博碩士論文 108521138 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:119 、訪客IP:3.133.117.215
姓名 林永琳(Yung-Lin Lin)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 電機工程學系
論文名稱 在晶圓圖分析中基於特徵擷取分類網格樣態
(Feature-based Grid Pattern Classification in Wafer Map Analysis)
相關論文
★ E2T-iSEE:應用於事件與情感狀態轉移排程器之編輯★ “偶”:具情感之球型機器人
★ 陣列區塊電容產生器於製程設計套件之評量★ 應用於數位家庭整合計畫影像傳輸子系統之設計考量與實現
★ LED 背光模組靜電放電路徑★ 電阻串連式連續參考值產生器於製程設計套件之評量
★ 短篇故事分類與敘述★ 延伸考慮製程參數相關性之類比電路階層式變異數分析器
★ 以電子電路觀點對田口式惠斯登電橋模擬實例的再分析★ 應用於交換電容ΔΣ調變電路之電容排列良率自動化擺置平台
★ 陣列MiM電容的自動化佈局★ 陣列MiM電容的平衡接點之通道繞線法
★ 氣象資訊達人★ 嵌入式WHDVI多核心Forth微控制器之設計
★ 應用於電容陣列區塊之維持比值良率的通道繞線法★ 使用於矽穿孔耦合分析之垂直十字鏈基板結構
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 在本篇論文中,我們提出了以特徵擷取方法的模型來辨識晶圓圖的網格錯誤樣態。我們使用的實際晶圓為台積電所提供的WM-811K晶圓資料庫,其中的錯誤樣態可分為以下九類,Center、Donut、Scratch、Edge-Ring、Edge-Loc、Loc、Near-Full、Random、None。本篇探討的網格錯誤樣態並沒有在以上分類,加上隱藏的網格錯誤樣態難以被人眼判別,因此本篇利用了兩種方法來標記網格錯誤樣態,第一種方法是直接透過人眼判別來標記,第二種方法我們利用了程式輔助挑選出可能的隱藏網格錯誤樣態,再透過人眼判別來標記網格錯誤樣態,值得一提的是,我們在改善網格錯誤樣態辨識模型時同時修正網格錯誤樣態的標籤。

  網格錯誤樣態辨識時,聚類的存在會影響網格錯誤樣態的辨識進而造成誤判,因此在模型的第一步,我們使用了DBSCAN聚類分析算法移除聚類,將晶圓圖上群聚的壞晶粒移除;再來,我們發現直線壞晶粒並不會在第一步中被濾掉,且會造成網格錯誤樣態的誤判,因此模型的第二步我們針對直線壞晶粒做移除;接著,模型的第三步我們要找尋晶圓圖上的網格樣態,我們根據重複出現的方向將網格錯誤樣態分類成列、行和棋盤三種類型,透過行與列兩個方向尋找連續出現的壞晶粒,接著推測是否存在棋盤類型的網格錯誤壞晶粒,在得到列類型、行類型和棋盤三種類型的網格錯誤壞晶粒個數後,透過三種判斷方式識別網格錯誤樣態。

  最後,我們分析模型辨識的結果,並以基於Precision和Recall調和平均的F1-Score當作模型改進的判斷指標。網格錯誤辨識模型的最終版本,F1-Score為74.40%,運算時間約40.07 ms/wafer。
摘要(英) In this paper, we propose a model of a feature extraction method to recognize grid failure pattern in wafer map. The actual wafer we use is the WM-811K wafer database provided by TSMC, and the failure patterns can be divided into the following nine categories: Center, Donut, Scratch, Edge-Ring, Edge-Loc, Loc, Near-Full , Random, None. The grid failure pattern discussed in this paper is not classified as above, and the hidden grid failure pattern is difficult to be recognized by human observation. Therefore, this paper uses two methods to label grid failure pattern. The first method is directly label by human observation. In the second method, we use program to collect possible hidden grid failure pattern, and then label grid failure pattern by human observation.

