排他性菁英人才管理措施的感知程度對留任意願之影響：以工作敬業度為中介與排他性菁英人才管理措施的期待程度為調節效果之探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：88

、訪客IP：18.117.105.215

姓名

梁妤瑄(Yu-Hsuan Liang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

排他性菁英人才管理措施的感知程度對留任意願之影響：以工作敬業度為中介與排他性菁英人才管理措施的期待程度為調節效果之探討

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

基於麥肯錫公司發表人才戰報告，企業視菁英人才管理措施為策略性人力資源管理的一環，將重要的資源配置於20%的菁英人才，創造80%的組織績效已成為企業重要的目標，且現今員工自我意識抬頭，企業提供的措施是否符合個人需求也成為影響的關鍵。
本研究的目的在探討菁英人才對企業實施排他性菁英人才管理措施的感知程度對於留任意願的影響，同步探討工作敬業度是否具有中介效果，並進一步剖析菁英人才對排他性人才管理措施的期待程度是否會受到依循期待不一致理論而對留任意願具有調節中介效果。
本次研究針對台灣29家實施菁英人才管理措施的企業進行調查，蒐集170份問卷，研究結果顯示：(1)排他性菁英人才管理措施的感知程度對留任意願呈負向關係；(2)工作敬業度在排他性菁英人才管理措施的感知程度與留任意願間具有負向完全中介效果；(3)排他性菁英人才管理措施的期待程度在感知程度與工作敬業度間具有顯著負向調節效果；(4)排他性菁英人才管理措施的期待程度對透過工作敬業度影響留任意願則不具調節式中介效果。綜合近年度人才管理領域及企業人才永續領域相關文獻說明，菁英人才的組成逐漸改變，不同族群與企業締結心理契約的方式不盡相同，將改變個人對工作資源的定義，並調整個人對菁英人才管理措施與自身的連結效果；意即當員工將多元化工作環境視為工作資源納入為對企業的要求，將影響個人的工作敬業度及留任意願。重視企業提供的措施與員工個人的需求能為組織留任更多菁英人才。

摘要(英)

Based on 《Talent War》 published by McKinsey & Company, enterprises consider talent management as part of strategic human resource management. Allocating important resources to 20% talent to create 80% organizational performance has become an important goal for businesses. Moreover, with employees′ increasing self-awareness, whether talent management provided by companies meet individual needs has become a key factor.
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of talent′s perception of exclusive talent management on their intention to stay in the company. Simultaneously, it investigates whether work engagement mediates this relationship. Furthermore, it delves into whether talent′s expectation of exclusive talent management moderates the intention to stay through the mediation of expectation-discrepancy theory.
This study surveyed 29 companies in Taiwan that implement talent management, collecting 170 questionnaires. The results indicate that: (1) Perception of exclusive talent management has a negative relationship with intention to stay; (2) Work engagement fully mediates the relationship between perception of exclusive talent management and intention to stay; (3) The expectation of exclusive talent management significantly moderates the relationship between perception and work engagement; (4) The expectation of exclusive talent management does not moderate the relationship between work engagement and intention to stay.
Drawing from recent literature in talent management and corporate talent sustainability, it′s evident that the composition of talent is changing, and different groups form psychological contracts with companies in varied ways. This will redefine individuals′ definitions of job resources and adjust their connection with talent management. When employees perceive a diverse work environment and their expectations of the company, it will affect their work engagement and intention to stay. Prioritizing talent management provided by companies and meeting employees′ personal needs can help retain more talent within organizations.

關鍵字(中)

★ 排他性菁英人才管理的感知程度
★ 排他性菁英人才管理的期待程度
★ 工作敬業度
★ 留任意願

關鍵字(英)

★ Perception of exclusive talent management
★ Expectation of exclusive talent management
★ Work engagement
★ Intention to stay

論文目次

第一章　緒論 1
1-1　研究背景與動機 1
1-2　研究目的 4
第二章　文獻探討與假設推論 5
2-1　菁英人才 5
2-1-1　菁英人才管理的定義與措施 6
2-1-2　排他性菁英人才管理措施的感知與期待程度 8
2-2　工作敬業度 9
2-3　留任意願 9
2-4　排他性菁英人才管理措施的感知程度與留任意願的關聯性 10
2-5　工作敬業度在排他性菁英人才管理措施的感知程度與與留任意願間的中介效果 11
2-6　排他性菁英人才管理措施的期待程度的調節效果與調節式中介效果 12
第三章　研究方法 14
3-1　研究架構 14
3-2　研究樣本與資料蒐集流程 15
3-3　研究工具 15
3-3-1　排他性菁英人才管理措施的感知程度 16
3-3-2　排他性菁英人才管理措施的期待程度 16
3-3-3　工作敬業度 16
3-3-4　留任意願 17
3-4　資料分析方法 17
第四章　研究結果 18
4-1　資料來源與樣本特性 18
4-2　信度與效度分析 20
4-2-1　信度分析 20
4-2-2　收斂效度分析 21
4-2-3　區辨效度分析 23
4-3　驗證性因素分析 23
4-4　相關分析 24
4-5　迴歸分析及假說檢定 26
4-5-1　中介效果分析 26
4-5-2　調節效果分析 27
4-5-3　調節式中介效果分析 29
第五章　結論與討論 31
5-1　研究結論與討論 31
5-2　研究限制與建議 35
圖目錄
圖 1　期望確認理論模型 8
圖 2　研究架構 14
圖 3　調節效果圖 29
表目錄
表 1　樣本特性分析 19
表 2　信度分析結果 21
表 3　收斂效度分析表 22
表 4　區辨效度分析表 23
表 5　驗證性因素分析表 24
表 6　相關分析表 25
表 7　中介效果迴歸分析表 27
表 8　調節效果迴歸分析表 28
表 9　調節式中介效果檢定 29
表 10 假設檢定結果總表 31
表 11　500人以上之科技製造業相關分析表 37

參考文獻

1. 古芷瑄. （2022）. 探討員工體驗, 員工敬業度, 留任意願與組織認同之間的關係: 以科技業員工為研究對象. 2022. PhD Thesis.
2. 吳冠諳. （2021）. 員工體驗與離職傾向關聯－以員工幸福感為中介變項國立中央大學]. 桃園縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/56de82
3. 吳麗萍. （2020）. 餐旅業之職場幸福感與組織認同對敬業貢獻之影響效果. 朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系學位論文, 2020, 1-67.
4. 沈昀萱. （2023）. 聚焦留人, 永續發展: 人才管理如何透過工作敬業心和知覺組織支持影響員工的留任意願, 以及工作與生活平衡的調節作用（Doctoral dissertation, 國立高雄科技大學人力資源發展系）.
5. 邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用（二版）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
6. 施能傑. （2006）. 文官體系能力與政府競爭力：策略性人力資源管理觀點. 東吳政治學報, 22, 1-46
7. 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2003）。多變量分析方法：統計軟體應用（三版）。台北：五南。
8. 資誠通訊第365期：全球大離職潮延燒掌握疫情下勞動力市場關鍵趨勢
9. Aguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2021). Talent management challenges during COVID-19 and beyond: Performance management to the rescue. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 24(3), 233-240.
10. Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C., & Soane, E. C. （2013）. The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24（2）, 330-351.
11. Alias, N. E., Noor, N., & Hassan, R. （2014）. Examining the mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between talent management practices and employee retention in the Information and Technology （IT） organizations in Malaysia. Journal of Human Resources Management and Labor Studies, 2（2）, 227-242.
12. Anlesinya, A., & Amponsah-Tawiah, K. (2020). Towards a responsible talent management model. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(2/3), 279-303.
13. Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. （2011）. Key questions regarding work engagement. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 20（1）, 4-28.
14. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. （2007）. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22（3）, 309-328.
15. Barney, J. （1991）. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–129
16. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A., 1986. The Moderator Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51（6）, 1173-1182.
17. Becker, G. S. （1964）. Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press
18. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. （1980）. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88（3）, 588-606.
19. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 351-370.
20. Bihani, A., & Dalal, K. （2014）. A review into talent management, talent retention and its scope for learning organisations. International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, 2（1）, 1–11.Google Scholar
21. Bose, S. C. （2018）. Impact of human resource practices on organizational commitment and employee retention-A study in private sector banks in Madurai district. IJICS, 5（1）, 10-17.
22. Breivik, E., & Olsson, U. H. （2001）. Adding variables to improve fit: the effect of model size on fit assessment in LISREL. In R. Cudeck, du Toit Stephen, & D. Sörbom （Eds）, Structural equation modeling: Present and future. A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog （pp.169-194）. IL: SSI.
23. Brewster, C. （2004）, “European perspectives on human resource management”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 365-382.
24. Chambers, E. G., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S. M., & Michaels III, E. G. （1998）. The war for talent. The McKinsey Quarterly（3）, 44.
25. Chami-Malaeb, R.; Garavan, T. Talent and leadership development practices as drivers of intention to stay in Lebanese organizations: The mediating role of affective commitment. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2013, 24, 4046–4062.
26. Coleman, J. S. （1990）. Foundations of social theory. Harvard university press.
27. Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. （2009）. Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human resource management review, 19（4）, 304-313.
28. Cross, R. and Thomas, R. （2008）, “How top talent uses networks and where rising stars get trapped”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 37, pp. 165-180.
29. De Vos, A., & Meganck, A. （2009）. What HR managers do versus what employees value: Exploring both parties’ views on retention management from a psychological contract perspective. Personnel Review, 38（1）, 45–60.
30. Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. （1994）. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 12（2）, 259-274.
31. Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272–285.
32. Fan, L., & Suh, Y. H. (2014). Why do users switch to a disruptive technology? An empirical study based on expectation-disconfirmation theory. Information & Management, 51(2), 240-248.
33. Fegley, S. (2006), “2006 talent management: survey report”, Society for Human Resource Management, Alexandria, VA.
34. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F.,（1981）. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
35. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. （1992）. Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21（2）, 132-160.
36. Gould-Williams, J.; Davies, E. Using Social Exchange Theory to Predict the Effects of HRM Practices on Employee Outcomes. Public Manag. Rev. 2005, 7, 1–24.
37. Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of applied psychology, 55(3), 259.
38. Handfield-Jones, H., Michaels, E., & Axelrod, B. （2001）. Talent management: A critical part of every leader′s job. Ivey Business Journal, 66（2）, 53-74.
39. Holtom, B. C., & Burch, T. C. （2016）. A model of turnover-based disruption in customer services. Human Resource Management Review, 26（1）, 25-36.
40. Hughes, J. C., & Rog, E. （2008）. Talent management: A strategy for improving employee recruitment, retention and engagement within hospitality organizations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20（7）, 743-757.
41. Igbaria, M., & Greenhaus, J. H. （1992）. The career advancement prospects of managers and professionals: are MIS employees unique? Decision Sciences, 23（2）, 478-499.
42. Iles, P., Chuai, X., & Preece, D. （2010）. Talent Management and HRM in Multinational companies in Beijing: Definitions, differences and drivers. Journal of World Business, 45（2）, 179–189.
43. Jeffrey, I., & Prasetya, A. B. （2019）. The employee performance assessment and employee training, on employee intension. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 17（1）, 56-65.
44. Jöreskog. K. G., & Sörbom, D. （1989）. LISREL 7:A guide to the program and application. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
45. Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 29 , Issue 5 , September 2023 , pp. 930 – 946, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.10
46. Jyoti, J.; Rani, R. Exploring talent management practices: Antecedents and Consequences. Int. J. Manag. Concepts Philos. 2014, 8, 220–248.
47. Kahn, W. A. （1990）. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724
48. Kaliannan, M., Darmalinggam, D., Dorasamy, M., & Abraham, M. (2023). Inclusive talent development as a key talent management approach: A systematic literature review. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100926.
49. Khadka, S. （2018）. Employee retention in banking industry of Nepal
50. Kryger Aggerholm, H., Esmann Andersen, S., & Thomsen, C. (2011). Conceptualising employer branding in sustainable organisations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(2), 105-123.
51. Kumar, S. (2022). The impact of talent management practices on employee turnover and retention intentions. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(2), 21-34.
52. Kwon, K., & Jang, S. (2022). There is no good war for talent: A critical review of the literature on talent management. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(1), 94-120.
53. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. （2002）. Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of management, 28（4）, 517-543.
54. Lewis, R. E., & Heckman, R. J. （2006）. Talent management: A critical review. Human resource management review, 16（2）, 139-154.
55. Luna-Arocas, R., & Danvila-del-Valle, I. （2022）. The impact of talent management on ethical behavior and intention to stay in the organization. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–16. doi:10.1017/jmo.2022.64
56. Lyons, T.F. Role Clarity, Need for Clarity, Satisfaction, Tension, and Withdrawal. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1971, 6, 99–110.
57. Lyu, H., Yao, M., Zhang, D., & Liu, X. （2020）. The relationship among organizational identity, psychological resilience and work engagement of the first-line nurses in the prevention and control of COVID-19 based on structural equation model. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 2379-2386.
58. Malhotra, Y., & Pachauri, V. (2023). Employee Engagement in ESG Practices: A Way to Sustainability. Digital Disruption and Environmental, Social & Governance, 1-15.
59. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. （2002）. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological methods, 7, 64-82.
60. Mohamed Mousa, Rami M. Ayoubi, （2019） “Inclusive/exclusive talent management, responsible leadership and organizational downsizing: A study of academics in Egyptian public business schools”, Journal of Management Development, https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2018-0325
61. Mousa, M. (2017). Responsible leadership and organizational commitment among physicians: can inclusive diversity climate enhance the relationship?. Journal of intercultural management, 9(2), 103-141.
62. Naidoo, P., & Martins, N. （2014）. Investigating the relationship between organizational culture and work engagement. Problems and perspectives in Management, （12, Iss. 4 （spec. iss.））, 433-441.
63. Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. （1978）. Psychometric theory.
64. Oliver, R. L. （1980）. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17（4）, 460-469.
65. Pagan-Castaño, E., Ballester-Miquel, J. C., Sánchez-García, J., & Guijarro-García, M. (2022). What’s next in talent management?. Journal of Business Research, 141(C), 528-535.
66. Price, J.L. and Mueller, C.W. (1986), Handbook of Organizational Measurement, Pitman, Marshfield, MA.
67. Rajneet, B., & Papori, B. （2020）. Exclusive talent management and its consequences: a review of literature. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 9（2）, 193-209.
68. R.L. Oliver, (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions, Journal of Marketing Research 17 (4), pp. 460–469.
69. R.L. Oliver, Varieties of value in the consumption satisfaction response, Adv. Consum. Res. 23 (1996) 143–147.
70. Robertson, A., & Abbey, G. （2003）. Managing Talented People: Getting on with-and Getting the Best from-Your Top Talent: Pearson Education.
71. Saks, A. M. （2006）. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology.
72. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. （2004）. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25（3）, 293-315.
73. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. （2003）. UWES-Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Preliminary manual. Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
74. Scullion, H., Collings, D.G. and Caligiuri, P. （2010）, “Global talent management”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 105-108.
75. Sepahvand, R., & Bagherzadeh Khodashahri, R. （2021）. Strategic human resource management practices and employee retention: A study of the moderating role of job engagement. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 14（2）, 437-468.
76. Siu, N. Y. M., Kwan, H. Y., Wong, H., & Zhang, T. J. F. (2017). Enhancing Positive Disconfirmation and Personal Identity Through Customer Engagement in Cultural Consumption. In Marketing at the Confluence between Entertainment and Analytics: Proceedings of the 2016 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) World Marketing Congress (pp. 525-536). Springer International Publishing.
77. Soares, P. H., & Gáudio, R. D. （2019）. On the imperative of planning employee communications: Theoretical considerations and the case study of vale. In Strategic Employee Communication （pp. 237-253）. Springer.
78. Tansley, C. （2011）. What do we mean by the term “talent” in talent management?. Industrial and commercial training, 43（5）, 266-274.
79. Tansley, C., Harris, L., Stewart, J. and Turner, P. (2006), Talent Management: Understanding the Dimensions, CIPD, London.
80. Thais, O. Y. G. （2020）. Leadership and organizational structure affecting employees’behaviors: A study on job satisfaction, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Management （IJM）, 11（4）.
81. Ulrich, D. （2008）. The talent trifecta. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal.
82. Vaiman, V. and Vance, C.M. （2008）, Smart Talent Management: Building Knowledge Assets for Competitive Advantage, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
83. Weng, T. C., Shen, Y. H., & Kan, T. T. （2023）. Talent Sustainability and Development: How Talent Management Affects Employees’ Intention to Stay through Work Engagement and Perceived Organizational Support with the Moderating Role of Work–Life Balance. Sustainability, 15（18）, 13508.
84. Williamson, D., & Harris, C. (2019). Talent management and unions: The impact of the New Zealand hotel workers union on talent management in hotels (19501995). International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(10), 3838–3854. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2018-0877
85. Wolverton, C. C., Hirschheim, R., Black, W. C., & Burleson, J. (2020). Outsourcing success in the eye of the beholder: Examining the impact of expectation confirmation theory on IT outsourcing. Information & Management, 57(6), 103236.
86. Yu, J., Ariza-Montes, A., Giorgi, G., Lee, A., & Han, H. （2020）. Sustainable relationship development between hotel company and its employees: Linking job embeddedness, job satisfaction, self-efficacy, job performance, work engagement, and turnover. Sustainability, 12（17）, 7168

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2024-7-26

推文