探討家庭金錢與非金錢教育支出之影響因素及其對子女學業表現之影響

NCU Institutional Repository > 管理學院 > 產業經濟研究所 > 博碩士論文 > Item 987654321/97976

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/97976

題名:	探討家庭金錢與非金錢教育支出之影響因素及其對子女學業表現之影響
作者:	吳柏翰;WU, BO-HAN
貢獻者:	產業經濟研究所
關鍵詞:	教育經濟學;教育支出;家庭背景因素;學業表現
日期:	2025-07-15
上傳時間:	2025-10-17 12:13:21 (UTC+8)
出版者:	國立中央大學
摘要:	教育長期以來被視為培養人力資本的重要投資。近年來，根據國內壽險業的長期調查顯示，家庭教育準備金逐年增加，顯示教育支出已成為台灣家庭普遍關注的核心議題。本文結合「家庭動態調查」（Panel Study of Family Dynamics, PSFD）與「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」（Taiwan Education Panel Survey, TEPS），前者可觀察各年齡層子女的教育支出與家庭背景的關係，後者雖僅涵蓋國中教育階段，卻能同時分析教育支出與家庭背景對學習成果的影響。本文採用普通最小平方法（Ordinary Least Squares, OLS）進行實證分析，將教育支出區分為金錢教育支出（如補習與才藝費用等）與非金錢教育支出（如父母陪讀與陪伴子女的時間），探討家庭背景因素如何影響家庭在金錢與非金錢教育支出上的投入，並進一步分析兩者之間的關係，最後利用TEPS資料觀察對子女學業表現與能力發展的影響。在家庭動態調查中，不同年齡層子女的家庭背景因素對金錢與非金錢教育支出的投入有所差異。整體而言，父親年齡較高、家庭收入較高、子女人數較多及居住在都會地區，有助於提升0-18歲首位子女的金錢教育支出。將首位子女年齡區分發現，父親年齡較高有助於0-5歲及6-18歲子女的金錢教育支出；父親教育程度較高有助於6-18歲及13-18歲子女的金錢教育支出；母親教育程度較高有助於6-12歲子女的金錢教育支出；家庭收入較高有助於6-12歲及6-18歲子女的金錢教育支出；父母婚姻狀態為已婚有助於6-12歲子女的金錢教育支出；子女人數較多有助於0-5歲、6-12歲、6-18歲、13-18歲子女的金錢教育支出；居住在都會地區有助於0-5歲、6-12歲、6-18歲子女的金錢教育支出。在非金錢教育支出方面，子女人數較多有助於提升18歲以下首位子女的非金錢教育支出的投入。將首位子女年齡區分發現，父親年齡較高有助於0-5歲子女的非金錢教育支出，卻會減少6-18歲子女的非金錢教育支出；父親教育程度較高有助於6-12歲與6-18歲子女的非金錢教育支出；家庭收入較高則會減少6-18歲子女的非金錢教育支出；父母婚姻狀態為已婚有助於6-18歲及13-18歲子女的非金錢教育支出；子女人數較多有助於13-18歲子女的非金錢教育支出；首胎為男性也有助於6-12歲子女的非金錢教育支出。在TEPS資料中，父母教育程度較高、家庭收入較高與居住在都會地區有助於金錢教育支出投入，相對地父母離婚及子女人數較多則會減少金錢教育支出的投入。非金錢教育支出方面，母親教育程度較高、家庭收入較高、父母離婚及居住在都會區與非金錢教育支出的投入減少有關。「家庭動態調查」（PSFD）13-18歲首位子女資料與「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」(TEPS)相比，研究結果顯示部分一致與差異。兩份資料均發現父親教育程度較高有助於金錢教育支出，父母婚姻穩定則有助於非金錢教育支出的投入，但子女人數對金錢教育支出的影響方向不同，PSFD資料呈正向顯著，TEPS資料則為負向顯著。在PSFD資料中13-18歲首位子女的母親教育程度、家庭收入、父母離婚狀態及居住地區，對金錢與非金錢教育支出均沒有顯著影響。探討金錢與非金錢教育支出的關係中，在PSFD資料中13-18歲首位子女中，金錢與非金錢教育支出之間呈負向關係，但未達統計顯著水準。在TEPS資料中，針對國中階段子女的分析則發現，金錢與非金錢教育支出之間呈現負向關係，顯示兩者之間可能存在替代關係。本研究接續使用TEPS資料，探討子女的學習成果，發現金錢與非金錢教育支出皆對子女學業成績具正向關係，但在學習能力方面，僅金錢教育支出有顯著關係，非金錢支出則無顯著關係。這些研究結果隱含，不同形式的教育支出對子女教育成果表現具有不同的影響，可能是反映家庭在教育投資策略上可能存在不同資源配置的選擇。 ;Education has long been regarded as an important investment in human capital. In recent years, according to longitudinal surveys conducted by the domestic life insurance industry, household education savings have steadily increased, indicating that education expenditure has become a core concern for Taiwanese families. This study integrates data from the Panel Study of Family Dynamics (PSFD) and the Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS). The PSFD allows observation of the relationship between educational expenditures and family background across different age groups, while the TEPS, though limited to the junior high school stage, enables analysis of how educational expenditures and family background affect learning outcomes. This study employs Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) for empirical analysis, categorizing educational expenditures into monetary (e.g., expenses for tutoring and extracurricular activities) and non-monetary (e.g., parental accompaniment and time spent with children) components. It examines how family background influences parental investment in both types of educational expenditures, further analyzes the relationship between them, and utilizes TEPS data to explore their impact on children′s academic performance and skill development. In the PSFD data, the effects of family background factors on monetary and non-monetary educational expenditures vary across different age groups. Overall, higher paternal age, higher household income, a greater number of children, and residence in metropolitan areas contribute to increased monetary educational expenditures for the first child aged 0–18. Further dividing