博碩士論文 110423031 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:37 、訪客IP:3.128.170.81
姓名 單宇浩(Yu-Hao Shan)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱
(When the Brand’s Stance is Against Yours. How Brand Loyalty, Product Category, and Self-Construal Determine the Impact of Corporate Political Advocacy)
相關論文
★ 網站設計探討—以國內外連鎖飯店集團為例★ 智慧型手機使用者介面與消費者態度之關聯
★ 零售業全通路策略分析 -以Family Mart為例★ 應用服務藍圖及顧客旅程優化汽車租賃業之服務流程: 以某汽車租賃業為例
★ 顧客對折扣促銷的評價-探討商店定價策略、促銷語意線索與折扣深度對消費者認知的影響★ 網路拍賣中外部線索的一致性:在不同的資訊不對稱程度下,起始價格以及賣方聲譽對於拍賣結果影響之探討。
★ 影響金融服務業之多重通路使用者評估通路整合性的因素★ 影響網路口碑行為意圖之因素分析
★ 在多通路環境中,實體通路的存在如何影響顧客決策★ 混合情緒操控與間接體驗產品途徑對消費者之影響-以創新產品為主
★ 服務業不同廣告型式的效果如何受消費者性別及代言人類型而改變★ 消費者於多通路環境下之跨通路搭便車行為之決定因素
★ 如何撰寫較好的網路口碑★ 探討線上環境中互動與故事對廣告效果之影響
★ 不同決策特質與搜尋時間壓力下部落格設計與使用者滿意度之探討★ 主購社群關係與主購經驗分享對網路合購行為因素影響之探討
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2028-5-3以後開放)
摘要(中) 隨著越來越多消費者期望品牌在分歧的政治和社會問題上採取立場,企業政治倡導 (CPA) 變得越來越普遍。本研究調查了品牌忠誠度、產品類別 (享樂型或功能型) 和自我解釋 (獨立或相互依賴) 如何影響消費者對品牌的選擇意願。雖然過去多數研究表明 CPA 參與的負面淨效應,但本研究認為,仍有特定因素可以透過增加消費者的購買意願來降低負面影響。本研究的貢獻包含表明忠誠度和產品類別在 CPA 影響中的作用,並讓品牌和零售商能夠依據自身情況制定 CPA 策略。品牌可以根據他們銷售的產品類型和客戶的特徵來考慮是否表達他們對分歧的社會或政治議題的看法。
摘要(英) Corporate political advocacy (CPA) has become more prevalent as consumers increasingly expect brands to take stances on political and social issues. This study investigates how brand loyalty, product category (hedonic or utilitarian), and self-construal (independent or interdependent) impact consumers′ choices in response to a brand′s CPA stance. While most research suggests a negative net effect of CPA engagement, this study argues that specific cases can attenuate the negative effect by increasing consumers′ willingness to choose their products. This study’s contributions include highlighting the role of consumer loyalty and product categories in influencing the impact of CPA and enabling brand owners and retailers to develop CPA strategies. Brands can consider whether to express their views on divisive social or political issues based on the types of products they sell and the characteristics of their customers.
關鍵字(中) ★ 企業政治倡導
★ 品牌忠誠度
★ 享樂型產品
★ 功能型產品
★ 自我解釋
關鍵字(英) ★ Corporate political advocacy
★ brand loyalty
★ hedonic product
★ utilitarian product
★ self-construal
論文目次 Abstract i
Table of Contents ii
List of Tables iii
List of Figures iv
1. Introduction 1
2. Theoretical Background 5
2.1 Corporate Political Advocacy (CPA) 5
2.2 Product Category 6
2.3 Brand Loyalty 9
2.4 Self-Construal 10
3. Methodology 14
3.1 Study 1 14
3.1.1.1 Pretest 1 14
3.1.1.2 Pretest 2 17
3.1.2 Measurement and Procedure 20
3.1.3 Result 22
3.1.3.1 Measurement Model 22
3.1.3.2 Hypothesis Testing 23
3.1.4 Discussion 26
3.2 Study 2 27
3.2.1 Measurement and Procedure 27
3.2.2 Result 29
3.2.2.1 Measurement Model 29
3.2.2.2 Hypothesis Testing 31
3.2.3 Discussion 39
4. General Discussion 40
5. Limitations and Future Research Directions 42
References 43
參考文獻 Adaval, R. (2001). Sometimes it just feels right: The differential weighting of affect-consistent and affect-inconsistent product information. Journal of consumer research, 28(1), 1-17.
Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 203-214.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing letters, 2, 159-170.
Bhagwat, Y., Warren, N. L., Beck, J. T., & Watson, G. F. (2020). Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value. Journal of Marketing, 84(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920937000
Bremmer, I., & Kupchan, C. (2022). Top Risks 2022. Eurasia Group. https://www.eurasiagroup.net/issues/top-risks-2022
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.
