| Abstract: | 本文討論可分為三個研究主軸，其一，探討臺北市改制政策的背景與契機，瞭解國民黨高層對於改制的看法；其二，透過臺北市改制政策的各項爭議，分析改制為何延宕近十一年的原因；其三，藉由臺北市改制政策的執行經過，探究行政院協商過程及臺灣省府會如何肆應對策。 1949年中央政府遷往臺灣後，臺北市已有別於臺灣省政府主政時期，綜觀歷史因素，國民黨政府取代臺灣總督府在臺治理權後，臺北市政氣象一時呈現遞嬗。本文研究指出，國民黨中央暫時將臺北市視為中央政府臨時所在地，形成中央、省及臺北市政府皆位於臺北市辦公，造成彼此轄下行政部門與行政轄區重疊。其次在臺灣省政府疏遷中部後，蔣介石同意改制，黨中央也指出臺北市為中央政府所在地，具有特殊的政治、經濟及文化地位，因此黨內議決臺北市有改隸必要。儘管如此，臺北市改制政策卻因故遲遲未能執行，其背後更牽涉中央、省及臺北市政府之間複雜的行政關係。1966年12月總統府為配合臺北市長暨市議員期滿及改選日期，旋即發佈人事命令，由行政院成立改制小組，進行各項籌備工作，因為改制政策攸關臺灣省政府切身權益，臺灣省府會遂成立專案小組擬定對策，主要用意是表達反對立場，這有別於中央及臺北市傾向支持的態度。 透過本文的探討，我們能看到國民黨如何以黨領政的運作情況，進而瞭解臺北市從省轄市升格直轄市的過程，這將有助於我們藉由臺北市改制政策，分析臺灣都市發展的不同面向。 This thesis principally comprises three topics. First, I will discuss the origin and turning point of Taipei City’s Reform Policy, by doing so, I try to possess the viewpoints which the KMT’s leadership treated this event . Second, in research of the controversy of Taipei City’s Reform Policy, I attempt to explain that the reason why it has been postponed. Third, the process of Taipei City’s Reform Policy, which was executed by central government, could clarify the negotiating course between the Executive Yuan and Taiwan Provincial Government. In 1949, The ROC government relocated to Taiwan, Taipei city’s character has been different from the period of Taiwan Provincial Government. However, the KMT government replaced the Japanese colonial regime. Taipei City thus has something changed. In my thesis, I point out that the KMT actually cited Taipei City as Central Government in the interim meanwhile, three “governments” (Provincial, Taipei City and Central government) in Taipei, caused the disorder in administrative area. In the other hand, after being moved to central Taiwan, Provincial Government was reorganized by Chiang Kai-Shek’s instruction. KMT leadership also pointed out that Taipei city is de facto Central government. It has special political, economic and cultural meaning. Therefore, the KMT decided to transfer the jurisdiction of Taipei city government. But, in fact, Taipei city’s Reform has been postponed for a period of time. This complex condition involved among Central Government, Provincial Government and Taipei City Government. In 1966, Office of the President decreed Executive Yuan to establish the Reform Group, which coincidence with election of Mayor of Taipei and city councilor, and prepared to accomplish the Reform plan. Contrast to Central, Taiwan Provincial Assembly establish the ad hoc group, whose purpose was mainly to express the opinion that was entirely distinctive to Central and Taipei City stand. Inquiring through my thesis, one can see how the KMT government rules Taiwan by his own. Finally, Taipei City was elevated to the status of special municipality. In this way, we could clearly analyze varying aspects of city development through the Taipei city’s Reform Policy. |
