博碩士論文 111427003 詳細資訊



以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：31 、訪客IP：3.145.95.76
姓名 蔡瓊茹(Chiung-Ju Tsai)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 中高齡員工心理資本與工作成長動機關聯性之研究—以現在享樂時間觀與過去正向時間觀為調節變項
(A study of Psychological Capital, focus on Growth Work Motives for middle-aged and elderly employees: An examination of Moderated Mediation Effect of Present-Hedonistic and Past-Positive Time Perspective)
相關論文
★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中) 為因應台灣人口老化與勞動市場的快速變化，如何提高中高齡員工的勞動參與率、協助中高齡員工持續學習與成長以適應瞬息萬變的勞動市場是當今政府及企業面臨的一大課題。
本次研究以社會情緒選擇理論與資源保存理論為基礎，旨在探究中高齡在職者心理資本與工作成長動機之間的關聯性，以未來時間觀為中介變項，並分析現在享樂時間觀與過去正向時間觀作為調節變項的作用，以探討不同面向的時間觀點如何影響心理資本、未來時間觀與工作成長動機之間的關聯性。
本研究以台灣四十五歲（含）以上的中高齡在職者為研究對象，問卷分為兩階段發放，最終回收有效問卷為兩百二十五份。研究結果發現，心理資本與工作成長動機呈顯著正相關，且未來時間觀在當中起到部分中介作用。研究中的發現對於理解中高齡員工的職涯發展具有管理意涵，同時希望能協助企業及政府在提供中高齡員工資源以利其持續學習與成長時，發揮最大效益。
摘要(英) To address the issues of aging population and rapid changes in Taiwan’s labor market, enhancing the labor force participation rate of middle-aged and elder employees, as well as assisting them in continuous learning and growth, are significant challenges faced by both the government and companies.
Based on the Socioemotional Selectivity Theory and Conservation of Resources Theory, this study aims to explore the relationship between psychological capital and growth work motives, with future time perspective as a mediating variable. Additionally, it analyzes the moderating effects of present-hedonistic time perspective and past-positive time perspective, examining how different dimensions of time perspective influence the relationship among psychological capital, future time perspective and growth work motives.
This research targets working individuals in Taiwan aged 45 and above. Questionnaires were distributed in two stages, with the final result of 225 valid responses. The findings indicate a positive correlation between psychological capital and growth work motives, with future time perspective partially mediating this relationship. The study offers managerial implications for understanding the career development of middle-aged and elder employees, aiming to assist management teams and governments in maximizing the effectiveness of resources provided to support these employees in continuous learning and growth.
關鍵字(中) ★ 中高齡員工
★ 心理資本
★ 未來時間觀
★ 現在享樂時間觀
★ 過去正向時間觀
★ 工作成長動機		 關鍵字(英) ★ middle-aged and elderly workers
★ psychological capital
★ future time perspective
★ present-hedonistic time perspective
★ past-positive time perspective
★ growth work motives
論文目次 目錄
中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vi
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究動機 3
1-3 研究目的 5
二、文獻探討與假說建立 6
2-1 文獻探討 6
2-1-1社會情緒選擇理論 6
2-1-2資源保存理論 7
2-1-3心理資本 8
2-1-4時間觀 9
2-1-4-1未來時間觀 10
2-1-4-2現在享樂時間觀 11
2-1-4-3過去正向時間觀 12
2-1-5工作成長動機 13
2-2 假說建立 14
2-2-1心理資本與工作成長動機之關聯性 14
2-2-2心理資本與未來時間觀之關聯性 15
2-2-3未來時間觀與工作成長動機之關聯性 15
2-2-4未來時間觀之中介效果 16
