博碩士論文 109421024 詳細資訊



以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：57 、訪客IP：13.59.82.167
姓名 曾旭捷(Xu-Jie Zeng)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 ESG表現對資本結構之影響
相關論文
★ 電動車產業之經營策略研究－以F公司為例★ 機車製造廠於新產品開發之過程管制探討-以Y公司為例
★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析★ 以均值回歸特性探討分析師個人評價產生之長短期預測不一致
★ 產業差異對於分析師目標價與推薦門檻影響之探討★ 分析師營收預測與油價變動關聯性之探討
★ 分析師多年期預測與其預測能力之探討★ 探討分析師對盈餘成份認定與其對資本市場之影響
★ 探討企業未來性資產對分析師盈餘預測與推薦不一致之影響★ 以中國新財富票選探討擇時能力對成為明星分析師之影響
★ 分析師觀點建構過度投資指標★ 公司財務限制與企業社會責任之關聯-以現金股利及庫藏股買回為指標
★ 探討分析師資本支出預測之資訊意涵★ 過度投資與球場因素對美國職棒關係之研究
★ 探討分析師推薦是否能區別高階經理人為過度自信之研究★ 企業發生負面事件與其企業社會責任之關聯
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究主要在討論企業對於環境、社會和公司治理(Environment、Social and Governance, ESG)的表現是否可解釋企業偏離自身長期資本結構，企業在付出企業社會責任時，將企業社會責任視為是一種保險效果，在公司面臨負面事件時減輕損失，因此使公司得以增加舉債，使其偏離長期資本結構。
本研究使用 MSCI ESG KLD 資料庫中 ESG 的分數結合 COMPUSTAT 資料庫，樣本時間從 1991 年至 2018 年，來檢視企業長期資本結構與 ESG 分數的關係。經由實證結果顯示 ESG 分數和偏離長期資本結構呈現顯著正向關係，表示企業 ESG 分數越高時，企業正向偏離長期資本結構的程度越大，同時，企業若是當年度 ESG 分數相對於前一年 ESG 分數上升(ΔESG)，也會造成企業正向偏離長期資本結構，亦即企業相較於前一年多付出 ESG，也會使得公司正向偏離。
另外，本研究也分別檢測 ESG 三個構面，企業在環境構面(E)和公司治理構面(G)分數和偏離長期資本結構具有正向顯著關係且公司治理構面的變動量(ΔG)也和偏離長期資本結構呈現正向顯著關係。
摘要(英) This study focuses on whether the extent to which firms pay for Environment、Social and Governance (ESG) can explain firms′ deviation from their own long-term capital structure. When firms pay for CSR, they view CSR as an insurance effect that mitigates losses when the firm faces negative events, thus allowing the firm to increase its debt raising and deviate from its long-term capital structure.
This study examines the relationship between the long-term capital structure and ESG scores using the ESG scores from the MSCI ESG KLD database combined with the COMPUSTAT database for the sample period from 1991 to 2018.The empirical results show that there is a significant positive relationship between the ESG score and the deviation from the long-term capital structure, which means that the higher the ESG score of the company, the greater the positive deviation of the company from the longterm capital structure. An increase in ESG score (ΔESG) will also cause the company to deviate from the long-term capital structure, that is, the company pays more ESG than the previous year, which will also cause the company to deviate positively.
In addition, the three ESG dimensions are examined separately, and the scores of environmental dimension (E) and corporate governance dimension (G) are positively
and significantly related to the deviation from the long-term capital structure, and the change in corporate governance dimension (ΔG) is also positively and significantly related to the deviation from the long-term capital structure.
