English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 70585/70585 (100%)
Visitors : 23253972      Online Users : 601
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version

    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/83087

    Title: 初探建築資訊模型與鋼結構分析軟體整合應用;Preliminary Study on the Integration of Building Information Modeling Tools and Structural Analysis Software
    Authors: 吳振呈;Wu, Chen-Cheng
    Contributors: 土木工程學系在職專班
    Keywords: 建築資訊模型;結構分析軟體;Dynamo
    Date: 2020-07-21
    Issue Date: 2020-09-02 14:53:15 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 建築資訊模型(Building Information Modeling, BIM)的使用在現今業界中越來越廣泛,且更為頻繁的使用,但BIM軟體的結構分析能力目前仍不足以取代傳統習慣使用的結構分析軟體,因此本研究計畫利用BIM軟體進行建模後,將模型資訊導入至業界常用之結構分析軟體中,進行結構分析並取得最佳化斷面設計的資訊,最後將最佳化斷面的結果匯回BIM軟體之中,並且更新BIM模型之中的梁柱尺寸,以達到最節省施工材料並且整合BIM軟體與結構分析軟體的目的。
    本研究之成果可完整將線性構件模型由Revit轉換至SAP2000中,並確實將SAP2000中最佳化分析設計後的斷面尺寸資訊匯出,讀取最佳化設計之參數後,修改Revit模型。;Building Information Modeling (BIM) is widely used in practice nowadays, however the structural analysis capabilities of BIM software are still not sufficient enough to replace the traditional software. As a result, this study utilizes BIM to conduct modularization and import the result of modularization from BIM into the traditional structural analysis software for the information of optimized cross-sections. Finally, we import the results of the optimized cross-sections back to BIM software and renew the sizes of pillars to match the objectives that can both save raw materials and integrate BIM with the traditional structural analysis software.
    There are two kinds of the most widely-used BIM software in the industry as modularizing software, which are Revit, introduced by Autodesk, and Tekla that was acquired by Trimble. Specifically, Revit has better integration than Tekla in terms of structures and mechanics. Therefore, this study selects Revit as the primary modularizing software for the ability to integrate more aspects of building information.
    For the structural analysis software, ETABS, introduced by CSI, and SAP200 are more frequently used in the industry. In comparison, ETABS is more applied to buildings, and SAP2000 can be used in less symmetric scenario. In order not to be limited in building applications in the following research, we choose SAP200 for higher flexibility.
    The results of this study can completely transform the linear component model from Revit to SAP2000 and the information of the sizes of cross-sections after the optimization can be completely extracted from SAP2000 that is able to read the parameters of the optimized design and modify the Revit model.
    Appears in Collections:[土木工程學系碩士在職專班] 博碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback  - 隱私權政策聲明