嘉義農業帶降水化學特徵分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：101

、訪客IP：18.223.211.139

姓名

邱佳陽(Chia-Yang Chiu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

大氣科學學系

論文名稱

嘉義農業帶降水化學特徵分析

相關論文

★ 雲凝結核計數器的製作與測試	★ 桃園地區硫沈降之觀測與模擬
★ 亞洲沙塵暴之模擬	★ 不同空氣源次微米氣溶膠活化能力之探討
★ 桃園地區降水化學特性分析	★ 鄰近國家嚴重核事故之大氣長程輸送對台灣的影響評估
★ 桃園地區降水化學與硫化物清除係數探討	★ 亞洲沙塵好發期間雲水化學特性分析
★ 光達及太陽輻射儀之應用：2005中壢氣膠光學垂直特性及邊界層高度之變化	★ 2001年東亞硫沉降之模擬
★ 亞洲生質燃燒氣膠對區域大氣輻射之衝擊及對氣象場的反饋作用	★ 鹿林山與中壢氣膠光學垂直特性之監測與比較
★ 北台灣冬季層狀雲化學特性分析	★ 鹿林山空氣品質背景監測站之背景值分析
★ 微脈衝光達及太陽輻射儀之應用: 2005-2007年中壢地區氣膠光學垂直特性分析	★ 多重濾鏡旋轉輻射儀與太陽輻射儀之應用: 2006-2008年鹿林山氣膠光學特性之探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究分析環保署嘉義酸雨站2004-2020年長期降雨化學監測資料，結果顯示其長期降水權重平均pH為5.20，pH與pAi(- log ( [nss-SO42-] + [NO3-] ))相關性分析結果並不顯著，表示降水化學中和效應顯著，而主要中和因子為NH4+，應與嘉義地區農業活動頻繁有關。主要致酸因子SO42-逐年權重平均有顯著降低趨勢，而NO3-長期逐年濃度趨勢有明顯震盪，但濃度值並未明顯減低，長期趨勢並不顯著。嘉義地區長期S沉降量呈現減少趨勢，具有顯著性；N沉降量主來自於NH4+貢獻，N與N-NH4+以及N-NO3-沉降量長期趨勢雖為減量，但並不顯著。
應用因子分析共分類出3個因子，Factor1 為農業活動與工業、交通污染以及塵土等因子混合影響，Factor 2 為Cl-、Na+及Mg2+為高度相關，三者屬海洋因子，Factor 3 為K+高度相關，Cl-為中度相關，為塵土與農業混合因子影響。污染來源推估結果可將氣流分為三個主要來源，Cluster 2可能會帶來較多之境外污染物傳輸貢獻，佔總樣本數之28 %，Cluster 1與Cluster 3 佔總樣本數72 %，可能以台灣區域性污染物為主。分析高濃度降水個案顯示，在嘉義地區除受到境外污染物傳送貢獻外，也可能受到台中地區較高污染排放傳送至嘉義地區影響當地降水。

摘要(英)

In this study, long-term precipitation chemistry monitoring data from the Chiayi Acid Rain Station from 2004 to 2020 were analysed. The results of the analysis showed that the long-term rainfall-weighted average pH of precipitation in the Chiayi region was 5.20. The correlation analysis between pH and pAi showed no significant relationship. This indicates a significant neutralization effect in precipitation chemistry. The primary neutralizing factor was found to be NH4+, which is likely associated with frequent agricultural activities in the Chiayi region. The main acidifying factor, SO42-, showed a significant decreasing trend in the rainfall-weighted average concentration over the years. On the other hand, the long-term yearly concentration trend of NO3- exhibited noticeable variability, but the concentration values did not show a significant decrease, and the long-term trend was not significant. The long-term S deposition in the Chiayi region showed a decreasing trend with a slope of -0.374(P = 0.0013<0.05), indicating statistical significance. The deposition of N was mainly contributed by NH4+, and although the long-term trends of N, N-NH4+, and N-NO3- deposition showed a decrease, they were not statistically significant.
The factor analysis classified three factors. Factor 1 represents a combination of agricultural activities, traffic pollution, and dust, among other factors. Factor 2 shows a high correlation between Cl-, Na+, and Mg2+, related a marine source. Factor 3 shows a high correlation with K+ and moderately correlated with Cl-, associated with agriculture, and dust-related influences. The estimated pollution sources suggest three main airflow source regions. Cluster 2 may be attributed more to the long-range transport pollutants, accounting for 28 % of the total samples. Cluster 1 and Cluster 3, comprising 72 % of the total samples, are likely to be associated with local/regional pollutants surrounding Taiwan. The analysis of high concentration precipitation events indicates that, in addition to the long-range transport pollutants, the Chiayi region may also be influenced by higher pollutant emissions from the Taichung area, which affect local precipitation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 酸雨
★ 酸沉降
★ 因子分析

