高性能高分子電解質燃料電池膜電極組之開發

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：76

、訪客IP：3.133.140.88

姓名

林晉賢(Ching-Hsien Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

機械工程學系

論文名稱

高性能高分子電解質燃料電池膜電極組之開發
(Development of High Performance Membrane Electrode Assembly of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells)

相關論文

★ 熱塑性聚胺酯複合材料製備燃料電池雙極板之研究	★ 以穿刺實驗探討鋰電池安全性之研究
★ 金屬多孔材應用於質子交換膜燃料電池內流道的研究	★ 不同表面處理之金屬發泡材於質子交換膜燃料電池內的研究
★ PEMFC電極及觸媒層之電熱流傳輸現象探討	★ 熱輻射對多孔性介質爐中氫、甲烷燃燒之影響
★ 高溫衝擊流熱傳特性之研究	★ 輻射傳遞對磁流體自然對流影響之研究
★ 小型燃料電池流道設計與性能分析	★ 雙重溫度與濃度梯度下多孔性介質中磁流體之雙擴散對流現象
★ 氣體擴散層與微孔層對於燃料電池之影響與分析	★ 應用於PEMFC陰極氧還原反應之Pt-Cu雙元觸媒製備及特性分析
★ 加熱對肌肉組織之近紅外光光學特性影響之研究	★ 超音速高溫衝擊流之暫態分析
★ 質子交換膜燃料電池陰極端之兩相流模擬與研究	★ 矽相關半導體材料光學模式之實驗量測儀器發展

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2029-8-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

本論文以高分子電解質燃料電池(Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells)為研究主題，並且是特指以質子交換膜為電解質，被認為是淨零碳排最有前景的技術之一的質子交換膜燃料電池(Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells, PEMFCs)。此研究領域中已有許多將鉑基合金奈米顆粒沉積在碳支撐體上，以增加鉑基觸媒的鉑質量比活性與電化學表面積，然而，在實際應用於PEMFC時，鉑質量比活性與電化學表面積的增加往往未能如預期地轉化為質量比功率密度(Mass Specific Power Density, MSPD)的提升，這是由於在燃料電池裝置中有離子、電子和氣體傳輸的限制。為解決這些問題，本研究主要採用了兩種策略。

首先，本研究通過脈衝雷射沉積(Pulsed Laser Deposition, PLD)直接將PtCo3奈米顆粒沉積到作為氣體擴散層(Gas Diffusion Layer, GDL)的碳紙上，形成奈米多孔薄膜觸媒層，提供連續的電子傳輸通路。並且進一步藉由使用掃描連續光雷射處理(Scanning Continuous-Wave Laser Processing, SCWLP)對奈米多孔薄膜進行材料改質，研究中顯示SCWLP同時具有鉑表面離析(surface segregation)與微燒結的效果，能夠使PtCo3奈米顆粒形成富鉑殼的殼核結構，並且將奈米顆粒間的接合強度提升，可以增加PtCo3奈米顆粒堆疊觸媒層的電化學表面積(Mass Specific Electrochemical Surface Area, MSECSA)與耐久性。實際用於PEMFCs時，使用SCWLP與不使用SCWLP相比，MSECSA增加了56%。並且在1大氣壓氧氣下$0.6~V$時的陰極MSMSPD達到8.79 kW g-1，顯著高於使用純鉑的情況(6.06 kW g-1)，並在1.5大氣壓氧氣下達到12.0 kW g-1。

其次，本研究開發滴塗法(drop-casting)，可直接將Nafion沉積在以PLD所製備的鉑奈米多孔薄膜氣體擴散電極上，形成質子交換膜，滴塗Nafion可建立在觸媒層中的質子傳輸網絡來提升電流密度。經由優化Nafion溶液的溶劑組成、乾燥溫度和熱壓條件，與相同厚度的商購膜相比，可使PEMFC之歐姆阻抗降低35%，本研究中的PEMFC電流密度可達1902 mA cm-2@0.6 V，在使用2 atm氫氣與氧氣的情況下，比商購質子交換膜高出21%。