關鍵字(中) ★ 企業社會責任
★ Environment、Social and Governance
★ 資本結構		 關鍵字(英)
論文目次 摘要i
Abstract ii
誌謝iii
目錄iv
壹、緒論 1
1-1研究動機 1
1-2研究目的 2
1-3論文架構 3
貳、文獻探討 4
2-1-1 企業社會責任 4
2-1-2 最適資本結構 7
2-2建立假說 10
參、研究方法 13
3-1 資料來源與樣本選擇方法 13
3-2研究方法與模型建立 13
3-2-1 假說一之實證模型 13
3-2-1-1 假說一之實證模型建立 13
3-2-1-2 假說一之模型控制變數 14
3-2-2-1 假說二之實證模型建立 17
3-2-3-1 假說三之實證模型建立 18
肆、實證結果 20
4-1 假說一之實證結果 20
4-1-1 假說一之敘述性統計 20
4-1-2 假說一之迴歸分析 21
4-1-3 假說一之相關性分析 23
4-2 假說二之實證結果 25
4-2-1 假說二之敘述性統計 25
4-2-2 假說二之迴歸分析 26
4-2-3 假說二之相關性分析 28
4-3 假說三之實證結果 30
4-3-1-1 假說三之一敘述性統計 30
4-3-1-2 假說三之一迴歸分析 32
4-3-1-3 假說三之一相關性分析 34
4-3-2-1 假說三之二敘述性統計 36
4-3-2-2 假說三之二迴歸分析 37
4-3-2-3 假說三之二相關性分析假說三之二相關性分析 38
4-3-3-1 假說三之一補充迴歸分析假說三之一補充迴歸分析 40
4-3-3-1 假說三之二補充迴歸分析假說三之二補充迴歸分析 42
4-4 假說一之額外檢測假說一之額外檢測 44
4-4-1 假說一之額外檢測迴歸結果假說一之額外檢測迴歸結果_移除部分控制變數移除部分控制變數 44
4-4-2 假說一之額外檢測迴歸結果假說一之額外檢測迴歸結果_偏離之持續性檢測偏離之持續性檢測 46
伍、結論與建議 48
5-1 研究結論研究結論 48
5-2 研究限制研究限制 49
參考文獻 50
參考文獻 1. Aman, H., and Nguyen, P. (2013) Does good governance matter to debtholders? Evidence from the credit ratings of Japanese firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 29, 14-34.
2. Andrade, S., C., Bernile, G., and Hood, F., M., III. (2014) SOX, corporate transparency, and the cost of debt. Journal of Banking and Finance, 38, 145-165.
3. Aupperle, K., E., Carroll, A., B., and Hatfield, J., D. (1985) An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
4. Bagnoli, M., and Watts, S., G. (2003) Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12, 419-445.
5. Bagnoli, M., and Watts, S., G. (2004). Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and The Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12(3), 419-445.
6. Baker, M., and Wurgler, J. (2002) Market timing and capital structure. Journal of Finance, 57, 1-32.
7. Barclay, M., J., and Smith, C., W. (2003) The joint determination of leverage and maturity. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(2), 149-167.
8. Barnea, A., and Rubin, A. (2010) Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between owners. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71-86.
9. Baron, D., P. (2001) Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10, 7–45.
10. Baron, D., P. (2004) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 7-45.
11. Benabou, R., and Tirole, J. (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77, 1-19.
12. Benlemlih, M., and Bitar, M. (2018) Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 647-671.
13. Berger, A., and Udell, F., G. (1998) The economics of small business finance: the roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 613-673.
14. Berger, P., G., Ofek, E., and Yermack, D., L. (1997) Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. Journal of Finance, 52, 1411-1438.
15. Besley, T., and Ghatak, M. (2007) Retailing public goods: the economics of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics, 91(9), 1645-1663.
16. Bie, T., D., and Haan, L., D. (2007) Market timing and capital structure: Evidence for Dutch firms. De Economist, 155, 183-206.
17. Birindelli, G., Ferretti, P., Intonti, M., and Iannuzzi, A., P. (2015) On the drivers of corporate social responsibility in banks: Evidence from an ethical rating model. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(2), 303-340.
18. Boutin-Dufresne, F., and Savaria, P. (2004) Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. Journal of Investing Spring, 13, 57-66.
19. Bradley, M., Jarell G., A., and Kim, E., H. (1984) On the Existence of an Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Finance, 39 (3), 857-880.
20. Briozzo, A., E., Vigier, H., and Martinez, L., B. (2016) Firm-level determinants of SME’s financing decisions: evidence from Argentina. Latin American Business Review, 17(3), 245-268.
51
21. Byrd, D., T., and Mizruchi, M., S. (2005) Bankers on the board and the debt ratio of firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), 129-173.
22. Chen, Y., M., and Jian, J., Y. (2006) The impact of information disclosure and transparency rankings system (IDTRs) and corporate governance structure on interest cost of debt. Working paper. National Yunlin University of Science and Technology.
23. Cone (2007) Cause evolution survey. Available from:
24. Cornell, B., and Shapiro, A., C. (1987) Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16, 5-14.
25. Crifo, P., Diaye, M.-A., and Oueghlissi, R. (2017) The effect of countries’ ESG ratings on their sovereign borrowing costs. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 66, 13-20.
26. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C., B., and Sen, S. (2007) Reaping relationship rewards from corporate social responsibility: the role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 224-241.
27. Dunbar, C., G., Li, Z., F., and Shi, Y. (2021) Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility and Firm Risk: The Role of Corporate Governance. Social Science Research Network, 1-47.
28. Economist (2008) Special report: corporate social responsibility. Economist. http://www.economist.com/ node/10491077.
29. Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., and Saleh, A. (2019) ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097.
30. Eliwa, Y., Gregoriou, A., and Paterson, A. (2019) Accruals quality and the cost of debt: The European evidence. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(2), 333-351.
31. Erragragui, E. (2017) Do creditors price firms’ environmental, social and governance risks? Research in International Business and Finance, 45, 197-207.
32. Fan, J., P., Titman, S., and Twite, G. (2010) An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47, 23-56.
33. Fisher, E., Heinkel, R., and Zechner, J. (1989) Dynamic capital structure choice: theory and tests. Journal of Finance, 44, 19-40.
34. Fombrun, C., and Shanley, M. (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233-258.
35. Fonseka, M., Rajapakse, T., and Richardson, G. (2019) The effect of environmental information disclosure and energy product type on the cost of debt: Evidence from energy firms in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 54, 159-182.
36. Friedman, M. (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, 173-178.
37. Gao, F., Lisic, L., L., and Zhang, I., X. (2014) Commitment to social good and insider trading. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57, 149-175.
38. Gaud, P., Hoesli, M., and Bender, A. (2007) Debt-equity choice in Europe. International Review of Financial Analysis, 16(3), 201-222.
39. Ge, W., and Liu, M. (2015) Corporate social responsibility and the cost of corporate bonds. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(6), 597-624.
40. Gerwanski, J. (2020) Does it pay off ? Integrated reporting and cost of debt: European evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2299-2319.
41. Ghoul, S., E., Guedhami, O., Kim, H., and Park, K. (2018) Corporate environmental responsibility and the cost of capital: International evidence.
52
Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 335-361.
42. Gillan, S., L., Koch, A., and Starks, L., T. (2021) Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889.
43. Godfrey P., C. (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-798.
44. Godfrey, P., C., Merrill, C., B., and Hansen J., M. (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425-445.
45. Goss, A., and Roberts, G., S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 1794-1810.
46. Graham, J., M., Lemmon, M., L., and Schallheim, J., S. (1998) Debt, Leases, Taxes and the Endogeneity of Corporate Tax Status. Journal of Finance, 53, 131-162.
47. Guidara, A., Khlif, H., and Jarboui, A. (2014) Voluntary and timely disclosure and the cost of debt: South African evidence. Meditari Accountancy Research, 22(2), 149-164.
48. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., and Zingales, L. (2008) Trusting the stock market. Journal of Finance, 63, 2557-2600.
49. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., and Zingales, L. (2015) The value of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics, 117, 60-76.
50. Harjoto, M., A. (2017) Corporate social responsibility and degrees of operating and financial leverage. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49(2), 487-513.
51. Hasan, I., Hoi, C., K., Wu, Q., and Zhang, H. (2017) Social capital and debt contracting: Evidence from bank loans and public bonds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(3), 1017-1047.
52. Hoepner, A., Oikonomou, I., Scholtens, B., and Schröder, M. (2016) The effects of corporate and country sustainability characteristics on the cost of debt: An international investigation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 43(2), 158-190.
53. Hovakimian, A., and Li, G. (2011) In search of conclusive evidence: how to test for adjustment to target capital structure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 33-44.
http://www.coneinc.com/content1091.
54. Islam, S., Z., and Khandaker, S. (2015) Firm Leverage Decision: Does Industry Matter? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 31, 94-107.
55. Jensen, G., R., Solberg, D., P., and Zorn, T., S. (1992) Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(2), 247-263.
56. Jensen, M., C. (2002) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256.
57. Jung, J., Herbohn, K., and Clarkson, P. (2018) Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151-1171.
58. Kayhan, A., and Titman, S. (2007) Firms′ Histories and Their Capital Structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 1-32.
59. Kleimeier, S., and Viehs, M. (2018) Carbon disclosure, emission levels, and the cost of debt. Working paper. Maastricht University
60. Knack, S., and Keefer, P. (1997) Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4),
53
1251-1288.
