生命價值衡量—以台灣夫妻配對資料分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：88

、訪客IP：18.226.200.180

姓名

賴柔穎(Jou-Ying Lai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

生命價值衡量—以台灣夫妻配對資料分析
(Valuing Life: Analysis Using Taiwanese Married Couples′ Data)

相關論文

★ 銀行授信行為之研究	★ 經發會前後台股指數、期貨指數、電子指數與金融指數之關聯性
★ 台灣家庭夏天用電需求分析	★ 影響台銀黃金存摺價格因素之研究
★ 國際原油投資報酬與資金行情之探討-GARCH模型	★ 電子商務對企業經營績效之影響
★ 有害廢棄物之處理與再利用研究：以A公司為例	★ 台灣電燈用電需求量探討--以縣市資料為例
★ 台美股價、匯率、利率之動態關聯-VECM與VECM-GARCH應用	★ 台灣攤販業獲利決定因素-人力資本的影響
★ 航空客運經濟帶油決定因素之實證分析	★ 台灣都會區用電需求影響因素實證分析
★ 便利商店現煮咖啡銷售之研究	★ 大陸鋼鐵出口與台灣鋼鐵價格的關聯性
★ 人口結構變遷對財政教育支出之影響	★ 運動鞋製業的市場結構、行為與績效分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

此論文主要研究職業死亡風險對工人工資的影響，尤其過去國內文獻中，鮮少針對性別及家戶成員（戶長與配偶）進行篩選，並特別考量同家庭內夫妻是否選擇高風險工作，探討此情況下生命價值的估計是否更高。本研究透過樣本篩選，分別探討男性樣本、女性樣本及男女混合樣本間的工資風險補償特性。
本研究主要使用Aldy(2019)透過選型配對(Assortative mating)進行重構後之特徵工資模型(Hedonic Model)作為模型，並以台灣之資料進行統計生命價值(Value of a Statistical Life, VSL)之估計，分析96至105年間戶長和配偶的工資數據，總樣本數4,640筆，並以四種樣本組合進行估計：(1)所有工作者樣本；(2)僅戶長樣本；(3)僅配偶樣本；(4)配偶相減樣本。
根據職業致命風險係數進行生命價值估算，包含所有工作者的樣本估計為141,039,987元；戶長樣本為101,371,723元；配偶樣本為105,294,878元；使用選型配對理論的夫妻樣本為250,179,018元，與傳統的估計方式相比，使用夫妻內部差異法之模型，排除異質性問題後，所估計之統計生命價值更高，且發現男性在面對工作風險時，工資補償效果顯著，而女性則未顯示出同樣的補償效果，反映出職場性別不平等現象。

摘要(英)

This study investigates the impact of occupational fatal risk on workers′ wages, particularly focusing on the rarely addressed aspects of gender and household member selection (household head and spouse) in previous domestic literature. It specifically considers whether spouses within the same family choose high-risk jobs and explores whether life value estimates are higher in such cases. Through sample selection, the study separately examines the wage-risk compensation characteristics among male samples, female samples, and mixed-gender samples.
The primary model used in this research is the hedonic wage model reconstructed through assortative mating, as proposed by Aldy (2019). Taiwanese data from 2007 to 2016 were used to estimate the value of life, analyzing wage data from household heads and spouses. The total sample size was 4,640, and the study conducted estimates using four sample combinations: (1) all workers, (2) only household heads, (3) only spouses, and (4) spousal difference samples.
According to the occupational fatal risk coefficients, the estimated values of life are as follows: for all workers, the estimate is NT$141,039,987; for household heads, it is NT$101,371,723 ; for spouses, it is NT$105,294,878 ; and for the sample using the assortative mating theory, it is NT$250,179,018. Compared to traditional estimation methods, the model using intra-household differences, which excludes heterogeneity issues, results in a higher estimated value of statistical life (VSL). The study also finds that wage compensation for job risks is significant for men, whereas women do not show the same compensation effect, reflecting workplace gender inequality.