此外，本研究亦使用滴塗法在Nafion質子交換膜中摻雜二氧化鈰奈米顆粒以提升質子交換膜之抗化學降解能力。結果表明摻有CeO2的Nafion膜可顯著提升PEMFC的電流密度，同時提升PEM的耐久性。這種改善歸因於CeO2奈米顆粒可增加水分吸收和膜內質子傳輸的能力，能夠促進更有效的水管理來減少觸媒層的水淹問題。

摘要(英)

This thesis focuses on Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs), specifically Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells, which are considered one of the most promising technologies for achieving net-zero carbon emissions. In this research field, many studies have deposited platinum-based alloy nanoparticles on carbon supports to increase the mass-specific activity and electrochemical surface area of platinum-based catalysts. However, in practical applications of PEMFCs, the increase in mass-specific activity and electrochemical surface area often does not translate as expected into an enhancement of mass-specific power density (MSPD) due to limitations in ion, electron, and gas transport within the fuel cell device. To address these issues, this thesis adopted two main strategies.

Firstly, this study employs Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD) to directly deposit PtCo3 nanoparticles onto carbon paper, serving as the Gas Diffusion Layer (GDL), forming a nanoporous thin-film catalyst layer that provides a continuous electron transport pathway. Additionally, the study further modified the nanoporous film material using scanning continuous-wave laser processing (SCWLP). The research shows that SCWLP induces both platinum surface segregation and micro-sintering effects, which can form a platinum-rich shell-core structure of the PtCo3 nanoparticles and enhance the bonding strength between nanoparticles. This increases the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) and durability of the $PtCo_{3}$ nanoparticle-stacked catalyst layer. When used in PEMFCs, the ECSA increased by 56% with SCWLP compared to without SCWLP. At 0.6 V under 1 atm of oxygen, the cathode mass-specific power density (MSPD) reached 8.79 kW g-1, significantly higher than that of pure platinum 6.06 kW g-1 and reached 12.0 kW g-1 under 1.5 atmospheres of oxygen.

Secondly, this study developed a drop-casting method to directly deposit Nafion onto the platinum nanoporous thin-film gas diffusion electrodes prepared by PLD, forming a proton exchange membrane. Drop-castied Nafion establishes a proton transport network within the catalyst layer, enhancing current density. By optimizing the solvent composition of the Nafion solution, drying temperature, and hot-pressing conditions, the ohmic resistance of the PEMFC was reduced by 35% compared to commercial membranes of the same thickness. The current density of the PEMFC in this study reached 1902mA cm-2@0.6 V, 21% higher than that of the commercial proton exchange membrane under 2 atm hydrogen and oxygen.

Moreover, this study also used the drop-casting method to dope cerium dioxide CeO2 nanoparticles into the Nafion proton exchange membrane to enhance the chemical degradation resistance. The results show that the Nafion membrane doped with CeO2 significantly improved the current density and durability of the PEMFC. This improvement is attributed to the ability of CeO2 nanoparticles to increase water absorption and proton transport within the membrane, facilitating more effective water management to reduce flooding issues in the catalyst layer.

關鍵字(中)

★ 質子交換膜燃料電池
★ 脈衝雷射沉積
★ 雷射燒結
★ 滴塗
★ Nafion
★ 觸媒

關鍵字(英)

★ proton exchange membrane fuel cell
★ pulsed laser deposition
★ laser sintering
★ drop-cast
★ Nafion
★ catalyst

