臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗編製及其信度與效度之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：65

、訪客IP：18.191.147.105

姓名

吳欣玲(HSIN-LING WU) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

學習與教學研究所

論文名稱

臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗編製及其信度與效度之研究
(Development, Reliability, and Validity Study of the Taiwanese Children′s Chinese Depth of Vocabulary)

相關論文

★ 建置臺灣兒童中文文字識詞測驗及其相關研究	★ 數學識讀文本發展與研究--以七年級的負數與分數單元為例
★ 臺灣中學生同儕教學對數學焦慮與學習成效影響之研究	★ 人格特質、投入程度與自我效能之關聯 ─以國小食農教育為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-6-21以後開放)

摘要(中)

本研究旨在編製「臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗」，使其得以使用於母語為中文的小學一至六年級的兒童，以補充國內測量詞彙深度工具的缺乏。測驗編製的理論基礎來自 Schmitt (2014)的詞彙深度工具的理論。本研究分為預式與正式階段，在預式階段，受試者為國小一至四年級的學生，人數共有60人，預式題目共有40 組試題(240個子題)；在正式階段，測驗試題共有32組試題，受試者總計242位國小一至六年級的兒童，進行團體施測。本研究以古典測驗理論 (CTT)及試題反應理論(IRT)進行試題分析，並統計學生的能力值及平均答對率。試題分析以及 Rasch 模式分析指出，本測驗的試題難度偏易，具有良好的鑑別度，且測驗試題與 Rasch 模式的適配程度良好。在信度方面，內部一致性Cronbach′s α 係數為 .94、PCM信度為.93。在效度方面，與畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗之同時效度為.52，同時與其月齡之相關為.51。綜合上述，本測驗具有良好之信度及效度，並顯示出本測驗可有效測量國小一至六年級學生的詞彙深度。此測驗將有助於未來兒童的詞彙、閱讀發展及教學診斷、介入等研究。

摘要(英)

This study aims to develop the Taiwanese Children′s Chinese Depth of Vocabulary Test of elementary school students in Taiwan. The test is designed to address the lack of vocabulary depth assessment tools for Chinese-speaking students in grades one to six. The theoretical framework for test development is based on Schmitt′s (2014) Depth of Vocabulary Tool. The study consists of two phases: a pilot phase and a formal phase. In the pilot phase, 60 students from grades one to four participated, and a set of 40 test items (240 sub-items) was administered. The formal phase involved 242 elementary school students from grades one to six, and a total of 32 test item sets were administered in a group setting. The test items were analyzed using Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the students′ ability values and average item response rates. The item analysis and Rasch model analysis indicated that the test items were relatively easy in difficulty, had good discriminability, and showed a good fit with the Rasch model. The reliability analysis yielded an internal consistency Cronbach′s α coefficient of .94 and a Person Separation Index reliability of .93. In terms of validity, the test demonstrated concurrent validity with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (r = .52) and a correlation with age (r = .51). Overall, the Taiwanese Children′s Chinese Depth of Vocabulary Test exhibited good reliability and validity, and it effectively measured depth of vocabulary of elementary school students in grades one to six. This test will be valuable for future research on children′s vocabulary and reading development, as well as educational diagnosis and intervention.

關鍵字(中)

★ 詞彙知識
★ 詞彙廣度
★ 詞彙深度
★ 詞彙測驗
★ 試題反應理論

關鍵字(英)

★ Vocabulary knowledge
★ Vocabulary breadth
★ Vocabulary depth
★ Vocabulary test
★ Item Response Theory