關鍵字(中)

★ 生命價值
★ 特徵工資法
★ 選型配對

關鍵字(英)

★ Value of Statistical Life
★ Hedonic Wage Method
★ Assortative Mating

論文目次

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究動機 1
第二節研究目的 2
第三節研究架構 3
第二章文獻回顧 5
第一節生命價值的定義與應用 5
第二節生命價值估計國內外文獻 6
第三節風險態度與配對問題 13
第三章理論架構與實證模型 18
第一節生命價值理論架構 18
第二節實證模型 21
一、特徵工資模型設定 21
二、調整之特徵工資模型設定 22
第四章資料來源與變數說明 25
第一節資料來源 25
第二節變數設定及說明 26
第三節樣本統計分析 28
第五章實證分析結果 30
第一節利用特徵工資模型進行戶主和配偶數據的實證結果 30
第二節進行戶主和配偶之生命價值估計 34
第六章結論與研究限制 35
第一節結論與建議 35
第二節研究限制與未來研究建議 35
參考文獻 37

參考文獻

(一) 中文文獻
1. 王葳. 1987. 「生命價值之推估」. 逢甲大學經濟研究所, 碩士論文.
2. 李汶洙. 2010. 「生命價值與年齡關係之實證分析—以台灣為例」. 國立中央大學產業經濟研究所, 碩士論文.
3. 郭姿瑩. 2020. 「以特徵工資探討台灣生命價值與年齡之關係」. 國立中央大學產業經濟研究所, 碩士論文.
4. 詹方冠. 1989. 「台灣地區勞動者職業風險與生命價值之研究」. 國立政治大學經濟研究所, 碩士論文.
5. 蔡彣涓. 2006. 「應用個體計量的三篇研究:教育政策、跨代教育效果與統計生命價值的評估」. 國立台灣大學經濟研究所, 博士論文.
6. 劉錦添與詹方冠. 1989. 「台灣地區勞動者生命價值之推估─民國71年至民國75年」. 中央研究院經濟研究所經濟論文, 17(2): 55-87.
7. 劉錦添與許績天. 1998. 「主觀工作風險知覺與工資補償─台灣石化工人的研究」. 中央研究院經濟研究所經濟論文, 26(1): 51-69.
8. 薛立敏與王素彎. 1987. 「台灣地區就業人口生命價值之評估—工資-風險貼水法之理論與實證」. 中華經濟研究院經濟專論.
(二) 英文文獻
1. Aldy, Joseph E., and Kip W. Viscusi. 2007b. “Age Differences in the Value of Statistical Life: Revealed Preference Evidence.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(2): 241-260.
2. Aldy, J. E. (2019). Birds of a feather: Estimating the value of statistical life from dual-earner families. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 58(2-3), 187-205.
3. Barsky, R. B., F. T. Juster, M. S. Kimball, and M. D. Shapiro. 1997. “Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2): 537-579.
4. Becker, G. S. 1973. “A Theory of Marriage: Part I.” Journal of Political Economy, 81(4): 813-846.
5. Becker, G. S. 1974. “A Theory of Marriage: Part II.” Journal of Political Economy, 82(2, Part 2): S11-S26.
6. Black, D. A., and T. J. Kniesner. 2003. “On the Measurement of Job Risk in Hedonic Wage Models.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(3): 205-220.
7. Clark, A. E., and F. Etile. 2006. “Don’t Give Up on Me Baby: Spousal Correlation in Smoking Behaviour.” Journal of Health Economics, 25(5): 958-978.
8. Chiappori, P. A., S. Oreffice, and C. Quintana-Domeque. 2010. “Matching with a Handicap: The Case of Smoking in the Marriage Market.” IZA Working Paper.
9. Dockins, Chris, Kelly B. Maguire, Steve Newbold, Nathalie B. Simon, Alan Krupnick, and Laura O. Taylor. 2018. “What’s in a Name? A Systematic Search for Alternatives to ‘VSL.’” Working Paper 18-01.
10. Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, and U. Sunde. 2012. “The Intergenerational Transmission of Risk and Trust Attitudes.” The Review of Economic Studies, 79(2): 645-677.
11. Eeckhoudt, Louis R., and James K. Hammitt. 2001. “Background Risks and the Value of a Statistical Life.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23(3): 261-279.
12. Eeckhoudt, Louis, and James K. Hammitt. 2004. “Does Risk Aversion Vary with Wealth? Evidence from Panel Data.” Economica, 71(282): 19-38.
13. Evans, Mary, and Georg Schaur. 2010. “A Quantile Estimation Approach to Identify Income and Age Variation in the Value of a Statistical Life.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(3): 260-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.11.004.
14. Gentry, Elissa Philip, and W. Kip Viscusi. 2019. "The Fatality and Morbidity Components of the Value of Statistical Life."
15. Giergiczny, Marek. 2008. “Value of a Statistical Life—the Case of Poland.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 41: 209-221.
16. Grazier, S. 2007. “Compensating Wage Differentials for Risk of Death in Great Britain: An Examination of the Trade Union and Health and Safety Committee Impact.”
17. Hakes, J. K., and W. K. Viscusi. 2007. “Automobile Seatbelt Usage and the Value of Statistical Life.” Southern Economic Journal, 73(3): 659-676.
18. Hammitt, James K., Jin-Tan Liu, and Jin-Long Liu. 2022. “Is Survival a Luxury Good? Income Elasticity of the Value per Statistical Life.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 65: 239-260.
