自然環境內在價值理論探究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：81

、訪客IP：3.144.19.165

姓名

羅嘉容(Chia-Jung Lo) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

哲學研究所

論文名稱

自然環境內在價值理論探究
(On Intrinsic Value Theory in Natural Environment)

相關論文

★ 人類中心主義批判研究	★ 從Peter Singer的動物解放學說探究台灣流浪犬的問題
★ Rolston生態環境內在價值探索	★ Naess深層生態學研究
★ Callicott環境倫理研究	★ 胎兒唐氏症施行人工流產的倫理反省
★ Cafaro環境德行倫理學研究：以台灣的人口與環境問題為例	★ Rolston 荒野價值理論探究
★ R. G. Frey 動物倫理研究	★ 環境公民倫理：當代公民社會的環境義務
★ 基因編輯技術的倫理反思

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

「為什麼人類有義務去保護自然環境」是當代環境倫理學討論眾多的一個議題。從典型的環境倫理學來看自然環境所衍生的環境問題，是因為人類為了自身的利益去掠奪自然環境的資源，而人類的惡意對待自然環境，造成了巨大的生態災難。當生態環境日益惡化，自然環境危機加劇時，人類便開始意識到自然環境所面臨的問題。為了回應這個問題，典型的環境倫理學試圖提出不同的學說來回應「人類為何有保護自然環境的義務」。本論文在探討當代環境倫理所面臨的問題時，首先對人類惡意對待自然環境提出倫理省思，即人類惡待自然的根源來自於強義人類中心主義。而這個思想顯然是造成自然環境資源日益減少及生態危機的主要根源。除此之外，更以主流的環境倫理學說對其作出倫理反思，即我們須要一個新的環境倫理學說來解決當代環境所面臨的問題。當代的環境倫理學家已經以內在價值來回應「為什麼人類有義務去保護自然環境」這個議題，但仍然很難擺脫人類中心主義或生態法西斯的難題，本論文試圖以「徹底的客觀內在價值理論」作為探討自然環境具有內在價值的一個新進路，以此回應「為什麼人類有義務去保護自然環境」。

摘要(英)

Why do human have the obligation to protect natural environment” is the most discussed issue in the contemporary environmental ethics. From a typical environmental ethics perspective, environmental issues occurred because human despoil natural environmental resources for the sake of one’s interest, causing severe ecological catastrophe as a result of harmful treatment on natural environment. When ecological environment is getting worse day by day and natural environment crisis increases, human begins start realizing the problems of natural environment.
To deal with this issue, typical environmental ethics attempts to raise different theories to respond to “why do human have the obligation to protect natural environment”. This dissertation aims to investigate the problem of contemporary environmental ethics. First, providing reflection on human harmful treatment on natural environment based on the strong sense of anthropocentrism as the root cause which leads to the resource depredation day by day and as the chief reason that causes ecological catastrophe. Second, providing ethical reflection on mainstream environmental ethics and thus derives at a need of new environmental ethics to solve the problems of contemporary environmental ethics. Contemporary environmental ethicists already provide the answer to “why do human have the obligation to protect natural environment” but hardly deal with the dilemma of anthropocentrism and ecofacism. This dissertation adopts a new approach to investigate whether natural environment possess intrinsic value through “the theory of radical objective intrinsic value” to respond to “Why do human have the obligation to protect natural environment”.

關鍵字(中)

★ 自然環境
★ 環境倫理
★ 人類中心主義
★ 內在價值
★ 徹底的客觀內在價值

關鍵字(英)

★ natural environment
★ environmental ethics
★ anthropocentrism
★ intrinsic value
★ radical objective intrinsic value

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要 ................................................................................................................... i
Abstract..................................................................................................................... ii
目錄......................................................................................................................... iv
導論...........................................................................................................................1
第一章當代自然環境所面臨的主要問題.......................................................... 10
第一節人類對地球的破壞................................................................................... 11
第二節人類惡待自然環境之倫理省思............................................................... 19
第三節自然環境內在價值之概念闡明................................................................30
第二章主觀內在價值理論 ..................................................................................38
第一節主觀內在價值理論之闡明........................................................................38
第二節主觀內在價值理論之批判........................................................................57
第三章客觀內在價值理論....................................................................................64
第一節客觀內在價值理論之闡明 .......................................................................64
第二節客觀內在價值理論之批判 ...................................................................... 78
第四章徹底的客觀內在價值論............................................................................87
第一節「利益」之進路........................................................................................87
第二節自然環境具有內在價值 .......................................................................... 99
第三節小結 ..........................................................................................................109
結論........................................................................................................................111
參考書目 ...............................................................................................................117

