| 參考文獻 |
1. Abrantes, A. C., Passos, A. M., Cunha, M. P. E., & Santos, C. M. (2022). Getting the knack for team-improvised adaptation: The role of reflexivity and team mental model similarity. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 58(2), 281-315.
2. Acuña, S. T., Gómez, M., & Juristo, N. (2008). Towards understanding the relationship between team climate and software quality—a quasi-experimental study. Empirical software engineering, 13, 401-434.
3. Acuña, S. T., Gómez, M. N., Hannay, J. E., Juristo, N., & Pfahl, D. (2015). Are team personality and climate related to satisfaction and software quality? Aggregating results from a twice replicated experiment. Information and Software Technology, 57, 141-156.
4. Agarwal, N. K. (2015). Towards a definition of serendipity in information behaviour. Information research: an international electronic journal, 20(3), n3.
5. Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Alshallaqi, M. (2022). Impact of autonomy, innovativeness, risk-taking, proactiveness, and competitive aggressiveness on students’ intention to start a new venture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100239.
6. Akbar, R. (2019). Tailoring agile-based software development processes. IEEE Access, 7, 139852-139869.
7. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.
8. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 19(3), 235-258.
9. Andersson, M., Moen, O., & Brett, P. O. (2020). The organizational climate for psychological safety: Associations with SMEs′ innovation capabilities and innovation performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 55, 101554.
10. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of marketing research, 14(3), 396-402.
11. Artinger, F., Petersen, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Weibler, J. (2015). Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S33-S52.
12. Austin, R. D., Devin, L., & Sullivan, E. E. (2012). Accidental innovation: Supporting valuable unpredictability in the creative process. Organization Science, 23(5), 1505-1522.
13. Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied psychology, 91(4), 963.
14. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 389-411.
15. Balzano, M. (2022). Serendipity in management studies: a literature review and future research directions. Management Decision, 60(13), 130-152.
16. Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., & Thomas, D. (2001). The agile manifesto.
17. Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long range planning, 45(5-6), 359-394.
18. Berger, J. O., & Delampady, M. (1987). Testing precise hypotheses. Statistical Science, 317-335.
19. Berraies, S., & Chouiref, A. (2023). Exploring the effect of team climate on knowledge management in teams through team work engagement: Evidence from knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 842-869.
20. Biancani, S., McFarland, D. A., & Dahlander, L. (2014). The semiformal organization. Organization Science, 25(5), 1306-1324.
21. Björneborn, L. (2017). Three key affordances for serendipity: Toward a framework connecting environmental and personal factors in serendipitous encounters. Journal of documentation, 73(5), 1053-1081.
22. Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016). Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1151.
23. Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hibben, F., & Hertel, G. (2020). Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams. Human Relations, 73(1), 3-34.
24. Bryant, P. (2007). Self‐regulation and decision heuristics in entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation. Management Decision, 45(4), 732-748.
25. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological bulletin, 56(2), 81.
26. Campanelli, A. S., & Parreiras, F. S. (2015). Agile methods tailoring: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 110, 85–100.
27. Campanelli, A. S., Camilo, R. D., & Parreiras, F. S. (2018). The impact of tailoring criteria on agile practices adoption: A survey with novice agile practitioners in Brazil. Journal of Systems and Software, 137, 366–379.
28. Cao, L., Ramesh, B., & Abdel-Hamid, T. (2010). Modeling dynamics in agile software development. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 1(1), 1-26.
29. Carayannis, E. G., Provance, M., & Givens, N. (2011). Knowledge arbitrage, serendipity, and acquisition formality: Their effects on sustainable entrepreneurial activity in regions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(3), 564-577.
30. Castillo-Vergara, M., & Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, D. (2021). Product innovation and performance in SME’s: the role of the creative process and risk taking. Innovation, 23(4), 470-488.
31. Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of applied psychology, 85(1), 65.
32. Cenfetelli, R. T., & Bassellier, G. (2009). Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 689-707.
33. Chen, C. Y., Hsu, P. Y., & Vu, H. N. (2023). Collaborative process tailoring in evolutionary software development: a teamwork-quality perspective. Software Quality Journal, 31(1), 89-119.
34. Chen, C. Y., & Lee, J. C. (2023). Exploring Teams′ Temporal Factors for Determining Process Tailoring that Promotes the Evolution of Agilebased Software Development. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 54(1), 46-65.
35. Chen, C. Y., & Tai, K. Y. (2023). Exploring the Effects of Team Learning Capabilities and Team Climates in Software Process Tailoring. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
36. Chin, W., Cheah, J. H., Liu, Y., Ting, H., Lim, X. J., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Demystifying the role of causal-predictive modeling using partial least squares structural equation modeling in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2161-2209.
37. Chong, D. S., Van Eerde, W., Chai, K. H., & Rutte, C. G. (2010). A double-edged sword: The effects of challenge and hindrance time pressure on new product development teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 71-86.
38. Chong, D. S., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Chai, K. H. (2012). Bringing employees closer: the effect of proximity on communication when teams function under time pressure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 205-215.
39. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
40. Cunha, M. P. E., & Berti, M. (2023). Serendipity in management and organization studies. In Serendipity Science: An Emerging Field and its Methods (pp. 49-67). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
41. Cunha, M.P., Clegg, S.R. and Mendonça, S. (2010), “On serendipity and organizing”, European Management Journal, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 319-330.
42. Cunha, M.P., Rego, A., Clegg, S. and Lindsay, G. (2015), “The dialectics of serendipity”, European Management Journal, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 9-18.
43. Conboy, K., & Fitzgerald, B. (2010). Method and developer characteristics for effective agile method tailoring: A study of XP expert opinion. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 20(1), 1-30.
44. Connelly, C. E., Ford, D. P., Turel, O., Gallupe, B., & Zweig, D. (2014). ‘I’m busy (and competitive)!’Antecedents of knowledge sharing under pressure. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(1), 74-85.
45. Daniel, P. A., & Daniel, C. (2018). Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management. International journal of project management, 36(1), 184-197.
46. Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092.
47. Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of business and psychology, 29(1), 1-19.
48. De Rond, M. (2014). The structure of serendipity. Culture and Organization, 20(5), 342-358.
49. Dew, N. (2009). Serendipity in entrepreneurship. Organization studies, 30(7), 735-753.
50. Edison, H., Bin Ali, N., & Torkar, R. (2013). Towards innovation measurement in the software industry. Journal of systems and software, 86(5), 1390-1407.
51. Edmondson AC (2002) Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
52. Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 5(1), 105-123.
53. Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for crosscultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 68(4), 435-441.
54. Erdelez, S., & Makri, S. (2020). Information encountering re-encountered: A conceptual re-examination of serendipity in the context of information acquisition. Journal of documentation, 76(3), 731-751.
55. Erdelez, S., Huang, Y. H., & Agarwal, N. K. (2024). Does serendipity matter in knowledge management? Organizational sharing and use of encountered information. Journal of Documentation, 80(1), 1-26.
56. Eschleman, K. J., Mathieu, M., & Cooper, J. (2017). Creating a recovery filled weekend: The moderating effect of occupation type on the relationship between non-work creative activity and state of feeling recovered at work. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 97-107.
57. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
58. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
59. Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of business research, 69(8), 3192-3198.
60. García-Granero, A., Llopis, Ó., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2015). Unraveling the link between managerial risk-taking and innovation: The mediating role of a risk-taking climate. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1094-1104.
61. Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. (2012). The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 1-40.
62. Gerow, J. E., Grover, V., Thatcher, J. B., & Roth, P. L. (2014). Looking toward the future of IT-business strategic alignment through the past: A meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1059–1085.
63. Giaccone, S. C., & Magnusson, M. (2022). Unveiling the role of risk‐taking in innovation: antecedents and effects. R&D Management, 52(1), 93-107.
64. Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual review of psychology, 62, 451-482.
65. Graziotin, D., Fagerholm, F., Wang, X., & Abrahamsson, P. (2017, June). On the unhappiness of software developers. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (pp. 324-333).
66. Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2023). Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 127-142.
67. Guhr, N., Lebek, B., & Breitner, M. H. (2019). The impact of leadership on employees′ intended information security behaviour: An examination of the full‐range leadership theory. Information Systems Journal, 29(2), 340-362.
68. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
69. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature.
70. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
71. Hanafiah, M. H. (2020). Formative vs. reflective measurement model: Guidelines for structural equation modeling research. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 18(5), 876-889.
72. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
73. Halachmi, A. and Woron, A.M. (2013), “Spontaneous inter-organizational learning”, International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 135-164.