Dodd, M. D., & Supa, D. (2015). Testing the viability of corporate social advocacy as a predictor of purchase intention. Communication research reports, 32(4), 287-293.
Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of consumer research, 32(3), 378-389.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 343-373.
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: effects of speakers′ assumptions about what others know. Journal of personality and social psychology, 62(3), 378.
Guest, L. (1944). A study of brand loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28(1), 16.
Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial management & data systems.
Hydock, C., Paharia, N., & Blair, S. (2020). Should Your Brand Pick a Side? How Market Share Determines the Impact of Corporate Political Advocacy. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1135-1151.
Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., & Arnold, M. J. (2006). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of business research, 59(9), 974-981.
Khamitov, M., Wang, X., & Thomson, M. (2019). How well do consumer-brand relationships drive customer brand loyalty? Generalizations from a meta-analysis of brand relationship elasticities. Journal of consumer research, 46(3), 435-459.
Klostermann, J., Hydock, C., & Decker, R. (2021). The effect of corporate political advocacy on brand perception: an event study analysis. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(5), 780-797.
Kühnen, U., Hannover, B., & Schubert, B. (2001). The semantic–procedural interface model of the self: The role of self-knowledge for context-dependent versus context-independent modes of thinking. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(3), 397.
Leguina, A. (2015). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). In: Taylor & Francis.
Liu, T. C., Wang, C. Y., & Wu, L. W. (2010). Moderators of the negativity effect: Commitment, identification, and consumer sensitivity to corporate social performance. Psychology & marketing, 27(1), 54-70.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224.
Mothersbaugh, D. L., Hawkins, D. I., Kleiser, S. B., Mothersbaugh, L. L., & Watson, C. F. (2020). Consumer behavior: Building marketing strategy. McGraw-Hill Education New York, NY, USA.
Mukherjee, S., & Althuizen, N. (2020). Brand activism: Does courting controversy help or hurt a brand? International journal of research in marketing, 37(4), 772-788.
Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A. E., Steele, G. M., & Thompson, A. W. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 901-907.
Nalick, M., Josefy, M., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. (2016). Corporate sociopolitical involvement: A reflection of whose preferences? Academy of management perspectives, 30(4), 384-403.
Ng, S., & Houston, M. J. (2006). Exemplars or beliefs? The impact of self-view on the nature and relative influence of brand associations. Journal of consumer research, 32(4), 519-529.
Odin, Y., Odin, N., & Valette-Florence, P. (2001). Conceptual and operational aspects of brand loyalty: An empirical investigation. Journal of business research, 53(2), 75-84.
Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43-53.
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4_suppl1), 33-44.
Sameeni, M. S., Ahmad, W., & Filieri, R. (2022). Brand betrayal, post-purchase regret, and consumer responses to hedonic versus utilitarian products: The moderating role of betrayal discovery mode. Journal of business research, 141, 137-150.
Schmalz, S., & Orth, U. R. (2012). Brand attachment and consumer emotional response to unethical firm behavior. Psychology & marketing, 29(11), 869-884.
Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. Journal of interactive marketing, 21(4), 76-94.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 20(5), 580-591.
Swaminathan, V., Page, K. L., & Gürhan-Canli, Z. (2007). “My” brand or “our” brand: The effects of brand relationship dimensions and self-construal on brand evaluations. Journal of consumer research, 34(2), 248-259.
Torelli, C. J. (2006). Individuality or conformity? The effect of independent and interdependent self-concepts on public judgments. Journal of consumer psychology, 16(3), 240-248.
van der Westhuizen, L.-M. (2018). Brand loyalty: exploring self-brand connection and brand experience. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
Weber, T. J., Hydock, C., Ding, W., Gardner, M., Jacob, P., Mandel, N., Sprott, D. E., & Van Steenburg, E. (2021). Political Polarization: Challenges, Opportunities, and Hope for Consumer Welfare, Marketers, and Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 40(2), 184-205.
Wettstein, F., & Baur, D. (2016). “Why should we care about marriage equality?”: Political advocacy as a part of corporate responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 138(2), 199-213.
White, K., Argo, J. J., & Sengupta, J. (2012). Dissociative versus associative responses to social identity threat: The role of consumer self-construal. Journal of consumer research, 39(4), 704-719.
YouGov. (2018). The social voice brands. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/economy/articles-reports/2018/10/11/social-voice-brands
Zhao, M., Hoeffler, S., & Zauberman, G. (2011). Mental simulation and product evaluation: The affective and cognitive dimensions of process versus outcome simulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 827-839.
指導教授 謝依靜(Yi-Ching Hsieh) 審核日期 2023-6-13
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明