康德的《單纯理性限度内的宗教》之哲學研究; The study of the philosophy of the Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason by Immanuel Kant

NCU Institutional Repository > 文學院 > 哲學研究所 > 博碩士論文 > Item 987654321/63495

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/63495

题名:	康德的《單纯理性限度内的宗教》之哲學研究;The study of the philosophy of the Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason by Immanuel Kant
作者:	鄧振岢;DENG,CHEN-KE
贡献者:	哲學研究所
关键词:	康德;善;惡;意志;良知;道德法則;上帝;Kant;Good;Evil;Will;Conscience;Moral Law;God
日期:	2014-01-24
上传时间:	2014-04-02 15:40:17 (UTC+8)
出版者:	國立中央大學
摘要:	康德的宗教哲學最重要的問題，在於「人的本性」及「上帝之國」如何現實現。「人的本性」分為「善」與「惡」，「善」即是為義務而義務；「惡」即是一種「傾向」。要勝過「傾向」唯有藉著「善」，而個人的善又必須在社群的「真正的教會」中才能持續發揮作用。「真正的教會」是由一群人組成的共善群體，這個群體是為防止「惡」的擴散及發展「善」而存在的。為了能夠在教會中合適的尊崇上帝，其內部要有合理的事奉。相反的，一些違反道德法則且不討上帝喜悅的「事奉」，可以稱為「偽事奉」。要避免「偽事奉」，唯有藉由人的「良知」。針對有些學者對於「善」及「良知」之批判，構成了本文的第二部分。對康德的「善」原則批判以席勒、黑格爾及費爾德曼為主，分別以感性、特殊性及極端道德分子為其論點。為了避免極端道德分子的產生，唯有藉由「良知」。針對「良知」的批判先有叔本華，叔本華視「良知」是迷信，後由黑格爾指出「良知」可能導致善惡有共同根源的問題。最後，費希特提出「道德共同體」，以解決康德哲學中「良知」所產生的問題。然而，康德早在《單纯理性限度内的宗教》己提出費希特所說的「道德共同體」。本文結論中分為：什麼決定「善」、「惡」，以及康德宗教哲學的作用。本文認為什麼決定「善」、「惡」呢？由於「惡」影響自由的運用，所以「惡」決定善惡的成分較大。康德宗教哲學的作用則在於藉由「良知」的辨識防止道德哲學崩解，再藉由「愛」的崇敬，企圖解決「惡」的問題。; 　　The most important question in Kant's philosophy of religion is how to realize the nature of man and the kingdom of God. The nature of man is divided into the good and the evil. The good is to do one's duty merely for the sake of duty; however the evil is a kind of propensity. Only by the good could we conquer this propensity, and the individual good could display durably its function in the community of the “true church”. The true church is a community of common good which consists of a group of people. This community exists for the sake of the prevention of evil and the development of the good. In order to honor God appropriately in the church, it should have a rational cultus. In contrast, some cultus which violate the moral law and do not please God could be called “spurious cultus”. We can only avoid a spurious cultus by employing our conscience. The second part of this article is formed by the probe in the light of the criticism on the the good and the conscience proposed by certain scholars. The critiques on the principle of good of Kant were mainly presented by Friedrich Schiller, G. W. F. Hegel and Fred Feldman: sensibility, particularity and extreme moralism. We could only avoid the production of the extreme moralism by means of the conscience. The criticism in connection with the conscience was first proposed by Arthur Schopenhauer, who considered it as a superstition. Later, Hegel has pointed out that the conscience could lead to the issue of the common root of the good and of the evil. Finally, Johann Gottlieb Fichte has presented the theory of moral community to solve the problem resulted by the good in the philosophy of Hegel. However, Kant had already proposed the moral community described by Fichte in his Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. The conclusion is divided into two parts: what is it to determine the good and the evil, and the application of Kant's philosophy of religion. What is it to determine the good and the evil by this article? Because the evil affects the exercise of our liberty, it has greater power to determine the good and the evil. The function of Kant's philosophy of religion is to prevent the collapse of ethics by the identification of conscience, and to try to solve the problem of evil by the adoration of love.
显示于类别:	[哲學研究所] 博碩士論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	1155	检视/开启

在NCUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

数据加载中.....