紙筆和平板電腦書寫語言差異比較

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：98

、訪客IP：18.218.71.21

姓名

施智元(Chih-Yuan Shih) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

學習與教學研究所

論文名稱

紙筆和平板電腦書寫語言差異比較
(Differences between writing by hand and writing by tablet)

相關論文

★ 以眼動型態探討背景知識對詞彙辨識的影響	★ 合作寫作對於國小學童科學概念學習之影響
★ 影響國小學童家長送子女參加課後補習之相關因素研究---以桃園縣中壢市為例	★ 國小學童圖文閱讀的理解策略
★ 幼童敘說書面故事之後設認知表現	★ 新移民家庭子女口語敘說能力之發展
★ 圖文提示對學童閱讀科學說明文記憶與理解之影響	★ 識字教學法與口語詞彙能力對新移民女性中文識字學習之影響
★ 先備知識對於不同閱讀能力的學童在閱讀歷程中自我提問的影響	★ Exploring Computer-based Nature Science Instruction Based on the Cognitive Load Theory: Spatial Contiguity Effect, and Effects of Prior Knowledge on Performance Assessments
★ 教師示範與文本提示對國小學童自我解釋與閱讀理解表現之影響	★ 國小學童之工作記憶能力對於閱讀理解監控表現的影響
★ 成人與幼童的言談行為分析：比較電子書與紙本書親子共讀的情境	★ 探討幼兒的早期書寫表現及其影響因素
★ 探究教師閱讀教學自我效能與閱讀自我調整教學信念及實踐之關係	★ 探討閱讀能力與文本架構對於國小學童使用理解策略的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-7-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

本研究目的旨在於探討國小學童在紙筆、平板寫作上書寫語言的現況與差異，並試著找出在轉錄技能與書寫語言之間的中介因素。過去對中文寫作的研究，常聚焦於學生的寫作品質及各維度的寫作表現，近年來開始有學者對中文寫作的寫作歷程進行探究，包括字詞、句子、篇章層級的轉錄技能、執行功能及寫作產出間的高層次認知層次發展，並探討不同中介因素對寫作品質的影響。奠基於此，本研究探討書寫語言在語意、語法、詞類使用及注音符號使用、符號使用與錯誤類型等層面上的差異，並從相關因素中找出可能造成影響的中介因子。研究對象為桃園市兩所國小的三、五年級學童共55位。本研究以口語表達能力、打字熟悉度及詞彙、聽寫、抄寫、句法知識等寫作相關測驗，結合在紙筆、平板的作文書寫測驗，以蒐集同一學童在不同寫作工具上的寫作資料並進行分析。研究結果顯示（1）三年級學童在紙筆寫作上表現較平板寫作好；（2）三、五年級學童相較於紙筆寫作，在平板書寫上皆減少注音符號的使用；（3）紙筆、平板寫作皆會與聽寫、句法意識達顯著相關；及（4）整體學生的轉錄技能（聽寫）透過句法意識能提升平板寫作書寫語言，具部分中介效果。

摘要(英)

The aim of this research is to investigate the distinctions among primary school students in their written language when using hand writing versus tablet, and to pinpoint the mediator that may influence the relationship between transcription skills and writing language. Prior studies on Chinese writing quality of students′ writing and various aspects of their writing performance. Recently, scholars have started delving into the writing process of Chinese characters, encompassing transcription skills at different levels such as characters, words, sentences, and discourse, executive functions, and the evolution of higher-order cognitive processes in writing generation. They have also begun exploring the effects of various mediating factors on writing quality. The participants included 55 third- and fifth-grade students. The research materials consisted of surveys from parents and teachers, assessments of language and writing skills, and writing by hand and writing by tablet. The results found that (1) third-grade students perform better in writing by hand; (2) in the third and fifth grades, students are decreasing their reliance on Mandarin Phonetic Symbols (Zhu-in-fu-hao) when composing text on tablet devices; (3) both writing by hand and writing by tablet are significantly correlated with dictation and syntactic awareness; and (4) there is a mediating effect of syntactic awareness between dictation and writing by tablet.

關鍵字(中)

★ 平板寫作
★ 紙本寫作
★ 書面語言

關鍵字(英)

★ written language
★ writing by hand
★ writing by tablet

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
謝誌 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的與問題 3
第三節名詞解釋 4
第二章文獻探討 6
第一節寫作發展觀點 6
第二節書面語言與寫作表現的相關研究 12
第三節紙筆寫作與數位寫作的相關研究 24
第三章研究設計與方法 34
第一節研究對象 34
第二節研究設計 34
第三節研究工具 36
第四節資料處理與分析 43
第四章研究結果與討論 45
第一節不同寫作工具於書寫語言指標的分布與差異 45
第二節紙筆、平板書寫語言的關係與中介影響 61
第五章結論與建議 74
第一節結論 74
第二節研究限制與建議 75
參考文獻 78

參考文獻

大腦與學習實驗室（2019）。語料分析：詞彙特性。https://drive.google.com/open?id = 0B0GaWSgkG5rYZFlDb21mMzZiaE0
文本可讀性指標自動化分析系統 3.0。（2019）文本可讀性指標自動化分析系統 3.0。http://www.chinesereadability.net/CRIE/?LANG = CHT
林玉霞（2012）。語言樣本分析法。雲嘉特教期刊，15，10-16。
林寶貴、黃瑞珍（1999）。國小兒童書寫語言評量指標研究。特殊教育研究學刊，17，163-188。
林寶貴、錡寶香（2000）。國小學童書寫語言測驗之編製。特殊教育與復健學報，8，53-74。
張菀真、廖長彥、陳德懷（2016）。探索明日創作活動於國小學生寫作表現的影響：從數位學校到實踐學校。數位學習科技期刊，8(1)，25-49。
張新仁（2004）。台灣地區寫作研究之回顧與展望。載於單文經（主編），課程與教學新論（pp. 245-308）。台北市:心理。
張新仁（2006）。寫作的認知歷程研究：跨教育階段別、不同寫作能力的學生在不同寫作文體上的寫作歷程和寫作表現（I）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（編號NSC93- 2413-H-017-014）。
教育部（2021）。推動「中小學數位學習精進方案」方案。https://pads.moe.edu.tw/pads_front/index.php
郭伯臣、李政軒、黃淇瀅（2021）。利用Google BERT提升中文寫作自動評分之準確率。測驗學刊，68(1)，53-74。
黃瑞琴（2003）。幼兒讀寫萌發課程。台北市:五南。
楊坤堂（2002）。我國國民小學一、三、五年級一般兒童與國語學習障礙兒童書寫語文能力之研究。台北市立師範學院學報，71，33-94。
楊婧、張鑑如（2021）。臺灣幼兒電子產品的使用及對幼兒發展的影響：臺灣幼兒發展調查資料庫之運用。教育心理學報，53(2)，257-284。
葉靖雲（2000）。以文章寫作和造句測驗評估國小學生作文能力之效度研究。特殊教育研究學刊，18，151-172。
劉惠美、張鑑如（2011）。口語和閱讀關連性研究之文獻回顧與展望。教育心理學報，閱讀專刊，43，251-268。
蔡茗香（2019）。國內讀寫整合教學研究之文獻回顧與展望。語文教育學報，5，59-93。
錡寶香（2009）。兒童語言與溝通發展。台北市:心理。
Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 281–298.
Ahmed, Y., Kent, S., Cirino, P. T., & Keller-Margulis, M. (2022). The not-so-simple view of writing in struggling reader/writer. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 38(3), 272–296.
Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635–651.
Berninger, V. W., & Chanquoy, L. (2012). What writing is and how it changes across early and middle childhood development: A multidisciplinary perspective. In E. L. Grigorenko, E. Mambrino, & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Writing: A mosaic of new perspectives (pp. 65–84). Psychology Press.
Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing Development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). The Guilford Press.
Berninger, V. W., Nagy, W., & Beer, S. (2011). Child writer’ construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: Contributions of syntax and transcription to translation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(2), 151–182.
Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R. D., Begay, K., Coleman, K. B., Curtin, G., Hawkins, J. M., & Graham, S. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 291–304.
Coker, D. (2006). Impact of firt-grade factor on the growth and outcomes of urban schoolchildren′s primary-grade writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 471–488.
Connelly, V., Gee, D., & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 479–492.
Dahlström, D., & Boström, B. (2017). Pros and cons : handwriting verus digital writing. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 12, 143-161.
Feng, L., Lindner, A., Ji, X. R., & Joshi, R. M. (2019). The roles of handwriting and keyboarding in writing: A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(1), 33–63.
Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computer on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1). https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1661
Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170–182.
Guan, C. Q., Ye, F., Wagner, R. K., & Meng, W. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in Chinese writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(6), 1031–1056.
Guan, C. Q., Ye, F., Wagner, R. K., Meng, W., & Leong, C. K. (2014). Text comprehension mediates morphological awareness, syntactic processing, and working memory in predicting Chinese written composition performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 779–798.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447.
Kent, S. C., & Wanzek, J. (2016). The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 year. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 570–601.
Kim Y.-S. G., & Schatschneider, C. (2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 35–50.
Kim, Y.-S. G., & Graham, S. (2022). Expanding the Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Writing (DIEW): Reading–writing relations, and dynamic relations as a function of measurement/dimensions of written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(2), 215–238.
Kim, Y.-S. G., Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., & Puranik, C. S. (2014). Evaluating the dimensionality of firt-grade written composition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 199–211.
Kim, Y.-S., Otaiba, S. A., Puranik, C., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., & Wagner, R. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 517–525.
Kim, Y.-S.G., Gatlin, B., Al Otaiba, S., & Wanzek, J. (2018). Theorization and an empirical investigation of the component-based and developmental text writing fluency construct. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 320–335.
Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2017). Written language burts mediate the relationship between transcription skills and writing performance. Written Communication, 34(3), 306–332.
Malpique, A., Pino-Pasternak, D., Ledger, S., Valcan, D., & Asil, M. (2024a). The effects of automaticity in paper and keyboard-based text composing: An exploratory study. Computer and Composition, 72, 102848.
Malpique, A. A., Asil, M., Pino-Pasternak, D., Ledger, S., & Teo, T. (2024b). The contributions of transcription skills to paper-based and computer-based text composing in the early years. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. Advance online publication.
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell Publishing.
Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R. G. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading–writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 116–123.
Skar, G. B., Lei, P.-W., Graham, S., Aasen, A. J., Johansen, M. B., & Kvistad, A. H. (2021). Handwriting fluency and the quality of primary grade students’ writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. Advance online publication.
Tangel, D. M., & Blachman, B. A. (1992). Effect of phoneme awareness instruction on kindergarten children′s invented spelling. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(2), 233–261.
Tong, X., & McBride, C. (2016). Reading comprehension mediates the relationship between syntactic awareness and writing composition in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(6), 1265–1285.
Tong, X., Tong, X., Shu, H., Chan, S., & McBride‐Chang, C. (2014). Discourse‐level reading comprehension in Chinese children: What is the role of syntactic awareness? Journal of Research in Reading, 37(Suppl 1), S48–S70.
Wagner, R. K., Puranik, C. S., Foorman, B., Foster, E., Wilson, L. G., Tschinkel, E., & Kantor, P. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(2), 203–220.
Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., Tømte, C., & Løver, N. (2016). The effect of pen and paper or tablet computer on early writing—A pilot study. Computer & Education, 98, 70–80.
Yan, C. M. W., McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., Zhang, J., Wong, A. M. Y., & Shu, H. (2012). Writing quality in Chinese children: Speed and fluency matter. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(7), 1499–1521.
Yeung, P.-s., Ho, C. S.-h., Chan, D. W.-o., & Chung, K. K.-h. (2013a). Modeling the relationships between cognitive-linguistic skills and writing in Chinese among elementary grades students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(7), 1195–1221.
Yeung, P.-s., Ho, C. S.-h., Chan, D. W.-o., & Chung, K. K.-h. (2013b). Contribution of oral language skills, linguistic skills, and transcription skills to Chinese written composition among fourth-grade students. Discourse Processes, 50(7), 498–529.
Yeung, P.-s., Ho, C. S.-h., Chan, D. W.-o., & Chung, K. K.-h. (2020). Longitudinal relationships between syntactic skills and Chinese written composition in grades 3 to 6. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(2), 201–228.
Yeung, P.‐s., Ho, C. S.‐h., Chan, D. W.‐o., & Chung, K. K.‐h. (2017). A simple view of writing in Chinese. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(3), 333–355.

指導教授

辜玉旻(Yu-Min Ku)

審核日期

2024-7-29

推文