2-2-5正向時間觀的調節及調節式中介效果 17
2-2-5-1現在享樂時間觀的調節效果 17
2-2-5-2現在享樂時間觀的調節式中介效果 18
2-2-5-3過去正向時間觀的調節效果 18
2-2-5-4過去正向時間觀的調節式中介效果 19
三、研究方法 21
3-1 研究架構 21
3-2 研究樣本及程序 21
3-3 研究變項之操作性定義說明 22
3-3-1心理資本 22
3-3-2未來時間觀 22
3-3-3現在享樂時間觀 23
3-3-4過去正向時間觀 23
3-3-5工作成長動機 24
3-3-6控制變項 24
3-4 資料分析研究方法 25
四、研究結果 26
4-1 資料來源、樣本分析與敘述性統計 26
4-2 驗證性因素分析 28
4-3 收斂效度與區辨效度 28
4-4 信度分析 29
4-5 相關分析 30
4-6 假說檢定 31
4-6-1未來時間觀的中介效果 31
4-6-2現在享樂時間觀的調節與調節式中介效果 33
4-6-3過去正向時間觀的調節與調節式中介效果 35
五、研究結論與討論 38
5-1 研究結論 38
5-2 研究貢獻 40
5-3 管理意涵 41
5-4 研究限制 41
參考文獻 42

圖目錄
圖1 研究架構 21

表目錄
表1 台灣中高齡員人口勞動參與率 2
表2 2022年主要國家中高齡及高齡勞動參與率 2
表3 樣本結構分布 26
表4 驗證性因素模型配適度分析結果 28
表5 收斂效度分析結果 29
表6 區辨效度分析結果 29
表7 信度分析結果 30
表8 相關分析結果 30
表9 未來時間觀中介效果分析 32
表10 現在享樂時間觀調節效果分析 33
表11 現在享樂時間觀調節式中介效果分析 34
表12 過去正向時間觀調節效果分析 35
表13 過去正向時間觀調節式中介效果分析 36
表14 假設檢驗結果 37
參考文獻 中華民國勞動部勞動力發展屬（2022, 2023）。中高齡者及高齡者就業服務。擷取自https://www.wda.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=446258303976F571
中華民國國家發展委員會（2023）。中華民國人口推估。擷取自https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=6EA756F006B2A924
中華民國統計資訊網（2023）。主計處人口統計專區。擷取自https://www.stat.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=4001&s=231112
彭慧純（2011），「人力資源專業人員之專業職能、工作動機與個人績效之關係探討」，國立中央大學，碩士論文。
林心榆（2015），「員工未來時間觀與職涯滿意度即持續工作動機的關係─以SOC為調節變項」，國立中央大學，碩士論文。
吳孟津（2016），「中高齡員工未來時間觀、認知未來機會與持續工作動機間的關係—調節式中介模型的檢驗」，國立中央大學，碩士論文。
陳慧娟、游心慈、劉怡佳（2016），教育鐘點戰：時間觀在適性教學與輔導的啟示。中等教育，67(1)，18-35。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2016.67.1.03
陳欽雨、蔡宜雯（2016），服務業員工自我概念、正向態度與專業契合對升遷機會之影響。人力資源管理學報，16(2)，81-114。https://doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.2016.1602.04
馬一如（2018），「中高齡員工未來時間觀與工作動機關聯性之研究—跨層次探討適用中高齡人力資源管理措施調節效果」，國立中央大學，碩士論文。
周俐君、林文政、李秉懿、黃美慈（2021），中高齡員工持續工作動機之研究－探討知覺中高齡相關人力資源措施的調節式中介作用。輔仁管理評論，28(3)，1-36。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10254412-202109-202110070021-202110070021-1-36
Atchley, Robert C. (1988). A Continuity Theory of Normal Aging, The Gerontologist, 29(2), 183-190, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/29.2.183
Armstrong?Stassen, M. (2008). Organisational practices and the post?retirement employment experience of older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(1), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00057.x
Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070.
Anagnostopoulos, F., & Griva, F. (2012). Exploring time perspective in Greek young adults: Validation of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and relationships with mental health indicators. Social indicators research, 106, 41-59. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9792-y
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Brief, A. P., & Aldag, R. J. (1977). The intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management review, 2(3), 496-500. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4281861
Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611-626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611.