74. Heggestad, E. D., Scheaf, D. J., Banks, G. C., Monroe Hausfeld, M., Tonidandel, S., & Williams, E. B. (2019). Scale adaptation in organizational science research: A review and best-practice recommendations. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2596-2627.
75. Heinström, J. (2006). Psychological factors behind incidental information acquisition. Library & Information Science Research, 28(4), 579-594.
76. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
77. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135.
78. Huff, R. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (2008). Information systems project management decision making: The influence of experience and risk propensity. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 34-47.
79. Iivari, J. (2021). A paradox lens to systems development projects: The case of the agile software development. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 49(1), 4.
80. Islam, M. A., Agarwal, N. K., & Ikeda, M. (2017). Effect of knowledge management on service innovation in academic libraries. IFLA journal, 43(3), 266-281.
81. Isaksen, S. G., & Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for innovation: The two faces of tension in creative climates. Creativity and innovation management, 19(2), 73-88.
82. Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., Djurdjevic, E., & Taing, M. U. (2012). Recommendations for improving the construct clarity of higher-order multidimensional constructs. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 62-72.
83. Jung, K. B., Kang, S. W., & Choi, S. B. (2020). Empowering leadership, risk-taking behavior, and employees’ commitment to organizational change: The mediated moderating role of task complexity. Sustainability, 12(6), 2340.
84. Kalus, G., & Kuhrmann, M. (2013, May). Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process (pp. 171-180).
85. Kato, K., Ito, S., & Itaya, K. (2019). Can accidental discoveries be managed? Exploring key factors impacting idea generation in R&D sites in Japan. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(06), 1950042.
86. Keil, M., Tan, B. C., Wei, K. K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V., & Wassenaar, A. (2000). A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS quarterly, 299-325.
87. King, D. (2020). Innovation-Oriented Programming: Software Development as a Medium for Exaptation and Implications for the Active Facilitation of Innovation Within Virtual Environments. Understanding Innovation Through Exaptation, 121-155.
88. Kiss, A. N., Danis, W. M., Nair, S., & Suddaby, R. (2020). Accidental tourists? A cognitive exploration of serendipitous internationalisation. International Small Business Journal, 38(2), 65-89.
89. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), 11(4), 1-10.
90. Kock, N. (2017). Common method bias: a full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications, 245-257.
91. Kop, R. (2012). The unexpected connection: Serendipity and human mediation in networked learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 2-11.
92. Kucharska, W. (2021). Do mistakes acceptance foster innovation? Polish and US cross-country study of tacit knowledge sharing in IT. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(11), 105-128.
93. Kuutila, M., Mäntylä, M., Farooq, U., & Claes, M. (2020). Time pressure in software engineering: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 121, 106257.
94. Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2020). Exploring the team dynamic learning process in software process tailoring performance: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(3), 502-518.
95. Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2022). Exploring the effects of team coordination and power distance on effective software process tailoring: a theoretical perspective. Information Technology & People, 35(3), 1009-1028.
96. Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2024). The impact of knowledge inertia on process tailoring in the dynamic development of software projects in Chinese industries. Information and Software Technology, 165, 107337.
97. Lee, J. C., Chou, I. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2021). The effect of process tailoring on software project performance: the role of team absorptive capacity and its knowledge‐based enablers. Information systems journal, 31(1), 120-147.
98. Lee, J. C., Wang, Y. T., & Chen, C. Y. (2020). The effect of transactive memory systems on process tailoring in software projects: The moderating role of task conflict and shared temporal cognitions. Journal of Systems and Software, 164, 110545.
99. Lee, L. T. S., & Sukoco, B. M. (2011). Risk-taking as a moderator of the effect of team reflexivity on product innovation: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 28(4), 263.
100. LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of management journal, 48(5), 764-775.
101. Ling, Y. A. N., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). Transformational leadership′s role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management journal, 51(3), 557-576.
102. Liu, C., & De Rond, M. (2016). Good night, and good luck: perspectives on luck in management scholarship. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 409-451.
103. Liu, Z., Liu, X., & Zhang, X. (2021). How to solve the time dilemma? The influence of team temporal leadership on team innovation performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 634133.
104. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate behavioral research, 39(1), 99-128.
105. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 593-614.
106. Makri, S., Blandford, A., Woods, M., Sharples, S., & Maxwell, D. (2014). “Making my own luck”: Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2179-2194.
107. Maruping, L. M., Venkatesh, V., Thatcher, S. M., & Patel, P. C. (2015). Folding under pressure or rising to the occasion? Perceived time pressure and the moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of management journal, 58(5), 1313-1333.
108. Marques, M., Ochoa, S. F., Quispe, A., Silvestre, L., & Villena, A. (2010, April). Coordination and pressing: A formula for teamwork—A case study. In The 2010 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (pp. 83-88). IEEE.
109. Maule, A. J., Hockey, G. R. J., & Bdzola, L. (2000). Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta psychologica, 104(3), 283-301.
110. McCay‐Peet, L., & Toms, E. G. (2015). Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it. Journal of the Association for Information Science and technology, 66(7), 1463-1476.
111. Memon, M. A., Cheah, J. H., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2019). Moderation analysis: issues and guidelines. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 3(1), 1-11.
112. Mohamad, M., Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., & Mohammad, M. (2019). Comparison between CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Testing and confirming the maqasid syariah quality of life measurement model. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(3), 608-614.
113. Molokken, K., & Jorgensen, M. (2003, September). A review of software surveys on software effort estimation. In 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2003. ISESE 2003. Proceedings. (pp. 223-230). IEEE.
114. Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European journal of social psychology, 15(3), 263-280.
115. Neves, P., & Eisenberger, R. (2014). Perceived organizational support and risk taking. Journal of managerial psychology, 29(2), 187-205.
116. Niazi, M., Wilson, D., & Zowghi, D. (2005). A maturity model for the implementation of software process improvement: an empirical study. Journal of systems and software, 74(2), 155-172.
117. Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial management & data systems, 116(9), 1849-1864.
118. O’Toole, J., Gong, Y., Baker, T., Eesley, D. T., & Miner, A. S. (2021). Startup responses to unexpected events: The impact of the relative presence of improvisation. Organization Studies, 42(11), 1741-1765.
119. Oesterle, S., Buchwald, A., & Urbach, N. (2020). Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis. Electronic Markets, 1-27.
120. Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi‐level study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 543-565.
121. Oliva, F. L., Couto, M. H. G., Santos, R. F., & Bresciani, S. (2018). The integration between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities in agile organizations. Management Decision, 57(8), 1960-1979.
122. Olshannikova, E., Olsson, T., Huhtamäki, J., Paasovaara, S., & Kärkkäinen, H. (2020). From chance to serendipity: Knowledge workers’ experiences of serendipitous social encounters. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 1-18.
123. Park, S. H., & Bae, D. H. (2013). Tailoring a large‐sized software process using process slicing and case‐based reasoning technique. Iet Software, 7(1), 47-55.
124. Parker, C., Scott, S., & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. SAGE research methods foundations.
125. Paul, S., & He, F. (2012, January). Time pressure, cultural diversity, psychological factors, and information sharing in short duration virtual teams. In 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 149-158). IEEE.
126. Paulin, D., & Griffin, B. (2016). The relationships between incivility, team climate for incivility and job-related employee well-being: a multilevel analysis. Work & Stress, 30(2), 132-151.
127. Perlow, L. A., Okhuysen, G. A., & Repenning, N. P. (2002). The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management journal, 45(5), 931-955.
128. Pirkkalainen, H., Olshannikova, E., Olsson, T., & Huhtamäki, J. (2021). Examining serendipitous encounters and self-determination in Twitter-enabled innovation. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2021, 1-12.
129. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
130. Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta psychologica, 104(1), 1-15.
131. Purwanto, A. (2021). Partial least squares structural squation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis for social and management research: a literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research.
132. Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of marketing research, 45(3), 261-279.
133. Ringle, Christian M., Wende, Sven, & Becker, Jan-Michael. (2024). SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com
134. Ruiz, M., Ramos, I., & Toro, M. (2001). A simplified model of software project dynamics. Journal of Systems and Software, 59(3), 299-309.
135. Russo, D. (2021). The agile success model: a mixed-methods study of a large-scale agile transformation. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 30(4), 1-46.
136. Sabol, M., Hair, J., Cepeda, G., Roldán, J. L., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2023). PLS-SEM in information systems: seizing the opportunity and marching ahead full speed to adopt methodological updates. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(12), 2997-3017.
137. Saadatmand, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2013). Content aggregation and knowledge sharing in a personal learning environment: Serendipity in open online networks. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 8(2013).
