探討COVID-19期間企業社會責任對企業併購決策的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：43

、訪客IP：18.222.112.252

姓名

楊詠涵(Yung-Han Yang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

探討COVID-19期間企業社會責任對企業併購決策的影響

相關論文

★ 電動車產業之經營策略研究－以F公司為例	★ 機車製造廠於新產品開發之過程管制探討-以Y公司為例
★ 跨境電商之倉儲物流管理研究－以K公司為研究對象	★ 逆向抵押貸款之風險管理政策-以C銀行為研究對象
★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析	★ 以均值回歸特性探討分析師個人評價產生之長短期預測不一致
★ 產業差異對於分析師目標價與推薦門檻影響之探討	★ 分析師營收預測與油價變動關聯性之探討
★ 分析師多年期預測與其預測能力之探討	★ 探討分析師對盈餘成份認定與其對資本市場之影響
★ 探討企業未來性資產對分析師盈餘預測與推薦不一致之影響	★ 以中國新財富票選探討擇時能力對成為明星分析師之影響
★ 分析師觀點建構過度投資指標	★ 公司財務限制與企業社會責任之關聯-以現金股利及庫藏股買回為指標
★ 探討分析師資本支出預測之資訊意涵	★ 過度投資與球場因素對美國職棒關係之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究主要在探討 COVID-19 期間，企業社會責任表現對於企業併購決策的影響。考慮到企業社會責任各面向之間的差異，同時比較了併購方與目標的企業社會責任表現各構面之相關性，檢測其是否會因為在某些面向做得較好，促使該企業選擇與其相同表現之目標。本研究關於企業併購、企業社會責任評分的資料皆取自於台灣經濟新報，選取的樣本時間從 2018 年 2021 年。實證結果顯示企業社會責任對企業併購決策有正向的解釋力。疫情期間併購方之企業社會責任表現與疫情前不存在顯著差異。此外，疫情期間，併購方本身企業社會責任與社會構面表現較佳者傾向選擇社會構面表現、社會構面揭露項表現較佳之併購目標。

摘要(英)

This study investigates the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance on corporate mergers and acquisitions (M&A) decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Taking into consideration the various dimensions of CSR, we compare the correlations between the acquirer and target companies′ CSR performance dimensions and explore whether superior performance in certain dimensions influences the acquirer′s choice of a target with a similar CSR profile. The data on M&A and CSR scores were obtained from Taiwan Economic News for the period between 2018 and 2021. The empirical results indicate a positive explanatory power of CSR performance on M&A decisions. Furthermore, the CSR performance of the acquirer during the pandemic did not significantly differ from its pre-pandemic performance. Additionally, amidst the pandemic, acquirers with better CSR performance, particularly in the social dimension, tended to choose targets with superior performance in social aspects and disclosure items.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業併購
★ 企業社會責任
★ COVID-19疫情

關鍵字(英)

★ Mergers and acquisitions
★ Environmental, Social and governance (ESG) performance
★ COVID-19

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與目的 1
1-2 研究架構 2
第二章、文獻探討 3
2-1 企業社會責任 3
2-2 疫情與企業社會責任 3
2-3 企業併購與企業社會責任 4
2-4 研究假說建立 5
第三章、研究方法 7
3-1 併購樣本來源與選樣方法 7
3-2 模型建立 9
3-3 控制變數說明 12
第四章、實證結果 13
4-1 假說一之實證結果 13
4-2 假說二之實證結果 18
4-3 假說三之實證結果 21
4-4 控制變數敏感性分析迴歸結果 27
第五章、結論與建議 29
5-1 研究結論 29
5-2 研究限制與建議 30
第六章、參考文獻 31

