| 摘要(英) |
In recent years, with the rise of sustainable development concepts, the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Government) indicators of businesses have gradually attracted attention and have become an important consideration for investors when selecting investment targets. This study, using the accommodation industry in Taiwan listed on the stock exchange from 2015 to 2021 as the sample, exploring the correlation between the industry′s overall ESG and financial performance and corporate value under the severe impact of COVID-19. Considering the accommodation industry′s operations being subject to numerous restrictions due to the pandemic and its characteristics of serving people and being a labor-intensive sector, the study further explores whether the social dimension performance of Taiwan′s accommodation industry during the COVID-19 period, in conjunction with government subsidy measures, has a more significant positive explanatory power for its financial performance and corporate value compared to the non-COVID-19 period. The study found that in the Taiwan accommodation industry from 2015 to 2021, the overall ESG performance has a significant positive impact on ROA (Return on Assets), ROE (Return on Equity) and Tobin′s Q. However, the overall ESG performance of the Taiwan accommodation industry during COVID-19 does not have a more significant positive marginal explanatory power for its financial performance compared to the non-COVID-19 period. Additionally, during the COVID-19 period, while the performance of the enterprise environment, social and government dimensions were examined simultaneously, the impact on financial performance and company value was not significant. However, the performance in the social aspect had a positive impact on ROE (Return on Equity) during the pandemic period compared to the non-pandemic period in terms of coefficient direction. |
| 參考文獻 |
交通部觀光局. (2023). 歷年來臺旅客按目的分. Retrieved 2023/4/4 from https://stat.taiwan.net.tw/
金融監督管理委員會. (2020). 公司治理3.0-永續發展藍圖. Retrieved 2023/4/16 from https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202008250004&dtable=News
臺灣旅宿網. (2023). 統計資料. Retrieved 2023/4/7 from https://taiwanstay.net.tw/statistics-hotel
衛生福利部疾病管理署. (2020a). 疾病介紹. Retrieved 2023/4/3 from https://www.cdc.gov.tw/Category/Page/vleOMKqwuEbIMgqaTeXG8A
衛生福利部疾病管理署. (2020b). 109年衛生福利部疾病管理署新聞稿. Retrieved 2023/4/3 from https://www.cdc.gov.tw/Bulletin/Detail/mwGBh07PQ_2FeJvl9xhfZw?typeid=9
衛生福利部疾病管理署. (2021). 110年衛生福利部疾病管理署新聞稿. Retrieved 2023/4/3 from https://www.cdc.gov.tw/Bulletin/Detail/E7bi2j8UYj1Rmz73OPE7Yg?typeid=9
聯合國人類環境會議宣言. (2015). 《人類環境宣言》. Retrieved 2023/4/12 from https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/dunche/dunche.html
Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451-4469.
Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin′s q. Financial management, 70-74.
Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Available at SSRN 2508281.
Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802-830.
Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business. Environmental quality management, 8(1), 37-51.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233.
Friedman, M. (1970). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13(1970), 32-33.
Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. The quarterly journal of Economics, 116(1), 229-259.
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & society, 36(1), 5-31.
Ilyukhin, E. (2015). The impact of financial leverage on firm performance: Evidence from Russia. Корпоративные финансы, 9(2), 24-36.
Lee, E. M., Park, S.-Y., Rapert, M. I., & Newman, C. L. (2012). Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues? Journal of business research, 65(11), 1558-1564.
Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 13(3), 301-318.
Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of money, credit and banking, 1(1), 15-29.
Tsoutsoura, M. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance.
Yeganeh, Y. H., & Barzegar, G. (2014). The effect of disclosure level of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on corporate financial performance (CFP) in Tehran stock exchange. International Journal of Accounting Research, 1(11), 43-51. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit