博碩士論文 110454027 詳細資訊



以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：31 、訪客IP：18.227.190.93
姓名 徐詩喬(Shih-Chiao Hsu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 產業經濟研究所在職專班
論文名稱 女性董事及研發投資比例對公司經營績效的影響
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中) 近年來，董事性別平等及女性董事的推動為國際趨勢，使得董事會的性別比例也成為國際上重要的研究議題。另一方面，企業得以擺脫經濟衰退、立足勝競爭對手的利基點上，企業研發投資也為廣受討論的議題。
　　2022年調查由台灣女性治理之138家上市公司指出，女性領導者欲增加投資的領域範圍，最高比例為創新及研發。故本研究探討女性董事比例，研發投資比例，以及女性董事比例與研發投資比例都居於高點時對於公司經營績效如Tobin’s Q，資產投報率 (ROA) 及股東權益報酬率(ROE) 的影響。
　　以2012年至2020年之上市櫃公司為研究對象，女性董事比例以總人數即占比作為衡量標準，而研發投資比例則以財報中的研究發展費在營業收入淨額之占比作為度量衡。實證結果發現女性董事比例與ROA及ROE有正向的顯著相關，表示女性董事比例越高，ROA及ROE也會相對提高；與Tobin’s Q則無顯著相關。研發投資比例與Tobin’s Q，ROA及ROE並無發現顯著相關，顯示研發投資比例對公司經營績效的影響並不明顯。前10%之女性董事及研發投資比例之交乘項則是與Tobin’s Q呈現顯著之負向相關，代表過高的女性董事比例降低研發投資對於公司市場價值的正向影響；另一方面，ROA出現顯著的正向相關，凸顯了延攬更多的女性董事在研發投資比例相對較高時，對資產報酬率產生了正向調節的效果；反之，與ROE則無表現出顯著的相關性，故此建議女性董事多與不同持分者對話，以提升股東權益報酬率。
摘要(英) In recent years, the promotion of gender equality and the female directors have become an international trend, making gender diversity of the board an important research topic at the international level. On the other hand, the investment in research and development (the “R&D”) is also a widely discussed topic for companies to overcome economic recession and establish a niche position to outperform their competitors.
　　A 2022 survey of 138 listed companies administered by female directors in Taiwan suggested that female leaders seek to expand the scope of investment with the highest proportion in R&D. Therefore, this study explores the impact of the ratio of female directors, the ratio of R&D investment, and the interaction of female directors and R&D investment when they are at a relatively high level on corporate performance such as Tobin′s Q, ROA and ROE.
　　Listed OTC companies from 2012 to 2020 are used as the research object. The ratio of female directors is measured by the total number of directors, while the ratio of R&D investment is measured by the proportion of R&D expenses in net operating income in financial reports. Empirical results indicate a positive and significant correlation between the ratio of female directors and returns to asset and equity, suggesting that hiring more female directors will augment the firm’s ROA and ROE, despite no significant connection to Tobin′s Q. Whereas, the ratio of R&D investment exhibits no significant correlation with Tobin’s Q, ROA and ROE, entailing that R&D investment has no substantial bearing on the corporate performance. Finally, taking the top 10% of R&D investment and female directors into consideration, their interaction shows negative correlation with Tobin’s Q, revealing that overly high ratio of female directors will attenuate the effect of R&D on the firm′s value, whilst its positive and significant correlation with ROA demonstrates that a high ratio of female directors will moderate the effect of R&D on corporate performance; in spite of no significant connection to ROE, highlighting the need for female directors to communicate with different stakeholders to improve the ROE.
關鍵字(中) ★ 資產報酬率
★ 股東權益報酬率
★ 女性董事
★ 研發		 關鍵字(英) ★ Return to Asset
★ Return to Equity
★ Female Directors
★ Research and Development
論文目次 摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
一、 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究流程 4
二、 文獻探討及建立研究假說 5
2-1 女性董事與公司經營績效 5
2-2 研發投資與公司經營績效 6
2-3 女性董事及創新活動（公司研發投資）與公司經營績效 8
三、 研究方法 11
3-1 樣本選取與資料來源 11
3-2 研究設計與模型 11
3-3 研究變數之定義 14
四、 實證結果 18
4-1 敘述統計 18
4-2 Hausman 檢驗 20
4-3 Pearson相關係數分析 20
4-4 迴歸分析結果 22
五、 結論與建議 33
5-1 研究結論 33
5-2 研究限制與建議 34
參考文獻 35
參考文獻 1. 王曉雯、王泰昌與吳明政（2008）。企業經營型態與研發活動績效。管理學報，25(2)，173-193。
2. 台灣女董事協會、安永聯合會計師事務所（2021）。女性治理白皮書，17-18。
3. 台灣女董事協會、安永聯合會計師事務所（2022）。女性治理白皮書，22-25。
4. 台灣女董事協會、安永聯合會計師事務所（2023）。女性治理白皮書，1-12。
5. 任頲、王峥（2010）。女性參與高管團隊對企業績效的影響：基於中國民營企業的實證研究。南開管理評論，13(5)，81-91。
6. 林欣儀（2017）。董事會性別對企業財務決策與企業績效是否有顯著影響。國立成功大學財務金融研究所。
7. 吳佳穎（2001）。台灣資訊電子產業研究發展活動與公司經營績效之研究。國立交通大學科技管理研究所。
8. 金融監督管理委員會（2023年3月28日）。上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案。https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202303280001&dtable=News
9. 洪麗芳（2004）。股權結構、財務決策與公司績效關聯性之研究。中原大學會計研究所。
10. 張琬渝（2012）。創新資本與社會資本對組織財務績效之影響－以人力資本為調節變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
11. 陳威廷（2001）。研究發展支出與市場價值關聯性之實證研究。中國文化大學會計研究所。
12. 楊志龍（2018）。研發、專利對公司經營績效之影響：以台灣高科技產業為例。國立交通大學科技管理研究所。
13. 蔡明宏、翁培師、王子綾、張航（2020）。家族企業與集團企業中董事會性別組成對公司的影響：績效、研發投資及現金持有。管理學報，37(1)，35-68。
14. 歐進士（1998）。我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯性之實證研究。中山管理評論，6(2)，357-386。
15. 賴維宏（2019）。董事會多樣性與企業經營績效之關聯研究--以策略變動為調節變數。淡江大學管理科學學系。
英文文獻
1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and the performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
2. Ambreen, S., & Aftab, J. (2016). Impact of free cash flow on profitability of firms listed in Karachi Stock Exchange. Euro-Asian Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(4), 113-122.
3. Bazel-Shoham, O., Almor, T., & Lee, S. M. (2018). The effect of board gender diversity on R&D. (Fox School of Business Research Paper No. 18-025). The 2018 Engaged Management Scholarship Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1997). Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 693-728.
5. Chan, L. K. C., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431-2456.
6. Chauvin, K. W., & Hirschey, M. (1993). Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financial Management, 22(4), 128-140.
7. Chen, S., Ni, X., & Tong, J. Y. (2016). Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: A case of R&D investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 599-621.
8. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S.W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74.
9. Clinch, G. (1991). Employee compensation and firm’s research and development activity. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(1), 59-78.
10. Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20-32.
11. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C.B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102-111.
12. Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39(C), 193-209.
13. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender, Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 85-106.
14. Gilman, J. J. (1978). Stock price and optimum research spending. Research Management, 21(1), 34-36.
15. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-296.
16. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M.-J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684.
17. Hillman, A. J., Cannella A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747-763.
18. Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457-1498.
19. Jose, M. L., Nichols, L. M., & Stevens, J. L. (1986). Contributions of diversification, promotion and R&D to the value of multi-product firms: A Tobin’s q approach. Financial Management, 15(4), 33-42.
20. Klein, A. (2002). Audit Committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375-400.
21. Koellinger, P. (2008). The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance－Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe. Research Policy, 37(8), 1317-1328.
22. Krüger, P., Landier, A., & Thesmar, D. (2015). The WACC fallacy: The real effects of using a unique discount rate. The Journal of Finance, 70(3), 1253-1285.
23. Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28(C), 169-184.
24. Marques, C. S., & Ferreira, J. (2009). SME innovative capacity, competitive advantage and performance in a ‘traditional’ industrial region of Portugal. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 4(4), 53-68.
25. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
26. McLeish, K. N., & Oxboy, R. J. (2007). Gender, affect and intertemporal consistency: An experimental approach (IZA Discussion Papers No.2663). Institute for the Study of Labor. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-20080415129
27. Miller, D. T., Downs, J. S., & Prentice, D. A. (1998). Minimal conditions for the creation of a unit relationship: The social bond between birthdaymates. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(3), 475-481.
28. Nadeem, M., Suleman, T., & Ahmed, A. (2019). Women on boards, firm risk and the profitability nexus: Does gender diversity moderate the risk and return relationship? International Review of Economics & Finance, 64, 427-442.
29. OANDA Global Markets Limited (n.d.)。美股投資教學 –股東權益報酬率 ROE與EPS間的關聯性解析。https://www.oanda.com/bvi-ft/lab-education/invest_us_stock/roe
30. Parasuramen, A., & Zeren L. M. (1983). R&D’s relationship with profits and sales. Research Management, 26(1), 25-28.
31. Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(6), 605-628.
32. Randøy, T., Thomsen, S., & Oxelheim, L. (2006). A Nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. (Nordic Innovation Centre Project No. 05030). Nordic Innovation Centre. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:707100/FULLTEXT02.pdf
33. Riley, W. B., Jr., & Chow, K. V. (1992). Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(6), 32-37.
34. Roberts, P. W., & Amit, R. (2003). The dynamics of innovative activity and competitive advantage: The case of Australian retail banking, 1981 to 1995. Organization Science, 14(2), 107-122.
35. Schubert, R., Brown, M., Gysler, M., & Brachinger, H. W. (1999). Financial decision-making: Are women really more risk-averse? American Economic Review, 89(2), 381-385.
36. Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration (pp. 33-38). Sage Publications.
37. Sher, P. J., & Yang, P. Y. (2005). The effect of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: The evidence of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Technovation, 25(1), 33-43.
38. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355-372.
39. Solomon, S. M. (2016, September 11). Seeking critical mass of gender equality in the boardroom. The New York Times. https://archive.nytimes.com/dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/seeking-critical-mass-of-gender-equality-in-the-boardroom
40. Sundén, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88(2), 207-211.
41. Trinidad, C., & Normore, A. H. (2005). Leadership and gender: A dangerous liaison? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26(7), 574-590.
42. Wagner,J. A., III, Stimpert, J. L., & Fubara, E. I. (1998). Board composition and organizational performance: Two studies of insider/outsider effects. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 655-677.
指導教授 蔡栢昇 鄭有為(Pak-Sing Choi Albert Yu-Wei Cheng) 審核日期 2024-1-24
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題，請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407，或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明