論文目次

摘要...........................I
英文摘要............................II
目錄................................IV
圖目錄..............................VII
表目錄..............................VIII
第一章緒論........................1
第一節研究背景與動機...............1
第二節研究目的.....................5
第三節名詞解釋......................6
第二章文獻探討......................7
第一節詞彙知識的廣度與深度...........7
第二節詞彙知識與閱讀理解.............10
第三節詞彙及語言能力與社經地位........12
第四節試題反應理論.................. 14
第五節國內外詞彙語言測驗工具..........18
一、畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗..................18
二、歐洲詞彙測驗.......................19
三、詞彙程級測驗.......................21
四、詞彙知識五級量表...................24
五、詞彙聯想測驗.......................26
六、國內的中文詞彙語言測驗工具..........28
第六節小結..........................30
第三章研究方法.......................31
第一節參與者.........................32
一、預試對象...........................32
二、正式施測對象.......................33
第二節研究工具.......................34
一、臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗測驗.........34
二、修訂畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗..............38
三、家庭富裕量表III....................39
第三節施測及資料分析方法..............40
一、預試階段...........................40
二、正式階段...........................48
第四章研究結果.......................54
第一節試題分析結果...................54
一、預試(60人).........................54
二、正式施測(242人)....................63
第二節信度分析結果...................71
一、內部一致性.........................71
二、Rasch 模式的信度指標...............71
第三節效度分析結果...................72
一、效標關聯效度PPVT-R.................72
二、建構效度...........................72
第五章討論與建議.......................75
第一節測驗性質.......................75
第二節研究限制與未來測驗應用..........76
第三節結論..........................79
第六章參考文獻........................83
一、中文文獻...........................83
二、外文文獻...........................85
附錄.............................................96
附錄一臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗每組試題與子題的詞彙..96
附錄二正式試題的每組階難度.......................105
附錄三各年級在臺灣兒童詞彙深度測驗之得分..........121
附錄四各年級在FAS作為社經地位之分數...............122
附錄五臺灣兒童詞彙深度測驗每組試題能力之表現.......123
附錄六 FAS 問卷內容..............................139
附錄七知情同意書................................140

圖目錄
圖1 EVST測驗英文題目例題..........................21
圖2 VLT測驗英文題目例題...........................23
圖3 新式VLT測驗英文題目例題........................23
圖4 VKS五級量表...................................26
圖5 WAT測驗英文題目例題...........................28
圖6 華語詞彙深度測驗例題..........................29
圖7 測驗題目設計範例.............................38
圖8 指導語.......................................42
圖9 指導語.......................................42
圖10練習題.......................................43
圖 11 指導語....................................43
圖 12 指導語....................................43
圖 13 指導語....................................44
圖 14 測驗題目..................................44
圖 15 指導語....................................45
圖 16 指導語....................................46
圖 17 預試施測流程................................47
圖 18 正式施測流程................................50
圖 19 受試者在臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗的整體表現.....68
圖 20 各年級在測驗分數的盒形圖(Box plot)...........70
圖 21 1_I該組試題得分之表現.......................71

表目錄
表 1預試樣本預覽表...............................33
表 2正式施測樣本預覽表............................33
表 3 兒童中文詞彙深度測驗題目範例..................35
表 4 測驗試題的古典難度、鑑別度及Rasch 難度........55
表 5「臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗」正式題目32題之PCM各分數難度..64
表 6多點計分模式的試題難度參數估計值之MNSQ..........65
表 7 「臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗」正式試題之每組試題之鑑別度...67
表 8「台灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗」之描述統計.............68
表 9 臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗分數在不同年級之描述統計....69
表 10「臺灣兒童中文詞彙深度測驗」正式試題之信度分析.....72
表 11 各年級在FAS問卷分數之描述統計................73
表 12 「詞彙深度測驗總得分數」、「月齡」、「社經地位」、「PPVT-R原始分數」、「 PPVT-R標準分數」之相關..............74

