| 摘要: | 隨著世界六分之一的人口居住在非正式化住居且繼續增加，氣候變遷會使非正式化居民在應變時變得更脆弱，甚至對他們更具有破壞性。無論是開發中國家或是已開發國家，都會無一倖免地受到規模逐年增加的災害所影響。事實上，大多數環境問題的後果都與領導不力和城市管理不善有關。非正式化住居改造一直是國際組織或非政府組織最好的方法。其透過提供金錢援助、土地所有權、結構性房屋、清潔水資源和衛生系統，?之進行改造。近代甚至有透過居民自主改造之方式。往年研究中，東南亞 (SEA) 的非正式化住區改造極少與氣候應對策略有關。因此，本研究的主要目的是透過分析五個分別來自印度尼西亞、泰國和菲律賓的模範專案（KIP、NSD、ProKlim、Baan Mankong 和 Post-Haiyan Self Recovery Housing Program），?非正式化住居改造提供有效的災害應對策略和架構。本研究方法依序採用案例研究、內容分析、數據分析、專家諮詢和案例驗證，找出結果及其關係。
結果顯示，“阻絕和保護”和“公共空間和綠色基礎設施”是五個案例共同擁有的調適措施。而對於減少碳排放的方法，廢棄物管理和減少運輸能源是改造案例中的主要核心。一個包含應對水災、乾旱、山體崩塌、颱風的對策的架構隨?產生，使利益相關者能夠設計永續的ISUP。通過案例驗證，該架構在某些限制下是可用的。
;As one-sixth of the world population lives in informal settlements and continues to increase, the vulnerability of informal dwellers to climate change will persist, or even be destructive. Increasing magnitude seem to be more inevitable in any countries, regardless of developing or developed. In fact, the consequences of most environmental issues are undeniably associated with poor leadership and deficient urban management. Informal settlement upgrading has always been a proper approach for international organization or NGO by providing monetary aids, land ownership, structured house, clean water supply and sanitation system or community governance by inhabitants themselves. However, informal settlement upgrading in Southeast Asia (SEA) are rarely connected with climate-related strategies. Therefore, main objective of this research is to provide effective climate countermeasures and a framework for Informal Settlements Upgrading Project (ISUP) by adopting best practice from five scheme (KIP, NSD, ProKlim, Baan Mankong, and Post-Haiyan Self Recovery Housing Program). These schemes are originated from Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines. Subsequently, the methodology of case study, content analysis, data analysis, expert consultation, and case validation were done in order to find out results and its relationship.
The results appeared that “Barriers and protective” and “Public spaces and green infrastructure” is commonly implemented in five case studies, under adaptation strategies. While, for climate mitigation approach, waste management and transport energy reduction are the main focus during upgrading. Subsequently, a framework comprising countermeasures to cope with flood, drought, landslide, typhoon is then produced to enable stakeholders to design a sustainable ISUP. Through case validation, the framework is usable under some limitation. |
