設計具幽默教學策略的虛擬人助教提升學生學習情緒與動機

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：44

、訪客IP：3.142.212.153

姓名

黃詔詠(Chao-yung Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

設計具幽默教學策略的虛擬人助教提升學生學習情緒與動機
(Building a virtual teaching assistant with humor teaching strategies to enhance student's emotion and motivation)

相關論文

★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場	★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制	★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統	★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統	★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具	★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索：學習效能評鑑之工具	★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式	★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統	★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來由於虛擬人的快速發展，虛擬人已經被應用到許多領域，數位學習領域中也已經有許多學者投入研究虛擬人在數位學習中對學生的影響。而在學習當中，不管是在傳統學習環境中還是數位學習環境中，應用幽默都可以對學生產生正面的影響，但是老師很難長期配合在既有的學習教材中加入幽默的活動。因此，本論文中設計了一個具有幽默教學策略的虛擬人在數位學習的環境中與學生互動，虛擬人會在學習的開頭、休息時間以及結尾用不同的幽默表演，分別是幽默笑話、幽默問題和幽默例子與學生互動，以提高學生的學習動機和學習情緒。本研究中設計了一個實驗來驗證在學習教材中加入虛擬人的幽默表演對學生的影響，我們找了30位受測者，並將受測者分為兩組，分別觀看有加入虛擬人幽默的教材和沒有加入虛擬人幽默的教材。實驗結果顯示在學習教材中加入虛擬人幽默確實可以提升學生的學習動機以及學習情緒，但是目前的實驗結果在學生的測驗成績上並沒有看出顯著的差異。

摘要(英)

Virtual human has already been applied in many fields since the rapid development of virtual human in recent years and many researchers in digital learning have researched the effect of virtual human on students learning. Humor can be used as a teaching tool in both traditional learning environment and digital learning environment to help student learning. But it is hard to ask a teacher to cooperate with us for a long period and perform the humor performance on the existed learning materials. Therefore, in this research, we design a virtual human who can use humor teaching strategies to interact with students in the digital learning enviroenment. The virtual human will use different humor performances, like jokes, humor questions and humor examples, to interact with students at the beginning of learning, learning break, and end of learning to increase students’ motivation and emotion. In this research, we design an experiment to identify the effect of virtual human’s humor performances on students’ learning. The experiment has 30 subjects and we classified subjects into two groups. The first group watch the learning material with virtual human’s humor performances and the second group watch the learning material without virtual human’s humor performances. The experiment result shows that the learning material with virtual human’s humor performances can truly increase students learning motivation and emotion, but has no significant effect on students test performances.

關鍵字(中)

★ 虛擬人
★ 幽默
★ 數位學習

關鍵字(英)

★ Virtual human
★ Humor
★ digital learning

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要.....................................i
英文摘要....................................ii
致謝.......................................iii
目錄........................................iv
圖片目錄....................................vi
表格目錄...................................vii
第1章緒論................................1
1-1、研究背景................................1
1-2、研究動機................................3
1-3、研究目標................................3
1-4、問題與對策..............................4
1-5、論文架構................................5
第2章相關研究與理論......................6
2-1、幽默代理人之研究........................6
2-2、虛擬人在學習上的研究及影響..............8
2-3、幽默在傳統教育環境中的發展..............9
2-4、幽默的理論.............................11
第3章幽默教學策略之教學設計.............13
3-1、學習流程設計...........................13
3-2、幽默教學活動設計.......................14
3-2-1、幽默開頭設計.........................15
3-2-2、幽默的休息時間設計...................16
3-2-3、幽默結尾設計.........................17
第4章虛擬人助教之幽默教學表演設計與製作....18
4-1、虛擬人助教幽默教學表演設計.............18
4-1-1、幽默笑話表演原則.....................18
4-1-2、幽默問題表演原則.....................21
4-1-3、幽默例子表演原則.....................24
4-2、虛擬人助教表情與肢體動作設計...........26
4-3、虛擬人製作.............................28
4-4、學習系統製作...........................29
第5章實驗與討論............................31
5-1、實驗背景...............................31
5-2、實驗目的...............................31
5-3、實驗設計...............................32
5-4、實驗結果與討論.........................33
第6章結論...............................41
參考文獻 ...................................43
附錄一教材問卷.............................47
附錄二虛擬人幽默表演問卷...................48
圖片目錄
圖 1 加入幽默活動的學習流程.................14
圖 2 幽默開頭活動流程.......................15
圖 3 幽默的休息時間活動流程.................16
圖 4 幽默的結尾活動流程.....................17
圖 5 虛擬人助教幽默笑話表演流程.............19
圖 6 虛擬人助教笑話表演情境營造截圖.........20
圖 7 虛擬人助教笑話表演製造爆點截圖.........21
圖 8 虛擬人助教幽默問題表演流程.............22
圖 9 虛擬人助教幽默問題選項圖片.............23
圖 10 虛擬人助教幽默問題回答圖片............24
圖 11 虛擬人助教幽默例子表演流程............24
圖 12 虛擬人助教幽默例子表演圖片............25
圖 13 虛擬人助教的肢體動作..................28
圖 14 虛擬人的設計環境......................28
圖 15 學習系統架構圖........................29
圖 16 虛擬人開頭介紹系統畫面................30
圖 17 虛擬人問問題系統畫面..................30
圖 18 學習教材有趣程度......................34
圖 19 學生學習時愉快程度....................34
圖 20 學生學習意願..........................36
圖 21 學生前測成績分布圖....................37
圖 22 學生後測成績分布圖....................37
表格目錄
表 1 幽默代理人研究整理......................7
表 2 虛擬人助教的頭部動作...................26
表 3 虛擬人助教的手勢動作表.................27
表 4 虛擬人助教的身體動作表.................27
表 5 學生對於教材科目喜好程度表.............33
表 6 學生感覺學習教材難易度表...............33
表 7 學習教材有趣程度問卷分數平均...........34
表 8 學生學習時愉快程度分數平均.............35
表 9 學生學習意願分數平均...................36
表 10 學生測驗平均成績比較表................38
表 11 學生後測與前測差......................38
表 12 虛擬人幽默表演問卷結果................38