參考文獻

參考書目
專書
Alexander, Samuel. (1968). Beaty and Other Forms of Value. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company
Callicott, J. Baird. (1989). In Defense of the Land Ethic. New York: State University
of New York.
Callicott, J. Baird. (1999). Beyond the Land Ethic: More Essays in Environmental Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press
Callicott, J. Baird. (2013). Thinking Like a Planet: The Land Ethic and the Earth Ethic New York: Oxford University Press
Darwin, Charles. (1964). On the Origin of Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Darwin, Charles. (1998). The Decent of Man. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press.
Feinberg, Joel. (1973). Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Gates, Bill. (2021). How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the
Breakthroughs We Need. New York: Random House.
Hume, David. (2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Hume, David. (2006). An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. London: The Echo Library
Kant, Immanuel. (1963). Lectures on Ethics, trans. Louis Infield. New York: Harper and Row), pp. 239-240.
Leopold, Aldo. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University.
Leopold, Aldo. (1987). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Li, Jack. (2010). Can Death be a Harm to the Person Who Dies? Dordrecht,
Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Rolston III, Holmes. (1988). Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the
Nature World. Philadelphia, USA: Temple University.
Rolston III, Holmes. (1989a). Environmental Ethics: Values in and Duties to the
Natural World. philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Rolston III, Holmes. (1989b). Philosophy Gone Wild. New York: Prometheus.
Regan, Regan. (2004). The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Singer, Peter. (1999). Practical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University
Singer, Peter. (2002). Animal Liberation. New York: Harper Collins.
Taylor, Paul W. (1989), Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics (New Jersey: Princeton University Press
Wilson, Edward O. (1984), Biophilia. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press
Windelband, Wilhelm (1921). An Introduction of Philosophy, trans. Joseph McCabe. London: T. Fisher Unwin.
Warnock, G. J. (1971). The Object of Morality. New York: Methuen.
王先謙：《荀子集解》二十卷，（臺北市：成文，1977）
瑞秋．卡森著，黃中憲譯：《寂靜的春天》（台北：野人文化出版公司，2017）
論文集論文
Cafaro, Philip. (2005). Thoreau, Leopold, and Carson: Toward an Environmental
Virtue Ethics. In P. Cafaro & R. Sandler (Eds.), in Environmental Virtue
Ethics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 31-44.
Callicott, J. Baird. (2001). “Holistic Environmental Ethics and the Problem of Ecofascism”, in Michael E. Zimmerman, J. Baird Callicott, George Sessions, Karen J. Warren, and John Clark (eds.), Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, pp.123-124.
Callicott, J. Baird. (2005). “The Conceptual Foundations of the Land Ethic”, in Louis P. Pojman (ed.), Environmental Ethics: Readings in Theory and Application Canada: Wadsworth, Inc., p.152.
Callicott, J. Baird. (1986). “The Intrinsic Value of Nonhuman Species”, in Bryan Norton (ed.), The Preservation of Species. Princeton: Princeton University Press), p.160.
Feinberg, Joel. (1977). “Harm and Self-interest” in Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honour of H.L.A Hart, eds., PMS Hacker and J. Raz. Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp.285-286.
Feinberg, Joel. (1993). Harm to Others. In J. M. Fischer (Ed.), in The Metaphysics of
Death. Stanford: Stanford University, pp. 169-190.
Goodpaster, Kenneth E. (2001). “On Being Morally Considerable”, in Michael E. Zimmerman, J. Baird Callicott, George Sessions, Karen J. Warren, and John Clark (eds.), Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, 3rd ed. (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall), pp.59-64.
Holmes Rolston, III. (1996). Feeding People versus Saving Nature. In W. Aiken & H.
LaFollette (Eds.), in World Hunger and Morality. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Holmes Rolston, III. (2005). Environmental virtue ethics: Half the truth but dangerous. In R. Sandler & P. Cafaro (eds.), Environmental Virtue Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield. pp.61-78.
Holmes Rolston, III. (2006). Science and Religion in the Face of the Environmental Crisis In Roger S. Gottlieb, ed., in The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Ecology. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.376-397.