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

摘要……………………………………………………………………i
Abstract…………………………………………………………………..ii
誌謝………………………………………………………...……………iv
目錄………………………………………………………………………v
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
第一章前言 1
1.1 前言 1
1.2 研究動機 2
第二章文獻回顧 4
2.1酸雨概述 4
2.1.1 酸雨的定義 4
2.1.2 酸雨的成因 5
2.2酸雨的危害 6
2.3 國際酸雨現況 9
2.3.1 美國與歐洲酸雨現況 9
2.3.2 亞洲酸雨現況 16
2.4 台灣酸雨研究 20
第三章研究方法 22
3.1 酸雨監測網介紹 24
3.1.1測站概述 34
3.1.2樣本採集方法 41
3.1.3樣本分析 41
3.2 資料計算 44
第四章結果與討論 49
4.1 雨水化學特性 49
4.2嘉義站長期降水化學年變化趨勢 72
4.2.1溼沉降量估算 83
4.3 污染源推估 90
4.4降水化學污染源區推估 97
4.5 個案分析 104
第五章結論與展望 127
5.1 結論 127
5.2 未來展望 130
參考文獻 131

參考文獻

呂世宗、陳福來、繆在澄，1975：大氣污染對台灣地區雨水pH值之影響，大氣科學，2(1) ，69-72。
呂世宗、林能暉(2005)酸雨監測分析及酸沈降調查評估計畫，行政院環境保護署。
呂世宗、林能暉(2013) 酸雨及有害物質溼沈降監測分析調查工作計畫(三)，行政院環境保護署。
呂世宗、林能暉(2020) 全國酸雨監測及成份分析調查評估（第二年），行政院環境保護署。
林能暉(2021)：全國酸雨監測及成分分析計畫，行政院環境保護署。
林能暉及陳景森，1996：酸沈降之源與受體關係之研究:氣流軌跡分析及降水系統影響，EPA-85-E104-09-03，行政院環境保護署。
張仲德, 林登秋, & 林能暉. (2009). 臺灣地區酸沉降臨界負荷量及其對環境與經濟影響之估算. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 56, 39-58.
林能暉、陳景森，1996：酸沈降之源與受體關係之研究：氣流軌跡分析及降水系統影響，行政院環境保護署。
林能暉、陳景森，1997：酸沈降之源與受體關係之研究：氣流軌跡分析及降水系統影響，行政院環境保護署。
林杜伊，2019：Characterization of wintertime precipitation chemistry at sites in the northern Taiwan，。國立中央大學大氣物理研究所碩士論文，中壢。
張斐章及金恆鑣，1993：台北市酸雨趨勢與特性分析，八十一年度環境工程研究計畫成果要覽。
曾韋迪，2005：桃園地區降水化學與硫化物清係數探討。國立中央大學大氣物理研究所碩士論文，中壢。
黃姵瑜，2015：區域氣候變化與台灣酸雨相關性之探討。國立中央大學大氣物理研究所碩士論文，中壢。
陳淨修，1994: 台灣酸雨現況及特性之分析，第十一屆空氣污染控制技術研討會，台中市，103-110。
鄭福田(1998)：臺灣地區酸沈降物之調查研究，行政院環境保護署。
羅友志，1995：以多變量分析評估北桃地區雨水特性之研究，國立中央大學，環境工程研究所碩士論文，中壢。
饒雅晴，2011：東亞五小島之降水化學比較。國立中央大學大氣物理研究所碩士論文，中壢。
Akimoto, H., & Narita, H. (1994). Distribution of SO2, NOx and CO2 emissions from fuel combustion and industrial activities in Asia with 1°× 1° resolution. Atmospheric Environment, 28(2), 213-225.
Aneja, V.P., Murray Jr., G., Southerland, J. (1998). Atmospheric nitrogen compounds: emissions, transport, transformation, deposition and assessment. Environmental Manager—Air and Waste Management Association, April, pp. 22–25.
Aneja, V.P., Nelson, D.R., Rolle, P.A., Walker, J.T., Battye, W. (2003). Agricultural ammonia emmissions and ammonium concentrations associated with aerosols and precipitation in the southeast United. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 4152–4162.
Battye, W., Aneja, V. P., & Roelle, P. A. (2003). Evaluation and improvement of ammonia emissions inventories. Atmospheric Environment, 37(27), 3873-3883.
Benish, S. E., Bash, J. O., Foley, K. M., Appel, K. W., Hogrefe, C., Gilliam, R., & Pouliot, G. (2022). Long-term regional trends of nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the United States from 2002 to 2017. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(19), 12749-12767.
Breemen, N. V., Driscoll, C. T., & Mulder, J. (1984). Acidic deposition and internal proton sources in acidification of soils and waters. Nature, 307(5952), 599-604.
Bridgman, H. A., 1992: Evaluating rainwater contamination and source southeast Australia using factor analysis. Atmos. Environ.,26, 2404-2412.
Burns, D. A., Fenn, M. E., Baron, J., Lynch, J. A., & Cosby, B. J. (2011). National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program report to congress: an integrated assessment. National Science Technology Council.
Burns, D. A., Aherne, J., Gay, D. A., & Lehmann, C. (2016). Acid rain and its environmental effects: Recent scientific advances. Atmospheric Environment, 146, 1-4.
Calvert, J. G., A. Lazrus, G. L. Kok, B. G. Heikes, J. G. Walega, J. Lind and C. A. Cantrell (1985): Chemical Mechanisms of Acid Generation in the Troposphere. Nature, 317(5), 27-35.