參考文獻

一、中文文獻
方金雅 (2001)。多向度詞彙評量與教學之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
王宣惠、洪儷瑜、辜玉旻 (2012)。小學中年級學童詞素覺識與閱讀理解之相關研究。Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly，20，1。
余民寧 (2020)。量表編制與發展: Rasch 測量模型的應用。新北:心理。
吳幼妃 (1980)。社經地位、智力、性別及城鄉背景與兒童語言能力關係之研究。國立高雄師範學院教育學系及教育研究所教育學刊，2，93-119。
吳武典、張正芬。(1984)。國語文能力測驗之編製及相關研究。
吳淑娟 (2001)。國小閱讀理解困難學童之詞彙能力分析研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所，臺北市。
李曉 (2007)。詞彙量、詞彙深度知識與語言綜合能力關係研究。外語教學與研究：外國語文雙月刊，39(5)，352-359。
李麗、張東波、趙守輝 (2013)。新加坡華族兒童的家庭華語讀寫環境與詞彙知識和閱讀能力。華語文教學研究，10(4)，109-130。
李麗綺 (2003)。國小低年級學童詞彙能力與閱讀理解能力之相關研究。台中教育大學測驗統計研究所碩士論文。未出版。
林寶貴(2004)。溝通障礙：理論與實務。台北：心理。
邱皓政 (2006)。量化研究與統計分析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
胡裕樹(1992) 。現代漢語。香港：三聯書店有限公司
張貴琳 (2013)。青少年線上閱讀素養評量工具之發展. 教育實踐與研究， 26(2)，29-65。
張境桓、簡馨瑩(2018)。幼兒推論理解表現分析之研究。幼兒教育，(326)， 121-133。
教育研究院(2020)。遣辭用「據」－臺灣華語文能力第一套標準。台北：教研究院。
教育部(2002)。國語文教育叢書43-國小學童常用詞集調查報告書。台北：教育部。
郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量。臺北市：精華。
郭伯臣、吳慧珉、陳俊華(2012)。試題反應理論在教育測驗上之應用。新竹縣教育研究集刊，民101，05-40。
陳彥君、洪素蘋(2019)。中學生現代公民核心素養之測驗編製。教育實踐與研究，32(2)，39-79。
陸莉、劉鴻香(1994)。修訂畢保德圖畫詞集測驗(PPVI-R)(Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised)。台北：心理出版社。
辜玉旻、張菀真(2016)。探討不同維度的詞彙知識與閱讀理解的關係。人文與社會科學簡訊，17(2)，18-24。
黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏(2012)。「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及其信度報告。測驗學刊，59，581-607。
楊坤堂、張世彗、李水源(2005)，學前幼兒與國小低年級兒童口語語法能力診斷測驗。台北:臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。
詹沛達、王文中、王立君(2013)。項目反應理論新進展之題組反應理論。心理科學進展，21(12)，22-65。
雷達莉 (2016)。華語學習者詞彙廣度與深度知識測試的設計。
劉惠美、陳昱君 (2015)。華語嬰幼兒表達性詞彙的語意內容及詞類組成之發展。教育心理學報，47(2)，217-242。
鄧蔭萍 (2020)。家庭社經地位與母親教養效能、幼兒適應行為及詞彙理解能力之關係。教育心理學報，51(4)，663-686。
簡馨瑩、趙子揚、王繼伶(2014)。「幼兒工作記憶測驗」之編製。測驗學刊，61(2)， 159-181。

二、外文文獻
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). Academic press.
Barrow, J., Nakanishi, Y., & Ishino, H. (1999). Assessing Japanese college students′ vocabulary knowledge with a self-checking familiarity survey. System, 27(2), 223-247.
Binder, K. S., Cote, N. G., Lee, C., Bessette, E., & Vu, H. (2017). Beyond breadth: The contributions of vocabulary depth to reading comprehension among skilled readers. Journal of research in reading, 40(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12069
Bracewell, R. J., Frederiksen, C. H., & Frederiksen, J. D. (1982). Cognitive processes in composing and comprehending discourse. Educational Psychologist, 17(3), 146-164.
Bruton, A. (2009). Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 136-140.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2014). Reading comprehension and vocabulary: Is vocabulary more important for some aspects of comprehension?. LAnnee psychologique, 114(4), 647-662.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and writing, 12(3), 169-190.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies (No. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Chall, J. S. (1996). American reading achievement: Should we worry?. Research in the Teaching of English, 30(3), 303-310.
Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language learning & technology, 2(1), 21-39.
Cronbach, L. J. (1942). An analysis of techniques for diagnostic vocabulary testing. The journal of educational research, 36(3), 206-217.
Currie, C. E., Elton, R. A., Todd, J., & Platt, S. (1997). Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health education research, 12(3), 385-397.
Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.). (2007). Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 19(4), 450-466.
Dunn, L. M. (1959). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. American guidance service, Incorporated.
Fan, N. (2020). Strategy use in second language vocabulary learning and its relationships with the breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: A structural equation modeling study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 752.
Freebody, P., & Anderson, R. C. (1981). Effects of differing proportions and locations of difficult vocabulary on text comprehension. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 202.
Fukkink, R. G., Blok, H., & De Glopper, K. (2001). Deriving word meaning from written context: A multicomponential skill. Language Learning, 51(3), 477-496.
German, D. J. (1989). Test of word finding (TWF). Pro-ed.
González-Fernández, B. (2022). Conceptualizing L2 vocabulary knowledge: An empirical examination of the dimensionality of word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(4), 1124-1154.
González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2020). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 481-505.
Goulden, R., Nation, P., & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be?. Applied linguistics, 11(4), 341-363.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
Gyllstad, H. (2007). Testing English collocations: Developing receptive tests for use with advanced Swedish learners. Lund University.
Haastrup, K., & Henriksen, B. (2000). Vocabulary acquisition: Acquiring depth of knowledge through network building. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221-240.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Hartley JE, Levin K, Currie C. A new version of the HBSC Family Affluence Scale - FAS III: Scottish Qualitative Findings from the International FAS Development Study. Child Indic Res. 2016;9:233-245. doi: 10.1007/s12187-015-9325-3. Epub 2015 Aug 2. PMID: 26925177; PMCID: PMC4757604.
Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in second language acquisition, 21(2), 303-317.
Kiefer, T., Robitzsch, A., Wu, M., & Robitzsch, M. A. (2015). Package ‘TAM’. Zugriff am, 11, 2015.
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. (2020). Structural Equation Modeling of vocabulary size and depth using conventional and Bayesian methods. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 618.
language assessment (pp. 55-74). Routledge.
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language learning, 54(3), 399-436.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied linguistics, 16(3), 307-322.
Le Thi Cam Nguyen, & Nation, P. (2011). A bilingual vocabulary size test of English for Vietnamese learners. RELC journal, 42(1), 86-99.
Letourneau, N. L., Duffett-Leger, L., Levac, L., Watson, B., & Young-Morris, C. (2013). Socioeconomic status and child development: A meta-analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21(3), 211-224.
Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 611-634.
Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149-174.
Meara, P. (1990). Some notes on the Eurocentres vocabulary tests. Foreign language comprehension and production, 103-113.
Meara, P. (1996). The vocabulary knowledge framework. Vocabulary acquisition research group virtual library, 5(2), 1-11.
Meara, P. (2005). Lexical frequency profiles: A Monte Carlo analysis. Applied linguistics, 26(1), 32-47.
Melka, F. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, 33(2), 84-102.
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. In Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
Nassaji, H. (2006). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 387-401.
Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge university press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists.
Nation, I. S., & Webb, S. A. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Nation, P. (2019). The different aspects of vocabulary knowledge. In The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 15-29). Routledge.
Nelson, J. R., & Stage, S. A. (2007). Fostering the development of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension though contextually-based multiple meaning vocabulary instruction. Education and treatment of children, 1-22.
Nurweni, A., & Read, J. (1999). The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 161-175.
Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social science & medicine, 56(4), 769-784.