參考文獻

1. Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51-84.
2. Mathieu Gomes, & Sylvain Marsat. (2018). Does CSR impact premiums in M&A transactions? Finance Research Letters, (26), 71-80.
3. Stefano Caiazza , Giuseppe Galloppo , & Viktoriia Paimanova. (2021). The role of sustainability performance after merger and acquisition deals in short and long-term. Journal of Cleaner Production,(314), 127982.
4. Vanhamme, J., and Grobben, B. (2009) Too good to be true! The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 273-283.
5. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., and De Nuccio, E. (2018) Integrated reporting: Development and state of art—The Italian case in the international context. International Journal of Business and Management, 13(11), 233-240.
6. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., and Rubino, M. (2019) Appreciations, criticisms, determinants, and effects of integrated reporting: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 518-528.
7. Aktas, N., De Bodt, E., Cousin, J.G., (2011). Do financial markets care about SRI? Evidence from mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1753-1761.
8. Aouadi, A., Marsat, S., (2016). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, Forthcoming, 1-21.
9. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G., (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23.
10. Cho, H., Ahn, H.S., (2017). Stock payment and the effects of institutional and cultural differences: A study of shareholder value creation in cross-border M&As. International Business Review 26, 461-475.
11. Gregory, A., Tharyan, R., Whittaker, J., (2014). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Disaggregating the effects on cash flow, risk and growth. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(4), 633-657.
12. Ioannou, I., Serafeim, G., (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions.Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834-864.
13. Ferrell, A., Liang, H., Renneboog, L., (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics 122(3), 585-606.
14. Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B., Hansen, J.M., (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30(4), 425-445.
15. Gomes, M., Marsat, S., (2018). Does CSR impact premiums in M&A transactions?. Finance Research Letters 26, 71-80.
16. Gomes, M., (2019), Does CSR influence M&A target choices?, Finance Research Letters, (30), 153-159
17. Hasbrouck, J., (1985). The characteristics of takeover targets and other measures. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(3), 351-362.
18. Palepu, K.G., (1986). Predicting takeover targets: A methodological and empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(1), 3-35.
19. Ahern, K. R.; Daminelli, D.; and Fracassi, C.. (2015).Lost in Translation? The Effect of Cultural Values on Mergers around the World. Journal of Financial Economics, 165–189.
20. Ahern, K. R., and Harford, J..(2014). The Importance of Industry Links in Merger Waves. Journal of Finance, 69, 527–576.
21. Bena, J., and Li, K.. (2014). Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 69 , 1923–1960.
22. Benabou, R., and Tirole, J.(2010). Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility. Economica, 77 , 1–19.
23. Marco, C., and Massimo, C., (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, (57), 365-388.
24. Chandrasekhar, K., and Syed, S., (2019). Socially responsible firms and mergers and acquisitions performance: Australian evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57(1), 101193.
25. Chokri, K., and Melanie, L., (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on Mergers, Acquisitions & Corporate Restructurings. Business, 1(2), 102-114.
26. Ioannis, T., and Athanasios., (2021). The effect of ESG on value creation from mergers and acquisitions. What changed during the COVID-19 pandemic? Corporate Governance, 21(6)
27. Brammer, S., Brooks, C., and Pavelin, S., (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial management, 35(3), 97-116.
28. Mishra, D. R., (2017). Post-innovation CSR performance and firm value. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 285-306.
29. Tampakoudis, I., Noulas, A., Kiosses, N., and Drogalas, G., (2021). The effect of ESG on value creation from mergers and acquisitions. What changed during the COVID-19 pandemic?. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
30. Fred, B., and Seong, K.B., (2018). The Effect of Cultural Similarity on Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(5).
31. Zhenkun, W., and Weijie., (2021). Corporate social responsibility overinvestment in mergers and acquisitions. International Review of Financial Analysis, 78.
32. Stefano, C., and Giuseppe., (2021). The role of sustainability performance after merger and acquisition deals in short and long-term. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314(10).
33. PwC Taiwan發布《2022全球併購產業趨勢報告》：2021年全球併購交易金額和交易量皆創歷史新高。

指導教授

黃承祖(Cheng-Tsu Huang)

審核日期

2023-7-27

推文