博碩士論文 111427002 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:94 、訪客IP:3.144.252.58
姓名 莊程皓(Cheng-Hao Chuang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 Z世代員工雇主品牌與工作投入之影響:以工作意義感為中介效果及知覺支持型組織氣候為調節效果
(The effects of employer branding and job involvement on Generation Z Employees: The mediating effect of meaningful work and the moderating effect of perceived organizational support.)
相關論文
★ 傳統食品業之轉型與品質升級策略探討-以P公司為例★ 航空器維修訓練調整策略探討-以C公司為例
★ 企業社會責任ヽ內控內稽制度措施的探討-以T銀行為例★ 主管管理職能評鑑與驗證-以A公司為例
★ 人力資源部門客戶服務代表角色與功能探討-以某科技公司為例★ E公司員工品格教育與工作投入、工作壓力、員工幸福感關係之研究,知覺組織支持之中介效果
★ 工作要求、工作控制與工作生活平衡關係之研究:以主管家庭支持行為為調節變項★ 如何打造正向的企業志工參與環境-以國內大型電子製造業為例
★ 如何塑造良好的企業志工投入與推薦-以國內大型電子製造業為例★ 組織自尊、學習目標導向及尋求回饋行為對於員工自我學習之影響
★ 家長式領導與組織認同感之關聯性研究-以信任主管為調節變項★ 影響在臺產業外籍移工的生活與工作適應程度: 從組織及勞工本身之變數探討
★ 尋求更好的解決之道!以正向觀點探討企業進用身心障礙者之問題-以M公司身障進用經驗為例★ 營業額意圖:組織和個人因素的影響以及企業家意圖在越南語境中的中介作用
★ 如何提升外派人員效能?知覺組織支持與配偶家庭支持對外派人員組織認同、工作投入、工作壓力之影響─以主管家庭支持行為為調節★ 育嬰的代價?影響育嬰留職停薪復職後個人績效及勞動條件變更之因素分析
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 隨著世代變遷遞進,Z 世代族群即將成為未來的勞動主力,而企業為了因應這群思想、價值觀、態度不同的族群,以經營雇主品牌的形式嘗試吸引志同道合的新血加入,與此同時也希望雇主品牌的效益不單只是招募員工,而時能夠同時鞏固內部員工的向心力,甚至提升員工績效,也因此成為一項現今企業重視之管理議題。因此,本研究以Z世代族群的員工作為研究對象,探討雇主品牌、工作意義感、工作投入的關係,並同時探討知覺支持型組織氣候在雇主品牌與工作意義感間的調節效果。

本研究透過 SurveyCake 線上問卷,進行結構性之問卷調查,共回收367份 有效問卷,並以回收之問卷進行研究分析。

研究結果顯示:(1)雇主品牌對工作投入具有正向影響。(2)雇主品牌對工作意義感具有?向影響。(3)工作意義感對工作投入具有正向影響。(4)工作意義感會中介影響雇主品牌與工作投入之間的關係。(5)知覺支持型組織氣候會正向調節雇主品牌與工作意義感之間的關係。
摘要(英) With the advancement of generational change, the Generation Z group will soon become the main force of labor in the future. To cope with this group of people with different thoughts, values, and attitudes, enterprises try to attract like-minded new blood to join in the form of employer branding, and at the same time hope that the benefits of employer branding are not only recruiting employees, but also consolidate the centripetal force of the internal staff, and even enhance employee performance, which has become an important management issue for today′s enterprises. Therefore, this study focuses on Generation Z as an important management issue for enterprises. Therefore, this study focuses on the employees of Generation Z to investigate the relationship between employer branding, meaningful work, and job involvement, and to explore the moderating effect of perceived organizational support between employer branding and meaningful work.

This study conducted a structured questionnaire survey through SurveyCake online, and a total of 367 valid questionnaires were collected and analyzed.

