社會影響力分析架構與個案研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：42

、訪客IP：3.144.124.232

姓名

宋淯騰(Yu-Teng Sung) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

社會影響力分析架構與個案研究
(Social Impact Analytics Framework and Case Study)

相關論文

★ 美國軟體產業創新活動與財務效率分析	★ Performance Measurements of Web 2.0, Social Media, and Mobile Apps for Municipal Emergency Management
★ 中國大陸股權結構與自願性財務預測之關聯性	★ 我國半導體產業下游公司法人說明會對供應鏈上游公司投資現金流量敏感度的影響
★ 線上串流音樂服務之使用者抗拒意圖研究	★ 從認知理論探討創業機會辨識對績效之影響
★ 影響Y世代消費者對智慧綠色產品購買意圖與使用意圖的因素：以智慧節能裝置為例	★ Application of social media mining on the comparison between two-dimensional barcode and near field communication
★ 應用社群探勘技術分析城市之創業精神與新創公司的特性	★ 科技接受度與學習風格對於頭戴式虛擬實境應用在學習行為意圖的影響
★ 電子發票巨量資料視覺化分析－以酒的消費為例	★ 應用文字探勘分析ERP之趨勢發展：以Twitter為例
★ 社群媒體文字採礦之研究：以第三方物流公司為例	★ 應用文字探勘技術分析遊戲產業趨勢：以兩大遊戲展之相關推文為例
★ 台灣有機食品消費與疾病死亡率之視覺化分析	★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2028-8-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

去的研究主要集中在衡量和評估社會影響力，這些研究提到了社會影響力的管理，但管理方面更注重從衡量數據中得出結論，對於數據後續分析和實際應用的關注程度相對較低。然而，社會影響力資料的深度分析 (Analytics) 也是至關重要的。因此提出「社會影響力分析架構」五個行動，每個行動都具有關聯性的任務步驟。首先，行動一是社會影響力資料收集與彙整，組織需要確定範疇並界定活動目標，同時識別相關的利害關係人，將長期影響力資料彙整。其次，行動二是價值與社會影響力分析，分析所有利害關係人的影響力成果和社會價值，分析結果可以為未來的管理行動提供有價值的訊息和指導。第三，行動三是貢獻度分析，組織需要分析組織活動對於實現社會影響力成果的貢獻程度。接下來，行動四是敏感度分析，組織需要分析成果價值的相關變數對於社會影響力的影響程度，並評估可能存在的風險。行動五是社會影響力管理行動，組織將從行動二至行動四的結果中獲取有關社會影響力的相關訊息並進行資料深度分析 (Analytics) ，可以針對顯著的成果或是成果指標來優化相關活動以此來提高社會價值以實踐管理行動。最後會應用此架構於某公益平台的社會影響力資料，得出組織策略目標有達到幫助更多服務對象以及增加組織相關資源以及未來活動改善的洞察指標，使分析架構有實用上的價值與參考性，這個分析架構除了具有實用性，也能夠提供統一的分析標準、指導和方向以及系統性的方法，將影響力資料轉化為一個有價值的工具，幫助組織更好地管理和應對社會影響力的挑戰。

摘要(英)

Past research has primarily focused on measuring and evaluating social impact, with some mention of managing social impact. However, management aspects have placed greater emphasis on drawing conclusions from measurement data, with relatively lower attention given to subsequent data analysis and practical application. Nevertheless, in-depth analysis (Analytics) of social impact data is crucial. Therefore, a "Social Impact Analysis Framework" is proposed, consisting of five interconnected actions, each with related task steps. Firstly, Action 1 involves the collection and aggregation of social impact data. Organizations need to define the scope, set activity objectives, and identify relevant stakeholders, while aggregating long-term impact data. Next, Action 2 focuses on the analysis of value and social impact. It involves analyzing the impact outcomes and social value of all stakeholders, providing valuable information and guidance for future management actions. Action 3 is contribution analysis, where organizations need to analyze the contribution of their activities towards achieving social impact outcomes. Subsequently, Action 4 involves sensitivity analysis, where organizations need to analyze the degree of impact of relevant variables on impact outcomes and evaluate potential risks. Action 5 is social impact management, where organizations derive relevant information about social impact from the results of Actions 2 to 4 and conduct in-depth data analysis (Analytics). This allows for optimizing activities related to significant outcomes or impact indicators, thereby enhancing social value through effective management actions. Finally, this framework will be applied to social impact data from a specific philanthropic platform, resulting in strategic objectives for organizations to assist more service recipients and increase relevant resources, as well as insights for future activity improvements. Thus, the analytical framework has practical value and reference significance. It not only provides practicality but also offers unified analytical standards, guidance, direction, and a systematic approach. It transforms impact data into a valuable tool to help organizations better manage and address the challenges of social impact.

