| 參考文獻 |
An, S., Ma, Z., Lin, Z., Zheng, N., Lou, J. G., & Chen, W. (2023). Learning from mistakes makes llm better reasoner. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.20689. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.20689
AlAli, R., & Al-Barakat, A. (2022). Using structural equation modeling to assess a model for measuring creative teaching perceptions and practices in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(10), 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100690
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1).
Alvidrez, M., Louie, N., & Tchoshanov, M. (2024). From mistakes, we learn? Mathematics teachers’ epistemological and positional framing of mistakes. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(1), 111-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09553-4
Aulia, E. T., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). Developing interactive e-module based on realistic mathematics education approach and mathematical literacy ability. Jurnal Elemen, 8(1), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i1.4569
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
Begolli, K. N., Dai, T., McGinn, K. M., & Booth, J. L. (2021). Could probability be out of proportion? Self-explanation and example-based practice help students with lower proportional reasoning skills learn probability. Instructional Science, 49, 441-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9
Bingolbali, E., & Bingolbali, F. (2021). An examination of open-ended mathematics questions′ affordances. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.1
Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., ... & Zhang, Y. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv:2303.12712. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12712
Clements, M. A. (1980). Analyzing children′s errors on written mathematical tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(1), 1-21. . https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369157
Collins, K. M., Jiang, A. Q., Frieder, S., Wong, L., Zilka, M., Bhatt, U., ... & Jamnik, M. (2024). Evaluating language models for mathematics through interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(24). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2318124121
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 281-288.
Fitzsimons, A., & Ni Fhloinn, E. (2023). The cops model for collaborative problem-solving in mathematics. Irish Educational Studies, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2189137
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33(3), 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309
Frieder, S., Pinchetti, L., Griffiths, R. R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P., & Berner, J. (2023). Mathematical capabilities of chatgpt. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.08760
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Abramson, R. (2020). Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS): A Validated Classwide Program for Improving Reading and Mathematics Performance. In: Reschly, A.L., Pohl, A.J., Christenson, S.L. (eds) Student Engagement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9_6
Fukaya, T. (2013). Explanation generation, not explanation expectancy, improves metacomprehension accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 8, 1-18.
Graesser, A. C., Greiff, S., Stadler, M., & Shubeck, K. T. (2020). Collaboration in the 21st century: The theory, assessment, and teaching of collaborative problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 104.
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach, 37-56.
Hwang, G. J., & Chen, N. S. (2023). Exploring the potential of generative artificial intelligence in education: applications, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202304_26(2).0014
Gattupalli, S., Maloy, R. W., & Edwards, S. (2023). Comparing teacher-written and AI-generated math problem solving strategies for elementary school students: Implications for classroom learning. https://doi.org/10.7275/8sgx-xj08
Inoferio, H. V., Espartero, M., Asiri, M., Damin, M., & Chavez, J. V. (2024). Coping with math anxiety and lack of confidence through AI-assisted Learning. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(5). 8. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2228
?pek, Z. H., Gozum, A. I. C., Papadakis, S., & Kallogiannakis, M. (2023). Educational Applications of the ChatGPT AI System: A Systematic Review Research. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(3), 26-55. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.123.2
Khalid, M., Saad, S., Hamid, S. R. A., Abdullah, M. R., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270-291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
Khasawneh, A. A., Al-Barakat, A. A., & Almahmoud, S. A. (2023). The impact of mathematics learning environment supported by error-analysis activities on classroom interaction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12951
Kramarski, B., & Zoldan, S. (2008). Using errors as springboards for enhancing mathematical reasoning with three metacognitive approaches. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.2.137-151
Kshetree, M. P., Acharya, B. R., Khanal, B., Panthi, R. K., & Belbase, S. (2021). Eighth Grade Students′ Misconceptions and Errors in Mathematics Learning in Nepal. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1101-1121. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1101
Kusmaryono, I., & Maharani, H.R. (2021). Imagination And Creative Thinking Skills Of Elementary School Students In Learning Mathematics: A Reflection Of Realistic Mathematics Education. ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal, 9(2), 287-287. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v9i2.11781
Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., Hoogerheide, V., van Gog, T., & Renkl, A. (2020). Timing matters! Explaining between study phases enhances students’ learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 841.
