環境保護、社會責任和公司治理表現對財務績效的影響—以台灣可再生資源與替代能源產業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：63

、訪客IP：18.119.141.115

姓名

陳雅琴(YA CHIN CHEN) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

會計研究所企業資源規劃會計碩士在職專班

論文名稱

環境保護、社會責任和公司治理表現對財務績效的影響—以台灣可再生資源與替代能源產業為例

相關論文

★ 企業組織再造之分析－以某醫材業公司為例	★ 台灣期貨市場晚盤價格發現能力分析
★ 台灣不動產逾期繳款影響因子分析	★ 光通訊產業競爭程度、產品多角化及公司治理對企業價值與經營績效之影響
★ 公司治理評鑑與企業績效的關聯性：以文化創意產業上櫃公司為例	★ 企業紓困貸款逾期繳款影響因子分析
★ 國外移工辦理跨境匯兌業務之研究-以菲律賓移工為例	★ 網通產業發行可轉換公司債對公司股價之影響
★ 台灣導線架產業財務結構分析與改善方法-以A公司為例	★ OECD金融帳戶資訊主動交換共同申報準則對高淨值人士資產配置之分析
★ 原料價格與匯率波動對人造纖維企業之營運分析	★ 公司治理對企業經營績效、股價報酬與外資持股影響 -以台灣通信網路產業上市櫃公司為例
★ 匯率、股價與外資買賣超關係之研究	★ 匯率波動對台灣汽車上市公司經營績效影響
★ 營建原物料價格與打房政策對營建業經營績效之影響	★ 公司治理、外資持股與企業績效 -以台灣半導體上市櫃公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-5-25以後開放)

摘要(中)

本研究聚焦於符合永續會計準則委員會（Sustainability Accounting Standards Board，簡稱SASB）定義的台灣上市櫃可再生資源與替代能源產業，探討企業ESG（環境、社會責任、公司治理）表現對財務績效的影響。研究結果未直接證明ESG績效與財務績效之間存在明顯的正相關性，僅發現COVID-19疫情期間公司為避免營運中斷風險，執行社會責任構面策略，以維護員工健康及安全而對自由現金流量有明顯影響；實際上，ESG績效作為一種良好的長期避險管理戰略，可能在增加企業面對經濟、政策及市場波動時的韌性方面發揮重要作用，在長期內建立更加穩固的基礎。
未來研究應更深入地探討各產業的ESG績效與財務績效之間的關聯，特別是如何通過提高企業的韌性以面對不同ESG重大議題，此外，考慮到不同時期ESG不同維度可能對財務績效有不同影響，應進一步分析這些維度如何獨立或共同影響財務表現，以了解ESG提升企業長期韌性及風險管理方面的潛在價值，促使企業能夠在不斷變化的市場和政策中，不破壞地球環境保持競爭力，同時為股東和社會創造更大的價值。

摘要(英)

This study focuses on the Taiwanese listed companies in the renewable resources and alternative energy industry as defined by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). It explores the impact of corporate ESG (Environmental, Social Responsibility, Governance) performance on financial performance. The results did not directly prove a clear positive correlation between ESG performance and financial performance. It was found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, companies implemented social responsibility strategies to mitigate operational disruption risks, particularly to maintain employee health and safety, which significantly impacted free cash flow. Indeed, ESG performance as a sound long-term risk management strategy may play a vital role in enhancing a company′s resilience against economic, policy, and market fluctuations, thereby establishing a more stable foundation in the long term.

Future research should delve deeper into the connection between ESG performance and financial performance across different industries, especially on how enhancing corporate resilience can address various significant ESG issues. Moreover, considering that different dimensions of ESG may impact financial performance differently across various periods, further analysis should be conducted on how these dimensions independently or jointly affect financial outcomes. This understanding will help reveal the potential value of ESG in enhancing long-term corporate resilience and risk management, enabling businesses to maintain competitiveness without harming the environment in an ever-changing market and policy landscape, while creating greater value for shareholders and society.