  In the first step of the model, we use the DBSCAN algorithm to remove the clusters; Secondly, we found that the line defect points will not be filtered out in the first step, and will cause misjudgment of the grid failure pattern recognition, so in the second step of the model, we remove the line defect points; Then, in the third step of the model, we need to find the grid failure pattern on the wafer map. We classify the grid failure pattern into three types: column, row and checkerboard according to the repeated direction. Search for continuous bad dies in both row and column directions, and then speculate whether there is checkerboard type grid failure pattern. After obtaining the number of grid failure pattern of column type, row type and checkerboard type, three judgments are made way to recognize grid failure pattern.

  Finally, we analyze the results of recognition model, and use the F1-Score as the judgment indicator for model improvement. The final version of the grid failure pattern recognition model, the F1-Score is 74.40%, and the simulation time is about 40.07 ms/wafer.
關鍵字(中) ★ 晶圓圖
★ 錯誤樣態辨識
★ 特徵分析
關鍵字(英) ★ Wafer map
★ Pattern recognition
★ Feature based analysis
論文目次 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1-1 前言 1
1-2 研究動機 2
1-3 研究方法 5
1-4 論文架構 6
第二章 預備知識 7
2-1 文獻探討 7
2-2 基於特徵擷取辨識晶圓圖 10
2-3 群聚演算法DBSCAN 11
第三章 晶圓圖之網格樣態標籤 13
3-1 錯誤樣態 13
3-2 網格樣態 15
3-3 網格樣態標籤方法與標籤種類 17
3-4 網格樣態標籤版本 25
第四章 晶圓圖之網格樣態辨識 27
4-1 晶圓圖網格樣態辨識模型之流程 28
4-2 晶圓圖之資料預處理 28
4-3 使用DBSCAN移除群聚 31
4-4 移除直線壞晶粒 35
4-5 網格樣態辨識演算法 36
第五章 實驗結果與模型評估 46
5-1 WM-811K網格樣態標籤分析 46
5-2 網格樣態辨識模型之評估 49
5-3 網格樣態辨識結果之偽陰偽陽分析 52
第六章 結論 56
參考文獻 57
參考文獻 [1] Mill-Jer Wang, Yen-Shung Chang, J.E. Chen, Yung-Yuan Chen, and Shaw-Cherng Shyu, “Yield Improvement by Test Error Cancellation”, Asian Test Symposium(ATS′96), pp.258-260, Nov. 1996.

[2] M. Wu, J. R. Jang and J. Chen, "Wafer Map Failure Pattern Recognition and Similarity Ranking for Large-Scale Data Sets," in IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1-12, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TSM.2014.2364237.

[3] T. Nakazawa and D. V. Kulkarni, "Wafer Map Defect Pattern Classification and Image Retrieval Using Convolutional Neural Network," in IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 309-314, May 2018, doi: 10.1109/TSM.2018.2795466.

[4] M. Nero, C. Shan, L. -C. Wang and N. Sumikawa, "Concept Recognition in Production Yield Data Analytics," 2018 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC), 2018, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1109/TEST.2018.8624714.

[5] P. Y. -Y. Liao et al., "WGrid: Wafermap Grid Pattern Recognition with Machine Learning Techniques," 2021 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC), 2021, pp. 309-313, doi: 10.1109/ITC50571.2021.00043.

[6] N. Yu, Q. Xu and H. Wang, "Wafer Defect Pattern Recognition and Analysis Based on Convolutional Neural Network," in IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 566-573, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TSM.2019.2937793.

[7] B. Liu, "A Fast Density-Based Clustering Algorithm for Large Databases," 2006 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2006, pp. 996-1000, doi: 10.1109/ICMLC.2006.258531.

[8] C. H. Jin, H. J. Na, M. Piao, G. Pok and K. H. Ryu, "A Novel DBSCAN-Based Defect Pattern Detection and Classification Framework for Wafer Bin Map," in IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 286-292, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TSM.2019.2916835.
指導教授 陳竹一 審核日期 2022-7-29
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明