中大機構典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/12803
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 81570/81570 (100%)
Visitors : 46926698      Online Users : 714
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/12803


    Title: 教育部94至97學年度獎勵大學教學卓越計畫:競賽理論之應用;The Study of MOE’s Teaching Excellence Project in Taiwan: The Application of Tournament Theory
    Authors: 王政傑;Jeng-jie Wang
    Contributors: 產業經濟研究所
    Keywords: 競賽理論;教學卓越計畫;教育指標;經費補助差距;Tournament Theory;Teaching Excellence Project;Education Indicator;Funding Gap
    Date: 2009-06-19
    Issue Date: 2009-09-22 15:13:57 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學圖書館
    Abstract: 在人力資源管理經濟學中,Lazear及Rosen於1981年提出競賽理論(tournament theory)用以解釋公司內部職級之間的薪資差距;本文將此理論擴及至教育政策的競爭型計畫經費補助結構,以教育部94至97學年度獎勵大學教學卓越計畫的獲獎學校為研究對象,試圖探討競爭型計畫的經費補助結構是否有競賽理論的適用,即各獲獎學校的教育指標變化是否會影響經費補助差距;若各校的教育指標變化確實會影響經費補助差距,則教育部是否能運用競爭型計畫政策來解決高等教育經費齊頭式分配導致競爭低落的問題。 本文實證結果顯示,競賽理論確實存在於教育部的競爭型計畫中,各校院在教育指標上的競爭會影響經費補助差距,在大學校院部份,主要影響的教育指標為理工農醫學生比率、全校課程大綱上網率及每師參與研究計畫件數;而在技職校院部份則為全校生師比率及每師參與研究計畫件數;教育部必須重視競爭型計畫的經費補助差距,謹慎思考經費差距的高低並妥善運用此種高等教育經費分配方式。 In the field of Personnel Economics, Tournament Theory was proposed by Lazear and Rosen (1981) to explain the pay differentials of the organizations. In this study, we extended this theory to the funding structure of competitive project and used data on the award-winning universities and colleges of MOE’s Teaching Excellence Project in Taiwan between 94-97 academic year to examine the funding structure of competitive project whether there is any application of Tournament Theory, that is, whether the changes of education indicators have any effects on the funding gap. Our empirical results confirm that the Tournament Theory actually existed in the MOE’s competitive project. The competition of education indicators affect the funding gap. On the part of universities, the main indicators are the ratio of medical, engineering, and agriculture students, the ratio of online syllabus, and the ratio of research project number; on the part of technological and vocational universities, the primary indicators are student-teacher ratio and the ratio of research project number. The MOE must pay attention to the funding gap of the competitive project and properly use the scheme of higher education funding distribution.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明