61. Kotler, P., and Lee, N. (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
62. Kurshev, A., and Strebulaev, I., A. (2015) Firm size and capital structure. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 5(3), 1-46.
63. Lee, D., and Faff, R. (2009) Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: a global perspective. Financial Review, 44, 213-237.
64. Lins, K., V., and Servaes, H., and Tamayo, A., M. (2016) Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
65. Makri, V., Tsagkanos, A., and Bellas, A. (2014) Determinants of nonperforming loans: The case of eurozone. Panoeconomicus, 61(2), 193-206.
66. Manes-Rossi, F., Nicolò, G., Tudor, A. T., and Zanellato, G. (2020) Drivers of integrated reporting by state-owned enterprises in Europe: A longitudinal analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 586-616.
67. Martinez, L., B., Guercio, M., B., Corzo, L., and Vigier, H. (2017) Determinantes del financiamiento externo de las PyMEs del MERCOSUR. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 22, 672-692.
68. McGuire, J., B., Sundgren, Alison., and Schneeweis, T. (1988) Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
69. McWilliams, A., and Siegal, D. (2001) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlations for misspecification. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
70. McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-27.
71. McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D., S. (2011) Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37, 1480-1495.
72. Miller, M., H. (1977) Debt and taxes. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 261-275.
73. Minor, D., and Morgan, J. (2011) CSR as Reputation Insurance: Primum Non Nocere. California Management Review, 53(3), 40-59.
74. Modigliani, F., and Miller, M., H. (1958) The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
75. Modigliani, F., and Miller, M., H. (1963) Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. The American economic review, 53(3), 433-443.
76. Myers, S., C. (1984) The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574-592.
77. Myers, S., C., and Majluf, N., S. (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
78. Nandy, M., and Lodh, S. (2012) Do banks value the eco-friendliness of firms in their corporate lending decision? Some empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 25, 83-93.
79. Peloza, J. (2006) Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48, 52-72.
80. Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R., M., and Marshall, R., S. (2015) Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Public Policy, 34(4), 336-361.
54
81. Putnam, R., D., Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R., Y. (1993) Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
82. Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., and Mariani, M. (2021) Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412-1421.
83. Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., and Rubino, M. (2020) The role of ownership structure in integrated reporting policies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2238-2250.
84. Ravid, S., A. (1988) On Interactions of Production and Financial Decisions. Financial Management, 17, 87-99.
85. Richardson, A., and Welker, M. (2001) Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 597-616.
86. Servaes, H., and Tamayo, A. (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on the value of the firm: The role of customer awareness. Management Sciences, 59(5), 1045-1061.
87. Sharfman, M., S., and Fernando C., S. (2008) Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569-592.
88. Shiu, Y., M., and Yang, S., L. (2017) Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance-like effects? Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 455-470.
89. Srivastava, R., K., Shervani, T., A., and Fahey, L. (1998) Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2-18.
90. Titman, S., and Tsyplakov, S. (2007) A dynamic model of optimal capital structure. Review of Finance, 11(3) 401-451.
91. Vanhamme, J., and Grobben, B. (2009) Too good to be true! The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 273-283.
92. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., and De Nuccio, E. (2018) Integrated reporting: Development and state of art—The Italian case in the international context. International Journal of Business and Management, 13(11), 233-240.
93. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., and Rubino, M. (2019) Appreciations, criticisms, determinants, and effects of integrated reporting: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 518-528.
94. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., and Garzoni, A. (2019) How pressure from stakeholders affects integrated reporting quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1591-1606.
95. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., and Garzoni, A. (2019) The impact of national culture on integrated reporting quality. A stakeholder theory approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1558-1571.
96. Vitolla, F., Salvi, A., Raimo, N., Petruzzella, F., and Rubino, M. (2020) The impact on the cost of equity capital in the effects of integrated reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 519-529.
97. Webb, E. (2005) Agency costs, leverage, and corporate social responsibility: a test of causality. Financial Decisions 17 (3), 1-19.
98. Wijst, N., V., D., and Thurik, R. (1993) Determinants of small firm debt ratios: an analysis of retail panel data. Small Business Economics volume, 5, 55-65.
99. Yang, S., He, F., Zhu, Q., and Li, S. (2017) How does corporate social responsibility change capital structure? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25, 1-36.
100. Ye, K., and Zhang, R. (2011) Do lenders value corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 197.
指導教授 黃承祖 審核日期 2023-1-11
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題，請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407，或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明