Chuang, M. T., Chou, C. C., Hsiao, T. C., Lin, K. Y., Lin, N. H., Lin, W. Y., ... & Lee, C. T. (2021). Analyzing the increasing importance of nitrate in Taiwan from long-term trend of measurements. Atmospheric Environment, 267, 118749.
Conradie EH, Van Zyl PG, Pienaar JJ, Beukes JP, Galy-Lacaux C, Venter AD, Mkhatshwa GV (2016) The chemical composition and fluxes of atmospheric wet deposition at four sites in South Africa. Atmos Environ., 146:113–131.
Duan, L., Yu, Q., Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Pan, Y., Larssen, T., ... & Mulder, J. (2016). Acid deposition in Asia: Emissions, deposition, and ecosystem effects. Atmospheric Environment, 146, 55-69.
EANET, (2021).Fourth Periodic Report on the State of Acid Deposition in East Asia(2021)
EANET, (2022). Data Report 2022.
Galloway, J.N. and Gaudry, A. (1984). The Composition of Precipitation on Amsterdam Island, Indian Ocean. Atmos. Environ., 18: 2649–2656.
Grennfelt, P., Engleryd, A., Forsius, M., Hov, Ø., Rodhe, H., & Cowling, E. (2020). Acid rain and air pollution: 50 years of progress in environmental science and policy. Ambio, 49, 849-864.
Galy-Lacaux, C., Laouali, D., Descroix, L., Gobron, N., & Liousse, C. (2009). Long term precipitation chemistry and wet deposition in a remote dry savanna site in Africa (Niger). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9(5), 1579-1595.
Hsu, C. H., Cheng, F. Y., Chen, C. L., Wu, D. H., Chen, T. Y., Liao, K. F., ... & Zhang, Y. T. (2023). A high-resolution inventory of ammonia emissions from agricultural fertilizer application and crop residue in Taiwan. Atmospheric Environment, 119920.
Irwin, J. G., & Williams, M. L. (1988). Acid rain: chemistry and transport. Environmental Pollution, 50(1-2), 29-59.
Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
Hara, H. (1993): Acid Deposition Chemistry in Japan. Bull. Inst. Pub. Health, 42, 426-437.
Hara, H. (1998): Acid deposition chemistry in Asia, Europe, and North America. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 32, 331-338.
Keene, W. C., A. A. Pszenny, , J. N. Galloway, and, M. E. Hartley (1986): Sea-salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine precipitation. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 6647-6658.
Krug, E. C., & Frink, C. R. (1983). Acid rain on acid soil: a new perspective. Science, 221(4610), 520-525.
Kruse, M., & Bell, J. N. B. (1987). Ammonia emissions and their role in acid deposition. Atmospheric Environment (1967), 21(9), 1939-1946.
Kulshrestha, U. C., Kulshrestha, M. J., Sekar, R., Sastry, G. S. R., & Vairamani, M. (2003). Chemical characteristics of rainwater at an urban site of south-central India. Atmospheric Environment, 37(21), 3019-3026.
Laouali, D., Galy-Lacaux, C., Diop, B., Delon, C., Orange, D., Lacaux, J. P., ... & Castéra, P. (2012). Long term monitoring of the chemical composition of precipitation and wet deposition fluxes over three Sahelian savannas. Atmospheric environment, 50, 314-327.
Larssen, T., Seip, H. M., Semb, A., Mulder, J., Muniz, I. P., Vogt, R. D., ... & Eilertsen, O. (1999). Acid deposition and its effects in China: an overview. Environmental Science & Policy, 2(1), 9-24.
Likens, G. E., Wright, R. F., Galloway, J. N., & Butler, T. J. (1979). Acid rain. Scientific American, 241(4), 43-51.
Lin, T. C. (1995) Atmospheric Deposition and Forest Canopy Processes in a Subtropical Rain Forest in southeast Asia-Taiwan. University of Kansas.
Lin, N. H., H. M. Lee, and M. B. Chang (1999): Evaluation of the characteristics of acid precipitation in Taipei, Taiwan using cluster analysis. Water, Air & Soil Pollut., 113, 241-260.
Liu, M., Huang, X., Song, Y., Tang, J., Cao, J., Zhang, X., ... & Zhu, T. (2019). Ammonia emission control in China would mitigate haze pollution and nitrogen deposition, but worsen acid rain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7760-7765.
Lokke, H., Bak, J., Falkengren-Grerup, U., Finlay, R. D., Ilvesniemi, H., Nygaard, P. H., & Starr, M. (1996). Critical loads of acidic deposition for forest soils: Is the current approach adequate?. Ambio, 510-516.
Misselbrook, T. H., Van Der Weerden, T. J., Pain, B. F., Jarvis, S. C., Chambers, B. J., Smith, K. A., ... & Demmers, T. G. M. (2000). Ammonia emission factors for UK agriculture. Atmospheric environment, 34(6), 871-880.
Mphepya, J.N., Pienaar, J.J., Galy-Lacaux, C., Held, G., Turner, C.R. (2004). Precipitation chemistry in semi-arid areas of southern Africa: a case study of a rural and an industrial site. J. Atmos. Chem. 47, 1-24.
Mphepya, J.N., Galy-Lacaux, C., Lacaux, J.P., Held, G., Pienaar, J.J. (2006). Precipitation chemistry and wet deposition in Kruger national Park, South Africa. J. Atmos. Chem. 53, 169-183.
NADP, (2022). NADP 2021 Report
Pascaud, A., Sauvage, S., Coddeville, P., Nicolas, M., Croisé, L., Mezdour, A., & Probst, A. (2016). Contrasted spatial and long-term trends in precipitation chemistry and deposition fluxes at rural stations in France. Atmospheric Environment, 146, 28-43.
Singh, A., & Agrawal, M. (2007). Acid rain and its ecological consequences. Journal of Environmental Biology, 29(1), 15.
Seinfeld, J. H. (1986). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution, Willey-Interscience.
Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (1998). From air pollution to climate change. Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 1326.
Singh, A. and M. Agrawal. (1996).: Response of two cultivars of Triticum aestivum L. to simulated acid rain. Environ. Pollut., 91, 161-167
Sivaramanan, S. (2015). Acid rain, causes, effect and control strategies. Central Environmental Authority, Battaramulla, 1.
Sosa-Echeverría, R., Bravo-Álvarez, H., Alarcón-Jiménez, A. L., Torres-Barrera, M. D. C., Jaimes-Palomera, M., Sánchez-Álvarez, P., & Granados-Hernández, E. (2018). Acid rain in a Mexican site on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Atmósfera, 31(4), 317-330.
Tabatabai, M. A., & Olson, R. A. (1985). Effect of acid rain on soils. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 15(1), 65-110.
Tomlinson, G. H. (1983). Air pollutants and forest decline. Environmental science & technology, 17(6), 246A-256A.
Tomlinson, G. H. (2003). Acidic deposition, nutrient leaching and forest growth. Biogeochemistry, 65, 51-81.
UENCE, (2016). Towards Cleaner Air Scientific Assessment Report 2016
US EPA, 2013, 2012 Power Sector Programs – Progress Report
US EPA, 2022, National Emissions Inventory/ Air Pollutant Emissions Trends Data.
US EPA, 2023, National Emissions Inventory/ Air Pollutant Emissions Trends Data.
Vet, R., R. S. Artz, S. Carou, M. Shaw, C. U. Ro, W. Aas, A. Baker, V. C. Bowersox, F. Dentener , C. Galy-Lacaux, A. Hou, J. J. Pienaar, R. Gillett, M. C. Forti, S. Gromov, H. Hara, T. Khodzher, N. M. Mahowald, S. Nickovic, P.S.P. Rao, N. W. Reid. (2014). A global assessment of precipitation chemistry and deposition of sulfur, nitrogen, sea salt, base cations, organic acids, acidity and pH, and phosphorus. Atmospheric Environment, 93, 3-100.
WMO, (2004). WMO/GAW Report No. 160, ‘Manual for the GAW
Precipitation Chemistry Programme. WMO TD No. 1251.
Yu, H., He, N., Wang, Q., Zhu, J., Xu, L., Zhu, Z., & Yu, G. (2016). Wet acid deposition in Chinese natural and agricultural ecosystems: Evidence from national‐scale monitoring. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121(18), 10-995.

指導教授

林能暉

審核日期

2023-8-16

推文