董事會性別多元化對員工福祉的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：61

、訪客IP：3.137.178.122

姓名

林姿伶(Tzu-Ling Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所在職專班

論文名稱

董事會性別多元化對員工福祉的影響

相關論文

★ 公司治理、創新與公司經營績效：台灣電子業之實證研究	★ 董事會性別組成比例與員工之關係：以台灣企業勞動訴訟為例子
★ 國家財富、最適外匯儲備水準與主權基金	★ 成人參與數位學習與個人特徵之關聯性分析
★ 未成年時期債務承擔對成年債務償還能力之影響：以臺灣健保費繳納行為為例	★ 臺灣廣基型ETF與專業化ETF 表現比較
★ Common Ownership and Online Platforms Competition with In-store Referral	★ 不確定性與資本結構：臺灣上市上櫃公司實證研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究以2012年至2022年臺灣上市公司為研究對象，探討董事會性別多元化對員工福祉的影響。員工福祉的衡量指標包括基層員工薪酬、員工離職率及員工流動率。為了避免內生性問題對結果產生影響，本文參考相關文獻使用工具變數法進行穩健性測試，選取同產業中女性董事數量佔所有董事數量的比率作為工具變數。

實證結果顯示，未控制內生性問題之前，女性董事比例的提升與基層員工薪酬之間存在顯著正相關性，但與員工離職率及員工流動率無顯著關聯；當修正內生性問題之後，則基層員工薪酬、員工離職率及員工流動率皆顯著性不足，此顯著性不足結果可能來源於，所使用工具變數在本文探討的議題中參考性有限所致，或是研究區間尚未受到金管會強制規定上市櫃公司需包含至少 1 名不同性別的董事，女性董事比例相對較低，難以確認女性董事是否對員工福祉產生影響力，亦建議後續研究者，可針對2023年之後的數據作規範前與規範後的探討。

摘要(英)

This study examines the impact of board gender diversity on employee welfare using data from Taiwan-listed companies from 2012 to 2022. Employee welfare is measured by grassroots employee compensation, employee turnover rate, and employee mobility. This paper adopts the instrumental variables approach to mitigate endogeneity issues, following relevant literature. The ratio of female directors to total directors within the same industry is the instrumental variable for robustness testing.

The empirical results indicate that before controlling for endogeneity issues, there is a significant positive correlation between the proportion of female directors and grassroots employee compensation but no significant relationship with employee turnover rate and mobility. After correcting for endogeneity issues, the significance of the effects on frontline employee compensation, employee turnover rate, and employee mobility rate diminishes. This insignificance may stem from limitations in the instrumental variables used in this study or the fact that during the study period, Taiwan′s Financial Supervisory Commission did not mandate listed companies to include at least one director of a different gender, resulting in a relatively low proportion of female directors. Therefore, it is challenging to confirm whether female directors influence employee welfare. Future research should examine data from 2023 onwards before and after regulatory changes to explore this issue further.

關鍵字(中)

★ 女性董事
★ 員工福祉
★ 工具變數法

關鍵字(英)

★ female directors
★ employee welfare
★ instrumental variables approach

論文目次

中文摘要··································································································································i
英文摘要 ················· ··············································································································ii
誌謝 ········································································································································iii
目錄 ········································································································································iv
圖目錄····································································································································· v
表目錄 ···································································································································vi
第一章緒論···························································································································1
1.1 研究動機··························································································································1
1.2 研究目的··························································································································5
1.3 研究流程··························································································································7
第二章文獻探討···················································································································8
2.1 影響員工福祉的因素····································································································8
2.2 女性董事參與企業組織的影響················································································10
2.2.1 女性特質與員工關係······························································································10
2.2.2 女性董事與企業經營績效······················································································11
2.3 公司治理與員工福祉的關連研究············································································13
第三章研究方法與資料來源···························································································15
3-1 資料來源·······················································································································15
3-2 研究變數之定義及說明·····························································································15
3-2-1 被解釋變數···············································································································15
3-2-2 解釋變數···················································································································16
3-2-3 控制變數···················································································································16
3-3 研究方法與模型··········································································································22
3-3-1 共線性診斷··············································································································22
3-3-2 最小平方法（Ordinary Least Square， OLS）模型·································22
3-3-3 二階段最小平方法（Two-stage OLS）模型················································25
第四章實證結果與分析····································································································30
4.1 敘述統計························································································································30
4.2 相關係數分析···············································································································33
4.3 迴歸分析結果···············································································································36
4.3.1 董事會女性成員比例的提高是否對基層員工薪酬（NEC）產生影響······36
4.3.2 董事會女性成員比例的提高是否對員工離職率（TR）產生影響··············39
4.3.3 董事會女性成員比例的提高是否對員工流動率（ETR）產生影響············41
4.4 內生性處理 ···················································································································44
4.4.1 女性董事比例（DIV）與基層員工薪酬（NEC）以工具變數法················44
4.4.2 女性董事比例（DIV）與員工離職率（TR）以工具變數法························48
4.4.3 女性董事比例（DIV）與員工流動率（ETR）以工具變數法······················52
第五章結論··························································································································56
參考文獻································································································································58