論文目次

中文摘要································i
英文摘要································iii
誌謝································v
圖目錄································vii
表目錄································xi
一、緒論································xxi
1-1研究背景·····························1
1-1-1質子交換膜燃料電池··················1
1-2研究發展·····························6
1-2-1觸媒層結構與製程····················16
1-2-2奈米結構薄膜觸媒層··················18
1-2-3脈衝雷設沉積觸媒層··················21
1-2-4雷射微加工微孔層····················23
1-2-5直接滴塗質子交換膜··················25
1-3研究目標·····························26
二、燃料電池基本原理·····················29
2-1基本電化學原理························31
2-2熱力學與開路電壓······················31
2-3反應動力學····························33
2-4極化損失······························35
2-5燃料電池效率··························36
2-6PEMFC退化機制·························41
2-6-1鉑觸媒的退化·························42
2-6-2離聚物降解···························47
2-6-3碳腐蝕·······························48
三、實驗方法與步驟·························51
3-1實驗材料································51
3-2製程方法································51
3-2-1脈衝雷射沉積·························51
3-2-2連續光雷射掃描製程····················53
3-2-3二維數控滴塗製程······················54
3-2-4滴塗Nafion之溶液製備··················54
3-2-5膜電極組組裝··························55
3-2-6燃料電池單電池組裝·····················55
3-3材料與元件量測方法·······················55
3-3-1穿透式電子顯微鏡······················55
3-3-2掃描電子顯微鏡························56
3-3-3能量色散X射線譜·······················57
3-3-4燃料電池極化··························58
3-3-5電化學阻抗譜··························58
3-3-6觸媒層電化學測試·······················62
3-3-7越極電流與短路電流量測·················63
3-3-8導電式原子力顯微鏡分析·················64
四、結果與討論······························65
4-1PtCo3合金觸媒層之開發····················65
4-1-1雷射製程參數優化·······················65
4-1-2燃料電池之測試·························69
4-1-3觸媒層結構分析·························74
4-1-4觸媒層耐久性分析·······················78
4-1-5小結································81
4-2以瓦楞形氣體擴散電極提升質量功率密度·······82
4-2-1膜電極組形貌分析·······················83
4-2-2熱壓參數對燃料電池之影響················83
4-2-3觸媒擔載量對燃料電池性能之影響··········84
4-2-4小結································84
4-3直接滴塗Nafion質子交換膜於鉑多孔觸媒層···89
4-3-1Nafion溶液組成對製程的影響············89
4-3-2不同乾燥溫度與熱壓壓力對滴塗製程的影響··93
4-3-3滴塗與商用PEM用於PEMFC之性能比較·······98
4-3-4增加觸媒層孔隙························104
4-3-5小結································105
4-4以二氧化鈰摻雜PEM提升耐久性··············105
4-4-1表面與截面形貌分析·····················108
4-4-2不同摻雜量對燃料電池性能之影響··········108
4-4-3開路電壓加速老化測試··················110
4-4-4小結································111
五、結論與未來工作·························113
5-1結論································113
5-2未來工作······························114
參考文獻·······························115

