中大學術數位典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/99983
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 94201/94201 (100%)
Visitors : 81663546      Online Users : 3826
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/99983


    Title: Robust design in geotechnical engineering – an update
    Authors: 莊長賢;Khoshnevisan, Sara;Gong, Wenping;Wang, Lei;Juang, C. Hsein
    Contributors: 工學院土木工程學系
    Keywords: deep excavation;Design engineering;Design factors;Design parameters;foundation;Geohazards;Methodology;Noise factor;probability of failure;reliability-based optimisation;robust design;Robustness;rock slope stability;Safety
    Date: 2014-01-01
    Issue Date: 2026-04-21 13:43:44 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd.;Taylor & Francis
    Abstract: 摘要: This paper presents an update for the robust geotechnical design (RGD) methodology, which seeks an optimal design with respect to design robustness and cost efficiency, while satisfying the safety requirements. In general, the design robustness is achieved if the system response is insensitive to the variation in the uncertain input parameters (called "noise factors"). In other words, a design is considered robust if the system response exhibits little variation, even though there is high variation in the input parameters. Robust design achieves this desirable outcome by carefully adjusting 'design parameters' (i.e., the parameters that can be controlled by the designer, such as the geometry and dimensions) without reducing the uncertainty in the noise factors. In this paper, the existing RGD methodology is updated with a gradient-based robustness measure and a simplified procedure for seeking the knee point. The RGD methodology and its simplified version (with new updates) are illustrated with three design examples. The results presented in this paper show that the RGD methodology and its simplified version are effective design tools that considers safety, cost and design robustness simultaneously. The advantages of the simplified RGD approach are discussed.
    出版者: Taylor & Francis
    出版日期: 2014-10-02
    出處: Georisk, 2014-10, Vol.8 (4), p.217-234
    版權: 2014 Taylor & Francis 2014
    識別號: ISSN: 1749-9518
    識別號: EISSN: 1749-9526
    識別號: DOI: 10.1080/17499518.2014.980274
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Civil Engineering] journal & Dissertation

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML15View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明