中大學術數位典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/106774
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 94274/94274 (100%)
造访人次 : 82919422      在线人数 : 1716
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/106774


    题名: Intangible assets evaluation: The machine learning perspective
    作者: 蔡志豐;Tsai, Chih-Fong;Lu, Yu-Hsin;Hung, Yu-Chung;Yen, David C.
    贡献者: 管理學院資訊管理學系
    关键词: Classifier ensembles;Classifier technology;Hybrid classifiers;Intangible assets value;Machine learning
    日期: 2016-01-29
    上传时间: 2026-04-23 13:41:54 (UTC+8)
    出版者: Elsevier;Elsevier B.V
    摘要: 摘要: The lack of regulations and disclosures regarding intangible capital has made it rather difficult for investors and creditors to evaluate a firm׳s intangible value before making the associated investment and loan decisions. This study represents an initial attempt to compare/contrast different types of machine learning techniques and identify the optimal prediction model for intangible assets. In addition, this paper shows that machine learning can be used effectively for the problem of intangible assets evaluation. To be specific, five classification algorithms are considered: decision trees (DT), artificial neural networks (ANN), naïve Bayes, support vector machines (SVM) and k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN). Consequently, thirty prediction models are constructed for comparison, including five single classifiers, boosting and bagging based classifier ensembles, and the combination of k-means clustering, single classifiers and classifier ensembles. The experimental results show that prediction models combining k-means with boosting/bagging based classifier ensembles perform much better than the other methods in terms of prediction accuracy, ROC Curve, as well as Type I and II errors. In particular, while the best single classifier, k-NN provides 78.24% prediction accuracy, k-means+bagging based DT ensembles provide the best performance to predict intangible assets with a prediction accuracy of 91.60%, 96.40% of ROC Curve and 18.65% of Type I and 6.34% of II errors, respectively. •Different machine learning techniques for intangible assets evaluation are compared.•Particularly, single classifiers, classifier ensembles and hybrid classifiers are compared.•Hybrid classifiers by k-means+DT ensembles provide the best performance.
    出版者: Elsevier B.V
    出版日期: 2016-01-29
    出處: Neurocomputing (Amsterdam), 2016-01, Vol.175, p.110-120
    版權: 2015 Elsevier B.V.
    識別號: ISSN: 0925-2312
    識別號: EISSN: 1872-8286
    識別號: DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.10.041
    显示于类别:[資訊管理學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML11检视/开启


    在NCUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明