Bal, P. M., Jansen, P. G., Van der Velde, M. E., de Lange, A. H., & Rousseau, D. M. (2010). The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: A study among older workers. Journal of vocational behavior, 76(3), 474-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.01.002
Brandt, T., Gomes, J. F. S., & Boyanova, D. (2011). Personality and psychological capital as indicators of future job success ? A multicultural comparison between three European countries. Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 3(11), 263-289. http://lta.hse.fi/2011/3/lta_2011_03_a1.pdf.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2015). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. Positive psychology in practice: Promoting human flourishing in work, health, education, and everyday life, 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118996874.ch13
Carstensen, L. L., & Lang, F. R. (1996). Future time perspective scale. Psychology and Aging. https://doi.org/10.1037/t31314-000
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
Carstensen, L. L., (2006). The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development. Science312,1913-1915. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127488
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Optimism. Clinical psychology review, 30(7), 879-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.006.
Cunningham, K.F., Zhang, J.W. & Howell, R.T. (2015). Time perspectives and subjective wellbeing: a dual-pathway framework. Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application, 403-415. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_26
De Volder, M. L., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive–motivational concept. Journal of personality and social psychology, 42(3), 42(3), 566-571 https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.42.3.566
Dweck, C. S. (2013). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783048
Datu, J. A. D., King, R. B., & Valdez, J. P. M. (2018). Psychological capital bolsters motivation, engagement, and achievement: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(3), 260-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1257056
Elrehail, H., Rehman, S.U., Chaudhry, N.I. et al. (2021). Nexus among cyberloafing behavior, job demands and job resources: A mediated-moderated model. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4731-4749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10496-1
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(3), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437810180
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 642-662. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.642
Friedman, M.S. (2002). Martin Buber: The Life of Dialogue (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203398197
Fasbender, U., Wohrmann, A. M., Wang, M., & Klehe, U.-C. (2019). Is the future still open? The mediating role of occupational future time perspective in the effects of career adaptability and aging experience on late career planning. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 111, 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.006
Fasbender, U., & Gerpott, F. H. (2022). Knowledge transfer between younger and older employees: A temporal social comparison model. Work, Aging and Retirement, 8(2), 146-162. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab017
Fasbender, U., Vignoli, M., & Topa, G. (2022). Understanding how aging experiences shape late career development. The Career Development Quarterly, 70, 174-189. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12301
Fernandez Da Lama, R.G., & Brenlla, M.E. (2023). Past-Positive time perspective predicts academic achievement via motivation, and procrastination might not be as bad as it seems. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(2), 392-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2021-0413.
Guan, P., Capezio, A., Restubog, S. L. D., Read, S., Lajom, J. A. L., & Li, M. (2016). The role of traditionality in the relationships among parental support, career decision-making self-efficacy and career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.018.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_4
Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A. (2000). Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. Handbook of organization behavior, 2, 57-81.
Higgs, P., Mein, G., Ferrie, J., Hyde, M., & Nazroo, J. (2003). Pathways to early retirement: structure and agency in decision-making among British civil servants. Ageing & Society, 23(6), 761-778. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001326
Henson, J. M., Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B., & Maisto, S. A. (2006). Associations among health behaviors and time perspective in young adults: Model testing with boot-strapping replication. Journal of behavioral medicine, 29, 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9027-2
Hollenbeck, J. R., & Mannor, M. J. (2007). Career success and weak paradigms: The role of activity, resiliency, and true scores. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 933-942. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.491.
Holman, E. A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2009). The social language of time: The time perspective–social network connection. Basic and applied social psychology, 31(2), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530902880415
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117, 32-60. https://doi:10.1037/a0017668
Hirschi, A., Freund, P. A., & Herrmann, A. (2014). The career engagement scale: Development and validation of a measure of proactive career behaviors. Journal of career assessment, 22(4), 575-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072713514813.
