運用六標準差手法於產品稽核流程之改善-以面板業 G 公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：88

、訪客IP：18.118.19.123

姓名

黃琬婷(Wan-Ting Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

運用六標準差手法於產品稽核流程之改善-以面板業 G 公司為例
(Applying Six Sigma Methodology for Improvement in Product Audit Process: A Case Study of Company G in the Panel Industry)

相關論文

★ 應用灰色理論於有機農產品之經營管理— 需求預測及關鍵成功因素探討	★ NAND型Flash價格與交運量預測在風險分析下之決策模式
★ 工業電腦用無鉛晶片組最適存貨政策之研究-以A公司為例	★ 砷化鎵代工廠磊晶之最適存貨管理-以W公司為例
★ 資訊分享&決策制定下產銷協同關係之研究 -以IC設計業為例	★ 應用分析層級法於電子化學品業委外供應商評選準則之研究
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車售服零件庫存滯銷因素分析-以C公司為例	★ 多目標規劃最佳六標準差水準: 以薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器C公司製造流程為例
★ 以資料探勘技術進行消費者返廠定期保養之實證研究	★ 以價值鏈觀點探討品牌公司關鍵組織流程之取決-以S公司為例
★ 應用產銷協同規劃之流程改善於化纖產業-現況改善與效益分析	★ 權力模式與合作關係對於報價策略之影響研究—以半導體產業A公司為例
★ 應用資料探勘於汽車製造業之庫存原因分析	★ 以類神經網路預測代工費報價---以中小面板產業C公司為例
★ 電路板產業存貨改善研究-以N公司為例	★ 運用六標準差改善機台備用零件(Spare parts)存貨管理

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在眾多流程改善的工具裡面，六標準差一直是被許多業界廣泛接受與利用的工具之一，由於其「數據導向」的特性，不僅限於製造業的品質改善，服務業、醫療業也均有六標準差的應用案例。
本研究以國內面板業G公司為例，進行六標準差應用在產品稽核抽樣流程改善之研究。G公司為國內專精於生產中小尺寸面板的廠商，主要應用於車用面板、醫療面板及工控面板。為了符合車用產品IATF16949:2016的規範，G公司每年進行兩次的產品稽核，目的希望從客戶的角度出發，評估確認所生產的車用型號品質狀況，達到風險控管的目的，並發掘任何持續改進的可能。儘管每年進行兩次的產品稽核，歷年來所完成稽核的產品種類卻不到全年生產的一半，該如何提升產品稽核的落實度，已為G公司所需要考量的重點之一。
為提升G公司產品稽核的落實程度，本研究利用六標準差的DMAIC手法，逐步利用衡量評估樹一一審視造成落實度不佳的可能變數，並且蒐集相關加以分析以確定根因。最後利用標準化及人員教育訓練等方式，達到控制維護成果的目的。
研究結果顯示，透過DMAIC的步驟手法，能夠有效幫助專案小組成員聚焦於改善的方向，鎖定加強可靠度項目的抽樣方式。經過抽樣方式的調整，成功將車載機種覆蓋率提升至100%，稽核覆蓋率提升5%，並且提升了未完成稽核機種的抽樣數量達30%之多，若能持續進行至下半年，預期能夠顯著改善。在本研究的最後，也闡明了未來可能的研究方向，讓後續持續改善的團隊有執行的依據。

摘要(英)

