摘要(英) |
Hastelloy is a metal material with high strength and excellent corrosion resistance, widely used in aerospace, energy, and automotive industries. However, the surface roughness of Hastelloy often requires further treatment to meet specific application requirements.
Electropolishing (EP) is a chemical reaction-based process that removes surface asperities, effectively improving surface smoothness and reducing roughness. However, during the EP process, significant material removal may occur, posing risks of excessive thinning for thin-walled structures. In contrast, Electrostatic Induction Electrochemical Machining (EIECM) is an innovative technique that utilizes electrostatic fields to optimize electrochemical reactions, achieving uniform material removal with lower material loss. Both methods enhance the surface quality of Hastelloy effectively while avoiding the high mechanical stress and thermal effects associated with conventional processing methods, making them suitable for applications requiring high precision and surface quality. This study aims to explore the differences, advantages, and disadvantages of these two electrochemical processing methods, providing effective solutions for precision machining.
This research investigates the application characteristics of EIECM in polishing the inner walls of Hastelloy tubes. Compared to EP, EIECM can effectively control material removal, achieve inner wall polishing, and reduce material loss. The study focuses on processing parameters such as voltage, processing time, electrolyte flow rate, and electrolyte temperature, analyzing their effects on surface roughness, material removal rate, roughness uniformity, and passivation layer thickness. Experimental evaluations under various conditions reveal that both EIECM and EP significantly improve the surface quality of inner tube walls, effectively reducing surface roughness. However, EIECM demonstrates superior material retention properties compared to EP. This method shows higher processing uniformity and cost-effectiveness in thin-walled structure machining, making it well-suited for polishing the inner walls of high-performance alloy materials. |
參考文獻 |
1. Kassim A. S., ThorA. J., SemanA. A., & Abdullah K. T. (2020). High temperature corrosion of Hastelloy C22 in molten alkali salts: The effect of pre-oxidation treatment. Corrosion Science, 108761.
2. Wang Q. Y., Bai S. L., ZhaoY. H., & LiuZ. D. (2014). Effect of mechanical polishing on corrosion behavior of Hastelloy C22 coating prepared by high power diode laser cladding. Applied Surface Science, 312-318.
3. Dansana B., Mahapatra R. T., Sahu P., & Sahu K. S. (2020). Tribological and electrochemical corrosion performance analysis of Hastelloy C276 under different loading conditions. Materials Today, 1434-1441.
4. Feng F., Zhang X. S. , Qu T. M., Zhang Y. Y., Qian X., Liu B. B. ,Feng P. F. (2018). Scaling analysis of the current inuence on Hastelloy surface roughness in electro polishing process. Rare Metals, 142-150.
5. Feng F., Shi K., Xiao S. Z., Zhao Z. J. , ZhangY. Y., Zhao Z. J., Han Z. N. (2012). Fractal analysis and atomic force microscopy measurements of surface roughness for Hastelloy C276 substrates and amorphous alumina buffer layers in coated conductors. Applied Surface Science, 3502–3508.
6. Hao S. P., Wang Y., Suo H. L., Jia Q., Liu M., & Ma L. (2018). Continuous electropolishing technique for long-length Hastelloy C-276 tape. Rare Metals, 795–802.
7. Lloyd A. C., Noel J. J., McIntyre S., & Shoesmith D. W. (2004). Cr, Mo and Walloying additions in Ni and their effect on passivity. Electrochimica Acta, 3015-3027.
8. Nowicki R., ?wiercz R., ?wiercz O. D., & Rozenek M. (2022). Experimental Investigation of Technological Indicators and Surface Roughness of Hastelloy C-22 after Electrical Discharge Machining Using POCO Graphite Electrodes. Materials, 5631.
9. Samson M. R., Raj A., Geethapriyan T., Senkathir S., & Muthiya S. (2018). Optimization of Machining Parameters on Electrochemical Micro Machining of Hastelloy C22 using Grey Taguchi Method. International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems,108-114.
10. Surekar H. S., Bhatwadekar S., & Bilgi S. D. (2014). Analysis of electrochemical machining process parameters affecting material removal rate of hastelloy C-276. Materials Science, 18-23
11. Wang Y., Wang P., Suo H., Jia Q., Lu D., Li H., & Wu H. (2017). Study on electropolishing of hastelloy C-276 alloy. Materials Reports, 37-40.
12. Yadidya M. D., & Leo K. S. P. (2021). Experimental Analysis on Electrochemical Machining of Hastealloy Material. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Combinatorial and Optimization, 2315109.
13. Yang X. C., Du L. Q., Li A. Q., Wu M. X., Wu C. h. , & Li J. M. (2024). A novel method of induction electrode through-mask electrochemical micromachining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 104221.
14. Zhang X. Y., Zhong J., Guo S. L., & Zhao J. (2021). Control of deformation and annealing process to produce incoherent Σ3. Nuclear Materials and Energy,100944.
15. Zheng C., Liu Z. D., Liu Q. B., Li Y., & Liu C. (2022). Comparative investigation on corrosion behavior of laser cladding C22 coating, Hastelloy C22 alloy and Ti–6Al–4V alloy in simulated desulfurized flue gas condensates. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2194-2207.
16. Derui J., Yang T., Yuman Z., Aijun H. (2022). Investigation of surface roughness post-processing of additively manufactured nickel-based superalloy Hastelloy X using electropolishing. Surface and Coatings Technology, 128529.
17. Sascha K., Paul N. A., Lawrence E. B., Steve R. F. & Vladimir M. (2003). Continuous electropolishing of Hastelloysubstrates for ion-beam assisted deposition of MgO. Superconductor Science and Technology, 613-616.
18. Tadeusz H., Krzysztof R. (2014). Highlights of Magnetoelectropolishing. Volume 1, Article 00003, DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2014.00003.
19. Li X., Ogle K. (2019). The Passivation of Ni-Cr-Mo Alloys: Time Resolved Enrichment and Dissolution of Cr and Mo during Passive-Active Cycles. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 3179-3185. |