Holman, E. A., Silver, R. C., Mogle, J. A., & Scott, S. B. (2016). Adversity, time, and well-being: A longitudinal analysis of time perspective in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 31(6), 640–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000115
Henry, H., Zacher, H. & Desmette, D. (2017). Future time perspective in the work context: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00413
Kastenbaum, R. (1964). The structure and function of time perspective. Journal of Psychological Researches, 8(3), 97-105.
Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who’s Smoking, Drinking, and Using Drugs? Time Perspective as a Predictor of Substance Use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BA210207
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of management review, 29(3), 440-458. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670969
Kooij, D., De Lange, A., Jansen, P., & Dikkers, J. (2008). Older workers′ motivation to continue to work: Five meanings of age: A conceptual review. Journal of managerial psychology, 23(4), 364-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810869015
Kooij, D. T. A. M., de Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W., & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2013). Beyond chronological age. Examining perceived future time and subjective health as age-related mediators in relation to work-related motivations and well-being. Work & Stress, 27(1), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.769328
Kooij, D. T. A. M., Bal, P. M., & Kanfer, R. (2014). Future time perspective and promotion focus as determinants of intraindividual change in work motivation. Psychology and Aging, 29(2), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036768.
Kooij, D. T., Tims, M., & Kanfer, R. (2015). Successful aging at work: The role of job crafting. Aging workers and the employee-employer relationship, 145-161. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08007-9_9
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Simon, L. S., & Judge, T. A. (2016). A Head Start or a Step Behind? Understanding How Dispositional and Motivational Resources Influence Emotional Exhaustion. Journal of Management, 42(3), 561-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313484518
Kanfer, R., Beier, M. E., & Ackerman, P. L. (2016). Goals and motivation related to work in later adulthood: An organizing framework. Age in the Workplace, 5-16. Routledge.
Luhmann, N. (2018). Trust and power. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs29553
Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125
Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. M. (2002). Hope: A new positive strength for human resource development. Human resource development review, 1(3), 304-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484302013003.
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006a). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.373.
Luthans, F., Vogelgesang, G. R., & Lester, P. B. (2006b). Developing the psychological capital of resiliency. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305285335.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., & Avey, J. B. (2007a). Psychological capital (PsyCap) questionnaire (PCQ). Inc: Mind Garden
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007b). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel psychology, 60(3), 541-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x.
Luthans, F., Avey, J.B., Avolio, B.J., & Peterson, S.J. (2010), The development and resulting performance impact of positive psychological capital, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20034
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of counseling psychology, 60(4), 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033446.
Lent, R. W., Miller, M. J., Smith, P. E., Watford, B. A., Lim, R. H., Hui, K., Morrison, M. A.,Wilkins, G., & Williams, K. (2013). Social cognitive predictors of adjustment to engineering majors across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.006.
Luthans, B. C., Luthans, K. W., & Avey, J. B. (2014). Building the leaders of tomorrow. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(2), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813517003.
Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324.
Masten, S. A., & Reed, M. J. (2002). Resilience in development. Handbook of positive psychology , 74-88. New York: Oxford University press.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
Matthews, G., & Stolarski, M. (2014). Emotional processes in development and dynamics of individual time perspective. Time perspective theory; review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo, 269-286. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_18
Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2014). The past, the present, and the future: A conceptual model of time perspective in adolescence. Time perspective theory; Review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo, 115-129. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_7
Mooney A, Earl JK, Mooney CH & Bateman H. (2017). Using Balanced Time Perspective to Explain Well-Being and Planning in Retirement. Front. Psychol. https://doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01781
Nordin, N.A., Rashid, Y.K.A., Panatik, S.A. & Rashid, A.H.A. (2019), Relationship between psychological capital and work engagement, Journal of Research in Psychology, 1(4).
Paullin, C. (2014). The aging workforce: Leveraging the talents of mature employees. SHRM Foundation.
Rutt, J. L., & Lockenhoff, C. E. (2016). From past to future: Temporal self-continuity across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 31(6), 631-639. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000090.
Ronnlund, M., Astrom, E., & Carelli, M. G. (2017). Time Perspective in Late Adulthood: Aging Patterns in Past, Present and Future Dimensions, Deviations from Balance, and Associations with Subjective Well-Being. Timing & Time Perception, 5(1), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-00002081
Rudolph, C.W., Kooij, D.T., Rauvola, R.S., & Zacher, H. (2018). Occupational future time perspective: a meta-analysis of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2264
Sickles, R. C., & Taubman, P. (1986). An Analysis of the Health and Retirement Status of the Elderly. Econometrica, 54(6), 1339-1356. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914302
Steverink, N., Westerhof, G. J., Bode, C., & Dittmann-Kohli, F. (2001). The personal experience of aging, individual resources, and subjective well-being. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, 56(6), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/56.6.P364
Szinovacz, M. E., DeViney, S., & Davey, A. (2001). Influences of family obligations and relationships on retirement: Variations by gender, race, and marital status. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(1), S20-S27. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/56.1.S20
Shmotkin, D., & Eyal, N. (2003). Psychological time in later life: Implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 81(3), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00252.x
Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W. et al. (2004). Placing Motivation and Future Time Perspective Theory in a Temporal Perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000026609.94841.2f
Stolarski, M., Bitner, J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011). Time perspective, emotional intelligence and discounting of delayed awards. Time & Society, 20(3), 346-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X11414296
Simons, M., Peeters, S., Janssens, M., Lataster, J., & Jacobs, N. (2016). Does age make a difference? age as moderator in the association between time perspective and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9806-1
Sobol-Kwapinska, M., & Jankowski, T. (2016). Positive time: Balanced time perspective and positive orientation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1511-1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9656-2
Stolarski, M., & Matthews, G. (2016). Time perspectives predict mood states and satisfaction with life over and above personality. Current psychology, 35, 516-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9515-2
Schuckert, M., Kim, T.T., Paek, S. & Lee, G. (2018). Motivate to innovate: how authentic and transformational leaders influence employees’ psychological capital and service innovation behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(2), 776-796. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2016-0282.
Smidt, W., Kammermeyer, G., Roux, S., Theisen, C., & Weber, C. (2018). Career success of preschool teachers in Germany–the significance of the Big Five personality traits, locus of control, and occupational self-efficacy. Early Child Development and Care, 188(10), 1340-1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1314275.
Trevelyan, R. (2008). Optimism, overconfidence and entrepreneurial activity. Management Decision, 46(7), 986-1001. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810890177.
Tho, N.D., Phong, N.D. & Quan, T.H.M. (2014). Marketers’ psychological capital and performance. The mediating role of quality of worklife, job effort and job attractiveness, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-04-2013-0026
Valero, D., Hirschi, A., & Strauss, K. (2015). Hope in adolescent careers: Mediating effects of work motivation on career outcomes in Swiss apprentices. Journal of Career Development, 42(5), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845314566866.
Wallace, M., & Rabin, A. I. (1960). Temporal experience. Psychological Bulletin, 57(3), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041410
Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of Fit in Overidentified Models with Latent Variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 118-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001005
Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and Distribution of the Product Methods for Testing Indirect Effects in Complex Models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 23-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701758166
Wojtkowska, K., Stolarski, M., & Matthews, G. (2021). Time for work: Analyzing the role of time perspectives in work attitudes and behaviors. Current Psychology, 40, 5972-5983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00536-y
Yarrow, K., Haggard, P., Heal, R., Brown, P., & Rothwell, J. C. (2001). Illusory perceptions of space and time preserve cross-saccadic perceptual continuity. Nature, 414(6861), 302-305. https://doi.org/10.1038/35104551
Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and individual differences, 23(6), 1007-1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00113-X
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. Simon and Schuster.
Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2011). Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: The interplay between age, job complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 291-318. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.683
Zimbardo, P., Clements, N., Rego Leite, U. (2017). Time Perspective and Financial Health: To Improve Financial Health, Traditional Financial Literacy Skills Are Not Sufficient. Understanding Your Time Perspective Is Critical. Time Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60191-9_2
指導教授 林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin) 審核日期 2025-3-27
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題，請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407，或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明