參考文獻

中文文獻
1. 呂英與王瀟，2020。女性董事有利於提高企業内部薪酬公平嗎？南方金融，1，48-59。
2. 林揚舜與鍾俊文，2005。員工分紅配股與員工流動率間之關係。貨幣觀測與信用評等，52，88-98。
3. 陳家偉，2021。公司治理是否降低了高管與基層員工間的薪資差異？以台灣為例。證券市場發展季刊，33(4)，1-29。
4. 廖益均，2015。從員工議題談企業社會責任－以基層員工薪資、員工流動率為例。貨幣觀測與信用評等，115，109-122。
5. 廖益興，2010。董事會組成、股權結構與年報資訊揭露水準。臺大管理論叢，20(2)，209-250。
6. 劉美纓、丁碧慧與朱奐聿，2014。企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關連性研究。科際整合管理研討會。
7. 蔡明宏、翁培師、王子綾與張航，2020。家族企業與集團企業中董事會性別組成對公司的影響：績效、研發投資及現金持有。管理學報，37(1)，35- 68。
8. 薛敏正、葉淑玲與盧怡妏，2022。股權結構、公司治理與企業社會責任對員工薪酬之影響。中華會計學刊，18(2)，167-205。
9. 鐘寧樺，2012。公司治理與員工福利：來自中國非上市企業的證據。經濟研究，12，137–151。

英文文獻
1. Abatecola, G., & Cristofaro, M. (2020). Hambrick and Mason’s “Upper Echelons Theory”: Evolution and open avenues. Journal of Management History, 26(1), 116-136.
2. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
3. Adams, R., Licht, A. & Sagiv, L. (2011). Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1331-1355.
4. Adhikari, B. K., Agrawal, A., & Malm, J. (2019). Do women managers keep firms out of trouble? Evidence from corporate litigation and policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(1), 202-225.
5. Baptiste, N. R. (2008). Tightening the link between employee wellbeing at work and performance: A new dimension for HRM. Management Decision, 46(2), 284-309.
6. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.
7. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
8. Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2020). Institutional ownership and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(3), 667-689.
9. Cumming, D., Leung, T. Y., & RUI, O. (2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1572-1593.
10. Devicienti, F., Grinza, E., Manello, A., & Vannoni, D. (2019). What are the benefits of having more female leaders? Evidence from the use of part-time work in Italy. ILR Review, 72(4), 897-926.
11. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102-111.
12. Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39(C), 193-209.
13. Fondas, N., & Sassalos, S. (2000). A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global focus, 12(2), 13-22.
14. Fuerst, O., & Kang, S.‐H. (2004). Corporate governance, expected operating performance, and pricing. Corporate Ownership and Control, 1(2), 13-30.
15. Gorden, W. I., Anderson, C. M., & Bruning, S. D., (1992). Employee perceptions of corporate partnership: An affective-moral quid pro quo. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5(1), 75-85.
16. Griffeth, R., Hom, P., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-488.
17. Hallowell, R. (1996). Southwest Airlines: A case study linking employee needs satisfaction and organizational capabilities to competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 35(4), 513-534.
18. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
19. Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941-952.
20. Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. J. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 822-839.
21. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
22. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53-72.
23. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A Meta-Analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.
24. Kabacoff, R. I. (1998). Gender differences in organizational leadership. Portland: Management Research Group.
25. Kanji, G. K., & Chopra, P. K. (2009). Psychosocial system for work well-being: On measuring work stress by causal pathway. Total Quality Management, 20(5), 563-580.
26. Li, Q., Lourie, B., Nekrasov, A., & Shevlinb, T. (2022). Employee turnover and firm performance: Large-Sample archival evidence. Management Science, 68(8), 5667-5683.
27. Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169-184.
28. McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42,75-99.
29. Mobley, W. H., (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237-240.
30. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067-1101.
31. Perryman, A. A., Fernando, G. D., & Tripathy, A. (2016). Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 579-586.
32. Price, J. L. (2001). Reflections on the determinants of voluntary turnover. International Journal of Manpower, 22(7), 600-624.
33. Rizwan, M., & Mukhtar, A. (2014). Preceding to employee satisfaction and turnover intention. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(3), 87-106.
34. Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration. Sage Publications, 33-38.
35. Sohail Ahmad, Owais Shafique, & Warda Najeeb Jamal. (2020). Impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on banks’ financial performance and the mediating role of employees’ satisfaction and loyalty in Pakistan. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, 6(3), 765-774.
36. Unsal-Akbıyık, B. S., & Zeytinoglu, I. U. (2018). “We are like a family!”: Flexibility and intention to stay in boutique hotels in turkey. Relations Industrielles, 73(2), 319-342.
37. Wieland, S., & Flavel, B. S. (2015). The influence of gender diverse corporate boards on employee-orientation. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(4), 825-848.

指導教授

蔡明宏蔡栢昇(Min-Hung Tsay Pak-Sing Choi)

審核日期

2024-7-17

推文