Lan, Y. J., & Chen, N. S. (2024). Teachers’ agency in the era of LLM and generative AI. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), I-XVIII. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48754837
Larrain, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Interpretation of students’ errors as part of the diagnostic competence of pre-service primary school Teachers. Journal for Mathematics Didactics, 43, 39-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-022-00198-7
Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2017). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers & Education, 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100
Martin, M. O., von Davier, M., & Mullis, I. V. (2020). Methods and procedures: TIMSS 2019 technical report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Ministry of Education (2019). Mathematics Syllabuses: Secondary one to four. Singapore: Author.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
National Academy for Education Research (2020). Literacy-oriented assessment items research and development for teachers’ professional development (first year): Mathematics items. New Taipei: Author. Retrieved from https://ptips.ntct.edu.tw/var/file/69/1069/img/173342938.pdf (in Chinese)
National Academy for Education Research (2021). Literacy-oriented assessment items research and development for teachers’ professional development (second year): Mathematics items, New Taipei: Author. Retrieved from https://ptips.ntct.edu.tw/var/file/69/1069/img/376480000A_1100252353_ATTACH1.pdf (in Chinese)
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014). Principles to actions: ensuringmathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
Nilimaa, J. (2023). New examination approach for real-world creativity and problem-solving skills in mathematics. Trends in Higher Education, 2(3), 477-495. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu2030028
Niss,M. & Jablonka, E. (2014). Mathematical Literacy. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 391-396). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_100
Niss, M., & Hojgaard, T. (Eds.). (2011). Competencies and mathematical learning: Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University.
Nuraina, N., Fauzi, K. M. A., & Simbolon, N. (2021). The effect of realistic mathematics educations (RME) approach based on ethnomatics on the improvement of concept understanding ability and students’ learning motivation in elementary school AlKausar City of Langsa. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4(1), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1707
OECD (2018). PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework (Draft). Retrieved from https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/
OpenAI (2022), ChatGPT: optimizing language models for dialogue, available at: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
OpenAI, R. (2023). Gpt-4 technical report. arxiv 2303.08774. View in Article, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
Pardos, Z. A., & Bhandari, S. (2023). Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hints. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06871. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.06871
Patero, J. L. (2023). Revolutionizing math education: Harnessing chatGPT for student success. Mathematics Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-12375
Plevris, V., Papazafeiropoulos, G., & Jimenez Rios, A. (2023). Chatbots Put to the Test in Math and Logic Problems: A Comparison and Assessment of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard. AI, 4(4), 949-969. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.18618
Putri, D. A., Susanti, V. D., & Apriandi, D. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Berbasis RME Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas Xi SMK. Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v1i2.470
Putri, S. K., Hasratuddin, & Syahputra, E. (2019). Development of Learning Devices Based on Realistic Mathematics Education to Improve Students′ Spatial Ability and Motivation. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 393-400. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5729
Reinke, L. T., Stephan, M., Ayan-Civak, R., & Casto, A. R. (2023). Teachers’ press for contextualization to ground students’ mathematical understanding of ratio. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(3), 335-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09531-w
Richey, J. E., Andres-Bray, J. M. L., Mogessie, M., Scruggs, R., Andres, J. M., Star, J. R., ... & McLaren, B. M. (2019). More confusion and frustration, better learning: The impact of erroneous examples. Computers & Education, 139, 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.012
Rong, L., & Mononen, R. (2022). Error-analysis of students with mathematics learning difficulties in Tibet. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 1(1) 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263221089357
Roorda, G., de Vries, S., & Smale-Jacobse, A. E. (2024). Using lesson study to help mathematics teachers enhance students’ problem-solving skills with teaching through problem solving. Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1331674). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1331674
Roscoe, R. D. (2014). Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching. Instructional Science, 42, 327-351.