參考文獻

[1] UNDP Sustainable Energy Hub, Energy transition, Retrieved Juun 15, 2024, from https://www.undp.org/energy/our-work-areas/energy-transition
[2] 行政院國家永續發展委員會, 臺灣2050淨零排放路徑, Retrieved Juun 15, 2024, from https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/Fore/nsdn/about0/2050Path
[3]國家發展委員會, 十二項關鍵戰略, Retrieved Juun 15, 2024, from https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=733396F648BE2845
[4] 經濟部能源局, 能源轉型白皮書, Retrieved Juun 15, 2024, from https://energywhitepaper.tw/#/whitepaper
[5] 能源及減碳辦公室, 綠能科技產業創新推動方案, Retrieved Juun 15, 2024, from https://www.ey.gov.tw/achievement/212C54ECAD28A29E
[6] Yi Fan Junye Wang, Hualin Wang. Techno-economic challenges of fuel cell commercialization. Engineering, 4:352–360, 2018.
[7] 財團法人台灣經濟研究院。全國性氫能發展之整體規劃期末報告書。
[8] Matthew M Mench. Fuel Cell Engines. John Wiley & Sons, Nashville, TN, 2008.
[9] Siew Hwa Chan Lixin Fan, Zhengkai Tu. Recent development of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies: A review. Energy Reports, 7:8421–8446, 2021.
[10] Junye Wang, Hualin Wang, and Yi Fan. Techno-economic challenges of fuel cell commercialization. Engineering, 4:352–360, 05 2018.
[11] Ahmet Kusoglu and Adam Z. Weber. New insights into perfluorinated sulfonic-acid ionomers. Chem. Rev., 117(3):987–1104, FEB 8 2017.
[12] RH; Jensen JO; Bjerrum NJ Li, QF; He. Approaches and recent development of polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cells operating above 100 °c. CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS, 15:4896–4915, 2003.
[13] D.B. Ingham K.J. Hughes L Ma S.M. Lyth M. Pourkashanian F.C. Lee, M.S. Ismail. Alternative architectures and materials for pemfc gas diffusion layers: A review and outlook. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166:112640, 2022.
[14] Xuefeng Ren, Qianyuan Lv, Lifen Liu, Bihe Liu, Yiran Wang, Anmin Liu, and Gang Wu. Current progress of pt and pt-based electrocatalysts used for fuel cells. Sustain. Energy Fuels, 4(1):15–30, 2020.
[15] Rizwan Haider, Yichan Wen, Zi-Feng Ma, David P. Wilkinson, Lei Zhang, Xianxia Yuan, Shuqin Song, and Jiujuin Zhang. High temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells: progress in advanced materials and key technologies. Chem. Soc. Rev., 50:1138–1187, 2021.
[16] Leonard Bonville, Jasna Jankovic, Aubrey Tang, Louis Crisci. An overview of bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 13:022701, 2021.
[17] T. Velumani, K. B. Chul R. Velayutham P. Shivakumar S. Sundaram M. Marappan, K. Palaniswamy. Performance studies of proton exchange membrane fuel cells with different flow field designs – review. Chem. Rec., 21:663, 2021.
[18] W.-G. Drossel S. Porstmann, T. Wannemacher. A comprehensive comparison of state-of-the-art manufacturing methods for fuel cell bipolar plates including anticipated future industry trends. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 60:366–383, 2020.
[19] Huang J., Li Z., and Zhang J. Review of characterization and modeling of polymer electrolyte fuel cell catalyst layer: The blessing and curse of ionomer. Front. Energy, 11:334–364, 2017.
[20] Shiqing Liu, Shu Yuan, Yuwei Liang, Huiyuan Li, Zhiling Xu, Qian Xu, Jiewei Yin, Shuiyun Shen, Xiaohui Yan, and Junliang Zhang. Engineering the catalyst layers towards enhanced local oxygen transport of low-pt proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Materials, designs, and methods. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(11):4389–4417, 2023.
[21] Xiaojing Cheng, Shuiyun Shen, Guanghua Wei, Chao Wang, Liuxuan Luo, and Junliang Zhang. Perspectives on challenges and achievements in local oxygen transport of low pt proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Advanced Materials Technologies, 7(8):2200228, 2022.
[22] Kei Sakai, Kazuyuki Sato, Tetsuya Mashio, Atsushi Ohma, Koichi Yamaguchi, and Kazuhiko Shinohara. Analysis of reactant gas transport in catalyst layers; effect of pt-loadings. ECS Transactions, 25(1):1193, sep 2009.
[23] Takahisa Suzuki, Kenji Kudo, and Yu Morimoto. Model for investigation of oxygen transport limitation in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 222:379–389, 2013.
[24] P. Gazdzicki, J. Mitzel, A. M. Dreizler, M. Schulze, and K. A. Friedrich. Impact of platinum loading on performance and degradation of polymer electrolyte fuel cell electrodes studied in a rainbow stack. Fuel Cells, 18(3):270–278, 2018.
[25] Ting Wei Huang, Hamza Qayyum, Guan Ren Lin, Szu Yuan Chen, and Chung Jen Tseng. Production of high-performance and improved-durability Pt-catalyst/support for proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells with pulsed laser deposition. J. Phys. D, 49:255601, 2016.
[26] Chia-Chun Lang, Ching-Hsien Lin, Hao-Hsuan Chen, Chung-Jen Tseng, and Szu yuan Chen. Performance enhancement of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell by PtCo3 nanoporous film as high mass-specific power density catalyst using laser deposition and processing. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 46(68):33948–33956, 2021.
[27] Hamza Qayyum, Chung-Jen Tseng, Ting-Wei Huang, and Szu-yuan Chen. Pulsed laser deposition of platinum nanoparticles as a catalyst for high-performance PEM fuel cells. Catalysts, 6(11):180, NOV 2016.
[28] Mark K. Debe. Nanostructured thin film electrocatalysts for pem fuel cells - a tutorial on the fundamental characteristics and practical properties of nstf catalysts. ECS Transactions, 45(2):47, apr 2012.
[29] Mark K Debe. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature, 486:43–51, 2012.
[30] N Cunningham, E Irissou, M Lefèvre, M C Denis, D. Guay, and J P Dodelet. Pemfc anode with very low pt loadings using pulsed laser deposition. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 6:A125–A128, 2003.
[31] Waldemar Mróz, Bogusław Budner, Wojciech Tokarz, Piotr Piela, and Michael L Korwin Pawlowski. Ultra-low-loading pulsed-laser-deposited platinum catalyst films for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 273:885–893, 2015.
[32] Jericha Iglesia, Chia-Chun Lang, Yen-Mu Chen, Szu-Yuan Chen, and Chung-Jen Tseng. Raising the maximum power density of nanoporous catalyst film-based polymer-electrolyte-membrane fuel cells by laser micro-machining of the gas diffusion layer. J. Power Sources, 436(226886):226886, 2019.
[33] Segeun Jang, Yun Sik Kang, Dohoon Kim, Subin Park, Changwook Seol, Sungchul Lee, Sang Moon Kim, and Sung Jong Yoo. Multiscale architectured membranes, electrodes, and transport layers for next-generation polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Advanced Materials, 35(43):2204902, 2023.
[34] Matthias Klingele, Matthias Breitwieser, Roland Zengerle, and Simon Thiele. Direct deposition of proton exchange membranes enabling high performance hydrogen fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A, 3:11239–11245, JUL 2015.
[35] Matthias Klingele, Benjamin Britton, Steven Holdcroft, Roland Zengerle, Simon Thiele, Severin Vierrath, Matthias Breitwieser. The reasons for the high power density of fuel cells fabricated with directly deposited membranes. Journal of Power Sources, 326:170–175, 2016.
[36] Matthias Klingele, Armin Hartmann, Johannes Erben, Hyeongrae Cho, Jochen Kerres, Roland Zengerle, Simon Thiele, Matthias Breitwieser, Carolin Klose. Simple fabrication of 12 µm thin nanocomposite fuel cell membranes by direct electrospinning and printing. Journal of Power Sources, 337:137–144, 2017.
[37] Peng Ren, Pucheng Pei, Yuehua Li, Ziyao Wu, Dongfang Chen, and Shangwei Huang. Degradation mechanisms of proton exchange membrane fuel cell under typical automotive operating conditions. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 80:100859, SEP 2020.
