部屬之潛能、任務性與適應性績效對晉升力評分關連性之研究－以主管目標導向為調節效果

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：13

、訪客IP：3.145.115.135

姓名

張斐純(Fei-Chun Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

部屬之潛能、任務性與適應性績效對晉升力評分關連性之研究－以主管目標導向為調節效果
(A study of the relationship between employee potential, task performance ,adaptive performance and promotability ratings: The moderating effects of supervisor goal orientation)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來企業逐漸開始重視人才管理的落實與發展，若組織能建立完善晉升決策流程，並精準地找出關鍵人才，將對組織將產生非常好的正向影響。主管在進行晉升決策時，通常以任務性績效及潛能作為晉升評估指標；然而現今的組織處於迅速變化且複雜的環境，具有不確定性的工作環境適應能力的員工顯得更加重要，因此除了任務性績效及潛能外，適應性績效亦能夠作為晉升力評分的預測指標。除此之外，在過去探討主管及員工個人特質相似性與員工晉升力的相關研究中，鮮少有實證性研究進一步探討主管目標導向作為預測變項進行探討。本研究將主管目標導向作為調節變項，探討與部屬潛能、任務性及適應性績效的交互作用是否會影響晉升力評分。
本研究透過問卷調查台灣與大陸之私人企業，樣本分佈於金融/保險業、高科技製造業、一般製造業、服務業以及其他產業等49家企業，並且問卷設計採用二階段不同時間施測，透過紙本郵寄、電子問卷以及親手轉交。以階層迴歸分析探討員工潛能、任務性績效、適應性績效對主管晉升力評分的解釋力，同時關注於社會要素中的主管目標導向對上述關係間存在的調節效果。研究結果發現，主效果中，無論是潛能或適應性績效皆與晉升力評分呈現正向且顯著的影響；調節效果中，主管的學習目標導向對部屬任務性績效和晉升力評分間具有負向顯著影響，而主管的績效目標導向對部屬適應性績效和晉升力評分間具有正向顯著影響。

摘要(英)

Many companies have been paid much attention to talent management practices in recent years. A well-designed process which precisely promotes key talent can have the greatest impact for organizations. Supervisors usually think of task performance and potential as the principle of promotion. However, as the environment becomes more complex and unstable, the required level of employee’s ability to adapt to dynamic work situations is more important. Therefore, adaptive performance could be as indicators of promotability ratings as well. For social context of promotion decisions, less study examine the effects of supervisor goal orientation on employee promotability ratings. Besides discussing the relationship between promotability, task performance, adaptively performance and potential, the moderate effect of supervisor goal orientation is discussed in the research.
This study is based on the questionnaire survey of 49 enterprises in China and Taiwan. The findings of our research are listed as following: (1) Results of main effect of regression analysis show that potential and adaptive performance have positive relationship with promotability ratings. (2) The results also indicate learning goal orientation of supervisor negatively moderates the relationship between with employee promotability ratings and task performance. Moreover, performance goal orientation of supervisor positively moderates the relationship between with employee promotability ratings and adaptive performance.

關鍵字(中)

★ 潛能
★ 任務性績效
★ 適應性績效
★ 晉升力評分
★ 目標導向

關鍵字(英)

★ potential
★ task performance
★ adaptive performance
★ promotability ratings
★ goal orientation

論文目次

中文摘要--i
Abstract--ii
目錄--iii
圖目錄--v
表目錄--v
第一章緒論--1
第一節研究背景及動機--1
第二節研究貢獻及目的--5
第二章文獻探討與研究假設--6
第一節晉升力評分--6
第二節潛能--7
第三節工作績效--8
第四節目標導向--10
第五節潛能與晉升力評分之關聯性--11
第六節工作績效與晉升力評分之關聯性--12
第七節主管學習目標導向於部屬潛能、任務性及適應性績效與晉升力評分之調節效果--14
第八節主管績效目標導向於部屬潛能、任務性及適應性績效與晉升力評分之調節效果--17
第一節研究架構--19
第二節研究樣本與流程--19
第三節研究工具及變數說明--20
第四節資料分析與統計方法--22
第四章資料分析與結果--24
第一節敘述性資料統計--24
第二節信度與效度分析--25
第三節階層迴歸分析--32
第五章結論與建議--37
第一節研究結果分析與探討--37
第二節學術貢獻--39
第三節管理意涵--40
第四節研究限制與未來研究方向--41
參考文獻--42
附錄一問卷題目--54

