中大機構典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/97761
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 83776/83776 (100%)
Visitors : 60770037      Online Users : 981
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/97761


    Title: 我國假訊息管制之研究-以中介者管制模式為中心;A Study on the Regulation of Disinformation in Taiwan: Focusing on the Intermediary Liability Model
    Authors: 吳友升;Wu, Yu-Sheng
    Contributors: 法律與政府研究所
    Keywords: 假訊息;中介者管制模式;社群平台;通訊端正法第230條;網路執行法
    Date: 2025-08-18
    Issue Date: 2025-10-17 11:52:27 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 近年來,假訊息透過Facebook、YouTube、LINE等社群平台大量散布,不僅衝擊民主秩序,也對公共安全與社會信任造成實質威脅。我國現行假訊息管制制度以發言者為主要規範對象,欠缺中介者對社群平台的責任加以管制。本文以「中介者管制模式」為核心,透過比較法觀點分析美國《通訊端正法》第230條與德國《網路執行法》(NetzDG)之立法與執行實況,歸納兩者在言論自由與假訊息管制之間所採取方式及差異性。本文據此提出我國未來立法建議,包括設置獨立監理機構、明確界定免責範圍、建立審查時效條款、強化申訴救濟機制及透明報告義務,期能在保障言論自由與有效遏止假訊息。;In recent years, disinformation has spread rapidly through social media platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, and LINE, posing significant threats to democratic order, public safety, and social trust. Taiwan′s current legal framework for regulating disinformation primarily targets individual speakers, while lacking adequate regulation of intermediaries such as digital platforms. This thesis focuses on the “intermediary regulation model” and adopts a comparative legal approach to analyze the legislative design and enforcement practices of Section 230 of the U.S. Communications Decency Act (CDA) and Germany′s Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG). It highlights the differences between the two in balancing freedom of speech with the need to combat disinformation. Based on this analysis, the thesis proposes several legislative recommendations for Taiwan, including the establishment of an independent regulatory body, clear delineation of liability exemptions, implementation of content review deadlines, enhancement of appeals and remedies, and mandatory transparency reports. These measures aim to achieve a balance between protecting freedom of expression and effectively curbing the spread of disinformation.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Law and Government] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML32View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明