[38] Gasteiger H. WolfVielstich, ArnoldLamm. Handbook of fuel cells: fundamentals, technology, and applications. Wiley, Nashville, TN, 2009.
[39] R E Rosli, A B Sulong, W R W Daud, M A Zulkifley, T Husaini, M I Rosli, E H Majlan, and M A Haque. A review of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (ht-pemfc) system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 42(14):9293–9314, 2017.
[40] Qianwen Tang, Bing Li, Daijun Yang, Pingwen Ming, Cunman Zhang, and Yanbo Wang. Review of hydrogen crossover through the polymer electrolyte membrane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 46(42):22040–22061, 2021.
[41] R. Eason. Pulsed laser deposition of thin films: applications-led growth of functional materials, first edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2006.
[42] Xiao-Zi Yuan, Haijiang Wang and Hui Li. PEM FUEL CELL DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS. Taylor Francis Group, Boca Raton, US, 2012.
[43] Xiaoxi Yuan, Haijiang Wang, Jian Colin Sun, and Jiujiun Zhang. AC impedance technique in PEM fuel cell diagnosis-A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32:4365–4380, 2007.
[44] Ivan Pivac, Boris Šimić, and Frano Barbir. Experimental diagnostics and modeling of inductive phenomena at low frequencies in impedance spectra of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 365:240–248, 2017.
[45] Chao Wei, Shengnan Sun, Daniel Mandler, Xun Wang, Shi Zhang Qiao, and Zhichuan J. Xu. Approaches for measuring the surface areas of metal oxide electrocatalysts for determining their intrinsic electrocatalytic activity. Chem. Soc. Rev., 48:2518-2534, 2019.
[46] Qinggang He, Ahmet Kusoglu, Ivan T Lucas, Kyle Clark, Adam Z Weber, and Robert Kostecki. Correlating humidity-dependent ionically conductive surface area with transport phenomena in proton-exchange membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B, 115(40):11650–11657, 2011.
[47] Daria Riabinina, Eric Irissou, Boris Le Drogoff, Mohamed Chaker, and Daniel Guay. Influence of pressure on the Pt nanoparticle growth modes during pulsed laser ablation. J. Appl. Phys., 108:034322, 2010.
[48] D. Bäuerle. Laser processing and chemistry, fourth edition. Springer, 2011.
[49] Alexandra Gelle, Tony Jin, Luis de la Garza, Gareth D. Price, Lucas V. Besteiro, and Audrey Moores. Applications of PlasnpIn-Enhanced Nanocatalysis to Organic Transformations. Chem. Rev., 120(2):986–1041, JAN 22 2020.
[50] F. van Schalkwyk, G. Pattrick, J. Olivier, O. Conrad, and S. Blair. Development and scale up of enhanced ORR Pt-based catalysts for PEMFCs. Fuel Cells, 16(4):414–427, 2016.
[51] Junbo Hou, Min Yang, Changchun Ke, Guanghua Wei, and Junliang Zhang. Optimizing the structural design of a nanocomposite catalyst layer for PEM fuel cells for improving mass-specific power density. Nanoscale, 12(26):13858–13878, JUL 14 2020.
[52] Andrew J. Steinbach, Jeffrey S. Allen, Rodney L. Borup, Daniel S. Hussey, David L. Jacobson, Andrei Konov, Anthony Kwong, James MacDonald, Rangachary Mukundan, Matt J. Pejsa, Michael Roos, Anthony D. Santamaria, James M. Sieracki, Dusan Spernjak, Iryna V. Zenyuk, and Adam Z. Weber. Anode-design strategies for improved performance of polymer-electrolyte fuel cells with ultrathin electrodes. Joule, 2(7):1297–1312, JUL 18 2018.
[53] Feng-Ju Lai, Wei-Nien Su, Loka Subramanyam Sarma, Din-Goa Liu, Cheng-An Hsieh, Jyh-Fu Lee, and Bing-Joe Hwang. Chemical dealloying mechanism of bimetallic Pt-Co nanoparticles and enhancement of catalytic activity toward oxygen reduction. Chem. Eur. J., 16(15):4602–4611, 2010.
[54] Binghong Han, Christopher E. Carlton, Anusorn Kongkanand, Ratandeep S. Kukreja, Brian R. Theobald, Lin Gan, Rachel O’Malley, Peter Strasser, Frederick T. Wagner, and Yang Shao-Horn. Record activity and stability of dealloyed bimetallic catalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci., 8(1):258–266, 2015.