關鍵字(中)

★ 社會影響力分析
★ 社會價值
★ 影響力衡量
★ 影響力管理
★ 影響力會計

關鍵字(英)

★ Social impact analytics
★ social value
★ impact measurement
★ impact management
★ impact accounting

論文目次

中文摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
第二章文獻探討 4
第三章研究方法 10
3.1 架構建立 10
3.2 行動一：社會影響力資料收集與彙整 11
3.3 行動二：價值與社會影響力分析 15
3.4 行動三：貢獻度分析 17
3.5 行動四：敏感度分析 18
3.6 行動五：社會影響力管理行動 19
第四章個案研究 20
4.1 行動一：社會影響力資料收集與彙整 20
4.2 行動二：價值與社會影響力分析 26
4.3 行動三：貢獻度分析 49
4.4 行動四：敏感度分析 55
4.5 行動五：社會影響力管理行動 59
第五章結論與建議 63
參考資料 65

參考文獻

(1) Afum, E., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Baah, C., Asamoah, G., & Kusi, L. Y. (2023). Green market orientation, green value-based innovation, green reputation and enterprise social performance of Ghanaian SMEs: the role of lean management. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-03-2021-0169
(2) Al-Omoush, K., Ribeiro-Navarrete, B., & McDowell, W. C. (2023). The impact of digital corporate social responsibility on social entrepreneurship and organizational resilience. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-11-2022-1613
(3) Ariza-Montes, A., Sianes, A., Fernández-Rodríguez, V., López-Martín, C., Ruíz-Lozano, M., & Tirado-Valencia, P. (2021). Social Return on Investment (SROI) to Assess the Impacts of Tourism: A Case Study. Sage Open, 11(1), 2158244020988733.
(4) Bilbao-Ubillos, J. (2023). The Social Dimension of the European Union: A Means to lock out Social Competition? Social Indicators Research, 165(1), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-03012-6
(5) Cucari, N., Tutore, I., Montera, R., & Profita, S. (2023). A bibliometric performance analysis of publication productivity in the corporate social responsibility field: Outcomes of SciVal analytics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 1-16.
(6) Damtoft, N. F., Lueg, R., van Liempd, D., & Nielsen, J. G. (2023). A critical perspective on the measurement of social value through SROI. In Social Value, Climate Change and Environmental Stewardship: Insights from Theory and Practice (pp. 13-32). Springer.
(7) Di Francesco, A., Pinelli, M., Lettieri, E., Toletti, G., & Galli, M. (2023). Towards a More Inclusive Society: The Social Return on Investment (SROI) of an Innovative Ankle–Foot Orthosis for Hemiplegic Children. Sustainability, 15(5), 4361.
(8) Distelhorst, G., & Shin, J. e. (2023). Assessing the social impact of corporations: Evidence from management control interventions in the supply chain to increase worker wages. Journal of Accounting Research.
(9) Firdaus, F., & Septiady, A. (2023). The effect of Project-Based Learning on the students’ speaking ability. Journal on Education, 5(3), 10105-10112.
(10) Frank, K. A., Lin, Q., Xu, R., Maroulis, S., & Mueller, A. (2023). Quantifying the robustness of causal inferences: Sensitivity analysis for pragmatic social science. Social Science Research, 110, 102815.
(11) Hafiz, N., Mohiuddin, M. F., Latiff, A. R. A., Yasin, I. M., Abd Wahab, S., & Razman, A. (2023). Scaling social impact in women-led social enterprises in developing countries: a knowledge-based perspective. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2022-0667
(12) Impact Frontiers((2023). https://impactfrontiers.org/norms/five-dimensions-of-impact/impact-risk/
(13) Jones, T. M., Fleming, C., Beaver, J., & Anderson, E. (2023). Seattle Public Schools′ Student Survey of School Climate and Social Emotional Learning: Psychometric Analyses in the Context of a Research-Practice Partnership. Child & Youth Care Forum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-023-09731-2
(14) Kaul, A., & Luo, J. (2023). From social responsibility to social impact: A framework and research agenda. Available at SSRN 3575027.
(15) Kumar, S. C. T., Chotia, V., Soni, S., & Khandelwal, V. (2023). Impact investing in action: A framework for sustainability. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 12(2), 245-258.