Six Sigma, widely accepted and utilized in various industries, is a data-driven tool not limited to quality improvement in manufacturing but also applicable in service sectors and healthcare industry. This study examines the application of Six Sigma in enhancing the product audit sampling process at Company G, a domestic manufacturer specializing in small and medium-sized panels primarily used in automotive, medical, and industrial control applications. To comply with the automotive IATF 16949:2016 standards, Company G conducts biannual product audits to evaluate the quality of automotive panels from the customer′s perspective, aiming for risk management and identifying opportunities for continuous improvement. Despite conducting these audits twice a year, the audited product types over the years have covered less than half of the annual production. Enhancing the implementation of product audits has become a key focus for Company G.
To enhance the implementation of product audits at G Company, this study utilized the Six Sigma DMAIC methodology. It systematically evaluated potential variables contributing to poor implementation through measurement and assessment, and collected relevant data for root cause analysis. Finally, standardization and personnel training were employed to achieve control and maintenance of outcomes.
The research findings demonstrate that the DMAIC approach effectively assists project team members in focusing on improvement directions, particularly in refining sampling methods to strengthen reliability aspects. Following adjustments to the sampling approach, the coverage rate of audit plan toward automotive models produced in first half of 2024 was successfully increased to 100%, with a 5% improvement in audit coverage. Moreover, the sampling quantity for unfinished audit models increased by up to 30%. Continued implementation of these strategies into the latter half of the year is anticipated to result in significant improvements. In conclusion, the study also elucidated potential future research directions to provide a basis for continuous improvement efforts within the team.

關鍵字(中)

★ 六標準差
★ DMAIC
★ 產品稽核
★ 流程改善

關鍵字(英)

★ Six Sigma
★ DMAIC
★ Product Audit
★ Process Improvement

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 - 1 -
1.1 研究背景 - 1 -
1.2 研究動機 - 1 -
1.3 研究目的 - 2 -
1.4 研究架構與方法 - 3 -
第二章文獻探討 - 5 -
2.1 車用產業 - 5 -
2.2 風險控管 - 5 -
2.3 六標準差與流程改善 - 6 -
2.4 六標準差相關應用案例 - 7 -
第三章研究方法 - 9 -
3.1 六標準差定義 - 9 -
3.2 六標準差組織架構 - 9 -
3.3 六標準差推動步驟 - 11 -
3.3.1 定義階段Define - 11 -
3.3.2 衡量階段Measure - 12 -
3.3.3 分析階段Analyze - 13 -
3.3.4 改善階段Improve - 14 -
3.3.5 控制階段Control - 16 -
第四章個案研究 - 17 -
4.1 公司概況 - 17 -
4.2 產品稽核簡介 - 18 -
4.3 G公司現行產品稽核抽樣流程 - 19 -
4.4 G公司現行狀況 - 22 -
4.5 專案改善步驟 - 24 -
4.5.1 定義階段Define - 26 -
4.5.2 衡量階段Measure - 28 -
4.5.3 分析階段Analyze - 31 -
4.5.4 改善階段Improve - 35 -
4.5.5 控制階段Control - 36 -
4.5.6 改善成效比較 - 37 -
4.5.7 其他效益 - 40 -
第五章研究結論與建議 - 41 -
參考文獻 - 44 -

參考文獻

[ 1 ] 證券櫃檯買賣中心, & 臺灣證券交易所. 平面顯示器產業鏈簡介. 2023年9月11日, 取自 https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=G000。
[ 2 ] 黃祖猶. (2017). IATF 16949:2016汽車行業品質管理系統標準新要求條文介紹（上）。品質月刊，53(1)，13-19. 2023年9月11日, 取自https://www-airitilibrary-com.ezproxy.lib.ncu.edu.tw/Article/Detail?DocID=10173692-201701-201701260013-201701260013-13-19
[ 3 ] 孫嘉正、葉子明. (2013). 製造業品質管理系統第一者、第二者與第三者稽核面面觀。品質月刊，49(5)，10-15. 2023年9月11日, 取自https://www-airitilibrary-com.ezproxy.lib.ncu.edu.tw/Article/Detail?DocID=10173692-201305-201306110041-201306110041-10-15
[ 4 ] 林公孚(Gon-Fu Lin). (2008). 六標準差演進的回顧與展望. 品質月刊, 44(3), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.29999/QM.200803.0005
[ 5 ] 曹岸生(An-sheng Cao), 荊寧寧(Ning-ning Jing), & 張德華(De-hua Zhang). (2020). QFD與DOE在六標準差DMAIC流程改善中的集成應用. 品質學報, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.6220/joq.202006_27(3).0002
[ 6 ] 俞凱允(Calvin K. Yu), & 蘇力萍(Li-Ping Su). (2019). 整合六標準差及精實生產於ISO 9000品質管理系統. 品質學報, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.6220/joq.201904_26(2).0002
[ 7 ] 潘迪, 紐曼, 卡法那夫, 樂為良, Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2002). 六標準差團隊實戰指南 / 彼得.潘迪(Peter S. Pande),羅伯.紐曼(Robert P. Neuman),羅蘭.卡法那夫(Roland R. Cavanagh)原著 ; 樂為良譯 (初版). 麥格羅.希爾出版.

