| 摘要: | 行政院為加強公共工程品質之管理，雖已訂頒「公共工程施工品質管理制度」及「公共工程施工品質管理作業要點」，要求承攬廠商、工程主辦機關及工程主管機關落實三級品管制度，惟經審計機關實際調查結果，仍發現公共工程品質管理未臻落實；另各級政府雖已依規定設立工程施工查核小組，實際執行品質查核結果，仍有偏重於一般品管制度及計畫文件等書面資料之查核，現場查核作業深度與品質均有待加強。因此，藉由審計機關查核公共工程施工品質缺失問題與對策之探討，瞭解問題徵結，研擬改進對策，並落實於各機關，以提升公共工程品質，為一值得探討之課題。 本研究透過審計機關查核公共工程施工品質、各級政府工程施工查核小組執行情形及工程會工程施工查核小組近二年來查核所發現之缺失問題，加以歸納、整理、分析，以瞭解作業執行面上缺失問題所在，並提供回饋性建議，供各工程主管機關、主辦機關、監造廠商及承攬廠商辦理公共工程之參考、避免在工程品質管理及施工品質方面，相同之缺失類型不斷重演發生，肇致施工品質大打折扣。並期能進一步有效的提昇公共工程施工品質，增進政府施政成效。 Executive Yuan wanted to strengthen the quality management of public Engineering construction, although had promulgated 「System of Quality Management for Public Engineering Construction」and 「guidelines for public Engineering construction quality Management」and for relative stipulation to request contractors、construction sponsoring agencies and superintendent organizations carry out third-level Quality System. But under the practical investigation result of the auditing authority, it still found that quality management of public Engineering construction System didn't carry out, additionally the all levels government has already established Engineering Construction Audit Subcommittee according to stipulation, quality auditing actual result still found that have already over-emphasized to auditing the written form datas, such as general quality control system and project document...etc, and auditing operation depth and quality all need to strengthen on the scene. Therefore, by the study of the auditing authority to examine the imperfection problem and counterplan of the public Engineering construction quality, understanding the problem advertises for knot, drawing up an improvement counterplan, and carrying out in each organization, with promote public Engineering construction quality, is one worthy of study of topic. This research according to the imperfection problem found by the public Engineering construction quality examined through the auditing authority, Construction Audit Subcommittee performance of the all levels government and Public Construction Commission in the last two years, and take in to induce、tidy up、analyze, to understanding the performance faces top imperfection problem place, and also provide feedback suggestion to each superintendent organizations、construction sponsoring agencies、supervision manufacturer and contractors carry out the reference of public Engineering construction, and avoid the construction quality managing and construction quality aspect having the same imperfection type repeats occurrence continuously, and cause Construction quality have discount greatly. Also expecting to promote a public engineering construction quality further effectively, and promote government administration result. |
