摘要(英) |
This study aims to explore whether subdividing the precision parameter grid for searching the strongest double intersection of circular arcs of earthquakes (SDICAE) can effectively acquire more SDICAE data. Based on the obtained data, the study evaluates the effectiveness of strong earthquake predictions using different screening methods. Additionally, the study statistically analyzes the geometry affecting the prediction results and their possible reasons.
The results show that subdividing the precision parameter grid significantly increases the amount of data obtained for SDICAE, with an increase of up to 80%. Moreover, this study examines the impact of different geometric feature on the prediction results and finds that under specific screening conditions, SDICAE exhibits significant effectiveness in short-term strong earthquake predictions. After screening, the short-term (within 120 days) strong earthquake prediction hit rate of the strongest double convex intersection of circular arcs reaches 86.6% (13/15), while that of the strongest concave-convex intersection of circular arcs reaches 58.3% (7/12). Overall, the short-term (within 127 days) strong earthquake prediction hit rate of SDICAE is 74.1% (20/27).
In summary, this study confirms the feasibility and effectiveness of subdividing the precision parameter grid and demonstrates that SDICAE under specific screening conditions has significant effectiveness in short-term strong earthquake predictions. |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻
[1] 交通部中央氣象署地震測報中心二十周年專刊,2009。
[2] 韓世寧、陳國東,九二一集集大地震南投縣台中縣死亡情形調查報告,.行政院衛生署中部辦公室、行政院衛生署疾病管制局疫情組流行病學訓練班、行政院衛生署疾病管制局疫情組,民國89年。
[3] H.C. Lei and C.W. Tang, “Circular Arcs and Curvilinear Distributions of Events of Earthquakes in Taiwan”, The Thirteenth National Conference on Structural Engineering, The Third National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taiwan, 2016.
[4] H.C. Lei, Circles, “Circular Arcs and Lines of Earthquakes Around Taiwan”, The 40th National Conference on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Taiwan, 2016.
[5] H.C. Lei, “Circles Arcs and Lines of Earthquakes Around Taiwan (II): Magnitude and Time”, The 15th Conference on Land Studies, Tainan, Taiwan, 2017.
[6] H.C. Lei, “Some Ideas for Constructing Significant Intersections of Circular Arcs of Earthquakes”, The 2017 Taiwan-Japan Joint Symposium on the Advancement of Urban Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan, 2017.
[7] H.C. Lei, P.Y. Sun, Y.Y. Chen, and M.H. Chen, “An Elementary Analysis of the Strongest Intersections of Circular Arcs of Earthquakes around Taiwan”, The Fourteenth National Conference on Structural Engineering/ The Fourth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taichung, Taiwan, 2018.
[8] H.C. Lei, ASICAE by HinChi Lei to find the strongest intersections of circular arcs of earthquakes. https://youtu.be/tvgYLpoH9T4, 2019.
[9] H.C. Lei, “Strongest Double Intersections of Circular Arcs of Earthquakes Around Taiwan”, The 23rd Forum on Land Use and Planning, Tainan, Taiwan, 2019.
[10] H.C. Lei, Developing the prediction of strong earthquakes within 70 days, https://youtu.be/gFvJ0T99TJg, 2019.
[11] 林亨學,「搜尋週期為三年時使用SDICAE做強震預測的最佳精度設定」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國110年。
[12] 范國豪,「搜尋週期為4年時使用SDICAE做強震預測的最佳精度設定」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國110年。
[13] 商文澤,「搜尋週期為三年半時使用SDICAE作強震預測的最佳精度設定」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國112年。
[14] 廖柏翰,[搜尋週期為四年時使用SDICAE作強震預測的最佳精度設定」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國112年
[15] C.roering,The Geometrical Singificance of Natural En-echelon Crack-arrays,1967
[16] Solomon Seyum and David D. Pollard, Shapes of Echelon Veins with Complementary Pressure Solution seams Provide Clues about the Stiffness of Limestone and the Remote Stresses,2014
[17] Solomon Seyum and David D. Pollard, The Mechanics of Intersecting Echelon Veins and 13 Pressure Solution seams in Limestone,2016. |