The results of this study show that: (1) Employer branding has a positive effect on job involvement. (2) Employer branding has a positive effect on meaningful work. (3) Employer brand has a positive effect on job involvement. (4) Meaningful work mediates the relationship between employer branding and job involvement. (5)Perceived organizational support positively moderates the relationship between employer branding and meaningful work.
關鍵字(中) ★ Z世代族群員工
★ 雇主品牌
★ 工作意義感
★ 工作投入
★ 知覺支持型組織氣候
關鍵字(英) ★ Generation Z employees
★ Employer branding
★ Meaningful work
★ Job involvement
★ Perceived organizational support
論文目次 中文摘要 ................................................................................................................................................... I
英文摘要 ..................................................................................................................................................II
圖目錄 ......................................................................................................................................................V
表目錄 .................................................................................................................................................... VI
第一章 緒論.............................................................................................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機.....................................................................................................................1
第二節 研究目的.................................................................................................................................4
第三節 研究流程.................................................................................................................................5
第二章 文獻探討.....................................................................................................................................6
第一節 Z 世代(GENERATION Z)...........................................................................................................6
第二節 工作投入(JOB INVOLVEMENT) ................................................................................................9
第三節 雇主品牌(EMPLOYER BRANDING) ........................................................................................12
第四節 工作意義感(MEANINGFUL WORK) .......................................................................................16
第五節 知覺支持型組織氣候(PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT)..........................................22
第三章 研究方法...................................................................................................................................26
第一節、研究架構與假設.................................................................................................................26
第二節、研究對象與資料收集方法.................................................................................................28
第三節、研究變項之衡量.................................................................................................................28
第四章 研究結果...................................................................................................................................33
第一節、樣本描述性分析.................................................................................................................33
第二節、效度分析.............................................................................................................................35
第三節、信度分析.............................................................................................................................37
第四節、相關分析.............................................................................................................................39
第五節、階層迴歸分析.....................................................................................................................41
第五章 結論與建議...............................................................................................................................68
第一節、研究意涵.............................................................................................................................68
第二節、管理意涵.............................................................................................................................71
第三節、研究限制及未來研究建議.................................................................................................73
第六章 參考文獻...................................................................................................................................74
中文文獻.............................................................................................................................................74
英文文獻.............................................................................................................................................76
附錄 .........................................................................................................................................................83
參考文獻 中文文獻
104 人力銀行(2023)。除了薪水,求職、在職者與員工還在乎哪些「工作價
值」?104 職場力。取自:https://blog.104.com.tw/2023-ceo-104/
104 人力銀行(2022)。2022 近 3 年「雇主品牌」經營成熟度的企業觀察|人資 F.B.I.報告。104 職場力。取自:https://blog.104.com.tw/104-fbi-2022-brand- management-recent-3-years/
Leslie C(2019)。企業如何經營「雇主品牌」?--專訪人資社群創辦人盧世安。 英語島。取自:https://www.eisland.com.tw/Main.php?stat=a_tKmL1h4
王亞德(2014)。組織信任對工作投入影響之研究-以工作滿意度為中介變項。 科技與人力教育季刊,1(2),1-19。
王迺萱(2023)。主動性人格特質對工作意義之影響:以使命感為中介變項與知 覺支 持性組織氣候為調節變項。〔碩士論文。國立中?大學〕臺灣博碩士 論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/88wq98
江旭新、游司宇(2021)。雇主品牌管理與員工品牌權益:跨層次之中介與調節 影響效果。管理評論,40(1),47-74。
江鈊瑜(2021)。雇主品牌及員工體驗對於工作投入度之影響。〔碩士論文。元 智大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/nh5897
何則文(2022)。雇主品牌為什麼值得經營?人資顧問 4 ?驟教你加強企業人才 永續。Yourator。取自:https://www.yourator.co/articles/272
晉麗明(2023)。三?驟做好雇主品牌—用品牌找到潛力人才。震旦集團。 取自:https://www.aurora.com.tw/aurora-monthly/627/0n268358116810113165
莊淑芬(2019)。面對務實的「Z世代」客人,大學該端出什麼菜,天下雜誌。 取自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5094452
許美惠(2019)。雇主品牌對組織承諾、工作投入與離職傾向之影響-以G科技公 司為例。
http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=106457002106457002
陳毓朗(2021)。雇主品牌與組織認同和工作投入之研究。〔碩士論文。國立中 74

