博碩士論文 111127004 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:62 、訪客IP:18.218.238.157
姓名 何雅安(Ya-An Ho)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 學習與教學研究所
論文名稱 人格特質、投入程度與自我效能之關聯 ─以國小食農教育為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-7-31以後開放)
摘要(中) 本研究欲檢驗現有食農教育的優點,檢視其是否增加學生的自我效能。同時,本研究將驗證五大人格特質,是否經由投入程度為中介,進而影響學生之自我效能。研究採準實驗設計,以桃園市一所國小二年級孩童,共七個班級為對象,其中實驗組五個班級(130 人),控制組兩個班級(42 人)。實驗組接受其為一學期,共七節食農教育課程;控制組則進行原有之校訂課程,不做任何實驗處理。本研究修訂「IPIP 五大人格特質量表」、「課程投入量表」及「自我效能量表」作為前驗及後測之研究工具,並以前測資料進行工具之信度及效度分析。本研究在後測結束後進行兩組在投入程度及自我效能之平均數差異檢定,此外,吾人亦使用結構方程模型,檢驗五大人格特質與
自我效能之間,投入程度的中介效果。
研究發現,食農教育對低年級孩童行為投入及一般性自我效能有正向影響,對認知投入有提升效果,主動性投入及社會性自我效能提升效果則不受課程所影響。此外,吾人亦驗證了投入程度於人格特質與自我效能間的中介效果。食農教育有助於增進低年級孩童投入程度及自我效能,於學習食農知識及技能的同時,亦對孩童內在心理層面有所助益。最後,本研究依據結論提出具體建議,以供食農教育實務及未來研究之參考。
摘要(英) This study aims to examine the advantages of existing food and agricultural education and investigate whether it enhances students′ self-efficacy. Additionally, this research will verify whether the five personality traits mediate the impact on students′ self-efficacy through the level of engagement. The research adopts a quasi-experimental design, focusing on second-grade students from a primary school in Taoyuan City, with a total of seven classes. Among them, five
classes (130 students) constitute the experimental group, receiving eight sessions of food and agricultural education courses over one semester. The control group consists of two classes (42 students), following the original school curriculum without any experimental treatment.The study employs the revised "IPIP Big Five Personality Traits Inventory," "Engagement Scale," and "Self-Efficacy Scale" as pre-test and post-test research tools. Pre-test data is analyzed for the reliability and validity of the instruments. After the post-test, the study conducts an independent samples T-test to examine the mean differences in engagement and self-efficacy between the two groups. Additionally, structural equation modeling is used to explore the mediating effect of engagement on the relationship between the five personality traits and self-efficacy.
The study found that food and agricultural education positively influenced behavioral engagement and general self-efficacy in lower-grade children and enhanced cognitive engagement. However, proactive engagement and social self-efficacy were not significantly affected by the program. Moreover, the mediating effect of engagement levels between personality traits and self-efficacy was verified. Food and agricultural education helps enhance lower-grade children′s engagement levels and self-efficacy, providing benefits to their inner psychological aspects while learning food and agricultural knowledge and skills.Finally, the study offers specific recommendations based on the conclusions for practical applications in food and agricultural education and future research.
關鍵字(中) ★ 食農教育
★ 五大人格特質
★ 投入程度
★ 自我效能
★ 結構方程模型
關鍵字(英) ★ Food and Agricultural Education
★ Big Five Personality Traits
★ Engagement Level
★ Self-Efficacy
★ Structural Equation Modeling
論文目次 摘 要 i
ABSTRACT ii
謝 辭 iv
表 次 vii
圖 次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題 5
第三節 名詞釋義 6
第四節 研究限制 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 食農教育 8
第二節 五大人格特質理論 14
第三節 投入程度 19
第四節 自我效能 23
第五節 五大人格特質、投入程度與自我效能之關聯 27
第三章 研究方法 30
第一節 研究架構與假設 30
第二節 對象與場域 31
第三節 食農教育課程規劃與安排 32
第四節 研究工具 38
第五節 資料蒐集與分析 45
第四章 研究結果 46
第一節 預試資料分析 46
第二節 資料分析 48
第三節 五大人格特質、投入程度與自我效能之路徑分析結果 57
第四節 研究分析結果統整 62
第五章 討論與建議 64
第一節 食農教育對投入程度及自我效能之影響 64
第二節 投入程度於五大人格特質與自我效能間之中介效果 69
第三節 食農教育於投入程度對人格特質與自我效能間的中介效果 72
第四節 研究貢獻與建議 73
參考文獻 78
附錄一 食農課程剪影 90
附錄二 實驗組知情同意書 92
附錄三 控制組知情同意書 93
附錄四 前測問卷 94
附錄六 後測問卷(實驗組) 98
附錄五 後測問卷(控制組)
參考文獻 方珍玲、古昌平 (2020)。臺灣食農教育推動模式之分析。農業推廣文彙,29-44
王秀美、李長燦(2011 年 10 月)。五大人格特質量表中文版之信效度研究。社會工作系會議論文,美和科技大學。
江玉卉 (2004)。實施休閒教育影響國中學生自我效能感之研究。公民訓育學報,16,57-84行政院農業 部 (2022) 。 食 農 教 育 法 。 全 國 法 規 資 料 庫 。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=M0090039
李仁豪、陳怡君(2016)。IPIP 五大人格量表簡版的發展及其跨年齡層的測量不變性檢定。教育研究與發展期刊,12(4),87-119
李岱穎 (2023)。以杜威溝通觀點思考 [人際互動] 能力培養。臺灣教育評論月刊,12(7),111-115
李幸玲 (2020)。高中食農教育課程發展與實踐。台灣鄉村研究,(15),1-30
李念茹(2017)。體驗學習對學生自我效能影響之研究-以食農教育為例(未出版之碩士論文)。
國立中興大學
林如萍 (2022)。食農教育的概念架構與推展策略。臺中區農業改良場特刊,82-94.
林如萍(2017)。食農教育之推展策略(一):學校教育實施之概念架構分析。產學研究計畫合作單位:中國生產力中心。
林佩瑩、楊志維、簡禎佑(2014)。學童種稻體驗教育計畫-[做中學, 學中做] 體驗傳統農耕文化。桃園區農業專訊,87,22-25
康以琳(2013)。人與食物的距離—農村小學推行食農教育之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。
康以琳、張瑋琪(2016)。人與食物的距離—鄉村小學食農教育課程發展之行動研究。教育實踐與研究,29(1),1-34。
張存真、游錦雲(2020)。[兒童五大人格特質量表] 之信效度及測量不變性: 探索性結構方程模式取向。測驗學刊,67(3),191-214。
張啟晸、李世昌、曾干育 (2022)。食農教育認知與永續之相關研究。休閒事業研究,20(2),1-8
郭宗瑾、金凱儀 (2020)。探索食農教育體驗課程對國中生的學習性與社會性自我效能影響之研究。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報,16(2),157-181.
賀宏偉、王志軒 (2021)。教出學童好食力—國小推動食農教育之行動策略探究。臺灣教育評論月刊,171
董時叡、蔡嫦娟(2016)。當筷子遇上鋤頭:食農教育作伙來。臺灣農業推廣學會,臺中市。
駱淑真 (2019)。食農教育融入學校本位課程之學習成效探究-以苗栗縣啟明國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學。
薛世杰(2002)。國中男、女生的網路遊戲使用時間與使用動機、自我效能、人格特質、學業成就、人際關係之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。
謝智如 (2022)。都市小學食農教育課程之素養實踐─從餐桌到土地的環境關懷。中等教育,73(4),69-86
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of school psychology, 44(5), 427-445.
Archambault, I., & Dupéré, V. (2017). Joint trajectories of behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in elementary school. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(2), 188-198. Bakker, A. B., Sanz Vergel, A. I., & Kuntze, J. (2015). Student engagement and performance: A weekly diary study on the role of openness. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 49-62.
Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human relations, 65(10), 1359-1378.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986, 23-28.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol.4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. Handbook of personality, 2, 154-96.
Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1-43).
Bandura, A.(2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big fivepersonality dimensions and job performance: a
meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of applied psychology, 78(5),715.
Barrick, M. R., Parks, L., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Self‐monitoring as a moderator of the relationships
between personality traits and performance. Personnel psychology, 58(3), 745-767.
Berezowitz, C. K., Bontrager Yoder, A. B., & Schoeller, D. A. (2015). School gardens enhance academic performance and dietary outcomes in children. Journal of School Health, 85(8), 508-518.
Betts, J. E., Appleton, J. J., Reschly, A. L., Christenson, S. L., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). A study of the factorial invariance of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 84.
Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and selfregulated learning strategies. Learning and individual differences, 17(1), 69-81.
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17(1), 1-30.
Bong, M., Cho, C., Ahn, H. S., & Kim, H. J. (2012). Comparison of self-beliefs for predicting student motivation and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 336-352.
Brandt, W. C. (2020). Measuring Student Success Skills: A Review of the Literature on Self-Directed Learning. 21st Century Success Skills. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.
Burt, K. G., Koch, P., & Contento, I. (2017). Development of the GREEN (Garden Resources, Education,and Environment Nexus) tool: An evidence-based model for school garden integration. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 117(10), 1517-1527.
Byrne, B. M. (1996). Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. In B. A.
Cahill, H., & Dadvand, B. (2018). Re-conceptualising youth participation: A framework to inform action. Children and Youth Services Review, 95, 243-253.
Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Di Giunta, L., Panerai, L., & Eisenberg, N. (2010). The contribution of agreeableness and self‐efficacy beliefs to prosociality. European Journal of Personality: Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology, 24(1), 36-55.
Caprara, G. V., Di Giunta, L., Pastorelli, C., & Eisenberg, N. (2013). Mastery of negative affect: a hierarchical model of emotional self-efficacy beliefs. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 105.
Caraway, K., Tucker, C. M., Reinke, W. M., & Hall, C. (2003). Self‐efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40(4), 417-427.
Caspi, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2001). Personality development across the life course: The argument for change and continuity. Psychological inquiry, 12(2), 49-66.
Chao, T. Y., & Sung, Y. T. (2019). An investigation of the reasons for test anxiety, time spent studying, and achievement among adolescents in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(4), 469-484.
Chen, J., Huebner, E. S., & Tian, L. (2020). Longitudinal relations between hope and academic achievement in elementary school students: Behavioral engagement as a mediator. Learning and Individual Differences, 78, 101824.
Chhetri, S. B., & Baniya, R. (2022). Influence of student-faculty interaction on graduate outcomes of undergraduate management students: The mediating role of behavioral, emotional and cognitive engagement. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100640.
Christenson, S., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement (Vol.840). New York: Springer.Collins, J. (1982). Discourse style, classroom interaction and differential treatment. Journal of reading behavior, 14(4), 429-437.
Connolly, J. (1989). Social self-efficacy in adolescence: relations with self-concept, social adjustment, and mental health. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 21(3), 258.
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and individual differences, 13(6), 653-665.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective wellbeing: happy and unhappy people. Journal of personality and social psychology, 38(4), 668.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Toward a synthesis of structural and energistic
approaches to cognition. New Ideas in psychology, 6(2), 159-176.
Dang, D., & Thi, T. (2022). A Mediated Learning Experience Perspective on Engagement with Feedback
Through a Sequence of Tasks. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 4(4).
Desmond, D., Grieshop, J., & Subramaniam, A. (2004). Revisiting garden-based learning in basic
education. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Devaraj, S., Easley, R. F., & Crant, J. M. (2008). Research note—how does personality matter? Relating
the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information systems research, 19(1), 93-
105.
Digman, J. M. (1989). Five robust trait dimensions: Development, stability, and utility. Journal of
personality, 57(2), 195-214.
Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement
in early adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 40, 1649-1660.
Eccles, J., & Wang, M. T. (2012). Part I commentary: So what is student engagement anyway?.
In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133-145). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Engel, S. (2011). Children′s need to know: Curiosity in schools. Harvard educational review, 81(4),
625-645.
Erozkan, A. (2013). The effect of communication skills and interpersonal problem solving skills on
social self-efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 739-745.
Ewen, J. A. (1984). Mechanisms of stereochemical control in propylene polymerizations with soluble
Group 4B metallocene/methylalumoxane catalysts. Journal of the American Chemical
Society, 106(21), 6355-6364.
Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and individual differences, 13(6),
667-673.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of educational research, 59(2), 117-142.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School Engagement & Students at Risk. Washington DC: National Center for
Education Statistics.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter?. In Handbook
of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept,
state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment:
Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and instruction, 43,
1-4.
Geller, K. S., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Rosenkranz, R. R., & Karteroliotis, K. (2009). Measuring children’s
self‐efficacy and proxy efficacy related to fruit and vegetable consumption. Journal of School
Health, 79(2), 51-57.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality
lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165).
Beverly Hills: Sage.
Goldsmith, H.H., Losoya, S.H., Bradshaw, D.L., & Campos, J.J. (1994). Genetics of personality: A twin
study of the five-factor model and parent–offspring analyses. In C.F. Halverson, Jr., G.A.
Kohnstamm, & R.P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from
infancy to adulthood (pp. 241–265). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graham, H., & Zidenberg-Cherr, S. (2005). California teachers perceive school gardens as an effective
nutritional tool to promote healthful eating habits. Journal of the American Dietetic
Association, 105(11), 1797-1800.
Grant, S., & Langan-Fox, J. (2007). Personality and the occupational stressor-strain relationship: the
role of the Big Five. Journal of occupational health psychology, 12(1), 20.
Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school
students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and
motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462–482.
Hirschi, J. S. (2017). Ripe for change: Garden-based learning in schools. Harvard Education Press.
Holahan, C. K., & Holahan, C. J. (1987). Self-efficacy, social support, and depression in aging: A
longitudinal analysis. Journal of Gerontology, 42(1), 65-68.
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures
of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7-27.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical
perspectives. In L. A.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits,
general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel psychology, 52(3), 621-
652.
Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses
(MOOCS).Computers & Education, 122, 9–22.
Kafeero, H. M., Kavuma, D., & Mbabazi, S. (2020). Relationship Between School Gardening and SelfEfficacy Towards Weekly Fruit & Vegetable Intake.
Kahraman, N., & Sungur, S. (2011). The contribution of motivational beliefs to students’ metacognitive
strategy use. Education and Science, 36(160), 3-10.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge
university press.
Kellett, P. (2009). Advocacy in Anthropology: Active engagement or passive scholarship. Durham
Anthropology Journal, 16(1), 22-31.
Kircaburun, K., Alhabash, S., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Uses and gratifications
of problematic social media use among university students: A simultaneous examination
of the Big Five of personality traits, social media platforms, and social media use
motives. International journal of mental health and addiction, 18, 525-547.
Klemmer, C. D., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2005). Growing minds: The effect of a school
gardening program on the science achievement of elementary students. HortTechnology, 15(3),
448-452.
Korfiatis, K., & Petrou, S. (2021). Participation and why it matters: Children’s perspectives and
expressions of ownership, motivation, collective efficacy and self-efficacy and locus of
control. Environmental Education Research, 27(12), 1700-1722.
Koutroubas, V., & Galanakis, M. (2022). Bandura’s social learning theory and its importance in the
organizational psychology context. Psychology, 12(6), 315-322.
Laidra, K., Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic
achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and
individual differences, 42(3), 441-451.
Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Nelson, B., ... & Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do
girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international
study from 12 countries. Journal of school psychology, 50(1), 77-94.
Lautenschlager, L., & Smith, C. (2007). Understanding gardening and dietary habits among youth
garden program participants using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Appetite, 49(1), 122-130.
Lee, S., & Klein, H. J. (2002). Relationships between conscientiousness, self-efficacy, self-deception,
and learning over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1175.
Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic
achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(3),
517-528.
Lester, D. (2013). A review of the student engagement literature. Focus on colleges, universities &
schools, 7(1), 1–8.
Lineberger, S. E., & Zajicek, J. M. (2000). School gardens: Can a hands-on teaching tool affect students′
attitudes and behaviors regarding fruit and vegetables?. HortTechnology, 10(3), 593-597.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and
learning in the classroom. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119-137.
Longhurst, M. L., Judd-Murray, R., Coster, D. C., & Spielmaker, D. M. (2020). Measuring agricultural
literacy: Grade 3-5 instrument development and validation. Journal of Agricultural
Education, 61(2), 173-192.
Lounsbury, J. W., Sundstrom, E., Loveland, J. M., & Gibson, L. W. (2003). Intelligence,“Big Five”
personality traits, and work drive as predictors of course grade. Personality and individual
differences, 35(6), 1231-1239.
Luan, L., Hong, J. C., Cao, M., Dong, Y., & Hou, X. (2023). Exploring the role of online EFL learners’
perceived social support in their learning engagement: A structural equation model. Interactive
Learning Environments, 31(3), 1703-1714.
Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The Role of Self-Efficacy in Health Self-Regulation. In W.
Greve, K. Rothermund, & D. Wentura (Eds.), The adaptive self: Personal continuity and
intentional self-development (pp. 137–152). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Nikčević, A. V., Marino, C., Kolubinski, D. C., Leach, D., & Spada, M. M. (2021). Modelling
the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19
psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of affective disorders, 279, 578-584.
MacCann, C., Duckworth, A. L., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). Empirical identification of the major facets
of conscientiousness. Learning and individual differences, 19(4), 451-458.
Mammadov, S. (2022). Big Five personality traits and academic performance: A meta‐
analysis. Journal of Personality, 90(2), 222-255.
Martin Sr, A. L. (2017). An Exploratory Study of the Relationships Among Middle School Students′ Food
and Garden Experiences and Their Engagement and Motivation (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue
University).
Martin, T. G., Martin, A. J., & Evans, P. (2017). Student engagement in the Caribbean region: Exploring
its role in the motivation and achievement of Jamaican middle school students. School Psychology
International, 38(2), 184-200.
Matsushima, R., & Shiomi, K. (2003). Social self-efficacy and interpersonal stress in
adolescence. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 31(4), 323-332.
McCrae, R. R. (2009). The five-factor model of personality traits: Consensus and controversy. The
Cambridge handbook of personality psychology, 148-161.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor
Inventory. Personality and individual differences, 36(3), 587-596.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman′s" adequacy taxonomy": Intelligence and
personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of personality and social
psychology, 49(3), 710.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across
instruments and observers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(1), 81.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective.
Guilford Press.
Miller, S. A., & Davis, T. L. (1992). Beliefs about children: A comparative study of mothers, teachers,
peers, and self. Child Development, 63(5), 1251-1265.
Mohammadyari, G. (2012). Comparative study of relationship between general perceived self-efficacy
and test anxiety with academic achievement of male and female students. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2119-2123.
Mooradian, T. A., & Swan, K. S. (2006). Personality-and-culture: The case of national extraversion and
word-of-mouth. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 778-785.
Moreira, P. A., Inman, R. A., Cloninger, K., & Cloninger, C. R. (2021). Student engagement with school
and personality: A biopsychosocial and person‐centred approach. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 91(2), 691-713.
National Research Council. (2004). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the
classroom. National Academies Press.
Niemi, H., & Multisilta, J. (2016). Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student
engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(4), 451-468.
Nikel, Ł. (2020). Submissiveness, assertiveness and aggressiveness in school-age children: The role of
self-efficacy and the Big Five. Children and youth services review, 110, 104746.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). An OECD Learning Framework
2030. The Future of Education and Labor, 23-35.
Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal
orientation nomological net. Journal of applied psychology, 92(1), 128.
Peterson, E. R., & Whiteman, M. C. (2007). “I think I can, I think I can…”: The interrelationships among
self-assessed intelligence, self-concept, self-efficacy and the personality trait intellect in university
students in Scotland and New Zealand. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 959-968.
Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2021). Mediation effect of self-efficacy in the relationship between neuroticism
and L2 attainment. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(3), 262-274.
Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Students’ emotional and cognitive engagement as the
determinants of well-being and achievement in school. International Journal of Educational
Research, 67, 40–51.
Plessen, C. Y., Franken, F. R., Ster, C., Schmid, R. R., Wolfmayr, C., Mayer, A. M., ... & Tran,
U. S. (2020). Humor styles and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the
relations between humor styles and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and
Individual Differences, 154, 109676.
Pollin, S., & Retzlaff-Fürst, C. (2021). The school garden: A social and emotional place. Frontiers in
psychology, 12, 567720.
Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q. (2009). The role of parental control in children′s development in Western
and East Asian countries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 285-289.
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic
performance. Psychological bulletin, 135(2), 322.
Quin, D., Hemphill, S. A., & Heerde, J. A. (2017). Associations between teaching quality and secondary
students’ behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement in school. Social Psychology of
Education, 20, 807-829.
Qureshi, A., Wall, H., Humphries, J., & Bahrami Balani, A. (2016). Can personality traits modulate
student engagement with learning and their attitude to employability? Learning and Individual
Differences, 51, 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.026
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of
research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves:
The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of educational psychology, 105(3), 579
Reeve, J., & Tseng, M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning
activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–
267.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Rousseau, D. (1996). Personality in computer characters. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the
American Association of Artificial Intelligence. In H. Kitano (Ed.), Entertainment and AI/A-Life,
AAAI Workshop Technical Report WS-96-03(pp. 38-43). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI.
Saleem, H., Beaudry, A., & Croteau, A. M. (2011). Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of
the role of personality traits and gender. Computers in human behavior, 27(5), 1922-1936.
Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive
behaviors. International journal of selection and assessment, 10(1‐2), 117-125.
Sayehmiri, K., Kareem, K. I., Abdi, K., Dalvand, S., & Gheshlagh, R. G. (2020). The
relationship between personality traits and marital satisfaction: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. BMC psychology, 8, 1-8.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a
short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4),
701-716.
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and
student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational
Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–28.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In Development of
achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). Academic Press.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The
self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological reports, 51(2), 663-671.
Shiner, R. L. (1998). How shall we speak of children′s personalities in middle childhood? A preliminary
taxonomy. Psychological bulletin, 124(3), 308.
Shiner, R. L. (2000). Linking childhood personality with adaptation: evidence for continuity and change
across time into late adolescence. Journal of personality
Shiner, R. L., & DeYoung, C. G. (2013). The structure of temperament and personality traits: A developmental perspective. The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology, 2, 113-141.
Shiner, R. L., & Masten, A. S. (2002). Transactional links between personality and adaptation from childhood through adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 580-588.
Shiner, R., & Caspi, A. (2003). Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: Measurement,development, and consequences. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 44(1), 2-32.
Shokuiku Kihon Hō (Food Education Basic Law). (2005)Act No. 63 of 2005, Japan.
Simons-Morton, B., & Chen, R. (2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & society, 41(1), 3-25.
Siu, O. L., Bakker, A. B., & Jiang, X. (2014). Psychological capital among university students:Relationships with study engagement and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15,979-994.
Skelly, S. M., & Bradley, J. C. (2000). The importance of school gardens as perceived by Florida
elementary school teachers. HortTechnology, 10(1), 229-231.
Skelly, S., & Zajicek, J. M. 1998.“The effect of an interdisciplinary garden program on the environ
mental attitudes of elementary students.” HortTechnology. 1998; 8(4): 579– 583.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4),571.
Skinner, E. A., Chi, U., & The Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment Group. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and engagement as “active ingredients” in garden-based education: Examining models and measures derived from self-determination theory. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(1), 16-36.
Snell, T. L., Simmonds, J. G., & Klein, L. M. (2020). Exploring the impact of contact with nature in
childhood on adult personality. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 55, 126864.
Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students′ engagement characteristics predict success and completion of
online courses. Journal of computer assisted learning, 35(3), 378-389.
Sökmen, Y. (2021). The role of self-efficacy in the relationship between the learning environment and
student engagement. Educational Studies, 47(1), 19-37.
Stajkovic, A. D., Bandura, A., Locke, E. A., Lee, D., & Sergent, K. (2018). Test of three conceptual
models of influence of the big five personality traits and self-efficacy on academic performance: A
meta-analytic path-analysis. Personality and individual differences, 120, 238-245.
Steel, P., Brothen, T., & Wambach, C. (2001). Procrastination and personality, performance, and
mood. Personality and individual differences, 30(1), 95-106.
Sulea, C., Van Beek, I., Sarbescu, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engagement, boredom, and
burnout among students: Basic need satisfaction matters more than personality traits. Learning and
Individual Differences, 42, 132-138.
Sun, J. N., & Hsu, Y. C. (2013). Effect of interactivity on learner perceptions in Web-based
instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 171-184.
Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2010). Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality,
job burnout, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational behavior, 76(3), 487-506.
Taylor, C., Symon, E. B., Dabbs, A., Way, A., & Thompson, O. M. (2017). Assessing a school gardening
program as an integrated component of a pilot farm-to-school initiative based in South
Carolina. Horttechnology, 27(2), 228-234.
Tempelaar, D. T., Gijselaers, W. H., van der Loeff, S. S., & Nijhuis, J. F. (2007). A structural equation
model analyzing the relationship of student achievement motivations and personality factors in a
range of academic subject-matter areas. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), 105-131.
Thompson, R. A., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2004). Academic aptitude and prior knowledge as predictors of
student achievement in introduction to psychology. Journal of educational psychology, 96(4), 778.
Traficante, D., Andolfi, V. R., & Wolf, M. (2017). Literacy abilities and well-being in children: findings
from the application of EUREKA, the Italian adaptation of the RAVE-O Program. Form@ re, 17(2), 12-38.
Turner, J. C., Thorpe, P. K., & Meyer, D. K. (1998). Students′ reports of motivation and negative affect:
A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of educational Psychology, 90(4), 758.
Ulmanen, S., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2016). The anatomy of adolescents’ emotional
engagement in schoolwork. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 587-606.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). Education for sustainable
development: A roadmap. https://doi.org/10.54675/YFRE1448
Vallera, F. L., & Bodzin, A. M. (2020). Integrating STEM with AgLIT (agricultural literacy through
innovative technology): The efficacy of a project-based curriculum for upper-primary
students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 419-439.
Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). The role of personality traits and goal
orientations in strategy use. Contemporary educational psychology, 26(2), 149-170.
Waliczek, T. M., Bradley, J. C., & Zajicek, J. M. (2001). The effect of school gardens on children′s
interpersonal relationships and attitudes toward school. HortTechnology, 11(3), 466-468.
Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped
classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79-91.
Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student
engagement. Child development perspectives, 8(3), 137-143.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement:
A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and
Instruction, 28, 12-23.
Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem
behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child development, 85(2), 722-737.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional
experience and their relation to the five‐factor model. Journal of personality, 60(2), 441-476.
Weeland, J., Moens, M. A., Beute, F., Assink, M., Staaks, J. P., & Overbeek, G. (2019). A dose of nature:
Two three-level meta-analyses of the beneficial effects of exposure to nature on children′s selfregulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101326.
Williams, D. R., & Dixon, P. S. (2013). Impact of garden-based learning on academic outcomes in
schools: Synthesis of research between 1990 and 2010.Review of educational,83(2),163-313
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313475824
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a metaanalytical review. Journal of applied psychology, 91(2), 259.
Zheng, L., Goldberg, L. R., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Tang, Y., & Liu, L. (2008). Reliability and concurrent
validation of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in China: Consistencies in factor structure between
Internet-obtained heterosexual and homosexual samples. Personality and individual differences, 45(7), 649-654.
Zimmerman, R. D. (2008). UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF PERSONALITY TRAITS ON INDIVIDUALS′TURNOVER DECISIONS:A META‐ANALYTIC PATH MODEL. Personnel psychology, 61(2), 309-348.
指導教授 張佩芬 趙子揚 審核日期 2024-7-26
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明