Kopnina Helen. (2019). Ecocentric education: Student reflections on anthropocentrism-ecocentrism continuum and justice in Journal of Education for Sustainable Development. (Journal of Education for Sustainable Development). pp.1-19.
Lee, Jack. (2010). “Intrinsic Value and Respect for the Natural Environment”, in Jack Lee ed., Sustainability and Quality of Life. Palo Alto, California: Ria University Press, p.42.
Thompson, Allen, & Gradiner, Stephen M. (2017). Introduction Contemporary
Environmental Ethics. In S. M. Gradiner & A. Thompson (Eds.), in The
Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics. New York: Oxford University.
Regan, Tom. (2001) “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs,” in Michael E. Zimmerman, J. Baird Callicott, George Sessions, Karen J. Warren, and John Clark (eds.), Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Singer, Peter. (1976). “All Animals Are Equal” in Tom Regan and Peter Singer, Animal Rights and Human Obligations. N. J.: Prentice-Hall, p.316.
Singer, Peter. (1989). “All Animals Are Equal”, in Tom Regan and Peter Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, pp.148-162.
Singer, Peter. (2001). “All Animals are Equal,” in Michael E. Zimmerman, J. Baird Callicott, George Sessions, Karen J. Warren, and John Clark (eds), Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, 3rd ed. (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2001), p.31.
Sylvan, Richard. (2001), “Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental Ethic?”, in Michael E. Zimmerman, J. Baird Callicott, George Sessions, Karen J. Warren, and John Clark (eds.), Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology, 3rd ed. (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall), pp.17-18.
Taylor, Paul W. (1994). “Biocentric Egalitarianism”, in Louis P. Pojman (ed.), Environmental Ethics: Readings in Theory and Application. Boston: Jones and Bartlett, p.71.
Vinterkvist Rut. (2024). A Possibility for Environmentalists to Deny Intrinsic Value in Nature, in Environmental Ethics Vol. 46, No.1(spring) pp.91-93.
Weir, Jack. (2001). Holmes Rolston III. In J. A. Palmer (Ed.), in Fifty Key Thinker on
The Environment. New York: Routledge, pp. 260-267.
期刊論文
Bradley, Ben. (2002). “Is Intrinsic Value Conditional?” Philosophical Studies, 107: pp.23-44.
Callicott, J. Baird. (1984). “Non-Anthropocentric Value Theory and Environmental Ethics”, American Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 21, p.299.
Callicott, J. Baird. (1986). “The Intrinsic Value of Nonhuman Species”. In Bryan Norton (ed.), The Preservation of Species. Princeton: Princeton University Pres), pp.142-143.
Callicott, J. Baird. (1988). Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Back
Together Again. Between the Species, 4(3), 163-169.
Hargrove, Eugene C. (1992). Weak Anthropocentric intrinsic Value. The Monist,
75(2), pp.195-196.
Holmes Rolston, III. (2016). Perpetual Perishing, Perpetual Renewal. The Northern Review 28 (Winter). pp.111-123.
Leopold, Aldo. (1933) “The Conservation Ethic”, Journal of Forestry 31, p.202.
Lee, Jack. (2008). Are All Animals Equal? Studies on Humanities and Ecology in
Taiwan, 10(1), 29-43.
Lo, Y. S. (2001). “The Land Ethic and Callicott’s Ethical System (1980-2001): An Overview and Critique”, Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 44:3, pp.331-358.
Moore, G. E. (1922). Philosophical Studies. New York: The Humanities Press, Inc, p.255.
Norton, Bryan G. (1984). “Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism”, Environmental Ethics, Vol. 6, pp.131-148.
Nelson, Michael P. (1996). Holists and Fascists and Paper Tiger...Oh My! Ethics and
the Environment, 1(2), pp.103-115.
O’Neill, John. (1992). “The Varieties of Intrinsic Value”, Monist 75, No. 2, pp.119-120.
Sylvan, Richard. (1973). “Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental Ethic?”, Proceedings of the XV World Congress of Philosophy, No.1, pp.207-209.
Singer, Peter. (2009). Speciesism and Moral Status. Metaphilosophy, 40(3-4), 567-
581.
Sagoff, Mark. (1984). Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Bad Marriage,
Quick Divorce. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 22(2), 297-307
Taylor, Paul W. (1981). The Ethics of Respect for Nature. Environmental Ethics, 3(3),
197-218.
Taylor, Paul W. (1984). “Are Humans Superior to Animals and Plants?”, Environmental Ethics 6, pp.150-151.
White, Lynn. (1967). “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis”, Science Vol. 155, pp.1203-1207.
Zimmerman, Michael E. (1995). The Threat of Ecofascism. Social Theory and
Practice, 21(2), 207-238.
李凱恩，2011，〈Singer 動物解放倫理學批判研究〉《應用倫理評論》， 51，頁19-34。
李凱恩(2019)。〈道德對待動物之理由淺悉〉《應用倫理評論》， 66，頁1-14。
林恩志（2017）。〈對Callicott非人類中心主觀內在價值論的反思〉，《應用倫理評論》，63，頁 79-99。
程進發（2017）。〈生態智慧 T 中的 friluftsliv/天地間自由地徜徉〉，《應用倫理評論》，63，頁 27-49。羅嘉容（2017）。〈Rolston與生態環境之客觀內在價值〉，《應用倫理評論》，63，頁 51-77。
線上資料
1. BBC NEWS（2020），Russian Arctic oil spill pollutes big lake near Norilsk, Retrieved 2022.5.15 from The BBC NEWS， URL= https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52977740

