藉由企業分割創造價值：以電信產業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：26

、訪客IP：18.116.27.229

姓名

賴信夫(Hsin-Fu Lai ) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務管理研究所

論文名稱

藉由企業分割創造價值：以電信產業為例
(Creating Value through Corporate Spin-offs: Evidences from Telecommunication Industry)

相關論文

★ 大陸台商經營模式對融資決策之影響—個案分析	★ 綜合證券商併購之綜效分析--以寶來證券為例
★ 發行可轉換公司債對會計盈餘數字調整進位之影響	★ 資本結構影響因素之探討─以台積電為例
★ 興建營運移轉(BOT)計畫案之財務可行性評估-以宜蘭縣羅東地區污水下水道系統為例	★ 目標成本制度執行問題與因應對策之探討－以國內某汽車公司為例
★ 銀行在併購風潮下之經營策略─以永豐銀行為例	★ 銀行分行屬性差異與績效評核制度之研究- 以個案銀行之消費金融分行為例
★ 銀行對企業中長期資本支出授信可行性分析-以台北富邦銀行對XX科技授信為例	★ 政府要求銀行配合對DRAM產業紓困措施之合理性-以茂德科技為例
★ 企業模式、經營策略與價值創造-以某五金家具製造業為例	★ 保險業如何建立創造公司、顧客及員工三贏的RFP商業模式 —以全球人壽為例
★ 在IAS 21：「匯率變動之影響」規範下，我國企業如何應用商業模式選擇功能性貨幣之研究-以A公司為例	★ 台灣銀行業如何改變商業模式以因應ECFA下之變局-以個案銀行為例
★ 商業模式創新與企業價值分析-以85度C為例	★ 台灣隱形眼鏡產業經營策略與企業價值分析 –以個案A及B公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究希望透過控制產業別，進而提供企業分割的價值動因，俾使吾人能對此一企業再造過程有更深入瞭解。企業利用組織架構再造增加企業價值，其方式有：資產分割（spin-offs）、權益分割（equity carve-outs）、發行追蹤股（tracking stocks）、收購與合併（mergers & acquisitions）。本研究的研究對象是世界各地從事過資產分割的電信公司以及電信設備製造商。利用事件研究法（event study）計算出母公司子公司分割宣告日的累積異常報酬率（cumulative abnormal return）；並且將異常報酬率的來源分為五個構面：經營效率、財務健全度、市場認同度、修正錯誤假說以及母子企業是否屬於同一產業。實證結果發現在此五項構面中，在經營績效、財務強度以及母子產業是否屬於同一產業為企業分割活動中的主要價值動因。

摘要(英)

The purposes of this study are to investigate the value drivers of spin-offs and provide insight on the issue of spin-offs. There are four typical ways of undertaking corporate reconstruction to increase firm value: mergers and acquisitions, equity carve-outs, tracking stocks and spin-offs. We gather data of firms undertaking spin-offs in the global telecommunication industry between 1992 and 2000; which composed of sixty-five companies in eight countries around the world. This study applies the event study methodology to analyze the spin-off announcement effect on the stock price. Furthermore, this study employs spin-off cumulative abnormal return (CAR) as dependent variable and selects five dimensions of explanatory variables to capture the source of value: managerial efficiency, financial strength, market expectation, correction of error and cross-industry spin-off. The empirical results suggest that managerial efficiency, financial strength, and cross-industry spin-off are key value drivers of corporate spin-offs.

關鍵字(中)

★ 事件研究法
★ 企業分割
★ 價值動因
★ 電信產業

關鍵字(英)

★ event study
★ spin-off
★ telecommunication industry
★ value driver

論文目次

Contents
Chapter I. Introduction1
1.Motivation1
2. Purposes of this study2
3 Composition of this Study2
4. Research Flow Chart3
Chapter II. Telecommunication Industry and Spin-offs4
1. Industry Overview4
2. Spin-offs in Telecommunication Industry4
Chapter III. Literature Review and Theoretical Structure6
1. Benefits of spin-off:6
2. Conglomerate Wave and Theories8
3. Value Discount of a Diversification conglomerate9
4. Focus and Divestiture10
Chapter IV. Research Methodology14
1. Research Model15
2. Samples16
3. Event study17
4. Variables and Hypotheses20
Chapter V. Empirical Results26
1. Event Study26
2. Descriptive Statistics27
3. Sensitivity Tests29
4. Multivariate Analysis34
Chapter .VI Conclusions38
References40
Figures
Figure1-1.Research Flow Chart3
Figure4-1 Reconstruction & Evaluations Methods14
Figure4-2. Research Model15
Figure4-3 Dimensions and Variables20
Tables
Table3-1: Summarized Table of Related Literature12
Table4-1 Summary of Hypotheses and Variables24
Table5-1 Spin-off announcement CAR26
Table5-2: Descriptive Statistics of Spin-off Firms and Non-Spin-off Firms28
Table5-3: Announcement Period Abnormal Return classified by Decomposition of ROA30
Table5-4: Announcement Period Abnormal Return classified by Managerial Characteristics30
Table5-5: Announcement Period Abnormal Return classified by Financial Characteristics32
Table5-6: Announcement Period Abnormal Return classified by Correction of An Error33
Table5-7: Announcement Period Abnormal Return classified by Market Expectation33
Table5-8: Announcement Period Abnormal Return classified by Relatedness of Parent and Subsidiary34
Table5-9: Multivariate Results35