19. Hersch, J., and W. Kip Viscusi. 2010. "The Heterogeneity of the Value of Statistical Life: Evidence from Panel Data."
20. Hsiao, Ching. 2014. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Liu, Jin-Tan, James K. Hammitt, and Jin-Long Liu. 1997. “Estimated Hedonic Wage Function and Value of Life in a Developing Country.” Economics Letters, 57: 353-358.
22. Kniesner, Thomas J., W. Kip Viscusi, and James P. Ziliak. 2014. “Willingness to Accept Equals Willingness to Pay for Labor Market Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48: 187-205.
23. Kimball, M. S., C. R. Sahm, and M. D. Shapiro. 2009. “Risk Preferences in the PSID: Individual Imputations and Family Covariation.” American Economic Review, 99(2): 363-368.
24. Liou, Je-Liang. 2019. “Effect of Income Heterogeneity on Valuation of Mortality Risk in Taiwan: An Application of Unconditional Quantile Regression Method.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9): 1620.
25. Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26. Rawlik, K., O. Canela-Xandri, and A. Tenesa. 2019. “Indirect Assortative Mating for Human Disease and Longevity.” Heredity. doi: 10.1038/s41437-019-0185-3.
27. Riera Font, Antoni, Aina Ripoll Penalva, and Josep Mateu Sbert. 2007. “Estimación del Valor Estadístico de la Vida en España: Una Aplicación del Método de Salarios Hedónicos.” Hacienda Pública Española (181): 29–48.
28. Santmyire, B. R., S. R. Feldman, and A. B. Fleischer Jr. 2001. “Lifestyle High Risk Behaviors and Demographics May Predict the Level of Participation in Sun Protection Behaviors and Skin Cancer Primary Prevention in the United States: Results of the 1998 National Health Interview Survey.” Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, 92(5): 1315-1324.
29. Scotton, Carol R., and Laura O. Taylor. 2008. “Of Cab Drivers and Coal Miners: Accounting for Risk Heterogeneity in Value of Statistical Life Estimates.”
30. Scotton, Carol R., and Laura O. Taylor. “Valuing Risk Reductions: Incorporating Risk Heterogeneity into a Revealed Preference Framework.”
31. Storesletten, Kjetil, Christopher I. Telmer, and Amir Yaron. 2004. “Consumption and Risk Sharing over the Life Cycle.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(3): 609–
32. Viscusi, W. Kip. 2004. “The Value of Life: Estimates with Risks by Occupation and Industry.” Economic Inquiry, 42(1): 29-48.
33. Viscusi, W. Kip. 2009. “The Devaluation of Life.” Regulation & Governance, 3: 103-127.
34. Viscusi, W. Kip. 2018. Pricing Lives: Guideposts for a Safer Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35. Viscusi, W. Kip, and Elissa Philip Gentry. 2015. “The Value of a Statistical Life for Transportation Regulations: A Test of the Benefits Transfer Methodology.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51(1): 53-77.
36. Viscusi, W. Kip, and Joseph E. Aldy. 2003. “The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1): 5-76.
37. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
(三) 其他參考資料
1. 內政部統計局. 2020. 《內政部統計通報》. 2020年3月23日取自: [內政部統計局](https://www.moi.9ov.tw/files/news file/wl0904%E4%BA%BA%E5%8F%A3%E5%B9%B4%E9%BD%A l.pdf).
2. 環境新聞服務 (ENS) 美國華盛頓特區報導. 2011. "U.S. EPA: Clean Air Act Saved 160,000 Lives in 2010." 2020年2月10日取自: ENS.
3. 美國交通部 (DOT). 2016. 《Revised Departmental Guidance 2016 Treatment of the Value of Preventing Fatalities and Injuries in Preparing Economic Analyses》. 2020年3月17日取自: DOT.
4. 美國環保署 (EPA). 2020. "Mortality Risk Valuation." 2020年3月7日取自: EPA.
5. National Poll on Healthy Aging. 2023. "Trends in Loneliness Among Older Adults: 2018-2023." Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. https://www.healthyagingpoll.org/reports-more/report/trends-loneliness-among-older-adults-2018-2023 (accessed May 30, 2024).

指導教授

劉錦龍(Jin-Long Liu)

審核日期

2024-6-21

推文