(16) Luthin, A., Traverso, M., & Crawford, R. H. (2023). Assessing the social life cycle impacts of circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 386, Article 135725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135725
(17) Mair, J., Chien, P. M., Kelly, S. J., & Derrington, S. (2023). Social impacts of mega-events: A systematic narrative review and research agenda. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(2), 538-560.
(18) Makanjuola, A., Lynch, M., Hartfiel, N., Cuthbert, A., & Edwards, R. T. (2023). Prevention of Poor Physical and Mental Health through the Green Social Prescribing Opening Doors to the Outdoors Programme: A Social Return on Investment Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(12), 6111.
(19) Mayer, D. J., & Fischer, R. L. (2022). Exploring Data Use in Nonprofit Organizations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 102197.
(20) Pacey, J., Ludwig, D., Higbea, R., Hajek, R., Molla, A., Booth, A., & Machnik, K. (2023). Examination of Student Knowledge of Social Determinants of Health Using Case Study Simulation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 104(3), e28.
(21) Palil, M. R., Hassan, N. S. A., Jamaluddin, N. A. A., Ismail, I. S., & Samsuddin, M. E. (2023). Social Enterprises Entrepreneur and Social Impacts to Community: A Review Paper. e-BANGI Journal, 20(1).
(22) Ramkissoon, H. (2023). Perceived social impacts of tourism and quality-of-life: A new conceptual model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(2), 442-459.
(23) Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 43(1), 82-115.
(24) Rijke, W. J., Meerman, J., Bloemen, B., Venkatapuram, S., van der Klink, J., & van der Wilt, G. J. (2023). Strategies for Researching Programs′ Impact on Capability: A Scoping Review. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2023.2209027
(25) Rufaedah, D. A., & Yalina, N. (2023). Development of Impact Evaluation on Zakat Fund Utilization Program Using Social Return on Investment (SROI). Management of Zakat and Waqf Journal (MAZAWA), 4(2), 200-221.
(26) Social Value UK((2012). https://socialvalueuk.org/principle-2-understand-what-changes/
(27) Social Value UK((2019).
(28) Social Value UK((2022). https://socialvalueuk.org/principle-8-be-responsive/
(29) Social Value UK((2023a). https://socialvalueuk.org/social-value-practice/
(30) Social Value UK((2023b). https://socialvalueuk.org/principle-5-do-not-overclaim/
(31) Solórzano-García, M., Navío-Marco, J., & Ruiz-Gómez, L. M. (2019). Ambiguity in the attribution of social impact: A study of the difficulties of calculating filter coefficients in the SROI method. Sustainability, 11(2), 386.
(32) Song, B., & Ferguson, M. A. (2023). The importance of congruence between stakeholder prosocial motivation and CSR attributions: effects on stakeholders’ donations and sense-making of prosocial identities. Journal of Marketing Communications, 29(4), 339-357.
(33) Tate, C., O’Neill, C., Tran, N., Heron, L., Kee, F., Tully, M. A., Dallat, M., & Hunter, R. F. (2023). The social return on investment of an urban regeneration project using real-world data: the Connswater Community Greenway, Belfast, UK. Cities & Health, 1-20.
(34) Turpin, A., & Shier, M. L. (2023). Relationships Between Social Entrepreneurial Orientation and Social Work Management Competencies in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations. Human Service Organizations Management Leadership & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2023.2198585
(35) Yu, X. M., & Bi, X. Y. (2023). Scaling strategies, organizational capabilities and scaling social impact: An investigation of social enterprises in China. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12418
(36) Zakaria, Y. A., Iddrisu, T. I., & Arthur, B. K. (2023). Social impact assessment (SIA) of the Tamale viaduct project in Ghana: Stakeholders management practices, better or worse? Heliyon, 9(3), Article e14249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14249

指導教授

沈建文(Chien-wen Shen)

審核日期

2023-7-24

推文