參考文獻 |
1. Yaghi, O.M., et al., Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature. 2003, 423(6941), 705-14.
2. Yaghi, O.M., G. Li, and H. Li, Selective binding and removal of guests in a microporous metal–organic framework. Nature. 1995, 378(6558), 703-706.
3. Li, H., et al., Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework. Nature. 1999, 402(6759), 276-279.
4. Furukawa, H., et al., The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science. 2013, 341(6149), 1230444.
5. Getman, R.B., et al., Review and Analysis of Molecular Simulations of Methane, Hydrogen, and Acetylene Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chemical Reviews. 2012, 112(2), 703-723.
6. Suh, M.P., et al., Hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Rev. 2012, 112(2), 782-835.
7. Li, J.-R., J. Sculley, and H.-C. Zhou, Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations. Chemical Reviews. 2012, 112(2), 869-932.
8. Yoon, M., R. Srirambalaji, and K. Kim, Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis. Chemical Reviews. 2012, 112(2), 1196-1231.
9. Horcajada, P., et al., Metal-organic frameworks in biomedicine. Chem Rev. 2012, 112(2), 1232-68.
10. Yoon, M., et al., Proton Conduction in Metal–Organic Frameworks and Related Modularly Built Porous Solids. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2013, 52(10), 2688-2700.
11. Kreno, L.E., et al., Metal–Organic Framework Materials as Chemical Sensors. Chemical Reviews. 2012, 112(2), 1105-1125.
12. Bétard, A. and R.A. Fischer, Metal-organic framework thin films: from fundamentals to applications. Chem Rev. 2012, 112(2), 1055-83.
13. Yusuf, V.F., N.I. Malek, and S.K. Kailasa, Review on Metal–Organic Framework Classification, Synthetic Approaches, and Influencing Factors: Applications in Energy, Drug Delivery, and Wastewater Treatment. ACS Omega. 2022, 7(49), 44507-44531.
14. Lee, Y.-R., J. Kim, and W.-S. Ahn, Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks: A mini review. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2013, 30(9), 1667-1680.
15. Shieh, F.K., et al., Water-based synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate framework-90 (ZIF-90) with a controllable particle size. Chemistry. 2013, 19(34), 11139-42.
16. Rabenau, A., The Role of Hydrothermal Synthesis in Preparative Chemistry. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 1985, 24(12), 1026-1040.
17. Ameloot, R., et al., Patterned film growth of metal–organic frameworks based on galvanic displacement. Chemical Communications. 2010, 46(21), 3735-3737.
18. Klinowski, J., et al., Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Dalton Transactions. 2011, 40(2), 321-330.
19. Pichon, A., A. Lazuen-Garay, and S.L. James, Solvent-free synthesis of a microporous metal–organic framework. CrystEngComm. 2006, 8(3), 211-214.
20. Qiu, L.-G., et al., Facile synthesis of nanocrystals of a microporous metal–organic framework by an ultrasonic method and selective sensing of organoamines. Chemical Communications. 2008(31), 3642-3644.
21. Seetharaj, R., et al., Dependence of solvents, pH, molar ratio and temperature in tuning metal organic framework architecture. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2019, 12(3), 295-315.
22. Zeraati, M., et al., Synthesis of Al-Based Metal-Organic Framework in Water With Caffeic Acid Ligand and NaOH as Linker Sources With Highly Efficient Anticancer Treatment. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2021, 9.
23. Mesa, C. and L.E. Fernández, Challenges facing adjuvants for cancer immunotherapy. Immunology & Cell Biology. 2004, 82(6), 644-650.
24. Lindblad, E.B., Aluminium adjuvants—in retrospect and prospect. Vaccine. 2004, 22(27), 3658-3668.
25. Hogenesch, H., Mechanism of immunopotentiation and safety of aluminum adjuvants. Front Immunol. 2012, 3, 406.
26. Wu, T., N. Prasetya, and K. Li, Recent advances in aluminium-based metal-organic frameworks (MOF) and its membrane applications. Journal of Membrane Science. 2020, 615, 118493.
27. Fan, W., et al., Aluminum metal–organic frameworks: From structures to applications. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2023, 489, 215175.
28. Gándara, F., et al., High Methane Storage Capacity in Aluminum Metal–Organic Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014, 136(14), 5271-5274.
29. Guo, L., et al., Efficient capture and storage of ammonia in robust aluminium-based metal-organic frameworks. Communications Chemistry. 2023, 6(1), 55.
30. Maity, A., et al., Crystal Structure Directed Catalysis by Aluminum Metal-Organic Framework: Mechanistic Insight into the Role of Coordination of Al Sites and Entrance Size of Catalytic Pocket. ACS Materials Letters. 2020, 2(7), 699-704.
31. Mallakpour, S., E. Nikkhoo, and C.M. Hussain, Application of MOF materials as drug delivery systems for cancer therapy and dermal treatment. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2022, 451, 214262.
32. Loiseau, T., et al., A Rationale for the Large Breathing of the Porous Aluminum Terephthalate (MIL-53) Upon Hydration. Chemistry – A European Journal. 2004, 10(6), 1373-1382.
33. Serre, C., et al., Very Large Breathing Effect in the First Nanoporous Chromium(III)-Based Solids: MIL-53 or CrIII(OH)·{O2C−C6H4−CO2}·{HO2C−C6H4−CO2H}x·H2Oy. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002, 124(45), 13519-13526.
34. Férey, G., et al., Hydrogen adsorption in the nanoporous metal-benzenedicarboxylate M(OH)(O2C–C6H4–CO2) (M = Al3+, Cr3+), MIL-53. Chemical Communications. 2003(24), 2976-2977.
35. Llewellyn, P.L., et al., Complex adsorption of short linear alkanes in the flexible metal-organic-framework MIL-53(Fe). J Am Chem Soc. 2009, 131(36), 13002-8.
36. Cheng, X., et al., Size- and morphology-controlled NH2-MIL-53(Al) prepared in DMF–water mixed solvents. Dalton Transactions. 2013, 42(37), 13698-13705.
37. Tran, T.V., et al., A critical review on the synthesis of NH2-MIL-53(Al) based materials for detection and removal of hazardous pollutants. Environmental Research. 2023, 216, 114422.
38. Boutin, A., et al., Thermodynamic analysis of the breathing of amino-functionalized MIL-53(Al) upon CO2 adsorption. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2011, 140(1), 108-113.
39. Parent, L.R., et al., Pore Breathing of Metal–Organic Frameworks by Environmental Transmission Electron Microscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2017, 139(40), 13973-13976.
40. Serra-Crespo, P., et al., Interplay of Metal Node and Amine Functionality in NH2-MIL-53: Modulating Breathing Behavior through Intra-framework Interactions. Langmuir. 2012, 28(35), 12916-12922.
41. Boulé, R., et al. Thermal and Guest-Assisted Structural Transition in the NH2-MIL-53(Al) Metal Organic Framework: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Investigation. Nanomaterials. 2018, 8.
42. Couck, S., et al., An Amine-Functionalized MIL-53 Metal−Organic Framework with Large Separation Power for CO2 and CH4. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009, 131(18), 6326-6327.
43. Couck, S., et al., Adsorption and Separation of Light Gases on an Amino-Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework: An Adsorption and In Situ XRD Study. ChemSusChem. 2012, 5(4), 740-750.
44. Amirilargani, M., et al., MIL-53(Al) and NH2-MIL-53(Al) modified α-alumina membranes for efficient adsorption of dyes from organic solvents. Chemical Communications. 2019, 55(28), 4119-4122.
45. Singh, R., et al., Microbial enzymes: industrial progress in 21st century. 3 Biotech. 2016, 6(2), 174.
46. Schmid, A., et al., Industrial biocatalysis today and tomorrow. Nature. 2001, 409(6817), 258-68.
47. Basso, A. and S. Serban, Industrial applications of immobilized enzymes—A review. Molecular Catalysis. 2019, 479, 110607.
48. Datta, S., L.R. Christena, and Y.R. Rajaram, Enzyme immobilization: an overview on techniques and support materials. 3 Biotech. 2013, 3(1), 1-9.
49. Chen, Y., et al., How Can Proteins Enter the Interior of a MOF? Investigation of Cytochrome c Translocation into a MOF Consisting of Mesoporous Cages with Microporous Windows. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012, 134(32), 13188-13191.
50. Lian, X., et al., Enzyme–MOF (metal–organic framework) composites. Chemical Society Reviews. 2017, 46(11), 3386-3401.
51. Pisklak, T.J., et al., Hybrid materials for immobilization of MP-11 catalyst. Topics in Catalysis. 2006, 38(4), 269-278.
52. Cao, S.-L., et al., Novel Nano-/Micro-Biocatalyst: Soybean Epoxide Hydrolase Immobilized on UiO-66-NH2 MOF for Efficient Biosynthesis of Enantiopure (R)-1, 2-Octanediol in Deep Eutectic Solvents. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2016, 4(6), 3586-3595.
53. Lykourinou, V., et al., Immobilization of MP-11 into a Mesoporous Metal–Organic Framework, MP-11@mesoMOF: A New Platform for Enzymatic Catalysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011, 133(27), 10382-10385.
54. de la Fuente, M., et al., Enzyme Therapy: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2021, 22(17).
55. Chaturvedi, S., et al., Human Metabolic Enzymes Deficiency: A Genetic Mutation Based Approach. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016, 2016, 9828672.
56. Robertson, J.G., Enzymes as a special class of therapeutic target: clinical drugs and modes of action. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007, 17(6), 674-9.
57. Petersen, K.U., Pepsin and Its Importance for Functional Dyspepsia: Relic, Regulator or Remedy? Dig Dis. 2018, 36(2), 98-105.
58. Brennan, G.T. and M.W. Saif, Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy: A Concise Review. Jop. 2019, 20(5), 121-125.
59. Shemesh, E., et al., Enzyme replacement and substrate reduction therapy for Gaucher disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015, 2015(3), Cd010324.
60. Dean, S.N., et al., Targeting and delivery of therapeutic enzymes. Ther Deliv. 2017, 8(7), 577-595.
61. Maximov, V., V. Reukov, and A.A. Vertegel, Targeted delivery of therapeutic enzymes. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2009, 19(5), 311-320.
62. Devasagayam, T.P., et al., Free radicals and antioxidants in human health: current status and future prospects. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004, 52, 794-804.
63. Webb, M. and D.P. Sideris Intimate Relations—Mitochondria and Ageing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020, 21.
64. Valko, M., et al., Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007, 39(1), 44-84.
65. Schroeder, W.A., et al., Some amino acid sequences in bovine-liver catalase. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Specialized Section on Enzymological Subjects. 1964, 89(1), 47-65.
66. Blokhina, O., E. Virolainen, and K.V. Fagerstedt, Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann Bot. 2003, 91 Spec No(2), 179-94.
67. Fita, I. and M.G. Rossmann, The NADPH binding site on beef liver catalase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985, 82(6), 1604-8.
68. Chance, B., Effect of pH upon the reaction kinetics of the enzyme-substrate compounds of catalase. J Biol Chem. 1952, 194(2), 471-81.
69. Najafi, A., et al., Catalase application in cancer therapy: Simultaneous focusing on hypoxia attenuation and macrophage reprogramming. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2022, 153, 113483.
70. Thakkar, S., et al., Tumor microenvironment targeted nanotherapeutics for cancer therapy and diagnosis: A review. Acta biomaterialia. 2020, 101, 43-68.
71. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/entry/pdb/7cat.
72. Chen, Y., et al., Acid-Resistant Mesoporous Metal-Organic Framework toward Oral Insulin Delivery: Protein Encapsulation, Protection, and Release. J Am Chem Soc. 2018, 140(17), 5678-5681.
73. Delchier, J.C., et al., Fate of orally ingested enzymes in pancreatic insufficiency: comparison of two pancreatic enzyme preparations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1991, 5(4), 365-78.
74. Ketwaroo, G.A. and D.Y. Graham, Rational Use of Pancreatic Enzymes for Pancreatic Insufficiency and Pancreatic Pain. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019, 1148, 323-343.
75. Gascón-Pérez, V., et al. Efficient One-Step Immobilization of CaLB Lipase over MOF Support NH2-MIL-53(Al). Catalysts. 2020, 10.
76. Liao, F.-S., et al., Shielding against Unfolding by Embedding Enzymes in Metal–Organic Frameworks via a de Novo Approach. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2017, 139(19), 6530-6533.
77. Jauncey, G.E., The Scattering of X-Rays and Bragg′s Law. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1924, 10(2), 57-60.
78. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bragg_diffraction_2.svg.
79. https://www.britannica.com/technology/scanning-electron-microscope.
80. Sing, K.S.W., Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). 1985, 57(4), 603-619.
81. https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201108/physicshistory.cfm.
82. Bradford, M.M., A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 72, 248-54.
83. Jiang, Z.Y., A.C. Woollard, and S.P. Wolff, Hydrogen peroxide production during experimental protein glycation. FEBS Lett. 1990, 268(1), 69-71.
84. Ou, P. and S.P. Wolff, A discontinuous method for catalase determination at ′near physiological′ concentrations of H2O2 and its application to the study of H2O2 fluxes within cells. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 1996, 31(1-2), 59-67.
85. Nelson, D.P. and L.A. Kiesow, Enthalpy of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by catalase at 25 degrees C (with molar extinction coefficients of H 2 O 2 solutions in the UV). Anal Biochem. 1972, 49(2), 474-8.
86. Liu, J., et al., Ionothermal synthesis and proton-conductive properties of NH2-MIL-53 MOF nanomaterials. CrystEngComm. 2016, 18(4), 525-528.
87. Sánchez-Sánchez, M., et al., Synthesis of metal–organic frameworks in water at room temperature: salts as linker sources. Green Chemistry. 2015, 17(3), 1500-1509.
88. Yue, Y., et al., Template-Free Synthesis of Hierarchical Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2013, 135(26), 9572-9575. |