138. Saini, A. K., & Khurana, V. K. (2013). Using Serendipity for ICT Development. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 5(2), 48-54.
139. Santos, C. M., Passos, A. M., Uitdewilligen, S., & Nübold, A. (2016). Shared temporal cognitions as substitute for temporal leadership: An analysis of their effects on temporal conflict and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 574-587.
140. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035-1064.
141. Schilbach, M., Haun, V. C., Baethge, A., & Rigotti, T. (2023). The challenging and hindering potential of time pressure: Qualitative job demands as suppressor variables. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(5), 1061-1075.
142. Selye, H. (1991). History and present status of the stress concept. In Stress and coping: An anthology (pp. 21-35). Columbia University Press.
143. Sharma, A., Tian, Y., Sulistya, A., Lo, D., & Yamashita, A. F. (2017, February). Harnessing Twitter to support serendipitous learning of developers. In 2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) (pp. 387-391). IEEE.
144. Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Estrada, J. M. V., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of business Research, 69(10), 4552-4564.
145. Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European journal of marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.
146. Škerlavaj, M., Connelly, C. E., Cerne, M., & Dysvik, A. (2018). Tell me if you can: time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding. Journal of knowledge Management, 22(7), 1489-1509.
147. Song, H., & Gao, R. (2023). The nonlinear effect of time pressure on innovation performance: New insights from a meta-analysis and an empirical study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1049174.
148. Soto, M. (2023). Serendipity Across Contexts: From Offices to Post-conflict Settings. In Serendipity Science: An Emerging Field and its Methods (pp. 205-223). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
149. Stol, K. J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2018). The ABC of software engineering research. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 27(3), 1-51.
150. Streukens, S., & Leroi-Werelds, S. (2016). Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. European management journal, 34(6), 618-632.
151. Sun, H., Teh, P. L., Ho, K., & Lin, B. (2017). Team diversity, learning, and innovation: a mediation model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57(1), 22-30.
152. Sun, X., Zhou, X., Wang, Q., & Sharples, S. (2022). Investigating the impact of emotions on perceiving serendipitous information encountering. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(1), 3-18.
153. Syrek, C. J., Apostel, E., & Antoni, C. H. (2013). Stress in highly demanding IT jobs: Transformational leadership moderates the impact of time pressure on exhaustion and work–life balance. Journal of occupational health psychology, 18(3), 252.
154. Tallon, P. P. (2010). A service science perspective on strategic choice, IT, and performance in US banking. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(4), 219-252.
155. Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of management sciences, 4(2), 142-168.
156. Thompson, J. D. (2017). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Routledge.
157. Truex, D., Baskerville, R., & Travis, J. (2000). Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods. Accounting, management and information technologies, 10(1), 53-79.
158. Urbach, T., & Weigelt, O. (2019). Time pressure and proactive work behaviour: A week‐level study on intraindividual fluctuations and reciprocal relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(4), 931-952.
159. Vogus, T. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007, October). Organizational resilience: Towards a theory and research agenda. In 2007 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (pp. 3418-3422). IEEE.
160. West, D. C., Acar, O. A., & Caruana, A. (2020). Choosing among alternative new product development projects: The role of heuristics. Psychology & Marketing, 37(11), 1511-1524.
161. Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS quarterly, 17-41.
162. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2012). Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media.
163. Wu, C. M., Schulz, E., Pleskac, T. J., & Speekenbrink, M. (2022). Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty. Scientific reports, 12(1), 4122.
164. Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2007). Software process tailoring: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 293-328.
165. Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2008). Impact of knowledge support on the performance of software process tailoring. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 277–314.
166. Xue, Y., Bradley, J., & Liang, H. (2011). Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing. Journal of knowledge management, 15(2), 299-312.
167. Yaqub, O. (2018). Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 47(1), 169-179.
168. Ye, P., Liu, L., & Tan, J. (2022). Creative leadership, innovation climate and innovation behaviour: the moderating role of knowledge sharing in management. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 1092-1114.
169. Young, D. L., Goodie, A. S., Hall, D. B., & Wu, E. (2012). Decision making under time pressure, modeled in a prospect theory framework. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 118(2), 179-188.
170. Zhang, X., Yao, Z., Qunchao, W., & Tsai, F. S. (2022). Every coin has two sides: the impact of time pressure on employees’ knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(8), 2084-2106. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 (2029-6-30以後開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit