參考文獻 |
1. National Development Council, Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions in 2050, 2022,. https://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/Content_List.aspx?n=B154724D802DC488. Accessed on 5 February, 2022
2. Hale, T., et al., Assessing the rapidly-emerging landscape of net zero targets. Climate Policy, 2022. 22(1): p. 18-29.
3. Lau, H.C. and S.C. Tsai, A Decarbonization Roadmap for Taiwan and Its Energy Policy Implications. Sustainability, 2022. 14(14): p. 8425.
4. IEA, Global Energy Review: CO2 Emissions in 2021-Global Emissions Rebound Sharply to Highest Ever Level. 2022, International Energy Agency Paris, France.
5. Jeudy-Hugo, S., L.L. Re, and C. Falduto, Understanding countries’ net-zero emissions targets. 2021.
6. Bureau of Energy. Taiwan. In: 2020 annual report of Bureau of energy, Taiwan. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Executive Yuan; 2022
7. National Development Council, Phased Goals and Actions Toward Net-Zero Transition, 2022. https://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/Content_List.aspx?n=2D918002A913582A. Accessed on 5 February, 2022
8. IPCC, Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of globalwarming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emissionpathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climatechange,sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, Intergovernmental Panel onClimate Change, Geneva,. 2018.
9. Cheng, F., Taiwan Addresses Climate Change: Policy Learning, Formulation and Implementation. East Asian Policy, 2022. 14(02): p. 38-55.
10. Environmental Protection Administration. Taiwan. Greenhouse gas reduction and management act. Taipei, Taiwan: Environmental Protection Administration, ExecutiveYuan; 2021
11. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment andVivid Economics(2020)Carbon pricing options for Taiwan. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, and Vivid Economics
12. Dos Santos, P.H., et al., The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of cleaner production, 2019. 212: p. 119-138.
13. Sindhwani, R., et al., Modeling the critical success factors of implementing net zero emission (NZE) and promoting resilience and social value creation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022. 181: p. 121759.
14. Burck, J.et.al., Climate Change Performance Index 2023. November 14th, 2022, Germanwatch.
15. Calabrese, A., et al., Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019. 139: p. 155-168.
16. Mohammed, H.J., I.A.M. Al-Jubori, and M.M. Kasim. Evaluating project management criteria using fuzzy analytic hierarchy Process. in AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019. AIP Publishing LLC.
17. Liu, Y., C.M. Eckert, and C. Earl, A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020. 161: p. 113738.
18. Ly, P.T.M., et al., Fuzzy AHP analysis of Internet of Things (IoT) in enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018. 136: p. 1-13.
19. Saaty, T.L., What is the analytic hierarchy process?, in Mathematical models for decision support. 1988, Springer. p. 109-121.
20. Vaidya, O.S. and S. Kumar, Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of operational research, 2006. 169(1): p. 1-29.
21. Vargas, L.G., An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European journal of operational research, 1990. 48(1): p. 2-8.
22. Büyüközkan, G., C.A. Havle, and O. Feyzioğlu, An integrated SWOT based fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MARCOS methodology for digital transformation strategy analysis in airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2021. 97: p. 102142.
23. Asadabadi, M.R., E. Chang, and M. Saberi, Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process (ANP). Cogent Engineering, 2019. 6(1): p. 1623153.
24. Ahmed, F. and K. Kilic, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A performance analysis of various algorithms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2019. 362: p. 110-128.
25. Chan, H.K., X. Sun, and S.-H. Chung, When should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process? Decision Support Systems, 2019. 125: p. 113114.
26. Scrieciu, S.Ş. and Z. Chalabi, Climate policy planning and development impact assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2014. 19: p. 255-260.
27. Solangi, Y.A., et al., Analyzing renewable energy sources of a developing country for sustainable development: an integrated fuzzy based-decision methodology. Processes, 2020. 8(7): p. 825.
28. Shen, Y.-C., C.J. Chou, and G.T. Lin, The portfolio of renewable energy sources for achieving the three E policy goals. Energy, 2011. 36(5): p. 2589-2598.
29. Eskander, S.M. and S. Fankhauser, Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from national climate legislation. Nature Climate Change, 2020. 10(8): p. 750-756.
30. Konidari, P. and D. Mavrakis, A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments. Energy Policy, 2007. 35(12): p. 6235-6257.
31. Press, N.A. and E.N.A.o. Sciences, Negative emissions technologies and reliable sequestration: a research agenda. 2019: National Academies Press.
32. Gland., U.N.E.P.a.I.U.f.C.o.N.N.-b.s.f.c.c.m.N.a.
33. Hasan, M., R. Chapman, and D. Frame, Acceptability of transport emissions reduction policies: A multi-criteria analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020. 133: p. 110298.
34. Hasan, M., R. Chapman, and D. Frame, Understanding Road Transport Emissions Reduction Policies Using Multi-criteria Analysis, in Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. 2022, Springer. p. 3203-3223.
35. Doczy, R. and Y. AbdelRazig, Green buildings case study analysis using AHP and MAUT in sustainability and costs. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 2017. 23(3): p. 05017002.
36. Ohene, E., A.P. Chan, and A. Darko, Prioritizing barriers and developing mitigation strategies toward net-zero carbon building sector. Building and Environment, 2022: p. 109437.
37. Boyce, J.K., Carbon pricing: effectiveness and equity. Ecological Economics, 2018. 150: p. 52-61.
38. Green, J.F., Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environmental Research Letters, 2021. 16(4): p. 043004.
39. Klenert, D., et al., Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change, 2018. 8(8): p. 669-677.
40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Effective carbon rates 2018: Pricing carbon emissions through taxes and emissions trading. OECD Publishing.
41. World Bank. 2022. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing;. © Washington, DC: World Bank. http://localhost:4000//entities/publication/a1abead2-de91-5992-bb7a-73d8aaaf767f License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”42. Cheng, Y., et al., Carbon tax and energy innovation at crossroads of carbon neutrality: Designing a sustainable decarbonization policy. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021. 294: p. 112957.
43. Hu, H., W. Dong, and Q. Zhou, A comparative study on the environmental and economic effects of a resource tax and carbon tax in China: Analysis based on the computable general equilibrium model. Energy Policy, 2021. 156: p. 112460.
44. Tsai, W.-H., S.-Y. Lai, and C.-L. Hsieh, Exploring the impact of different carbon emission cost models on corporate profitability. Annals of Operations Research, 2022: p. 1-34.
45. Hsiao, C.-M., Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions Quota and Optimal Allocation under Uncertainty. Sustainability, 2022. 14(14): p. 8706.
46. Lin, B.Q. and C.C. Huang, Analysis of emission reduction effects of carbon trading: Market mechanism or government intervention? Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2022. 33: p. 28-37.
47. Vats, G. and R. Mathur, A net-zero emissions energy system in India by 2050: An exploration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022. 352: p. 131417.
48. Pye, S., et al., Modelling net-zero emissions energy systems requires a change in approach. Climate Policy, 2021. 21(2): p. 222-231.
49. García-Freites, S., C. Gough, and M. Röder, The greenhouse gas removal potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) to support the UK′s net-zero emission target. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2021. 151: p. 106164.
50. Sezgin, B., et al., Hydrogen energy systems for underwater applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022. 47(45): p. 19780-19796.
51. IEA (2022), Renewables 2022, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022, License: CC BY 4.0
52. Blanco, H., et al., A taxonomy of models for investigating hydrogen energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022. 167: p. 112698.
53. Magzymov, D., B. Dindoruk, and R.T. Johns. Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in the Context of Petroleum Industry: A State-of-the-Art Review. in 2022 SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, IOR 2022. 2022. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).
54. Hong, W.Y., A techno-economic review on carbon capture, utilisation and storage systems for achieving a net-zero CO2 emissions future. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 2022: p. 100044.
55. Morkner, P., et al., Distilling data to drive carbon storage insights. Computers & Geosciences, 2022. 158: p. 104945.
56. English, J.M. and K.L. English, An Overview of Carbon Capture and Storage and its Potential Role in the Energy Transition. First Break, 2022. 40(4): p. 35-40.
57. Viti, M., et al., Knowledge gaps and future research needs for assessing the non-market benefits of Nature-Based Solutions and Nature-Based Solution-like strategies. Science of the Total Environment, 2022: p. 156636.
58. Tyllianakis, E., J. Martin-Ortega, and S.A. Banwart, An approach to assess the world’s potential for disaster risk reduction through nature-based solutions. Environmental Science & Policy, 2022. 136: p. 599-608.
59. Wijsman, K. and M. Berbés-Blázquez, What do we mean by justice in sustainability pathways? Commitments, dilemmas, and translations from theory to practice in nature-based solutions. Environmental Science & Policy, 2022. 136: p. 377-386.
60. Yu, M., K. Wang, and H. Vredenburg, Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021. 46(41): p. 21261-21273.
61. Liang, B., et al., Planted forest is catching up with natural forest in China in terms of carbon density and carbon storage. Fundamental Research, 2022.
62. Valatin, G., Forest Green Infrastructure and the Carbon Storage and Substitution Benefits of Harvested Wood Products, in Green Infrastructure and Climate Change Adaptation. 2022, Springer, Singapore. p. 443-456.
63. Fleischman, F., et al., How politics shapes the outcomes of forest carbon finance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2021. 51: p. 7-14.
64. Raihan, A., et al., Nexus between carbon emissions, economic growth, renewable energy use, urbanization, industrialization, technological innovation, and forest area towards achieving environmental sustainability in Bangladesh. Energy and Climate Change, 2022. 3: p. 100080.
65. Amundson, R. and L. Biardeau, Soil carbon sequestration is an elusive climate mitigation tool. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018. 115(46): p. 11652-11656.
66. Lu, X., et al., Nitrogen deposition accelerates soil carbon sequestration in tropical forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021. 118(16): p. e2020790118.
67. Hübner, R., et al., Soil carbon sequestration by agroforestry systems in China: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021. 315: p. 107437.
68. Rodrigues, L., et al., Achievable agricultural soil carbon sequestration across Europe from country‐specific estimates. Global Change Biology, 2021. 27(24): p. 6363-6380.
69. Schlesinger, W.H. and R. Amundson, Managing for soil carbon sequestration: Let’s get realistic. Global Change Biology, 2019. 25(2): p. 386-389.
70. Marteau, T.M., N. Chater, and E.E. Garnett, Changing behaviour for net zero 2050. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. 375: p. n2293.
71. Carmichael, R., Behaviour change, public engagement and net zero, a report for the committee on climate change. 2019.
72. Haggi, H., et al., Optimal H2 Production and Consumption for Improved Utility Operations: Path to Net-Zero Emission Energy Production. 2022.
73. Azevedo, I., et al., Net-zero emissions energy systems: what we know and do not know. Energy and Climate Change, 2021. 2: p. 100049.
74. TANHIDY, J., Y. NDAPAMURI, and R.J. GUILD, The Church′s Ethical Responsibilities towards Net-Zero Carbon Emissions Objectives. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 2022. 5(2): p. 123-135.
75. Logan, K.G., Transportation in a Net Zero World: Transitioning Towards Low Carbon Public Transport. 2022: Springer Nature.
76. Benton, T.G., et al., A ‘net zero’equivalent target is needed to transform food systems. Nature Food, 2021. 2(12): p. 905-906.
77. Setiawan, I.C. and M. Setiyo, Renewable and Sustainable Green Diesel (D100) for Achieving Net Zero Emission in Indonesia Transportation Sector. Automotive Experiences, 2022. 5(1): p. 1-2.
78. Costa, C., et al., Roadmap for achieving net-zero emissions in global food systems by 2050. Scientific Reports, 2022. 12(1): p. 1-11.
79. Nunes, A., L. Woodley, and P. Rossetti, Re-thinking procurement incentives for electric vehicles to achieve net-zero emissions. Nature Sustainability, 2022: p. 1-6.
80. Mengis, N., et al., Net‐Zero CO2 Germany—A Retrospect From the Year 2050. Earth′s Future, 2022. 10(2): p. e2021EF002324.
81. Cohen, M.A. and M.P. Vandenbergh, The potential role of carbon labeling in a green economy. Energy Economics, 2012. 34: p. S53-S63.
82. Shewmake, S., et al., Predicting consumer demand responses to carbon labels. Ecological Economics, 2015. 119: p. 168-180.
83. Carmichael, R. and T. Wainwright. Psychology and the road to Net Zero. in Clinical Psychology Forum. 2020.
84. Wang, J. and R. Duan, A Comparative Study of Carbon labeling Policy and Application. CCBC 2022, 2022: p. 16.
85. Nelson, S. and J.M. Allwood, Technology or behaviour? Balanced disruption in the race to net zero emissions. Energy Research & Social Science, 2021. 78: p. 102124.
86. Endo, N., et al., Thermal management and power saving operations for improved energy efficiency within a renewable hydrogen energy system utilizing metal hydride hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021. 46(1): p. 262-271.
87. Gabrielli, P., M. Gazzani, and M. Mazzotti, The role of carbon capture and utilization, carbon capture and storage, and biomass to enable a net-zero-CO2 emissions chemical industry. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020. 59(15): p. 7033-7045.
88. Saaty, T.L., The analytic hierarchy process McGraw-Hill. New York, 1980. 324.
89. Buckley, J.J., Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 1985. 17(3): p. 233-247.
90. Jaskowski, P., S. Biruk, and R. Bucon, Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment. Automation in construction, 2010. 19(2): p. 120-126.
91. Meixner, O. Fuzzy AHP group decision analysis and its application for the evaluation of energy sources. in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2009.
92. Ayhan, M.B., A fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection problem: A case study in a Gear motor company. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.2886, 2013.
93. Zahedi, F., The analytic hierarchy process—a survey of the method and its applications. interfaces, 1986. 16(4): p. 96-108.
94. Saaty, T.L., Modeling unstructured decision problems—the theory of analytical hierarchies. Mathematics and computers in simulation, 1978. 20(3): p. 147-158.
95. Saaty, T.L., How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 1990. 48(1): p. 9-26.
96. Csutora, R. and J.J. Buckley, Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 2001. 120(2): p. 181-195.
97. Kannan, D., et al., Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner production, 2013. 47: p. 355-367.
98. Buysse, K. and A. Verbeke, Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic management journal, 2003. 24(5): p. 453-470.
99. Glicken, J., Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls. Environmental Science & Policy, 2000. 3(6): p. 305-310.
100. Reed, M.S., Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological conservation, 2008. 141(10): p. 2417-2431.
101. Manoliadis, O., I. Tsolas, and A. Nakou, Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece: a Delphi study. Construction Management and Economics, 2006. 24(2): p. 113-120.
102. IEA, Transport Improving the Sustainability of Passenger and Freight Transport. (2021). https://www.iea.org/topics/transport. Accessed 23 December, 2022
103. Nyoni, T. and W.G. Bonga, Prediction of co2 emissions in india using arima models. DRJ-Journal of Economics & Finance, 2019. 4(2): p. 01-10.
104. Rahman, A. and M.M. Hasan, Modeling and forecasting of carbon dioxide emissions in Bangladesh using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models. Open Journal of Statistics, 2017. 7(4): p. 560-566.
105. Kamoljitprapa, P. and S. Sookkhee. Forecasting models for carbon dioxide emissions in major economic sectors of Thailand. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2022. IOP Publishing.
106. Sharma, S., A.K. Saxena, and M. Bansal. Forecasting of GHG (greenhouse gas) Emission using (ARIMA) Data Driven Intelligent Time Series Predicting Approach. in 2022 7th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES). 2022. IEEE.
107. Kour, M., Modelling and forecasting of carbon-dioxide emissions in South Africa by using ARIMA model. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2022: p. 1-8.
108. Prananda, J., R. Hantoro, and G. Nugroho, The prediction of carbon dioxide emission using ARIMA for support green energy development in Surabaya Municipality. KnE Energy, 2015: p. 106-110.
109. Lotfalipour, M.R., M.A. Falahi, and M. Bastam, Prediction of CO2 emissions in Iran using grey and ARIMA models. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2013. 3(3): p. 229-237.
110. Guarnaccia, C., et al. ARIMA models application to air pollution data in Monterrey, Mexico. in AIP Conference Proceedings. 2018. AIP Publishing LLC.
111. 2022 National Inventory Report_abstract, R.O.C.T. Environmental Protection Administration, Editor. 2022.
112. Ward, P.J., et al., Natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2020. 20(4): p. 1069-1096.
113. Samset, B.H., J.S. Fuglestvedt, and M.T. Lund, Delayed emergence of a global temperature response after emission mitigation. Nature Communications, 2020. 11(1): p. 3261.
114. Harker, P.T., Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical modelling, 1987. 9(11): p. 837-848.
115. International Energy Agency. (2021). Global Hydrogen Review 2021. OECD Publishing.
|