English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94201/94201 (100%)
Visitors : 81547656      Online Users : 1640
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/102092


    Title: A comparison of coronal mass ejection models with observations for two large CMEs detected during the whole heliosphere interval
    Authors: 林佳賢;Lin, Chia-Hsien;Chen, James
    Contributors: 地球科學學院太空科學與工程學系
    Keywords: atmospheric science;Brightening;Coronal mass ejection;Emissions;Eruptions;geology;geophysics;Heliosphere;hydrology;Kinematics;Light curve;Mathematical models;oceanic science;Predictions;Profiles;Soft x rays;space science;X rays
    Date: 2015-01-01
    Issue Date: 2026-04-23 11:02:45 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Chinese Geoscience Union;Taiwan: 中華民國地球科學學會
    Abstract: 摘要: Two major coronal mass ejections (CMEs) observed during the Whole Heliosphere Interval (WHI) are compared with the catastrophe (CA) and eruptive flux rope (EF) models. The objective is to test two distinct mechanisms for CMEs by mod- eling these well-observed CMEs and comparing predictions of the theories and observed data. The two CMEs selected for this study occurred on 25 March and 5 April 2008, respectively. For the 25 March event, an M 1.7 class flare, a filament eruption, and hard X-ray (HXR) and soft X-ray (SXR) emissions were observed during the CME onset. The observed CME kinemat- ics and SXR light curve of this event are found to be more consistent with the EF model than with the CA model. For the 5 April event, the SXR light curve shows multiple enhancements, some of which temporally coincide with successive side loop brightening and multiple foot points at the source region after the eruption. The physical connection between the side- loop multiple brightenings and the eruption cannot be determined from the data. Both models produced observationally consistent kinematics profiles, and the EF model correctly predicted the first emission enhancement. Neither model includes multiple brightenings in the formulation.
    出版者: Taiwan: 中華民國地球科學學會
    出版日期: 2015-04-01
    出處: TAO : Terrestrial, atmospheric, and oceanic sciences, 2015-04, Vol.26 (2), p.121-134
    資源來源: 中文電子期刊服務 CEPS: Chinese Electronic Periodical Services
    版權: 2015. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
    識別號: ISSN: 1017-0839
    識別號: ISSN: 2223-8964
    識別號: ISSN: 2311-7680
    識別號: EISSN: 2311-7680
    識別號: DOI: 10.3319/TAO.2014.10.15.01(AA)
    Appears in Collections:[DEPARTMENT OF SPACE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING] journal & Dissertation

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML15View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明