English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 94274/94274 (100%)
造訪人次 : 82915227      線上人數 : 2378
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/108490


    題名: Comparison among load-, ROM-, and displacement-controlled methods used in the lumbosacral nonlinear finite-element analysis
    作者: 黃俊仁;Chuang, Wen-Hsien;Kuo, Yi-Jie;Lin, Shang-Chih;Wang, Chih-Wei;Chen, Shih-Hao;Chen, Yeung-Jen;Hwang, Jiun-Ren
    貢獻者: 工學院機械工程學系
    關鍵詞: Biomechanical Phenomena;Bone Screws;Cadaver;Computer Simulation;Elastic Modulus;Feasibility Studies;Finite Element Analysis;Humans;Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - diagnostic imaging;Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - physiopathology;Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - surgery;Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging;Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology;Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery;Muscle Contraction;Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology;Nonlinear Dynamics;Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted;Orthopedic Procedures - instrumentation;Prosthesis Design;Prosthesis Failure;Range of Motion, Articular;Reproducibility of Results;Sacrum - diagnostic imaging;Sacrum - physiopathology;Sacrum - surgery;Tomography, X-Ray Computed;Weight-Bearing
    日期: 2013-03-01
    上傳時間: 2026-04-23 14:51:28 (UTC+8)
    出版者: United States
    摘要: 摘要: For lumbosacral nonlinear analysis, the characteristics and differences between the load- and range-of-motion (ROM)-controlled methods (LCM and RCM) were compared using the numerical approach. This study aimed to discuss the LCM and RCM problems inherent in the method assumption and calculation procedure. A displacement-controlled method (DCM) based on the nodal movement at the lumbosacral top was proposed to offer a more efficient and equivalent comparison between the evaluated models. Both LCM and RCM have been extensively used to evaluate the biomechanical performance of lumbosacral implants. The LCM models were subject to the same loads as the intact model. The ROMs of the RCM models were controlled in the same way by iteratively adjusting some of the applied loads. However, the different strategies for adjusting lumbar loads might affect the predicted results and the execution might be inefficient. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the kinematic, mechanical, and computational comparisons between the 2 methods have still not been extensively investigated. An intact lumbosacral model was developed and validated with the cadaveric and numerical data from the literature studies. The intact model was then modified as a degenerative model, in which the moderately dehydrated L4-L5 segment was instrumented with transpedicular fixation. Lumbosacral flexion was simulated by ligament interconnection, muscular contraction, and weight compression. One LCM, 3 RCM, and 1 DCM models were developed to evaluate their effects on biomechanical results and the computational efficiency of the lumbosacral nonlinear analysis. Both solution feasibility and calculation time were closely related to the loading sequence that was defined as the time curves of the load-incremental control. The calculation of the RCM models was the most time-consuming. The calculation time of the DCM model was about 17 times faster than that of the RCM counterparts. Apart from the LCM model, the total ROM of the other models could be consistently controlled with the same value as that of the intact model. The intersegmental ROMs of all models were quite comparable. However, the LCM model predicted the least value of the screw stress and averaged 15.6% and 19.9% less than the RCM and DCM models. In general, the computational efficiency between the models was the most different, followed by the mechanical stress; the kinematic results were the most comparable. The superiority of the computational efficiency of the DCM compared with its counterparts makes it the improved strategy for executing lumbosacral nonlinear analysis.
    其他題名: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
    出版者: United States
    出版日期: 2013-03
    出處: Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2013-03, Vol.38 (5), p.E276-E285
    識別號: ISSN: 0362-2436
    識別號: ISSN: 1528-1159
    識別號: EISSN: 1528-1159
    識別號: DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828251f9
    識別號: PMID: 23250233
    顯示於類別:[機械工程學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML16檢視/開啟


    在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明