英文文獻
[ 8 ] Reid, R. D. (2005). TS 16949-Where Did It Come From? In Quality progress (Vol. 38, Issue 3, pp. 31). American Society for Quality.
[ 9 ] Reid, R. D. (2017). IATF 16949:2016’s evolution. In Quality progress (Vol. 50, Issue 1, pp. 56–57). American Society for Quality.
[ 10 ] Helmold, M. (2020). Audits as Tool to Evaluate Value. In Total Revenue Management (TRM) (pp. 79–82). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46985-6_7
[ 11 ] Kaplan, R. S., & Mikes, A. (2012). Managing risks: A new framework. In Harvard business review (Vol. 90, Issue 6, pp. 48–58). Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
[ 12 ] Verband der automobilindustrie e. v. (2020). VDA 6.5 Product Audit (3rd ed.).
[ 13 ] Aven, T. (2016). European Journal of Operational Research. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
[ 14 ] Mast, J. de, Schippers, W. A. J., Does, R. J. M. M., & van den Heuvel, E. R. (2000). Steps and strategies in process improvement. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 16(4), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1638(200007/08)16:4<301::AID-QRE340>3.0.CO;2-E
[ 15 ] Salah, S., Rahim, A., & Carretero, J. A. (2010). The integration of Six Sigma and lean management. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(3), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461011075035
[ 16 ] Bozdogan, K. (2010). Towards an integration of the lean enterprise system, total quality management, six sigma and related enterprise process improvement methods. In R. Blockley & W. Shyy (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering (Vol. 6, Section 5). John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved April 4, 2024, from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102815
[ 17 ] Antony, J. (2004). Some pros and cons of six sigma: an academic perspective. TQM Magazine, 16(4), 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780410541945
[ 18 ] Bhat, S., Gijo, E. V., & Jnanesh, N. A. (2014). Application of Lean Six Sigma methodology in the registration process of a hospital. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(5), 613–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2013-0191
[ 19 ] Kusnadi, A., & Yudoko, G. (2016). Contractor Work Preparation Process Improvement Using Lean Six Sigma: A Case Study Of A Global Oil And Gas Company In Indonesia. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 10(1), 1-29. Retrieved April 4, 2024, from https://ezproxy.lib.ncu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/contractor-work-preparation-process-improvement/docview/1800742396/se-2
[ 20 ] Condé, G. C. P., Oprime, P. C., Pimenta, M. L., Sordan, J. E., & Bueno, C. R. (2023). Defect reduction using DMAIC and Lean Six Sigma: a case study in a manufacturing car parts supplier. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(9), 2184–2204. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2022-0157
[ 21 ] Bhargava, M., & Gaur, S. (2021). Process Improvement Using Six-Sigma (DMAIC Process) in Bearing Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1017(1), 12034-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1017/1/012034
[ 22 ] Knop, K. (2022). Using Six Sigma DMAIC Cycle to Improve Workplace Safety in the Company from Automotive Branch: A Case Study. Manufacturing Technology, 22(3), pp. 298. https://doi.org/10.21062/mft.2022.040
[ 23 ] Schroeder, R. G., Linderman, K., Liedtke, C., & Choo, A. S. (2008). Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.007
[ 24 ] Antony, J., & Karaminas, H. (2016). Critical assessment on the Six Sigma Black Belt roles/responsibilities, skills and training: A global empirical study. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(5), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-08-2014-0106

指導教授

陳振明(Jen-Ming Chen)

審核日期

2024-7-23

推文