| 摘要: | 聚氨酯產業在全球經濟發展中具有舉足輕重之地位，其產品應用涵蓋建築、交通、電子等多元領域。然而，該產業因高碳排放與廢棄物管理挑戰，對環境永續構成潛在威脅。為應對全球化工產業綠色轉型需求，聚氨酯產業逐漸導入低碳排放製造技術、循環經濟模式與生物基材料，並致力於將SDGs目標嵌入營運與供應鏈管理之核心，以強化其永續韌性與資源效率。本研究以個案聚氨酯製造業為案例，發現其現行以成本、品質與交期為導向之傳統供應商評選模式，已無法滿足現代永續發展需求，因此，基於以上背景，構建出以SDGs為核心之永續供應商評選模型。
本研究採用層級分析法作為本研究方法，透過文獻探討方式以英國環境與發展顧問尼哈·查克拉瓦蒂（Neha Chakravarty）所歸類之ESG與17項SDGs目標對應框架，結合研究彙整出屬於化學業之九個標準、機構與企業關注SDGs目標共八項，最終得出ESG三大構面及17項SDGs目標準則之層級架構，隨後設計層級分析法問卷，發放予個案公司十位專家填答，並通過一致性檢驗以確保結果科學性，再依相對權重篩選出個案聚氨酯產業永續供應商評選之關鍵指標。研究結果顯示，環境構面於評選準則中佔據最高權重，其次為公司治理構面，最後為社會構面。從全體權重值分析結果與排序中可發現，排序前三名集中於環境構面內之準則，分別為SDG6、SDG3、SDG7，表示專家一致認為環境構面在永續供應商評選中至關重要。本研究構建之模型可作為個案公司及聚氨酯產業建立永續供應鏈之重要依據。此模型不僅有助於提升供應鏈透明度與韌性，亦能促進企業實現經濟效益與環境永續間之平衡發展。
;The polyurethane industry plays a pivotal role in global economic development, with its products widely applied across sectors such as construction, transportation, and electronics. However, this industry faces significant challenges, particularly high carbon emissions and waste management issues, which pose threats to environmental sustainability. To address the demand for green transformation in the chemical industry, the polyurethane sector has increasingly adopted low-carbon manufacturing technologies, circular economy practices, and bio-based materials. Additionally, efforts are being made to integrate the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into its operations and supply chain management, thereby enhancing resilience and resource efficiency.
This study examines a case in the polyurethane manufacturing sector, revealing that traditional supplier selection models, focused primarily on cost, quality, and delivery, are inadequate for meeting modern sustainability requirements. To address this gap, a sustainable supplier selection model centered on SDGs was developed. The research employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology, integrating the ESG and SDGs correlation framework proposed by Neha Chakravarty. By incorporating nine industry-specific criteria, organization and chemical enterprises to get eight SDGs prioritized. A hierarchical structure was constructed, encompassing three ESG dimensions and 17 SDGs based evaluation criteria. An AHP-based questionnaire was distributed to ten experts within the case company, and the responses underwent consistency verification. Key indicators for sustainable supplier selection were identified based on relative weight analysis. The findings indicate that the environmental dimension carries the highest weight among evaluation criteria, followed by corporate governance and social dimensions. Notably, the top three criteria — SDG6, SDG3 and SDG7, highlight the critical importance of environmental considerations in sustainable supplier selection. The proposed model developed in this study serves as a crucial foundation for establishing sustainable supply chains in the case company and the polyurethane industry. This model not only enhances supply chain transparency and resilience but also facilitates the balance between economic benefits and environmental sustainability. |