[55] Ivan Khalakhan, Mykhailo Vorokhta, Michal Vaclav, Bretislav Smid, Jaroslava Lavkova, Iva Matolinova, Roman Fiala, Nataliya Tsud, Tomas Skala, and Vladimir Matolin. In-situ electrochemical atomic force microscopy study of aging of magnetron sputtered Pt-Co nanalloy thin films during accelerated degradation test. Electrochim. Acta, 211:52–58, 2016.
[56] José M Doña Rodriguez, José Alberto Herrera Melián, and Jesus Pérez Peña. Determination of the real surface area of Pt electrodes by hydrogen adsorption using cyclic voltammetry. J. Chem. Educ., 77:1195–1197, 2000.
[57] Sheng Dai, Jyh-Pin Chou, Kuan-Wen Wang, Yang-Yang Hsu, Al-Hue He, Xiaoqing Pan, and Tsan-Yao Chen. Platinum-ruthenium-
[58] KA Mauritz and RB Moore. State of understanding of Nafion. Chem. Rev., 104(10):4535–4585, OCT 2004.
[59] Klaus Schmidt-Rohr and Qiang Chen. Parallel cylindrical water nanochannels in Nafion fuel-cell membranes. Nat. Mater., 7(1):75–83, JAN 2008.
[60] Heng Zhang, Lei Li, Martin Moeller, Xiaomin Zhu, Jaime J. Hernandez Rueda, Martin Rosenthal, and Dimitri A. Ivanov. From channel-forming ionic liquid crystals exhibiting humidity-induced phase transitions to nanostructured ion-conducting polymer membranes. Adv. Mater., 25(26):3543–3548, JUL 12 2013.
[61] Pavel G. Khalatur and Alexei R. Khokhlov. Nonconventional scenarios of polymer self-assembly. Soft Matter, 9(46):10943–10954, 2013.
[62] Quentin Berrod, Sandrine Lyonnard, Armel Guillermo, Jacques Olivier, Bernhard Frick, Abdelatif Manseri, Bruno Ameduri, and Gerard Gebel. Nanostructure and Transport Properties of Proton Conducting Self-Assembled Perfluorinated Surfactants: A Bottom-Up Approach toward PFSA Fuel Cell Membranes. Macromolecules, 48(17):6166–6176, SEP 8 2015.
[63] Kourosh Malek, Tetsuya Mashio, and Michael Eikerling. Microstructure of catalyst layers in PEM fuel cells redefined: a computational approach. Electrocatalysis, 2(2):141–157, JUN 2011.
[64] Qinggang He, Ahmet Kusoglu, Ivan T. Lucas, Kyle Clark, Adam Z. Weber, and Robert Kostecki. Correlating humidity-dependent microscopically conductive surface area with transport phenomena in proton-exchange membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B, 115(40):11650–11657, OCT 13 2011.
[65] Jiwoo Choi, Je Hyeon Yeon, Seung Ho Yook, Sungsoo Shin, Jin Young Kim, Mansoo Choi, and Segeun Jang. Multifunctional Nafion/CeO2 dendritic structures for enhanced durability and performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 13(1):806–815, JAN 13 2021.
[66] Abu Zafar Al Munsur, Bon-Hyuk Goo, Youngkwang Kim, Oh Joong Kwon, Sae Yane Paek, So Young Lee, Hyoung-Juhn Kim, and Tae-Hyun Kim. Nafion-based proton-exchange membranes built on cross-linked semi-interpenetrating polymer networks between poly(acrylic acid) and poly(vinyl alcohol). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 13(24):28188–28200, JUN 23 2021.
[67] Yao Lu Na Li Zhaoxia Hu Shouwen Chen Lili Liu, Yangyang Pu. Superacid sulfated sno2 doped with ceo2: A novel inorganic filler to simultaneously enhance conductivity and stabilities of proton exchange membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 621:118972, 2021.
[68] Karen Chan and Michael Eikerling. Water balance model for polymer electrolyte fuel cells with ultrathin catalyst layers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16:2106–2117, 2014.
[69] Xiang Deng, Chao Huang, Xiaodong Pei, Bin Hu, and Wei Zhon. Recent progresses and remaining issues on the ultrathin catalyst layer design strategy for high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cell with further reduced Pt loadings: a review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 47(3):1529–1542, 2022.
[70] Jun Huang, Zhe Li, and Jianbo Zhang. Review of characterization and modeling of polymer electrolyte fuel cell catalyst layer: the blessing and curse of ionomer. Front. Energy, 11:334–364, 2017.

指導教授

曾重仁(Chung-jen Tseng)

審核日期

2024-7-26

推文