山大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dc4t35 陳佳慶(2022)。【HR 必修課,做好品牌 】 Z 世代人才知多少。104 人資充
電。取自:https://vip.104.com.tw/preLogin/recruiterForum/post/61923
陸洛、林惠彥、楊士倫(2015)。經濟誘因之外-雇主品牌吸引力與員工工作 後果之關聯。商略學報,7(2),113-128 https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=20732147-201506- 201507060006-201507060006-113-128
黃郁茹(2022)。對 Z 世代員工的 5 個觀察及 3 個管理建議。104 學習精靈。取 自:https://nabi.104.com.tw/posts/nabi_post_868520ba-0ac3-4ecb-9a2a- abd38d12c077
齊立文、劉沛琪(2022)。大缺工潮後,如何搶才?104 資深特助:4 維度建立 雇主品牌、奪得求職者好感。經理人。取自: https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/64818?utm_source=copyshare
賴若函(2021)首度跨世代職場大調查!Z世代最在意什麼?Cheers 雜誌。 取自:https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5099579
潘沛芸(2023)。雇主品牌、員工工作投入與組織氣候關聯性之研究。〔碩士 論文。國立高雄師範大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/72se3f
張偉豪、鄭時宜(2012)。與結構方程模型共舞:曙光初現。新北市:前程文 化。
黃品維(2022)。員工體驗與雇主品牌吸引力之關聯性-員工世代之差異。〔碩 士論文。國立臺灣師範大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6z2cj5。


英文文獻
Ambler, T., & Barrow, S. (1996). The employer brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), 185-206.
Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501-517.
Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & Soane, E. (2017). The mismanaged soul: Existential labor and the erosion of meaningful work. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 416-430.
Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4-11.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389-411.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Baruch, Y. (2004). Managing careers: Theory and Practice. Pearson Education.
Blanco-Donoso, L. M., Garrosa, E., Moreno-Jiménez, B., de Almeida, E. C., & Villela-Bueno, S. M. (2017). Social job resources as sources of meaningfulness and its effects on nurses’ vigor and emotional exhaustion: A cross-sectional study among Spanish nurses. Current Psychology, 36(4), 755-763.
Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Routledge.
Boxall, P. (1998). Achieving competitive advantage through human resource strategy: Towards a theory of industry dynamics. Human Resource Management Review, 8(3), 265-288.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological. Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
Conference Board. (2001). Engaging employees through your Brand. The Conference Board, New York, NY.
Cohen-Meitar, R., Carmeli, A., & Waldman, D. A. (2009). Linking meaningfulness in the workplace to employee creativity: The intervening role of organizational identification and positive psychological experiences. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 361-375.
Ćulibrk, J., Delić, M., Mitrović, S., & Ćulibrk, D. (2018). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job involvement: The mediating role of job involvement. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 328333.
De Boeck, G., Dries, N., & Tierens, H. (2019). The experience of untapped potential: Towards a subjective temporal understanding of work meaningfulness. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 529-557.
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where millennials end and generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17(1), 1-7.
Druckman, D., Singer, J. E., & Van Cott, H. (1997). Enhancing organizational performance. National Academy Press.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
Ensari, M. S. (2017). A study on the differences of entrepreneurship potential among generations. Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 52-62.
Costigan, R. D., Iiter, S. S., & Berman, J. J. (1998). A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(3), 303–317.

Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company, 12, 1-10.
Ghielen, S. T. S., De Cooman, R., & Sels, L. (2021). The interacting content and process of the employer brand: person-organization fit and employer brand clarity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(2), 292- 304.
Gurin, G., Veroff, J., & Feld, S. (1960). Americans view their mental health. Mental- hospitals, 12(6), 33-33.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
Herzberg, F. (1976). The managerial choice: To be effective or to be human. Herzberg–Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin.
Herzberg, F. M., B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The Motivation to Work (2nd ed.). New York. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Johnson, J. J., & McIntye, C. L. (1998). Organizational culture and climate correlates of job satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 82(3), 843-850.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Spss.
Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341-349.
Kanungo, R. N. (1979). The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited. Psychological Bulletin, 86(1), 119-138.
Karjaluoto, H., & Paakkonen, L. (2019). An empirical assessment of employer branding as a form of sport event sponsorship. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 20(4), 666-682.