圖目錄
圖 1 研究架構圖--19
圖 2 主管學習目標導向於部屬任務性績效與晉升力評分之交互作用效果分析--34
圖 3 主管績效目標導向於部屬適應性績效與晉升力評分之交互作用效果分析--35

表目錄
表 1 潛能因素負荷量分析結果--26
表 2 信度分析結果--27
表 3 有效樣本驗證性因素分析結果--28
表 4 收斂效度與區別效度分析結果--30
表 5 相關分析結果--31
表 6 階層迴歸分析表--33
表 7 研究假設結果彙整表--36

參考文獻

中文部分
1.沈俊吟(2013)。適應性績效對晉升力評分之影響-以 LMX 及關係年資為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園市。
2.俞志緯(2012)。任務性, 脈絡性及適應性績效對晉升力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園市。
3.陳真毓(2013)。工作績效和潛能對部屬晉升力評分的影響-以主管-部屬交換關係為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園市。
4.程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究. 師大學報: 教育類, 48(1), 15-40.
5.葉譯元(2011)。潛能, 工作績效, 挑戰性工作經驗與晉升力關聯性之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園市。
6.蕭妤安(2012)。任務績效對於晉升力之影響-以脈絡績效與適應績效為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園市。
7.賴聽柔(2013)。領導潛能量表之建立(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園市。
8.簡博浩 & 韓志翔。(2008). 任務性, 脈絡性及適應性績效表現對主管獎酬決策的影響: 調查法及實驗法. 臺大管理論叢, 18(2), 27-62.
9.顏名蔚(2013)。工作績效, 個人與主管配適與主管晉升力評分的關聯性(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園市。

英文部分
1.Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct‐oriented Biodata: Capturing Change‐related and Contextually Relevant Future Performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2), 97-111.
2.Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students′ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260.
3.Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 465-487.
4.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
5.Baker, G. P., Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1988). Compensation and incentives: Practice vs. theory. The Journal of Finance, 43(3), 593-616.
6.Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart′s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 802-836.
7.Becker, G. S. (1975). Front matter, human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, 2nd ed. (pp. 22-20): NBER.
8.Beechler, S., & Woodward, I. C. (2009). The global “war for talent”. Journal of International Management, 15(3), 273-285.
9.Bempechat, J., London, P., & Dweck, C. S. (1991). Children′s conceptions of ability in major domains: An interview and experimental study. Child Study Journal.
10.Bennis, Warren G., and Robert J. Thomas. (2002). Crucibles of Leadership. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 39-45.
11.Bhatnagar, J. (2008). Managing capabilities for talent engagement and pipeline development. Industrial and Commercial Training, 40(1), 19-28.
12.Borman, W. C. (2004). The concept of organizational citizenship. Current directions in psychological science, 13(6), 238-241.
13.Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations, 71(1993), 98.
14.Breaugh, J. A. (2010). Modeling the managerial promotion process. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(4), 264-277.
15.Brett, J. F., & VandeWalle, D. (1999). Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 863.
16.Browne, Michael W., and Robert Cudeck. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
17.Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26-48.
18.Byrne, D. E. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm (Vol. 11): Academic Pr.
19.Campbell, J., Gasser, M., & Oswald, F. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations, 258-299.
20.Carraher, S. M., Sullivan, S. E., & Crocitto, M. M. (2008). Mentoring across global boundaries: An empirical examination of home-and host-country mentors on expatriate career outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), 1310-1326.
21.Chambers, E. G., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S. M., & Michaels, E. G. (1997). The war for talent. McKinsey Quarterly, 44-57.
22.Chen, Z. X., Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. (2002). Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(3), 339-356.
23.Conger, J. A., & Fulmer, R. M. (2003). Developing your leadership pipeline. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 76-85.
24.Corporate Leadership Council. (2005). Realizing the Full Potential of Rising Talent :A Quantitative Analysis of the Identification and Development of High-Potential Employees. Washington, DC: Corporate Executive Board.
25.Corporate Leadership Council. (2010). From Rising Stars to Successful Leaders, Washington, DC Corporate Executive Board.
26.Cox, T., & Nkomo, S. M. (1992). Candidate age as a factor in promotability ratings. Public Personnel Management, 21(2), 197-210.
27.Cox, T. H., & Nkomo, S. M. (1991). A race and gender-group analysis of the early career experience of MBAs. Work and Occupations, 18(4), 431-446.
28.De Pater, I. E., Van Vianen, A. E., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Klehe, U. C. (2009). Employees’ Challenging Job Experiences and Supervisors’ Evaluations of Promotability. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 297-325.
29.Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2007). Using emotional intelligence to identify high potential: a metacompetency perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(8), 749-770.
30.Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2012). How to identify leadership potential: Development and testing of a consensus model. Human Resource Management, 51(3), 361-385.
31.Dries, N., Vantilborgh, T., & Pepermans, R. (2012). The role of learning agility and career variety in the identification and development of high potential employees. Personnel Review, 41(3), 340-358.
32.Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040.
33.Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256.
34.Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501.
35.Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5.
36.Farh, J.-L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S.-C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 421-444.
37.Feldman, J. M. (1986). Instrumentation and training for performance appraisal: A perceptual-cognitive viewpoint. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 4, 45-99.
38.Fernández-Aráoz, C. (2014). 21st Century Talent Spotting. Harvard Business Review, 92(6), 46-56.
39.Fields, G. S. (2002). Predicting potential for promotion: how the data in human resource information systems can be used to help organizations gain competitive advantage.
40.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
41.Garrow, V., & Hirsh, W. (2008). Talent management: issues of focus and fit. Public Personnel Management, 37(4), 389-402.
42.Gentry, W. A., & Sosik, J. J. (2010). Developmental relationships and managerial promotability in organizations: A multisource study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 266-278.
43.Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
44.Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2005). Are conscietious workers adaptable? Australian Journal of Management, 30(2), 245-259.
45.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate analysis. Englewood: Prentice Hall International.
46.Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (2006). An examination of temporal variables and relationship quality on promotability ratings. Group & Organization Management, 31(6), 677-699.
47.Hay Group. (2008). Potential for what. Retrieved from www.haygroup.com.
48.Heneman, H.G. & Judge, T.A. (2009). Staffing Organizations. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston
49.Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development, 21-55.
50.Hui, C., Lam, S. S., & Law, K. K. (2000). Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: a field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 822.
51.Ilgen, D. R., & Favero, J. L. (1985). Limits in generalization from psychological research to performance appraisal processes. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 311-321.
52.Ilgen, D. R., & Pulakos, E. D. (1999). The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development. Frontiers of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: ERIC.
53.Jawahar, I., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A longitudinal investigation of task and contextual performance influences on promotability judgments. Human Performance, 24(3), 251-269.
54.Johlke, M. C., & Duhan, D. F. (2000). Supervisor communication practices and service employee job outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 154-165.
55.Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 984.
56.Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 80-105.
57.Karaevli, A., & Hall, D. T. (2003). Growing leaders for turbulent times: is succession planning up to the challenge? Organizational Dynamics, 32(1), 62-79.
58.Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 602.
59.Kinicki, A. J., & Latack, J. C. (1990). Explication of the construct of coping with involuntary job loss. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36(3), 339-360.
60.Kipnis, D., & Vanderveer, R. (1971). Ingratiation and the use of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(3), 280.