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., McCarthy, D., & Nightingale, Z. (2012). Making the link between vocabulary knowledge and comprehension skill. From words to reading for understanding, 101-114.
O′Dell, F., Read, J., & McCarthy, M. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge university press.
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What′s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of educational psychology, 98(3), 554.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy, 55(4), 174-200.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1993). Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada journal, 09-29.
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of neuroscience methods, 162(1-2), 8-13.
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific studies of reading, 11(4), 357-383.
Pignot-Shahov, V. (2012). Measuring L2 receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. Language Studies Working Papers, 4(1), 37-45.
Potocki, A., Chailleux, M., Gimenes, M., & Pylouster, J. (2021). ProVoc: An app to train vocabulary depth in order to foster children′s reading comprehension. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1324-1335.
Poulton, R., Caspi, A., Milne, B. J., Thomson, W. M., Taylor, A., Sears, M. R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). Association between children′s experience of socioeconomic disadvantage and adult health: a life-course study. The lancet, 360(9346), 1640-1645.
Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., Harring, J. R., & Montecillo, C. (2012). The role of vocabulary depth in predicting reading comprehension among English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in elementary school. Reading and Writing, 25, 1635-1664.
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian modern language review, 56(2), 282-308.
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language learning, 52(3), 513-536.
Qian, D. D., & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21(1), 28-52.
Qian, D. D., and Lin, L. H. F. (2020). “The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and language proficiency,” in The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies, ed. S. Webb (London, UK: Routledge), 66–80. doi: 10.4324/9780429291586-5
Rasch, G. (1960). Studies in mathematical psychology: I. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.
Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language testing, 10(3), 355-371.
Read, J. (1998). 3.4 Vocabulary and testing. Materials Development in Language Teaching, 303.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge university press.
Read, J. (2004). 7. research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 146-161.
Read, J. (2013). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In Validation in language assessment (pp. 55-74). Routledge.
Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL quarterly, 77-89.
Rodríguez, B. L., Hines, R., & Montiel, M. (2009). Mexican American mothers of low and middle socioeconomic status: Communication behaviors and interactive strategies during shared book reading.
Roth, F. P., Speece, D. L., & Cooper, D. H. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the connection between oral language and early reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 259-272.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Springer.
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language learning, 64(4), 913-951.
Schmitt, N., Nation, P., & Kremmel, B. (2020). Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and validation. Language Teaching, 53(1), 109-120.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language testing, 18(1), 55-88.
Sénéchal, M., Ouellette, G., & Rodney, D. (2006). The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading. Handbook of early literacy research, 2, 173-182.
Shen, H. (2009). Size and strength: Written vocabulary acquisition among advanced learners. Shi jie han yu jiao xue, 23(1), 74-85.
Sonnenschein, S., & Munsterman, K. (2002). The influence of home-based reading interactions on 5-year-olds’ reading motivations and early literacy development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(3), 318-337.
Stæhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in second language acquisition, 31(4), 577-607.
Stocking, M. L., & Lord, F. M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied psychological measurement, 7(2), 201-210.
Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific studies of reading, 10(4), 381-398.
Thorndike, R. L. (1973). Reading as reasoning. Reading Research Quarterly, 135-147.
Torsheim T., Cavallo F., Levin K.A., Schnohr C., Mazur J., Niclasen B., Currie C. Psychometric Validation of the Revised Family Affluence Scale: A Latent Variable Approach. Child Indic. Res. 2016; 9:771–784. doi: 10.1007/s12187-015-9339-x
Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(3), 407-423.
Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied psycholinguistics, 22(2), 217-234.
Walker, D., Greenwood, C., Hart, B., & Carta, J. (1994). Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. Child development, 65(2), 606-621.
Webb, S. (2013). Depth of vocabulary knowledge. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 346-354.
Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33-69.
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13-40.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching (Vol. 111). London: Edward Arnold.
Wright, B. D. (1996). Local dependency, correlations and principal components. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10(3), 509-511.
Wu, M., & Adams, R. (2007). Applying the Rasch model to psycho-social measurement: A practical approach. Melbourne: Educational Measurement Solutions.
Yanagisawa, A., Webb, S., & Uchihara, T. (2020). How do different forms of glossing contribute to L2 vocabulary learning from reading?: A meta-regression analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 411-438.
Zhang, D., & Yang, X. (2016). Chinese L2 learners’ depth of vocabulary knowledge and its role in reading comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 699-715.

指導教授

趙子揚(TZU-YANG CHAO)

審核日期

2023-7-26

推文