. (2002). The role of personality in new product development team performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(1), 39-58.
Ramírez‐Mora, S. L., Oktaba, H., & Patlán Pérez, J. (2020). Group maturity, team efficiency, and team effectiveness in software development: a case study in a CMMI‐DEV Level 5 organization. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32(4), 1-19.
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg′s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506-516.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 135-148.
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2003). The structure of personality attributes. InBarrick MR, Ryan AM (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 1–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schneider, B., Hanges, P. J., Smith, D. B., & Salvaggio, A. N. (2003). Which comes first: employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 836.
Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553-572.
Shin, Y., Kim, M., Choi, J. N., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Does team culture matter? Roles of team culture and collective regulatory focus in team task and creative performance. Group & Organization Management, 41(2), 232-265.
Soomro, A. B., Salleh, N., Mendes, E., Grundy, J., Burch, G., & Nordin, A. (2016). The effect of software engineers’ personality traits on team climate and performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology, 73, 52-65.
Shameem, M., Chandra, B., Kumar, C., & Khan, A. A. (2018). Understanding the relationships between requirements uncertainty and nature of conflicts: a study of software development team effectiveness. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 43(12), 8223-8238.
Söllner, M., Bitzer, P., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2018). Process is king: Evaluating the performance of technology-mediated learning in vocational software training. Journal of Information Technology, 33(3), 233-253.
Seman, N. A. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Saman, M. Z. M., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019). The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 115-127.
Singh, S. K., Chen, J., Del Giudice, M., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2019). Environmental ethics, environmental performance, and competitive advantage: Role of environmental training. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 203-211.
Stipelman, B. A., Rice, E. L., Vogel, A. L., & Hall, K. L. (2019). The Role of Team Personality in Team Effectiveness and Performance. In Strategies for Team Science Success (pp. 189-196). Cham: Springer.
Smith, M. L., Hamplová, D., Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (2021). Concise survey measures for the Big Five personality traits. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 73, 100595.
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035-1064.
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 225-251.
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330.
Tjosvold, D., Wong, A., Nibler, R., & Pounder, J. S. (2002). Teamwork and controversy in undergraduate management courses in Hong Kong: Can the method reinforce the message?. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 61(3), 131-138.
Trimmer, K. J., Domino, M. A., & Blanton, J. E. (2002). The impact of personality diversity on conflict in ISD teams. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(4), 7-14.
Tjosvold, D. (2008). Constructive controversy for management education: Developing committed, open-minded researchers. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 73-85.
Tsai, K. H., & Hsu, T. T. (2014). Cross-Functional collaboration, competitive intensity, knowledge integration mechanisms, and new product performance: A mediated moderation model. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 293-303.
Tjosvold, D., Wong, A., & Chen, N. Y. F. (2014). Managing conflict in organizations constructively. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 545-568
Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M., & Wan, P. M. (2015). Constructive controversy for innovation in business: theory, research, and application. In Konstruktive Kontroverse in Organisationen (pp. 89-107). Gabler, Wiesbaden: Springer.
von Wangenheim, C. G., Weber, S., Hauck, J. C. R., & Trentin, G. (2006). Experiences on establishing software processes in small companies. Information and Software Technology, 48(9), 890-900.
Vollmer, A., & Seyr, S. (2013). Constructive controversy research in the business organizational context: A literature review. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24(4), 399-420.
Van Casteren, W. (2017). The Waterfall Model and the Agile Methodologies: A comparison by project characteristics. Research Gate, 2, 1-6.
Vishnubhotla, S. D., Mendes, E., & Lundberg, L. (2020). Investigating the relationship between personalities and agile team climate of software professionals in a telecom company. Information and Software Technology, 126, 106335.
Wickramasinghe, V., & Nandula, S. (2015). Diversity in team composition, relationship conflict and team leader support on globally distributed virtual software development team performance. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 8(2/3), 13-155.
Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2003, January). A tool for the capture and use of process knowledge in process tailoring. In 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 7-pp). Berlin: IEEE.
Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2004). Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 68-74.
Xu, P. (2005, January). Knowledge support in software process tailoring. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 87c-87c). Berlin: IEEE.
Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2007). Software process tailoring: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 293-328.
Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2008). Impact of knowledge support on the performance of software process tailoring. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 277-314.
Xiang, S., Chen, G., Liu, W., Zhou, Q., & Xing, S. (2019). An empirical study of the impact of goal orientation on individual ambidexterity–moderating roles of goal interdependence and constructive controversy. Nankai Business Review International, 10, 456-484.
Xu, X., Jiang, L., & Wang, H. J. (2019). How to build your team for innovation? A cross‐level mediation model of team personality, team climate for innovation, creativity, and job crafting. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(4), 848-872.
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
Zhang, X., Stafford, T. F., Dhaliwal, J. S., Gillenson, M. L., & Moeller, G. (2014). Sources of conflict between developers and testers in software development. Information & Management, 51(1), 13-26.
Zhang, R., Li, A., & Gong, Y. (2021). Too much of a good thing: Examining the curvilinear relationship between team‐level proactive personality and team performance. Personnel Psychology, 74(2), 295-321. |