61.Landau, J. (1995). The relationship of race and gender to managers′ ratings of promotion potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 391-400.
62.Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87(1), 72.
63.Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1983). The measurement of work performance: Methods, theory, and applications: Academic Press New York.
64.LePine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 563-593.
65.Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future.
66.Lin, S.-C., & Chang, J.-N. (2005). Goal orientation and organizational commitment as explanatory factors of employees′ mobility. Personnel Review, 34(3), 331-353.
67.Locke, E. A., Mento, A. J., & Katcher, B. L. (1978). The interaction of ability and motivation in performance: An exploration of the meaning of moderators1. Personnel Psychology, 31(2), 269-280.
68.Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (2000). High potentials as high learners. Human Resource Management, 39(4), 321-329.
69.London, M., & Mone, E. M. (1999). Continuous learning. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development, 119-153.
70.London, M., & Stumpf, S. A. (1983). Effects of candidate characteristics on management promotion decisions: An experimental study. Personnel Psychology, 36(2), 241-259.
71.Longenecker, C. O., & Fink, L. S. (2008). Key criteria in twenty-first century management promotional decisions. Career Development International, 13(3), 241-251.
72.Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 777.
73.Maehr, M. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3.
74.Marshall, G. (2009). What got you here won′t get you there: how successful people become even more successful. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 103-105.
75.Martin, J., & Schmidt, C. (2010). How to keep your top talent. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 54-61.
76.Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 424.
77.Mitchell, T. (1983). The effects of social, task, and situational factors on motivation, performance, and appraisal. Performance Measurement and Theory, 39, 59.
78.Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475.
79.Motowildo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83.
80.Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
81.Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328.
82.Pepermans, R., Vloeberghs, D., & Perkisas, B. (2003). High potential identification policies: an empirical study among Belgian companies. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 660-678.
83.Podsakoff, P. M. (1982). Determinants of a Supervisor′s use of rewards and punishmens: A literature review and suggestions for further research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29(1), 58-83.
84.Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612.
85.Pulakos, E. D., & Wexley, K. N. (1983). The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 129-139.
86.Ready, A. D., Conger, A. J., & Hill, A. L. (2010). Are you a high potential. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 78-84.
87.Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism (Vol. 22): Walter de Gruyter.
88.Rogers, R., & Smith, A. (2004). Finding future perfect senior leaders: Spotting executive potential. Employment Relations Today, 31(1).
89.Schumacker, R., & Lomax, R. (2004). A beginner′s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 288, 144.
90.Senger, J. (1971). Managers′ perceptions of subordinates′ competence as a function of personal value orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 14(4), 415-423.
91.Sharma, R., & Bhatnagar, J. (2009). Talent management–competency development: key to global leadership. Industrial and Commercial Training, 41(3), 118-132.
92.Shoss, M. K., Witt, L., & Vera, D. (2012). When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 910-924.
93.Silzer, R., & Church, A. H. (2009). The pearls and perils of identifying potential. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(4), 377-412.
94.Silzer, R., & Dowell, B. E. (2009). Strategy-driven talent management: A leadership imperative (Vol. 28): John Wiley & Sons.
95.Sinclair, R. C. (1988). Mood, categorization breadth, and performance appraisal: The effects of order of information acquisition and affective state on halo, accuracy, information retrieval, and evaluations. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 42(1), 22-46.
96.Smith, E. A., & Bliege Bird, R. (2005). Costly signaling and cooperative behavior. Moral sentiments and material interests: the foundations of cooperation in economic life, 115-148.
97.Smith, E. M., Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S. W. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies.
98.Stahl, G., Björkman, I., Farndale, E., Morris, S. S., Paauwe, J., Stiles, P., . . . Wright, P. (2012). Six principles of effective global talent management. Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 25-42.
99.Stewart, L. P., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1982). Differential Factors Influencing the Hierarchical Level and Number of Promotions of Males and Females Within an Organization1. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 586-597.
100.Strauss, J. P., Barrick, M. R., & Connerley, M. L. (2001). An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(5), 637-657.
101.Thacker, R. A., & Wayne, S. J. (1995). An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management, 21(4), 739-756.
102.Tiffan, B. (2009). Are You Considered A “High Potential?”. Physician Executive, 35(2), 74-77.
103.Tsui, A. S., & Barry, B. (1986). Research Notes: Interpersonal Affect and Rating Errors. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 586-599.
104.Tucker, J. S., Gunther, K. M., & Pleban, R. J. (2010). The Mediating Effects of Adaptive Skill on Values-Performance Relationships (vol 23, pg 81). Human Performance, 23(2), 191.
105.Turban, D. B., & Jones, A. P. (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: types, effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 228.
106.Turner, R. H. (1960). Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system. American Sociological Review, 855-867.
107.Van Dierendonck, D., & Van der Gaast, E. (2013). Goal orientation, academic competences and early career success. Career Development International, 18(7), 694-711.
108.Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 526.
109.Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525.
110.VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 390.
111.Wakabayashi, M., Graen, G., Graen, M., & Graen, M. (1988). Japanese management progress: Mobility into middle management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 217.
112.Walker, J. W., & LaRocco, J. M. (2002). Perspectives: talent pools: the best and the rest. HR. Human Resource Planning, 25(3), 12-15.
113.Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487.
114.Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Graf, I. K., & Ferris, G. R. (1997). The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 979-1006.
115.Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 577-595.
116.Wexley, K. N., Alexander, R. A., Greenawalt, J. P., & Couch, M. A. (1980). Attitudinal congruence and similarity as related to interpersonal evaluations in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of management Journal, 23(2), 320-330.
117.Wexley, K. N., & Klimoski, R. (1984). Performance appraisal: An update. Research in personnel and human resources management, 2, 35-79.
118.William, R., & Walker, J. (1985). Sex differences in performance rating: A research note. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58(4), 331-337.
119.Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2014-7-18

推文