參考文獻

1.Allen, J.W. and J. J. McConnell (1998) “Equity Carve-outs and Managerial Discretion” The Journal of Finance, no.1 Feb, p163-185
2.Anslinger, P.L., S.J. Klepper, and S. Subramaniam(1999) “Breaking Up Is Good to Do” The Mckinsey Quarterly, p.16-27
3.Barber, B.M., D.A. Palmer, and J. Wallace (1995) “Determinants of Conglomerate and Predatory Acquisitions: Evidence from the 1960s”, Journal of Finance, vol.1, p.283-318
4.Bergh, D.D.(1997) “Predicting Divestiture of Unrelated Acquisitions: An Integrative Model of Ex Ante Conditions” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18:9, p.715-731
5.Berger, P.G. and E. Ofek (1995) “Diversification’s Effect on Firm Value” Journal of Financial Economics, p.39-65
6.Berger, P.G. and E. Ofek (1996) “Bustup Takeovers of Value-Destroying Diversified Firms”, Journal of Finance, vol.LI, p.1175-1199
7.Bernake, B. and J.Y. Campell (1988) “Is there a corporate debt crisis?”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, p.83-125
8.Bhagat, S., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny (1990) “Hostile Takeovers in the 1980s:The Return to Corporate Specialization”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activities: Microeconomics, p.1-72
9.Bieshaar, H., J.Knight, and A. Van Wassenaer (2001) “Deals That Create Value,” The Mckinsey Quarterly, p.65-73
10.Campbell, A., M. Goold and M. Alexander (1994) “Corporate-Level Strategy: Creating Value in the Multibusiness Company”
11.Chiu, T.K. and G. Shyy ”Corporate Restructuring Through Spin-off: The Case of AT&T” Unpublished working paper.
12.Collis, D.J. and C.A. Montgomery (1995) “Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s”, Havard Business Review, vol.73, p.118-130
13.Cusatis, P.J., James. A.M., and J.R. Woolridge (1993) “Restructuring Through Spin-offs: The Stock Market Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol.33, p.293-311
14.Daley, L., V. Mehrotra, and R. Sivakumar (1997) “Corporate Focus and Value Creation: Evidence form Spinoffs” Journal of Financial Economics, vol.45, p.257-281
15.Fama, E.F., L. Fisher and M.C. Jensen and R. Roll (1969) “The Adjustment of Stock Price to New Information”, International Economic Review vol.10 p.1-21
16.Fluck, Z and A.W. Lynch (1999) “Why do firms merge and then divest? A theory of financial synergy”, The Journal of Business, vol.72, p.319-346
17.Hudspetb, T.H. and M.J. Kliegman (1996) “The Intricate Rules for Crafting a Spin-off” Mergers & Acquisitions, p.47-52
18.Jensen, M.C. (1986) “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers”, American Economic Review, vol.76, p.323-329
19.John, K. and E. Ofek (1995) “Asset Sales and Increase in Focus”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol.37, p.105-126
20.Kaplan, S.N. and M.S. Weisbach (1992) “The Success of Acquisitions: Evidence from Divestiture”, Journal of Finance, p107-138Pearson, M. (July 1998) “Spin-offs: Breaking Up is Hard to Do,” Journal of Business Strategy, p.31-35.
21.Kochhart, R. and M. Hitt (1998) “Research Notes and Communications linking Corporate Strategy to Capital Structure: Diversification Strategy, Type and Source of Financing“ Strategy Management Journal, vol.19, p.601-610
22.Lewellen, W.G. (1971) “A Pure Financial Rationale for the Conglomerate Merger”, Journal of Finance, vol26, p.521-537
23.Michaely, R. and W.H. Shaw (1995) “The Choice of Going Public: Spin-offs vs. Carve-outs,” Financial Management, vol.24, no.3, p.5-21
24.Parrino, R (1997) “Spin-offs and Wealth Transfers: The Marriott Case”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol.43, p.241-274
25.Servae, H. (1996) “The Value of Diversification During the Conglomerate Merger Wave”, Journal of Finance, vol.4, p.1201-1225

指導教授

鄭漢鐔(Hann-Tarn Jeng)

審核日期

2001-6-29

推文