Contrasting various metrics for measuring tropical cyclone activity

NCUIR > College of Earth Sciences > Department of Atmospheric Sciences > journal & Dissertation > Item 987654321/99795

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/99795

Title:	Contrasting various metrics for measuring tropical cyclone activity
Authors:	余嘉裕;Yu, Jia-Yuh;Chiu, Ping-Gin
Contributors:	地球科學學院大氣科學學系
Keywords:	Climate change;Climate variability;Cyclones;Cyclonic activity;Energy;Hurricanes;Modified Rankine vortex;Race;Tropical climate;Tropical cyclone activity;Tropical cyclones;Typhoons;Wind power
Date:	2012-06-01
Issue Date:	2026-04-21 13:35:43 (UTC+8)
Publisher:	Chinese Geoscience Union;Taiwan: 中華民國地球科學學會
Abstract:	摘要： Popular metrics used for measuring the tropical cyclone (TC) activity, including NTC (number of tropical cyclones), TCD (tropical cyclone days), ACE (accumulated cyclone energy), PDI (power dissipation index), along with two newly proposed indices: RACE (revised accumulated cyclone energy) and RPDI (revised power dissipation index), are compared using the JTWC (Joint Typhoon Warning Center) best-track data of TC over the western North Pacific basin. Our study shows that, while the above metrics have demonstrated various degrees of discrepancies, but in practical terms, they are all able to produce meaningful temporal and spatial changes in response to climate variability. Compared with the conventional ACE and PDI, RACE and RPDI seem to provide a more precise estimate of the total TC activity, especially in projecting the upswing trend of TC activity over the past few decades, simply because of a better approach in estimating TC wind energy. However, we would argue that there is still no need to find a "universal" or "best" metric for TC activity because different metrics are designed to stratify different aspects of TC activity, and whether the selected metric is appropriate or not should be determined solely by the purpose of study. Except for magnitude difference, the analysis results seem insensitive to the choice of the best-track datasets. 出版者： Taiwan: 中華民國地球科學學會出版日期： 2012-06-01 出處： TAO : Terrestrial, atmospheric, and oceanic sciences, 2012-06, Vol.23 (3), p.303-316 資源來源： Chinese Electronic Periodical Services (CEPS) 版權： 2012. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 識別號： ISSN: 1017-0839 識別號： ISSN: 2223-8964 識別號： ISSN: 2311-7680 識別號： EISSN: 2311-7680 識別號： DOI: 10.3319/TAO.2011.11.23.01(A)
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Atmospheric Sciences] journal & Dissertation

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	11	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...