English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 70585/70585 (100%)
Visitors : 23080329      Online Users : 609
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/27327


    Title: Comparison of Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter, 3DVAR, and 4DVAR in a Quasigeostrophic Model
    Authors: Yang,SC;Corazza,M;Carrassi,A;Kalnay,E;Miyoshi,T
    Contributors: 大氣物理研究所
    Keywords: NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION;DATA-ASSIMILATION SYSTEM;VARIATIONAL ASSIMILATION;METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS;ADAPTIVE OBSERVATIONS;THEORETICAL ASPECTS;ANALYSIS SCHEMES;ERROR;EVOLUTION;4D-VAR
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-06-29 18:36:15 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 中央大學
    Abstract: Local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF) data assimilation, three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR), and four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR) schemes are implemented in a quasigeostrophic channel model. Their advantages and disadvantages are compared to assess their use in practical applications. LETKF and 4DVAR, which take into account the flow-dependent errors, outperform 3DVAR under a perfect model scenario. Given the same observations, LETKF produces more accurate analyses than 4DVAR with a 12-h window by effectively correcting the fast-growing errors with the flow-dependent background error covariance. Even though 4DVAR performance benefits substantially from using a longer assimilation window, LETKF is also able to achieve a satisfactory accuracy compared to the 24-h 4DVAR analyses. It is shown that the advantage of the LETKF over 3DVAR is a result of both the ensemble averaging and the information about the "errors of the day'' provided by the ensemble. The analysis corrections at the end of the 12-h assimilation window are similar for LETKF and the 12- h window 4DVAR, and they both resemble bred vectors. At the beginning of the assimilation window, LETKF analysis corrections obtained using a no-cost smoother also resemble the corresponding bred vectors, whereas the 4DVAR corrections are significantly different with much larger horizontal scales.
    Relation: MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
    Appears in Collections:[大氣物理研究所 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML490View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明