關鍵字(中)

★ 新冠肺炎疫情
★ 自由現金流量
★ 環境保護、社會責任和公司治理

關鍵字(英)

★ COVID-19
★ Free Cash Flow to the Firm
★ ESG

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
1-1　　研究背景與動機 1
1-2　　研究目的 8
1-3　　研究架構 9
第二章SASB可再生資源與替代能源產業簡介 11
2-1　　可再生資源與替代能源定義 11
2-2　　SASB可再生資源與替代能源產業 11
第三章文獻探討 18
3-1　　企業社會責任擴展為ESG 18
3-2　　ESG非財務資訊揭露及準則 24
3-3　　ESG表現對財務績效的影響 26
第四章研究方法 29
4-1　　研究對象、期間及資料來源 29
4-2　　研究變數定義及模型 29
第五章實證結果與分析 33
5-1　　敘述性統計 33
5-2　　迴歸分析 36
第六章結論與建議 46
6-1　　研究結論 46
6-2　　研究建議及限制 46
參考文獻 48

參考文獻

池祥萱, 池祥麟, & 梁綺羚. (2016). 企業社會責任之策略性分析. 管理評論, 35(1), 21–45.
張育琳. (2019). 節能減碳, 企業綠色環境管理策略與公司績效之關連性. 中山管理評論, 27(2), 279–326.
鄭桂蕙, 林宛瑩, & 汪瑞芝. (2023). SASB 準則下環境社會治理績效與企業績效之關聯性. 會計審計論叢, 13(2), 1–40.
朱文儀, 李庭閣, 莊正民, & 廖盈琇. (2019). 大股東股權集中度, 外部法人持股, 外部董事年資對公司績效之影響-台灣上市公司的實證研究. 中山管理評論, 27(3), 551–582.
Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Guerrero-Villegas, J., Vidal-Salazar, M. D., & Delgado-Márquez, B. L. (2015). International Cultural Diversification and Corporate Social Performance in Multinational Enterprises: The Role of Slack Financial Resources. Management International Review, 55(3), 323–353.
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.
Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344.
Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental Performance and Executive Compensation: An Integrated Agency-Institutional Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.
Blair_Stout_1999_A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law.pdf. (不詳).
Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman. University of Iowa Press.
Brammer et al_2006_Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns.pdf. (不詳).
Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116.
Cahan, S. F., Chen, C., Chen, L., & Nguyen, N. H. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and media coverage. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 409–422.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.
Clark, J. M. (1916). The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility. Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), 209–229.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.
Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line for 21st century business. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136.
Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182–192.
Fatemi, A. M., & Fooladi, I. J. (2013). Sustainable finance: A new paradigm. Global Finance Journal, 24(2), 101–113.
Fatemi_Fooladi_2013_Sustainable finance.pdf. (不詳).
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
Friedman, M. (不詳). September 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. NY Times Mag, 13.
Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of business ethics, 100, 45–67.
Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.
Kim, Y., & Statman, M. (2012). Do corporations invest enough in environmental responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 115–129.
Lee, D. D., & Faff, R. W. (2009). Corporate Sustainability Performance and Idiosyncratic Risk: A Global Perspective. Financial Review, 44(2), 213–237.
Lööf, H., Sahamkhadam, M., & Stephan, A. (2022). Is Corporate Social Responsibility investing a free lunch? The relationship between ESG, tail risk, and upside potential of stocks before and during the COVID-19 crisis. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102499.
Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business ethics quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.
Semenova, N., & Hassel, L. G. (2008). Financial outcomes of environmental risk and opportunity for US companies. Sustainable Development, 16(3), 195–212.
Sheldon, O. (2004). The philosophy of management. Routledge.
Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2009). Can environmental investment and expenditure enhance financial performance of US electric utility firms under the clean air act amendment of 1990? Energy Policy, 37(11), 4819–4826.
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.
Wang, T., & Bansal, P. (2012). Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long‐term orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1135–1153.
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691.

指導教授

徐之強(Chih-Chiang Hsu)

審核日期

2024-5-21

推文