參考文獻

李宗益(民96)。設計能使學習者感受關懷之情緒互動虛擬人物。國立中央大學資訊工程學系碩士論文。
邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲(民92)。幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估。教育心理學報，34卷，2期，179-198頁。
林群泰(民95)。使用虛擬代言人透過關懷互動與學生建立長期關係的學習網站互動機制。國立中央大學資訊工程學系碩士論文。
陳祥浩(民97)。設計具引導學生達成學習目標之情緒互動的虛擬人物。國立中央大學資訊工程學系碩士論文。
陳學志(民93)。從「哈哈」到「啊哈」－統整知、情、意、行的幽默課程對創造力培養的影響。教育心理學報， 35卷，4期，393-411頁。
詹竹莘(民92)。表演技術與表演教程。書林出版有限公司。
鄭右佳(民97)。設計虛擬人物結合同理互動機制來促進學生對學習系統的動機意願。國立中央大學資訊工程學系碩士論文。
Ajaye, F. (2002). Comic insights: the art of stand-up comedy: Silman-James Pr.
Augello, A., Saccone, G., Gaglio, S., & Pilato, G. (2008). Humorist Bot: Bringing Computational Humour in a Chat-Bot System. Paper presented at the Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, 2008. CISIS 2008. International Conference on.
Bandes, B. (1988). Humor as motivation for effective learning in the classroom: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Berk, R. (1996). Student ratings of 10 strategies for using humor in college teaching. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 7(3), 71-92.
Berk, R. (2000). Does Humor in Course Tests Reduce Anxiety and Improve Performance? College Teaching, 48(4), 151-158.
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2004). Social dialogue with embodied conversational agents. Natural, intelligent and effective interaction with multimodal dialogue systems. New York: Kluwer Academic, 23-54.
Bickmore, T., & Picard, R. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 293-327.
Brown, A.R.& Voltz, B.D. (2005). Elements of effective e-learning design. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(1).
Bull, S., Greer, J., & McCalla, G. (2003). The caring personal agent. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(1), 21-34.
Burke, R(2003). Great expectations:: Prediction in entertainment systems. Lifelike Characters. Tools, Affective Functions and Applications, ed. by Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M.(Springer 2003). This volume.
Burleson, W. (2006). Affective learning companions: strategies for empathetic agents with real-time multimodal affective sensing to foster meta-cognitive and meta-affective approaches to learning, motivation, and perseverance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Carter, J. (2001). The Comedy Bible: From Stand-up to Sitcom: the Comedy Writer's Ultimate How-to-guide: Fireside.
Cassell, J., Churchill, E., Prevost, S., & Sullivan, J. (2000). Embodied conversational agents: MIT press Cambridge, Mass.
Cassell, J., & Thorisson, K. (1999). The power of a nod and a glance: Envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4), 519-538.
Chen, S. H., Chang, C. W, Hsu, C. C., & Chen, G. D. (2008). Building an Interactive Agent with Intention to Increase Students' Learning Will.
Cheng, Y. C, Chang, C. W., & Chen, G. D. (2008). Design an Interactive Agent by Multi-Empathic Strategies to Reduce Student's Negative Emotion.
Dormann, C., & Biddle, R. (2006). Humour in game-based learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(4), 411-424.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1975). Unmasking the face. A guide to recognizing emotions from clues: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gagne, R. M. (1977). The conditions of learning(3rd ed.): New York: HarperCollins.
Givens, D. B. (2006). Nonverbal dictionary of gestures, signs and body language cues. Center for Nonverbal Studies Press, Washington. Available at http://www. members. aol. com/nonverbal2/diction1. htm.
Greenagel, F. L. (2002). The illusion of e-learning: why we're missing out on the promise of technology. On line learning.