2. Morelle, Rebecca（2013），Deforestation in Africa′s Congo Basin rainforest slows, Retrieved 2022.5.15 from The BBC NEWS URL=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-23382526

3. BBC NEWS （2019年5月），「人類擴張地球遭殃」百萬物種生命瀕危， BBC NEWS 中文，URL=https://www.bbc.com/ukchina/trad/48201045

4. 維基百科（2023年）2010墨西哥灣漏油事。維基百科，URL=https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010%E5%B9%B4%E5%A2%A8%E8%A5%BF%E5%93%A5%E7%81%A3%E6%BC%8F%E6%B2%B9%E4%BA%8B%E6%95%85（2023年1月13日瀏覽）

5. 看守台灣（2021年8月），石油開採的危害，看守台灣， URL=https://www.taiwanwatch.org.tw/node/1173#:~:text=%E6%AF%94%E5%A6%82%EF%BC%8C%E8%98%87%E8%81%AF%E7%9A%84%E7%9F%B3%E6%B2%B9%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD,%E5%9A%B4%E9%87%8D%EF%BC%8C%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E5%A4%B1%E5%8E%BB%E4%BA%86%E5%B8%8C%E6%9C%9B%E3%80%82 （2022年5月11日瀏覽）

6. 未來生活實驗（2021年2月），藻礁懶人包－藻礁是什麼？一秒帶你看懂桃園大潭藻礁和中油的關係，未來生活實驗，URL=https://www.lifeaholic.tw/article51894/ （2022年5月14日瀏覽）

7. Greenpeace 綠色和平（2019年12月），巴西亞馬遜毀林，創十年新高，Greenpeace 綠色和平， URL= https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/11281/%E5%B7%B4%E8%A5%BF%E4%BA%9E%E9%A6%AC%E9%81%9C%E6%AF%80%E6%9E%97%EF%BC%8C%E5%89%B5%E5%8D%81%E5%B9%B4%E6%96%B0%E9%AB%98/ （2022年5月17日瀏覽）

8. BBC NEWS（2019年8月），亞馬遜雨林：創紀錄大火源於天災還是人禍，BBC NEWS中文，URL=https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-49444685

9. 安吉（2022年8月），「我們的目標是賺錢不是救地球」剛果民主共和國拍賣雨林地促石油開發，地球圖輯隊，URL=https://dq.yam.com/post/15018 （2022年9 月19日瀏覽）
10. 維基百科（2022年7月），剛果盆地，維基百科，URL=https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%88%9A%E6%9E%9C%E7%9B%86%E5%9C%B0 （2022年5月11日瀏覽）

11. Greenpeace綠色和平（2014年11 月），森林消失的原因：非法貿易、農業開墾、森林火災與... ， Greenpeace綠色和平，URL=https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/1620/%E6%A3%AE%E6%9E%97%E6%B6%88%E5%A4%B1%E7%9A%84%E5%8E%9F%E5%9B%A0/ （2022年5月16日瀏覽）

12. Greenpeace綠色和平（2018年5月），印尼「最後的雨林」遭棕櫚業者砍伐，Greenpeace綠色和平，URL=https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/1433/%E5%8D%B0%E5%B0%BC%E3%80%8C%E6%9C%80%E5%BE%8C%E7%9A%84%E9%9B%A8%E6%9E%97%E3%80%8D%E9%81%AD%E6%A3%95%E6%AB%9A%E6%A5%AD%E8%80%85%E7%A0%8D%E4%BC%90/ （2022年5月19日瀏覽）

13. URL=https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201905070004.aspx（2022年11月1日瀏覽）

14. Greenpeace綠色和平（2022年9月），亞馬遜雨林瀕臨氣候臨界點，巴西政府放任毀林，森林恐退化成草原！URL=https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/32563/%E4%BA%9E%E9%A6%AC%E9%81%9C%E9%9B%A8%E6%9E%97%E7%80%95%E8%87%A8%E6%B0%A3%E5%80%99%E8%87%A8%E7%95%8C%E9%BB%9E%EF%BC%8C%E5%B7%B4%E8%A5%BF%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E6%94%BE%E4%BB%BB%E6%AF%80%E6%9E%97%EF%BC%8C/（2023年12月17日瀏覽）

15. 全球災害事件簿（2019年12月），2019年亞馬遜雨林大火探討
URL=https://den.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/1132/1188/1205/20844/51192/（2023年12月17日瀏覽）

指導教授

李凱恩

審核日期

2024-7-26

推文