Katz, R., Ogilvie, S., Shaw, J., & Woodhead, L. (2022). Gen Z, explained: The art of living in a digital age. University of Chicago Press.
Kashyap, V., & Chaudhary, R. (2019). Linking employer brand image and work engagement: modelling organizational identification and trust in organization as mediators. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 6(2), 177- 201.
Kim, K. Y., Eisenberger, R., & Baik, K. (2016). Perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment: Moderating influence of perceived organizational competence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 558- 583.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
Kislik, L. (2022). What do newer generations of employees want, and can your business adjust?, https://www.forbes.com/sites/lizkislik/2022/01/28/what-do- newer-generations-of-employees-want-and-can-your-business- adjust/?sh=591a8b362ee0
Lawler III, E. E. (1988). Choosing an involvement strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2(3), 197-204.
Lawler III, E. E. (1994). Total quality management and employee involvement: are they compatible?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 8(1), 68-76.
Lievens, F., Van Hoye, G., & Anseel, F. (2007). Organizational identity and employer image: Towards a unifying framework. British Journal of Management, 18(1), 45-59.
Lin, W. B. (2006). The exploration of employee involvement model. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(1), 69-82.
Litwin, G.H. & Stringer, R.A. Jr. (1968). Motivation and organisational climate. (pp. 209-214). Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Boston.
Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J., & Avey, J. B. (2008). The mediating roleof psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate—employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 219-238.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Bros. Co.
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
Maxwell, R., & Knox, S. (2009). Motivating employees to" live the brand": a comparative case study of employer brand attractiveness within the firm. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(9-10), 893-907.
Millar, C. C., Chen, S., & Waller, L. (2017). Leadership, knowledge and people in knowledge-intensive organizations: implications for HRM theory and practice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 261-275.
Oelberger, C. R. (2019). The dark side of deeply meaningful work: Work‐ relationship turmoil and the moderating role of occupational value homophily. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 558-588.
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research?. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.
Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91- 127.
Rampl, L. V., Opitz, C., Welpe, I. M., & Kenning, P. (2016). The role of emotions in decision-making on employer brands: insights from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Marketing Letters, 27(2), 361-374.

Raub, S., & Blunschi, S. (2014). The power of meaningful work: How awareness of CSR initiatives fosters task significance and positive work outcomes in service employees. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 10-18.
Rogg, K. L., Schmidt, D. B., Shull, C., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Human resource practices, organizational climate, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Management, 27(4), 431-449.
Smith‐Crowe, K., Burke, M. J., & Landis, R. S. (2003). Organizational climate as a moderator of safety knowledge–safety performance relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(7), 861-876.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2010). How to Improve Work Engagement? (399- 415). Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Schermerhorn Jr, J. R., Gardner, W. L., & Martin, T. N. (1990). Management dialogues: Turning on the marginal performer. Organizational Dynamics, 18(4), 47-60.
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361-388.
Schroer, W. J. (2008). Generations X, Y, Z and the others. The Journal of the Household Goods Forwarders Association of America, Inc, 40(1), 9-11.
Siehl, C., & Martin, J. (1989). Organizational culture: A key to financial performance?. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. 241-281.
Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322-337.


Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The History of America′s Future (1st ed., pp. 1584-2069). New York: William Morrow and Company
Swystun, J. (2007). The brand glossary. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tanwar, K., & Prasad, A. (2017). Employer brand scale development and validation:
a second-order factor approach. Personnel Review, 46(2), 389-409.
Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The Journal of
Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103-113.
Tomer, A., & Pugesek, B. H. (2003). Guidelines for the implementation and publication of structural equation models. (pp. 125-140). Structural equation modeling: Applications in ecological and evolutionary biology, Cambridge University Press.
Vomberg, A., Homburg, C., & Bornemann, T. (2015). Talented people and strong brands: The contribution of human capital and brand equity to firm
value. Strategic Management Journal, 36(13), 2122-2131.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation, 1st. New York: Wiley
Vroom, V. H., (2006). Ego-involvement, job satisfaction, and job performance.
Personnel Psychology, 15(2), 159-177.
Wang, Q., & Wang, C. (2020). Reducing turnover intention: perceived organizational support for frontline employees. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 14(1), 1-16.
Yeoman, R. (2014). Conceptualising meaningful work as a fundamental human need. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 235-251.
指導教授 王群孝(Chun-Hsiao Wang) 審核日期 2024-6-17
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明