Hill, R., Gratch, J., Marsella, S., Rickel, J., Swartout, W., & Traum, D. (2003). Virtual humans in the mission rehearsal exercise system. K nstliche Intelligenz, 4(03), 5-10.
Howell, D. (2001). Elements of effective e-learning. College Teaching, 49(3), 87-91.
Johnsen, K., Raij, A., Stevens, A., Lind, D., & Lok, B. (2007). The validity of a virtual human experience for interpersonal skills education.
Johnson, W., Rickel, J., & Lester, J. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(1), 47-78.
Kaplan, R. M., & Pascoe, G. C., (1977). Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(1), 61-65.
Kher, N., Molstad, S., & Donahue, R. (1999b). Using Humor in the College Classroom to Enhance Teaching Effectiveness in" Dread Courses". College Student Journal, 33(3).
Kim, Y. (2005). Empathetic virtual peers enhanced learner interest and self-efficacy.
Laufer, L., & Tatai, G (2004). Learn, Chat and Play¡VAn ECA Supported Stock Markets E-Learning Curricula.
Lee, T. Y., Chang, C.W., & Chen, G D.. (2007). Building an Interactive Caring Agent for Students in Computer-based Learning Environments.
Lomax, R., & Moosavi, S. (2002). Using humor to teach statistics: must they be orthogonal? Understanding Statistics, 1(2), 113-130.
Martin, R. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach: Academic Press.
Mateas, M., & Stern, A. (2004). A Behavior Language: Joint action and behavioral idioms. Life-like Characters. Tools, Affective Functions and Applications, 194¡V202.
Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication: Chicago: Aldine.
Messina , J.J., & Constance Messina.(2007). Nonverbal Communication Issues. Available at http://www.coping.org/dialogue/nonverbal.htm#nonverbal
Minchew, S., & Hopper, P. (2008). Techniques for Using Humor and Fun in the Language Arts Classroom. The Clearing House, 81(5), 232-236.
Moreno, R., Mayer, R., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177-213.
Nierenberg, G.I. & Calero, H.H. (2001).How to Read a Person Like a Book. Barnes & Noble Digital.
Nijholt, A. (2002). Embodied agents: A new impetus to humor research. Stock et al, 101-111.
Okonkwo, C. (2001). Vassileva,(2001)¡§Affective Pedagogical Agents and User Persuasion,¡¨. Proceedings of Universal Access in Human-Computer.
Powell, J. P. & Andresen, L. W. (1985). Humour and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 10(1), 79-90.
Rainsberger, C. (1994). Reducing Stress and Tension in the Classroom through the Use of Humor.
Reategui, E., Boff, E., & Campbell, J. (2007). Using virtual characters in personalized recommendations.
Robinson, V. (1977). Humor in rhe Health Professions: Thorofare, NJ: Charles B. Slack.
Shade, R. (1996). License to laugh: Humor in the classroom: Teacher Ideas Press.
Sumi, Y., & Mase, K(2004). Interface agents that facilitate knowledge interactions between community members. Life-like Characters. Tools, Affective Functions and Applications.
Tamblyn, D. (2002). Laugh and learn: 95 ways to use humor for more effective teaching and training: AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Torok, S., McMorris, R., & Lin, W. (2004). IS HUMOR AN APPRECIATED TEACHING TOOL? PERCEPTIONS OF PROFESSORS'TEACHING STYLES AND USE OF HUMOR. College Teaching, 52(1), 14-20.
Wanzer, M., Frymier, A., Wojtaszczyk, A., & Smith, T. (2006). Appropriate and inappropriate uses of humor by teachers. Communication Education, 55(2), 178-196.
WeaverII, R., & Cotrell, H. (1987)TEN SPECIFIC TECHNIQUES FOR DEVELOPING HUMOR IN THE CLASSROOM. Education, 108(2).

指導教授

陳國棟(Gwo-Dong Chen)

審核日期

2009-7-10

推文