摘要(英) |
In the modern age where global warming is intensifying year by year, carbon reduction has long been an issue that countries around the world must pay attention to. At the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26), countries adopted a new agreement: the " Glasgow Climate Pact ". So far, the voice of carbon reduction and sustainable development has become something that countries and people around the world must face. Therefore, through the carbon taxation and carbon rights trading system, it is a measure that effectively responds to sustainable development. The government sets a reasonable upper limit for carbon emissions, and those who exceed the upper limit can purchase carbon rights from other companies. At this time, producers may reflect the cost on commodity prices, causing consumers to reduce purchases; or switch to materials or equipment with lower carbon emissions in order to reduce costs, and both of the above two situations can achieve the effect of carbon reduction . In order to effectively control the total carbon emissions of each country. This study takes the glass industry as an example. Under the green economy, the concept of circular economy is added: waste glass is recycled and reused. According to the European Container Glass Federation (FEVE), every 10% of recycled waste glass can reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 5%. It can be seen that recycling waste glass will not only save the cost of raw materials, but also contribute to the sustainable development. Taking the above argument as the main axis, combined with Activity-Based Costing and Theory of Constraints, to establish a production decision-making model that includes carbon tax and carbon trading. The eight models in this paper include systems such as tax allowances, continuous or discontinuous tax rates, and carbon rights trading. They are solved through mathematical programming to explore the impact of carbon taxes and carbon rights costs on corporate profits, and the results can be provided to the government as a reference for establishing a carbon tax system. |
參考文獻 |
1. Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1988). “Measure costs right: make the right decisions.” Harvard business review.
2. Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1992). “Activity-based systems: Measuring the costs of resource usage.” Accounting Horizons, 6(3), 1-13.
3. Julia R. Mueller, Michael W. Boehm , & Charles Drummond (Aug. 2012), “Direction of CRT waste glass processing: Electronics recycling industry communication”
4. Turney, P. B. B. (2005). Common cents: The ABC performance breakthrough:
How to succeed with activity-based costing, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
5. Tsai, W. H., & Lai, C. W. (Dec. 2007). “Outsourcing or capacity expansions:Application of activity-based costing model on joint products decisions.” Computers & Operations Research 34(12), 3666-3681.
6. Tsai, W. H. (Aug. 2018b), “Carbon Taxes and Carbon Rights Cost Analysis for the Tire Industry,” energies, 11(8), Paper #2121.
7. Tsai, W. H., Lai, C. W., Tseng, L. J., & Chou, W. C. (Sep. 2008). “Embedding management discretionary power into an ABC model for a joint products mix decision.” International Journal of Production Economics 115(1): 210-220.
8. Tsai, W. H. (2018). Green production planning and control for the textile industry by using mathematical programming and industry 4.0 techniques. Energies, 11(8), 2072.
9. Tsai, W. H., Lin, T. W., & Chou, W. C. (2010). Integrating activity-based costing and environmental cost accounting systems: a case study. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 4(2), 186-208.
10. Tsai, W. H., Yang, C. H., Chang, J. C., & Lee, H. L. (2014). An activity-based costing decision model for life cycle assessment in green building projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 238(2), 607-619.
11. Tsai, W. H., Chang, J. C., Hsieh, C. L., Tsaur, T. S., & Wang, C. W. (2016). Sustainability concept in decision-making: Carbon tax consideration for joint product mix decision. Sustainability, 8(12), 1232.
12. 泛科學專欄(2021),「玻璃碎滿地怎麼辦?掃一掃再回收啊!它是「碳中和」的送分題」 。網址:https://pansci.asia/archives/336925
13. 行政院環境保護署環保新聞專區(2013),「回收再生廢容器,資源循環減碳氣」。
網址:https://enews.epa.gov.tw/page/3b3c62c78849f32f/31d5a4a7-1e0a-456f-9d78-e4cc3b1281a9
14. 新竹市玻璃工藝博物館---認識材料 。
網址:https://glassmuseum.moc.gov.tw/home/zh-tw/knowledge_of_material
15. ESG遠見(2022),「碳定價時代來臨!碳稅、碳費對產業影響一次看」。
網址:https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/14384
16. 群輝商務科技部落格(2023),「【碳權指南】了解碳權、碳費、碳稅與交易市場」 。網址:https://chci.com.tw/carbon-credits-guide/
17. 綠色和平(2022),「碳權、碳費、碳稅是什麼?碳交易市場如何運作?是否真的能幫助減碳?」 。
18. 天下雜誌(2023),「碳權概念夯!碳權是什麼?台灣碳交易平台何時上路?」。
網址:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5125529
19. 國家發展委員會,「臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明」。
網址:https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=DEE68AAD8B38BD76
20. 數位時代(2023),「【觀點】綠色時代最夯關鍵字:ESG、永續、減碳,三個有什麼關聯?」 。網址:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/73723/esg_keywords
21. 科技新報(2021),「「台灣淨零行動聯盟」成立,27 家企業 2030 年辦公據點零碳排」 。網址:https://technews.tw/2021/09/02/net-zero-emissions/
22. 數位時代(2021),「賣車、電池本業都不賺!特斯拉營收淨利卻雙雙破紀錄,靠的是哪兩項無形收入?」 。
網址:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/62520/tesla-bitcoin-regulatory-credits
23. 台玻集團官方網站,網址:http://www.taiwanglass.com/index.php
24. 經濟部工業局(2018),「玻璃相關產業低碳製程技術彙編」。
25. MoneyDJ理財網(2021),「中國拚碳中和終極目標,台玻多面向受惠」。
網址:https://www.moneydj.com/kmdj/news/newsviewer.aspx?a=cc95f85b-0d0e-4d6f-ba40-8a83eac598b4
26. 台玻集團(2021),「2021台玻永續發展報告書」。 |