by age group: higher paternal age is associated with increased monetary expenditures for children aged 0–5 and 6–18; higher paternal education level is associated with increased expenditures for children aged 6–18 and 13–18; higher maternal education level is associated with expenditures for children aged 6–12; higher household income is associated with expenditures for children aged 6–12 and 6–18; parents being married is associated with expenditures for children aged 6–12; a greater number of children is positively associated with expenditures across all age groups (0–5, 6–12, 6–18, and 13–18); and living in metropolitan areas is associated with expenditures for children aged 0–5, 6–12, and 6–18. Regarding non-monetary educational expenditures, a greater number of children contributes to higher investment for the first child aged below 18. Breaking this down by age group: higher paternal age increases non-monetary expenditures for children aged 0–5 but decreases them for children aged 6–18; higher paternal education is positively associated with expenditures for children aged 6–12 and 6–18; higher household income is associated with decreased non-monetary expenditures for children aged 6–18; parents being married contributes to higher expenditures for children aged 6–18 and 13–18; a greater number of children increases expenditures for children aged 13–18; and firstborns being male is positively associated with expenditures for children aged 6–12. In the TEPS data, higher parental education, higher household income, and residence in metropolitan areas are associated with increased monetary educational expenditures. Conversely, parental divorce and a greater number of children are associated with reduced monetary educational expenditures. For non-monetary expenditures, higher maternal education, higher household income, parental divorce, and living in metropolitan areas are associated with decreased investments. A comparison of the PSFD data (for first children aged 13–18) and the TEPS data reveals both consistencies and differences. Both datasets indicate that higher paternal education promotes monetary educational expenditures, and parental marital stability supports non-monetary educational investments. However, the number of children has opposite effects: a significant positive association in the PSFD data, but a significant negative association in the TEPS data. In the PSFD data for first children aged 13–18, maternal education, household income, parental divorce, and residential location show no significant effects on either type of educational expenditure. Regarding the relationship between monetary and non-monetary expenditures, the PSFD data show a negative but statistically insignificant correlation for children aged 13–18, while the TEPS data reveal a significant negative relationship at the junior high school stage, suggesting a substitutive relationship between the two forms of educational investment. Further utilizing the TEPS data to explore children′s learning outcomes, the study finds that both monetary and non-monetary educational expenditures are positively associated with academic performance. However, for learning ability, only monetary expenditures exhibit a significant effect, while non-monetary expenditures do not. These findings suggest that different forms of educational investment have varying impacts on children′s educational outcomes, possibly reflecting families′ differing resource allocation strategies in educational investment.
顯示於類別:	[產業經濟研究所] 博碩士論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
index.html		0Kb	HTML	5	檢視/開啟

在NCUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

資料載入中.....