從《玉谿生詩說》到《點論李義山詩集》──紀昀評點李商隱詩研究;From a Commentary on Yu-Xi-Sheng’S Poetry to Commenting on a Collection of Li Yi-Shan’S Poems: a Study of Ji Yun’S Commentary on Li Shang-Yin’S Poetry

NCU Institutional Repository > 文學院 > 中國文學系 > 研究計畫 > Item 987654321/82015

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/82015

題名:	從《玉谿生詩說》到《點論李義山詩集》──紀昀評點李商隱詩研究;From a Commentary on Yu-Xi-Sheng’S Poetry to Commenting on a Collection of Li Yi-Shan’S Poems: a Study of Ji Yun’S Commentary on Li Shang-Yin’S Poetry
作者:	李宜學
貢獻者:	國立中央大學中國文學系
關鍵詞:	紀昀;《玉溪生詩說》;《點論李義山詩集》;李商隱詩;評點;Ji Yun;A Commentary on Yu-Xi-Sheng’s Poetry;Commenting on A Collection of Li Yi-Shan’s Poems;Li Shang-Yin’s poetry;comment
日期:	2020-01-13
上傳時間:	2020-01-13 14:03:36 (UTC+8)
出版者:	科技部
摘要:	申請者執行科技部一百零七年度計畫〈「海虞二馮」、紀昀評點《才調集》與其李商隱詩論關係之研究〉（107-2410-H-008-049-）的過程中，因追蹤紀昀與李商隱詩的關係，發現其不僅「初學詩從玉溪集入」（〈二樟詩鈔序〉），二十七歲即撰成《玉谿生詩說》，開啟畢生詩歌評點的序幕；逮至三十九歲，又曾撰成一部《點論李義山詩集》（後收入《鏡煙堂十種》），卷數、內容均與前書不盡相同，而流傳不廣，寓目者少。此事學界罕知；縱或知之，亦鮮重視。論紀批李商隱詩者，多僅就《玉谿生詩說》發言，幾乎不引《點論李義山詩集》，甚至誤以為是同一本書。實則兩書相距十二年，前者係一選本，殆紀氏少作；後者方為全編，乃晚出之論。申請者以為：欲明紀氏李商隱詩論之整體，便不能無視《點論李義山詩集》，且須結合《玉谿生詩說》，始克其功；若能逐首分析前、後評點差異，更可清楚勾勒紀氏理解李商隱詩的階段性演變，深具接受（reception）意義。職是，本計畫擬以兩年期的時間，先分別探賾《玉谿生詩說》與《點論李義山詩集》書中話語，再詳加比勘，冀動態描繪出紀昀詮釋李商隱詩的進程，以具體把握其研究內涵與成果，進而將之置於清代詩學、歷代李商隱詩學、李商隱詩接受史的脈絡下，重新評估其學術定位與價值。 ;I am executing the 107th Annual Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology “A Study on the Relationship between the Comments of ‘The Two Fengs of Haiyu’ and Ji Yun on A Collection of the Tunes of Talent and Those on Li Shang-Yin’s Poems” (107-2410-H-008-049-). When I tracked the relationship between Ji Yun and Li Shang-Yin’s poetry, I found that Ji not only “began my [his] poetic studies with The Collection of Yu-Xi” (“The Preface to The Poetry Anthology of Two Camphor Trees”) but also started his career of poetry commentary at the age of 27 by writing A Commentary on Yu-Xi-Sheng’s Poetry. He wrote Commenting on A Collection of Li Yi-Shan’s Poems when he was 39 and the content of this book is not quite the same as that of the Commentary. The book was later collected in Ji’s Ten Books of the Mirror-Smoke Hall but did not spread widely and was little known. Having this book, The Institute of History and Language, Academia Sinica lent it to Shin Wen Feng Publishing Company for photocopy, and the photocopy was included in The Third Volume of A Collection of Series and published in 1996. So far, the academic circles have still not fully utilized this book. Most of discussions on Ji and Li’s poetry only focus on the Commentary; they rarely mention the Commenting or even confuse the two books. In fact, the two books are different in time by twelve years: the former is a work of Ji’s youth and is a selection while the latter is Ji’s final conclusion in his later years and is a complete collection. To understand the full picture of Ji’s discussions on Li’s poetry, it is necessary to consider the Commenting and also take the Commentary into consideration. Accordingly, this project plans to scrutinize in sequence the discourses of the Commentary and the Commenting and carefully compare their similarities and differences, in a 2-year period. I hope to dynamically sketch Ji’s process of interpreting Li’s poems, deepen connotations and achievements of his poetics about Li, place it in the context of acceptance of Li’s poetry in the Qing dynasty or even the overall history of acceptance of Li’s poetry, and reassess its academic position and value.
關聯:	財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心
顯示於類別:	[中國文學系 ] 研究計畫

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
index.html		0Kb	HTML	327	檢視/開啟

在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

資料載入中.....