Rospigliosi, P. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: What questions should we ask of ChatGPT? Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2180191
Rushton, S. J. (2018). Teaching and learning mathematics through error analysis. Fields Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40928-018-0009-y
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Samritin, S., Natsir, S. R., Manaf, A., & Sari, E. R. (2023). The effect of realistic mathematics education implementation in mathematics learning in elementary school. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 13(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v13i1.16522
Sanchez-Ruiz, L. M., Moll-Lopez, S., Nunez-Perez, A., Morano-Fernandez, J. A., & Vega-Fleitas, E. (2023). ChatGPT challenges blended learning methodologies in engineering education: A case study in mathematics. Applied Sciences, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106039
Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Problem solving in mathematics education: tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8
Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM, 42, 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01060-w
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective. Pearson.
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Shakarian, P., Koyyalamudi, A., Ngu, N., & Mareedu, L. (2023). An independent evaluation of ChatGPT on mathematical word problems (MWP). arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13814. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.13814
Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 110-121. https://doi.org/10.62037/cjer.2023.03.01.06
Subekti, M. A. S., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2021). Developing interactive electronic student worksheets through discovery learning and critical thinking skills during pandemic era. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 13(2), 137-176.
Supriyadi, E., & Kuncoro, K. S. (2023). Exploring the future of mathematics teaching: Insight with ChatGPT. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 305-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.30738/union.v11i2.14898
Surya, E., & Putri, F. A. (2017). Improving mathematical problem-solving ability and self-confidence of high school students through contextual learning model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3324.85-94
Tay, L. Y., Chan, M., Chong, S. K., Tan, J. Y., & Aiyoob, T. B. (2024). Learning of mathematics: A metacognitive experiences perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(3), 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10385-8
Toikka, S., Eronen, L., Atjonen, P., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2024). Combined conceptualisations of metacognitive knowledge to understand students’ mathematical problem-solving. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2357901
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic mathematics education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 713-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM, 52, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
Wang, A., Prihar, E., Haim, A., & Heffernan, N. (2024, July). Can Large Language Models Generate Middle School Mathematics Explanations Better Than Human Teachers?. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 242-250). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64312-5_29
Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
Wildgans-Lang, A., Scheuerer, S., Obersteiner, A., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. (2020). Analyzing prospective mathematics teachers’ diagnostic processes in a simulated environment. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 52(2), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01139-9
Wu, J. S., Hsieh, C. J., & Huang, Y. K. (2022). An Investigation into the Performances of Sixth Graders in Answering Literacy-oriented Assessments in Mathematics.Taiwan Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.6278/tjme.202210_9(2).004
Yarman, Y., Fauzan, A., Armiati, A., & Lufri, L. (2020). Analysis of student errors in solving ordinary differential equations based on SOLO taxonomy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1554, No. 1, p. 012065). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012065
Zafrullah, Z., Hakim, M. L., & Angga, M. (2023). ChatGPT open AI: Analysis of mathematics education students learning interest. Journal of Technology Global, 1(01), 1-10.
Zainiyah, U. (2018). Mathematical Literacy: How if Reviewed from Mathematics Problem Solving Ability of High-Grade’s Elementary School Students. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 5-14.
Zhang, D. (2017). Effects of visual working memory training and direct instruction on geometry problem solving in students with geometry difficulties. Learning Disabilities-A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 117-138.
Zheng, S., Huang, J., & Chang, K. C. C. (2023). Why does chatgpt fall short in answering questions faithfully? arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10513. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.10513
Zong, M., & Krishnamachari, B. (2023). Solving math word problems concerning systems of equations with GPT models. Machine Learning with Applications, 14. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i13.26896 |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 (2029-8-1以後開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit